Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
974
Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of #934 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Declaration Of Mark D. Selwyn In Support Of Samsungs Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony, #14 Selwyn Decl. Ex. 1, #15 Selwyn Decl. Ex. 2, #16 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Samsungs Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony)(Related document(s) #934 ) (Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 5/24/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3150058
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL RE SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT
TESTIMONY
1
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and
2
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) filed Samsung’s
3
Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal on May 17, 2012 (D.N. 934) in support of
4
Samsung’s Motion to Strike Expert Testimony Based on Undisclosed Facts and Theories
5
(“Motion to Strike”). Pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(d), Samsung moved to seal certain documents
6
designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” and “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS’ EYES
7
ONLY” by plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) under the interim protective order for the Northern
8
District of California. Also pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(d), for the purpose of establishing that the
9
designated information is sealable, Apple filed the Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of
10
Sealing Samsung’s Motion to Strike (“Wheeler Declaration”) and the Declaration of Mark D.
11
Selwyn in Support of Sealing Samsung’s Motion to Strike (“Selwyn Declaration”). The Wheeler
12
and Selwyn Declarations provide sufficient evidence that the documents and information
13
designated as confidential by Apple, and filed under seal by Samsung, are “privileged or
14
protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law,” and thus sealable.
15
Civil L.R. 79-5(a).
16
17
18
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following documents shall be filed
under seal, as and to the extent described in the Wheeler and Selwyn Declarations:
•
Exhibits E, H, K, L, T, O, U, V, and X to the Declaration of James Ward in Support of
19
Samsung’s Motion to Strike;
20
21
•
Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, H, I, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, BB, CC,
22
DD, FF and GG to the Declaration of Christopher Price in Support of Samsung’s Motion
23
to Strike; and
24
25
•
The confidential, unredacted versions of Samsung’s Motion to Strike Expert Testimony,
the Declaration of Christopher E. Price in Support of Samsung’s Motion to Strike, and the
26
Declaration of James Ward in Support of Samsung’s Motion to Strike, which include
27
28
information from the documents discussed above.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3150058
1
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: _______________________
4
5
______________________________
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3150058
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?