Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 974

Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of #934 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Declaration Of Mark D. Selwyn In Support Of Samsungs Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony, #14 Selwyn Decl. Ex. 1, #15 Selwyn Decl. Ex. 2, #16 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Samsungs Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony)(Related document(s) #934 ) (Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 5/24/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.com ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) atucher@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 10 WILLIAM F. LEE william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 22 23 24 25 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL RE SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT TESTIMONY Defendants. 26 27 DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN ISO SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK 1 I, Mark D. Selwyn, do hereby declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner with the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 3 and counsel for plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”). I am familiar with 4 and knowledgeable about the facts stated in this declaration and if called upon could and would 5 testify competently as to the statements made herein. 6 2. Samsung’s Motion to Strike Expert Testimony (“Samsung’s Motion to Strike”), 7 the Declaration of Christopher E. Price in Support of Samsung’s Motion to Strike (“Price 8 Declaration”), the Declaration of James Ward in Support of Samsung’s Motion to Strike (“Ward 9 Declaration”), and Exhibits to the Price and Ward Declarations contain information that Apple, 10 11 Samsung or third parties have designated confidential. Specifically: A. Exhibit L to the Ward Declaration is an excerpt from the Expert Report of 12 Tony D. Givargis, Ph.D. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of 13 U.S. Patent No. 7,698,711. Exhibit L contains redactions supplied by 14 Samsung’s counsel. In addition to those redactions, paragraph 99 of Apple 15 Expert Tony Givargis’s Expert Report contains confidential information 16 supplied by third party Sony Ericsson. A proposed redacted version is 17 attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 18 B. Exhibit O to the Price Declaration is an excerpt from the deposition of 19 Samsung Expert Vincent O’Brien, held on April 20, 2012. This transcript 20 was designated Highly Confidential-Attorneys' Eyes Only in accordance 21 with the Protective Order entered in this Action by Apple. The deposition 22 includes confidential information regarding Apple licenses. A proposed 23 redacted version is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 24 C. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung’s Motion to Strike 25 discusses and references the information contained in paragraphs A-B 26 above, and should therefore be sealed for the same reasons. 27 28 DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN ISO SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK 1 3. The relief requested in this motion is necessary and is narrowly tailored to protect 2 confidential information, focusing only on specific exhibits and specific portions of the briefs at 3 issue. 4 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that 5 the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that this Declaration was 6 executed this 24th day of May, 2012, at Palo Alto, California. 7 8 Dated: May 24, 2012 By: __/s/ Mark D. Selwyn ____________ Mark D. Selwyn 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN ISO SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK 1 2 3 4 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been served on May 24, 2012 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5.4. Any other counsel of record will be served by electronic mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery. 6 7 /s/ Mark D. Selwyn Mark D. Selwyn 8 9 10 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 11 12 13 I, Jason R. Bartlett, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Mark D. Selwyn has concurred in this filing. 14 Dated: May 24, 2012 15 By: /s/ Jason R. Bartlett Jason R. Bartlett 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN ISO SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?