Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 887

Declaration of Mia Mazza In Support Of Apples Administrative Motion For Clarification Regarding April 12 Order filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24)(Tucher, Alison) (Filed on 4/26/2012)

Exhibit 9

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mazza, Mia
Monday, April 23, 2012 9:50 AM
Diane Hutnyan
AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service
FW: Apple v. Samsung: Compliance with Part B.2 of the Court's April 12, 2012 Order

As mentioned in my attached letter and in my email of last night, here are the Protective Orders for the Motorola cases.
We have determined that no protective order was filed in the Motorola 661 case in the Western District of Wisconsin.
______________________________________________
From:
Mazza, Mia
Sent:
Sunday, April 22, 2012 9:01 PM
To:
'Diane Hutnyan'
Cc:
AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; '[e-mail]'
Subject:
Apple v. Samsung: Compliance with Part B.2 of the Court's April 12, 2012 Order

Hi Diane,
Attached please find correspondence regarding Part B.2 of the Court's April 12, 2012, Order.
We await your input by Tuesday morning.
Mia Mazza
Morrison & Foerster LLP
San Francisco
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
[phone] fax

1

425 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO
CALIFORNIA 94105-2482
U.S.A.

MO RRI SO N & F O E RST E R L LP

TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: 415.268.7522

T O K YO , L O N D O N , BR U SSE L S,
BE I JI N G , SH AN G H AI , H O N G K O N G

N E W YO RK , SAN F RAN C I SCO ,
L O S A N G E L E S, P A L O A L T O ,
SAC RAME N T O , SAN D I E G O ,
D E N VE R, N O RT H E RN VI RG I N I A,
WASH I N G T O N , D .C.

WWW.MOFO.COM

April 15, 2012

Writer’s Direct Contact
415.268.6024
[e-mail]

By Email ([e-mail])
Diane Hutnyan
Quinn Emanuel
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Re:

Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.)

Dear Diane:
This letter responds to your email sent the afternoon of Friday, April 13, 2012.
In light of Judge Grewal’s April 12, 2012, Order, Apple agrees that all transcripts of
depositions taken in Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof,
ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-796 (“ITC 796”) are deemed produced in Apple v. Samsung, Case No.
11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.) (the “N.D. Cal. case”).
Apple reserves its right to challenge admissibility of ITC 796 transcripts in the N.D. Cal.
case.
Sincerely,
/s/ Mia Mazza
Mia Mazza
cc:

S. Calvin Walden
Peter Kolovos

sf-3133316