Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 974

Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of #934 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Declaration Of Mark D. Selwyn In Support Of Samsungs Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony, #14 Selwyn Decl. Ex. 1, #15 Selwyn Decl. Ex. 2, #16 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Samsungs Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony)(Related document(s) #934 ) (Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 5/24/2012)

Exhibit 2

EXHIBIT H
FILED UNDER SEAL

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10
11
12

WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc.

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

14
15
16

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

17

Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21
22
23

Civil Action No. 11-CV-01846-LHK

vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

APPLE INC.’S OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S FOURTH
SET OF INTERROGATORIES
CONFIDENTIAL UNDER THE
PROTECTIVE ORDER

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28
1

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Subject to and without waiving the foregoing General and Specific Objections, Apple
responds that in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d), Apple has produced
and/or will produce documents responsive to this Interrogatory, and that the burden of
ascertaining the answer to this Interrogatory from the produced business records is substantially
the same for Apple as for Samsung. Apple further designates, at this time, the following
documents from which information responsive to this Interrogatory may be ascertained:
APLNDC-Y0000051606 - APLNDCY0000051615.
INTERROGATORY NO. 68:
Separately for each APPLE DESIGN PATENT and APPLE TRADE DRESS, state fully
and in detail all facts that support YOUR contention as to the non-functionality of any claimed
feature, element or combination of features or elements.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 68
Apple objects to the phrase “fully and in detail” as vague and ambiguous. Apple objects
to this Interrogatory as unduly burdensome, overbroad, and impracticable to the extent that it
requests Apple to state “all facts” supporting Apple’s contention “fully and in detail,” especially
given the late date in the discovery period at which this Interrogatory was propounded. Apple

18

additionally objects to this Interrogatory as onerous and unduly burdensome because it is

19

effectively two interrogatories – one for design patents and one for trade dress – as each requires

20

analysis under a separate legal standard. Apple further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent

21

it seeks information that: (i) would require Apple to draw a legal conclusion to respond; or (ii) is

22

subject to a confidentiality or nondisclosure agreement or governed by a protective order

23

preventing its production.

24
25

Subject to and incorporating its General Objections and its specific objections, Apple
responds as follows:

26
27
28
61

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Apple is not aware that any aspect of Apple’s design patents or trade dress at issue in this
case is functional. First, there are a plethora of alternative designs available for smartphones and
tablet computers, some of which are set forth below. Second, Apple believes that its designs are
more difficult to manufacture than designs for other smartphones and tablet computers that
currently are or have been available in the marketplace. Third, Apple is not aware of any cost
benefits to any aspect of the Apple trade dress or design patents at issue in this case. In fact,
implementing Apple’s designs makes their manufacturing more challenging and expensive than
alternative smartphone and tablet computer designs in the marketplace. Fourth, Apple is not
aware of any utilitarian advantage to its smartphone and tablet computer designs and therefore
does not tout any such “advantages” in advertising its products. Apple’s exclusive use of its
designs will not put competitors at a significant non-reputation related disadvantage.

13
14

The following is a representative sampling of alternative designs that are available for
each of the design patents and trade dresses as issue in this case.

15
Alternative designs with respect to the D’889 patent include without limitation the

16
17

following patents and products:

18



Samsung Q1

19



Compaq TC1000

20



Sony Tablet S & P

21



Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet

22



Vinci Tablet

23



Acer Iconia Tab A500

24



Fusion Garage Grid 10

25



GriDPAD 2050

26



Motion Computing LS800

27



Droid XYBoard 8.2

28
62

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Alternative designs with respect to the D’087, D’677, and D’270 Patents include without
limitation the following products:


Pantech Crossover



Sony Ericsson Xperia X10



Nokia N8



NEC N908



Nokia Lumia 800



Casio GZ One Commando



Sony Ericsson Xperia S



Modu phones and related jackets



Nokia X5-01



Samsung M7600 Beat DJ
Alternative designs with respect to the D’790, D’334, and D’305 include without

14
15

limitation the following products:


Sony Ericsson Xperia X10



Nokia N8

18



Palm Centro

19



Palm Pixi Plus

20



Nokia Lumia 800

21



Palm Treo 700p

22



Pantech Hotshot CDM8992VW

23



Blackberry Torch 9850

24



Blackberry Storm 2

25



Samsung F700

16
17

26
27

Alternative designs with respect to Apple’s Original iPhone Trade Dress, iPhone 3G
Trade Dress, iPhone 4 Trade Dress, iPhone Trade Dress, and the trade dress registered in U.S.

28
63

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Trademark Reg. Nos. 3,470,983, 3,457,218, and 3,475,327 include without limitation the
following products:


Pantech Crossover



Sony Ericsson Xperia X10



Nokia N8



NEC N908



Nokia Lumia 800



Casio GZ One Commando



Sony Ericsson Xperia S



Modu phones and related jackets



Nokia X5-01



Samsung M7600 Beat DJ
Alternative designs with respect to the iPad Trade Dress and the iPad 2 Trade Dress

14
15

include without limitation the following patents and products:


Samsung Q1



Compaq TC1000

18



Sony Tablet S & P

19



Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet

20



Vinci Tablet

21



Acer Iconia Tab A500

22



Fusion Garage Grid 10

23



GriDPAD 2050

24



Motion Computing LS800

25



Droid XYBoard 8.2

16
17

26
27
28
64

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

INTERROGATORY NO. 69:
Separately for each APPLE TRADE DRESS and APPLE TRADEMARK, state the date
on which YOU contend such trade dress and trademark became famous and acquired secondary
meaning and state fully and in detail all facts that support YOUR contention that such trade dress
and trademark became famous and acquired secondary meaning as of that date.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 69
Apple objects to the phrase “fully and in detail” as vague and ambiguous. Apple objects
to this Interrogatory as unduly burdensome, overbroad, and impracticable to the extent that it
requests Apple to state “all facts” supporting Apple’s contention “fully and in detail,” especially
given the late date in the discovery period at which this Interrogatory was propounded. Apple
also objects to this Interrogatory as seeking information that is irrelevant and not likely to lead to

18

the discovery of admissible testimony to the extent that it seeks information regarding fame and

19

secondary meaning for the trademarks asserted in this proceeding. Apple additionally objects to

20

this Interrogatory as onerous and unduly burdensome because it is effectively two interrogatories

21

– one for trademarks and one for trade dress – as each requires analysis under a separate legal

22

standard. Apple further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information that: (i)

23

would require Apple to draw a legal conclusion to respond; (ii) is outside of Apple’s possession,

24

custody, or control; (iii) can be obtained as easily by Samsung, is already in Samsung’s

25

possession, or is publicly available; or (iv) is subject to a confidentiality or nondisclosure

26

agreement or governed by a protective order preventing its production.

27
28
65

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2

Subject to and incorporating its General Objections and its specific objections, Apple
responds as follows:

3
4

The public has come to recognize the appearance of the iPhone as a trademark by virtue

5

of the enormous publicity surrounding Apple’s announcement in January 2007 and the launch of

6

the product on June 9, 2007, and the iPhone’s unprecedented success in the marketplace. Sales

7

of the iPhone reached the 1 million mark after only 74 days, but the image of the product became

8

well-known to consumers not only because the product had enormous sales, but also because

9

images of the iPhone were and continue to be featured in news media, on the web, and in a much

10

admired marketing campaign. With front-page coverage in national newspapers, lead stories on

11

network TV newscasts, and comic parodies on late-night television and YouTube, the iPhone

12

received an estimated $400 million in free advertising within months of its release. As a result,

13

consumers who saw the image of the iPhone immediately recognized it as Apple’s iPhone, so

14

that the configuration of the product came to serve as an indicator of source.

15
16
17

Like the iPhone, the public quickly came to recognize the distinctive and unique
appearance of the iPad as a trademark of Apple due to the overwhelming publicity surrounding

18

the launch of the product and its impressive early sales. Following the announcement of the

19

product in January 2010, there were images of the iPad appearing on the front pages or lead

20

sections of The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and USA Today. The publicity

21

continued through the April 2010 launch date, when the iPad appeared on the front pages of The

22

New York Times and USA Today. The iPad product was also the subject of cover stories in Time

23

and Newsweek. As a result, consumers immediately recognized the distinctive look of the iPad

24

as an Apple product. In fact, in its first 80 days on the market, Apple sold 3 million iPads, and,

25

by March 2011, Apple had sold over 19 million iPads. Given the distinctive design of the iPad,

26

every iPad that is sold increases its recognition as a source identifier of Apple.

27
28
66

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4

Apple believes that the each of the trade dresses identified in the Amended Complaint
was famous and had secondary meaning at least as early as the release of the corresponding
Apple product, as set forth in the chart below, and certainly earlier than the launch of Samsung’s
infringing products at issue in this lawsuit:

5
6

Trade Dress

7

Original iPhone Trade Dress  

Release Date for First Product Embodying
Trade Dress
June 29, 2007

8

iPhone 3G Trade Dress  

June 29, 2007

9

iPhone Trade Dress

June 29, 2007

10

iPhone 4 Trade Dress  

June 24, 2010

iPad Trade Dress  

April 3, 2010

13

iPad 2 Trade Dress  

April 3, 2010

14

June 29, 2007

15

The trade dress registered in U.S. Trademark
Reg. No. 3,470,983

11
12

16
17
18

The trade dress registered in U.S. Trademark
Reg. No. 3,457,218

June 29, 2007

The trade dress registered in U.S. Trademark
Reg. No. 3,475,327

June 29, 2007

19
20

Facts that support Apple’s contention that its various trade dresses have secondary

21

meaning and are famous include, but are not limited to, facts relating to (i) the unique appearance

22
23
24
25
26

of the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad products, (ii) pre-launch publicity for the iPhone, iPod touch,
and iPad products, (iii) Apple’s extensive advertising of the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad
products, (iv) unsolicited third-party press for the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad products,
including positive reviews and press accolades, (v) the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad products’
appearance in popular media, (vi) the widespread use of the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad

27
28
67

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

products by well known political, sports, and entertainment figures, (vii) design awards received
by Apple for the design of the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad products, and (viii) sales of the
iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad products. Apple notes that the icon trademarks asserted in this case
are inherently distinctive and are not the subject of a dilution claim; therefore, any facts
supporting acquired distinctiveness or fame are not relevant for the icon trademarks.
INTERROGATORY NO. 70:
Separately for each APPLE TRADE DRESS, state fully and in detail all facts that
support YOUR contention that SAMSUNG is diluting or has diluted such trade dress.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 70
Apple objects to the phrase “fully and in detail” as vague and ambiguous. Apple objects

12

to this Interrogatory as unduly burdensome, overbroad, and impracticable to the extent that it

13

requests Apple to state “all facts” supporting Apple’s contention “fully and in detail,” especially

14

given the late date in the discovery period at which this Interrogatory was propounded. Apple

15

further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information that: (i) would require

16

Apple to draw a legal conclusion to respond; (ii) is outside of Apple’s possession, custody, or

17

control; (iii) can be obtained as easily by Samsung, is already in Samsung’s possession, or is

18

publicly available; or (iv) is subject to a confidentiality or nondisclosure agreement or governed

19

by a protective order preventing its production.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Subject to and incorporating its General Objections and its specific objections, Apple
responds as follows with respect to the Samsung products accused in Apple’s Amended
Complaint:
Samsung is diluting Apple’s Original iPhone Trade Dress, iPhone 3G Trade Dress,
iPhone 4 Trade Dress, iPhone Trade Dress, iPad Trade Dress, iPad 2 Trade Dress and the trade
dress registered in U.S. Trademark Reg. Nos. 3,470,983, 3,457,218, and 3,475,327 by
advertising and selling a wide variety of lookalike products, including without limitation Galaxy,

27
28
68

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

INTERROGATORY NO. 71:
Separately for each SAMSUNG product or product packaging that YOU contend
infringes any APPLE TRADE DRESS or APPLE TRADEMARK, state fully and in detail on a
trade dress-by-trade dress and trademark-by-trademark basis all facts that support YOUR
contention that the SAMSUNG product or product packaging is likely to cause confusion, cause
mistake, or deceive consumers as to the affiliation, connection, or association of SAMSUNG
with APPLE, or as to origin, sponsorship, or approval by APPLE of SAMSUNG’S goods,
services or commercial activities.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 71:
Apple objects to the phrase “fully and in detail” as vague and ambiguous. Apple objects

12

to this Interrogatory as unduly burdensome, overbroad, and impracticable to the extent that it

13

requests Apple to state “all facts” supporting Apple’s contention “fully and in detail,” especially

14

given the late date in the discovery period at which this Interrogatory was propounded. Apple

15

further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information that: (i) would require

16

Apple to draw a legal conclusion to respond; (ii) is outside of Apple’s possession, custody, or

17

control; (iii) can be obtained as easily by Samsung, is already in Samsung’s possession, or is

18

publicly available; or (iv) is subject to a confidentiality or nondisclosure agreement or governed

19

by a protective order preventing its production.

20
21

Subject to and incorporating its General Objections and its specific objections, Apple

22

responds as follows with respect to the Samsung products accused in Apple’s Amended

23

Complaint:

24
25
26

Samsung is infringing Apple’s Original iPhone Trade Dress, iPhone 3G Trade Dress,
iPhone 4 Trade Dress, iPhone Trade Dress, iPad Trade Dress, iPad 2 Trade Dress and the trade
dress registered in U.S. Trademark Reg. Nos. 3,470,983, 3,457,218, and 3,475,327 by

27
28
73

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

advertising and selling a wide variety of lookalike products, including without limitation Galaxy,
Galaxy S, and Galaxy SII products such as Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G,
Fascinate, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy S (i9000), Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy S II (AT&T
Edition, 4G), Galaxy S II (i9100), Galaxy S II (T-Mobile edition), Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch,
Galaxy S II Skyrocket (4G LTE), Galaxy S Showcase (i500), Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Vibrant,
Galaxy Tab 7.0, Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus, Galaxy Tab 10.1, and Galaxy Tab 10.1 LTE. These
products were intentionally designed to look like Apple products in their hardware and user
interface design and infringe Apple’s trade dress rights, as shown in the charts below.

10

Trade Dress

11

A.

12

Original iPhone Trade Dress; iPhone 3G Trade Dress; iPhone 4 Trade Dress;
iPhone Trade Dress; U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 3,470,983; 3,457,218;
3,475,327

13
14

Trade Dress
Original iPhone Trade Dress;
iPhone Trade Dress

iPhone 3G Trade Dress

iPhone 4 Trade Dress

U.S. Reg. No. 3,470,983

U.S. Reg. No. 3,457,218

U.S. Reg. No. 3,475,327

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
74

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Accused Samsung Designs
Captivate

Continuum

Droid Charge

Epic 4G

Fascinate

Galaxy Prevail

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
75

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Galaxy S (i9000)

Galaxy S 4G

Galaxy S II (AT&T Edition, 4G)

Galaxy S II (i9100)

Galaxy S II (T-Mobile edition)

Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
76

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Galaxy S II Skyrocket (4G LTE)

Galaxy S Showcase (i500)

Infuse 4G

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Mesmerize

Vibrant

25
26
27
28
77

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

B.

iPhone 4 Trade Dress
Trade Dress

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Accused Samsung Design
Galaxy Ace

28
78

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

C.

iPad Trade Dress and iPad2 Trade Dress
Trade Dress

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Accused Samsung Designs

28
79

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus

Galaxy Tab 7.0

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
80

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

Galaxy Tab 10.1 LTE

Galaxy Tab 10.1

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Samsung is also infringing Apple’s icon trademarks by advertising and selling a wide

18

variety of products using confusingly similar icons, including without limitation phones and

19

products such as Captivate; Continuum; Droid Charge; Epic 4G; Exhibit 4G; Fascinate; Galaxy

20

Ace; Galaxy S (i9000); Galaxy S 4G; Galaxy S II (AT&T Edition, 4G); Galaxy S II (T-Mobile

21

Edition); Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch; Galaxy S II Skyrocket (4G LTE); Galaxy S Showcase;

22

Gem; Gravity Smart; Indulge; Infuse 4G; Mesmerize; and Vibrant. The icons on these products

23

were intentionally designed to look like Apple’s icons and infringe Apple’s trademark rights, as

24

shown in the charts below.

25
26
27
28
81

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

Icon Trademarks

2

I.

3,886,196 – Trademark Icon for Telephone Calls

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Captivate

Continuum

Droid Charge

Epic 4G

Exhibit 4G

Fascinate

Galaxy Ace

Galaxy S (i9000)

Galaxy S 4G

Galaxy S II (AT&T
Edition, 4G)

Galaxy S II (i9100)

Galaxy S II (T-Mobile
Edition)

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
82

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

Galaxy S II Epic 4G
Touch

Galaxy S II Skyrocket
(4G LTE)

Galaxy S Showcase

Gem

Gravity Smart

Indulge

Infuse 4G

Mesmerize

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Vibrant

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

J.

3,889,642 – Trademark Icon for Messaging

19
20
21
22
23

Acclaim

Continuum

Droid Charge

Fascinate

24
25
26
27
28
83

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

Galaxy Prevail

Galaxy S Showcase

Galaxy Tab 7.0

Gem

Intercept

Mesmerize

Nexus S

Nexus S 4G

Replenish

Transform

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

K.

3,886,200 – Trademark Icon for Photos

17
18
19
20
21
22

Captivate

Continuum

Droid Charge

Epic 4G

23
24
25
26
27
28
84

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

Exhibit 4G

Fascinate

Galaxy Ace

Galaxy S (i9000)

Galaxy S 4G

Galaxy S Showcase

Galaxy Tab 7.0

Gem

Gravity Smart

Indulge

Infuse 4G

Mesmerize

Sidekick

Vibrant

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

L.

3,889,685 – Trademark Icon for Settings

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
85

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

Captivate

Continuum

Droid Charge

Epic 4G

Exhibit 4G

Fascinate

Galaxy Ace

Galaxy S (i9000)

Galaxy S 4G

Galaxy S II (AT&T
Edition, 4G)

Galaxy S II (i9100)

Galaxy S II (T-Mobile
Edition)

Galaxy S II Epic 4G
Touch

Galaxy S II Skyrocket
(4G LTE)

Galaxy S Showcase

Galaxy Tab 7.0

Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus

Galaxy Tab 10.1

Gem

Gravity Smart

Indulge

Infuse 4G

Mesmerize

Vibrant

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
86

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

M.

3,886,169 – Trademark Icon for Notes

2
3
4
5
6
7

Captivate

Continuum

Epic 4G

Exhibit 4G

Fascinate

Galaxy Ace

Galaxy S (i9000)

Galaxy S 4G

Galaxy S II (AT&T
Edition, 4G)

Galaxy S II (i9100)

Galaxy S II Skyrocket
(4G LTE)

Galaxy S Showcase

Galaxy Tab 7.0

Gravity Smart

Indulge

Infuse 4G

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
87

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

Mesmerize

Sidekick

Vibrant

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
88

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

N.

3,886,197 – Trademark Icon for Contacts

2
3
4
5
6
7

Captivate

Continuum

Droid Charge

Epic 4G

Exhibit 4G

Fascinate

Galaxy Ace

Galaxy S (i9000)

Galaxy S 4G

Galaxy S II (AT&T
Edition, 4G)

Galaxy S II (i9100)

Galaxy S II (T-Mobile
Edition)

Galaxy S II Epic 4G
Touch

Galaxy S II Skyrocket
(4G LTE)

Galaxy S Showcase

Galaxy Tab 7.0

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
89

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus

Galaxy Tab 10.1

Gem

Gravity Smart

Indulge

Infuse 4G

Mesmerize

Vibrant

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

O.
Application No. 85/041,463 (Purple iTunes Store Trademark) and
Registration No. 2,935,038 (“iTunes Eighth Note and CD Design Trademark”)

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
90

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

Captivate

Continuum

Droid Charge

Epic 4G

Exhibit 4G

Fascinate

Galaxy Ace

Galaxy S (i9000)

Galaxy S 4G

Galaxy S II (AT&T
Edition, 4G)

Galaxy S II (i9100)

Galaxy S II (T-Mobile
Edition)

Galaxy S II Epic 4G
Touch

Galaxy S II Skyrocket
(4G LTE)

Galaxy S Showcase

Galaxy Tab 7.0

Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus

Galaxy Tab 10.1

Gem

Gravity Smart

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
91

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

Indulge

Infuse 4G

Mesmerize

Vibrant

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Consumers who see Samsung’s products are likely to be confused as to the source of
Samsung’s products, or misled into believing that there is an association between the Samsung
products and Apple. Samsung had many options in developing its smartphones and tablet
computers. Indeed, earlier versions of Samsung smartphones did not embody the same
combination of elements of Apple’s trade dress. Even the icons in earlier versions of the
Samsung smartphones looked different because, for example, they did not appear as a matrix of
colorful square icons above a bottom “dock” of icons.

15

Facts that support Apple’s contention that Samsung’s Galaxy, Galaxy S, and Galaxy SII

16

smartphone and tablet computer products have infringed and will continue to infringe the Apple

17

trade dress and icon trademarks at issue in this lawsuit include, but are not limited to, facts

18

relating to (i) the unique appearance of the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad products, (ii) pre-launch

19

publicity for the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad products, (iii) Apple’s extensive advertising of the

20

iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad products, (iv) unsolicited third-party press for the iPhone, iPod

21

touch, and iPad products, including positive reviews and press accolades, (v) the iPhone, iPod

22

touch, and iPad products’ appearance in popular media, (vi) the widespread use of the iPhone,

23

iPod touch, and iPad products by well known political, sports, and entertainment figures,

24

(vii) design awards received by Apple for the design of the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad

25

products, (viii) sales of the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad products, (ix) Samsung’s extensive

26

advertisements of the Galaxy, Galaxy S, and Galaxy SII smartphone and tablet computer

27

products, (x) third-party reviews of Samsung’s Galaxy, Galaxy S, and Galaxy SII smartphone

28
92

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3

and tablet computer products, including reviews comparing Samsung’s smartphone and tablet
computer products to Apple’s products, and (xi) Samsung’s sales of the Galaxy, Galaxy S, and
Galaxy SII smartphone and tablet computer products.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

INTERROGATORY NO. 72:
Separately for each SAMSUNG product that YOU contend infringes any APPLE
DESIGN PATENT, state fully and in detail on a patent-by-patent basis all facts supporting
YOUR contention of infringement, describe fully and in detail on a patent-by-patent basis where
each claimed element or feature of the patent is found on the accused SAMSUNG product and
provide a chart identifying fully and in detail on a patent-by-patent basis specifically where each
claimed element or feature is found on the accused SAMSUNG product.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 72
Samsung directly infringes each asserted design patent (D’889, D’087, D’677, D’270,
D’790, D’334, and D’305) by making, using, selling, and offering for sale within the United
States and importing into the United States devices that practice these patents, including the
Accused Products. Each design patent claims the overall designs depicted, and the claims in
these patents are presumptively valid.
No aspect of the designs in the asserted design patents is dictated by function. Thus, no
aspect of the designs should be factored out for purposes of determining whether Samsung’s
devices infringe the D’889, D’087, D’677, D’270, D’790, D’334, and D’305 Patents. A design

18

is not dictated solely by function when alternative designs are available. With respect to the

19

designs claimed in the asserted design patents, numerous alternative designs exist—some of

20

which were patented or commercially manufactured by Samsung itself and some of which were

21

patented or made by third parties.

22
23
24

The following is a representative sampling of alternative designs that are available for
each of the design patents at issue in this case.
Alternative designs with respect to the D’889 Patent include without limitation the

25

following patents and products:

26



Samsung Q1

27



Compaq TC1000

28
94

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11



Sony Tablet S & P



Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet



Vinci Tablet



Acer Iconia Tab A500



Fusion Garage Grid 10



GriDPAD 2050



Motion Computing LS800



Droid XYBoard 8.2

Alternative designs with respect to the D’087, D’677, and D’270 Patents include without
limitation the following products:


Pantech Crossover



Sony Ericsson Xperia X10



Nokia N8



NEC N908



Nokia Lumia 800



Casio GZ One Commando

18



Sony Ericsson Xperia S

19



Modu phones and related jackets

20



Nokia X5-01

21



Samsung M7600 Beat DJ

12
13
14
15
16
17

22
23

Alternative designs with respect to the D’790, D’334, and D’305 Patents include without
limitation the following products:

24



Sony Ericsson Xperia X10

25



Nokia N8

26



Palm Centro

27



Palm Pixi Plus

28
95

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17



Nokia Lumia 800



Palm Treo 700p



Pantech Hotshot CDM8992VW



Blackberry Torch 9850



Blackberry Storm 2



Samsung F700

Moreover, alternative cellular phone and tablet computer designs were explored during
the development process of Apple products and some were commercially manufactured by
Apple. These alternatives designs are contained in the native design files that have been
produced for inspection, in the printouts of these native files that have been produced to
Samsung, and in the numerous Apple mockups that have been produced for inspection. A
number of these alternative designs were identified in Christopher Stringer’s reply declaration in
support of Apple’s motion for preliminary injunction.
In determining whether an accused product infringes a design patent, courts must
compare the patented design as a whole to the accused products. Verbal descriptions of the
claimed designs are not required. As demonstrated in the following claim charts, the asserted

18

Apple designs are substantially the same in overall visual appearance as the corresponding

19

portion of each accused Samsung product.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
96

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

1.

The D’889 Patent

2
3
4

Each accused Samsung product incorporates a body and front face that is substantially
the same in overall visual appearance as the design claimed in the D’889 Patent.

5

a.

6

D’889 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
97

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’889 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
98

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

2.

The D’087 Patent2

2
Each accused Samsung product incorporates a front face and bezel that is substantially

3
4

the same in overall visual appearance as the design claimed in the D’087 Patent.

5

a.

6

Samsung Galaxy S i9000

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S i9000

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

2

In the charts that follow with respect to the D’087 patent, drawings that consist entirely of dotted lines are omitted.
Figures 5 through 8, respectively, are equivalent to figures 13 through 16; 21 through 24; 29 through 32; 37 through
40; and 45 through 48. Because the D’087 incorporates numerous alternative embodiments, only the relevant ones
are included.

28
99

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S i9000

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

b.

Samsung Galaxy S 4G

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S 4G

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
100

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S 4G

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
101

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2

c.

Samsung Infuse 4G

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Infuse 4G

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
102

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Infuse 4G

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

d.

Samsung Vibrant

9
10

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Vibrant

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
103

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Vibrant

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

e.

Samsung Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
104

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
105

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2

f.

Samsung Galaxy S II (AT&T)

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S II (AT&T)

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
106

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S II (AT&T)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

g.

Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
107

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

h.

Samsung Galaxy S II i9100

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S II i9100

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
108

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S II i9100

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
109

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’087 Patent Claim (Selected Embodiments)

Samsung Galaxy S II i9100

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
110

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

3.

The D’677 Patent3

2
Each accused Samsung product incorporates a front face that is substantially the same in

3
4

overall visual appearance as the design claimed in the D’677 Patent.

5
6

a.

Samsung Mesmerize (SCH-I500); Samsung Showcase i500

(SCH-I500); Samsung Showcase Galaxy S (SCH-I500) Samsung Fascinate (SCH-I500)

7

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung SCH-I500 (Mesmerize / Showcase
i500 / Showcase Galaxy S / Fascinate)

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

3

In the charts below with respect to the D’677 patent, drawings that consist entirely of dotted lines are omitted.

28
111

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung SCH-I500 (Mesmerize / Showcase
i500 / Showcase Galaxy S / Fascinate)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

b.

Samsung Galaxy S i9000

17

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S i9000

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
112

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S i9000

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

c.

Samsung Galaxy Ace

22

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy Ace

23
24
25
26
27
28
113

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy Ace

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
114

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

d.

2

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S 4G
Samsung Galaxy S 4G

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
115

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

e.

2

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung Infuse 4G
Samsung Infuse 4G

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
116

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

f.

2

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung Vibrant
Samsung Vibrant

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
117

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3

g.

Samsung Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
118

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3

h.

Samsung Galaxy S II (T-Mobile)

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S II (T-Mobile)

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
119

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3

i.

Samsung Galaxy S II (AT&T)

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S II (AT&T)

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
120

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3

j.

Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
121

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2

k.

3

D’677 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S II i9100
Samsung Galaxy S II i9100

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
122

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5

4.

The D’270 Patent

Each accused Samsung product incorporates a body and front face that are substantially
the same in overall visual appearance as the design claimed in the D’270 Patent.

6

a.

7

D’270 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S i9000
Samsung Galaxy S i9000

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
123

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’270 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S i9000

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
124

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

b.

2

D’270 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S 4G
Samsung Galaxy S 4G

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
125

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’270 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S 4G

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

c.

Samsung Vibrant

D’270 Patent Claim

Samsung Vibrant

23
24
25
26
27
28
126

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’270 Patent Claim

Samsung Vibrant

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
127

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

D’270 Patent Claim

Samsung Vibrant

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
128

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

5.

The D’790 Patent

2
3
4

Each accused Samsung product incorporates an array of icons that is substantially the
same in overall visual appearance as the design claimed in the D’790 Patent.

5

a.

6

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Captivate
Samsung Captivate

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

b.

Samsung Continuum

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Continuum

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
129

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3

c.

Samsung Droid Charge

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Droid Charge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

d.

14

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Epic 4G
Samsung Epic 4G

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
130

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

e.

2

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Fascinate
Samsung Fascinate

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

f.

Samsung Gem

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Gem

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
131

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

g.

2

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S i9000
Samsung Galaxy S i9000

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

h.

Samsung Galaxy S 4G

13

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S 4G

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
132

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

i.

2

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Indulge
Samsung Indulge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

j.

Samsung Infuse 4G

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Infuse 4G

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
133

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

k.

2

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Mesmerize
Samsung Mesmerize

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

l.

14

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Showcase Galaxy S
Samsung Showcase Galaxy S

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
134

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

m.

2

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Showcase i500
Samsung Showcase i500

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

n.

Samsung Vibrant

D’790 Patent Claim

Samsung Vibrant

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
135

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

6.

The D’334 Patent4

2
Each accused Samsung product incorporates an array of icons that is substantially the

3
4

same in overall visual appearance as the design claimed in the D’334 Patent.

5

a.

6

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Captivate
Samsung Captivate

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
4

27

In the charts below with respect to the D’334 patent, only one figure is presented out of the eight figures in the
design patent. Each figure in the design patent is substantially the same, and the comparison herein applies equally
to each figure...

28
136

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

b.

2

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Continuum
Samsung Continuum

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

c.

Samsung Droid Charge

13

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Droid Charge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
137

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

d.

2

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Epic 4G
Samsung Epic 4G

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

e.

Samsung Fascinate

13
14

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Fascinate

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
138

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

f.

2

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Gem
Samsung Gem

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
139

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

g.

2

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S i9000

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

h.

14

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S 4G
Samsung Galaxy S 4G

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
140

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3

i.

Samsung Indulge

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Indulge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

j.

Samsung Infuse 4G

15

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Infuse 4G

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
141

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3

k.

Samsung Mesmerize

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Mesmerize

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

l.

Samsung Showcase Galaxy S

15

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Showcase Galaxy S

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
142

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4

m.

Samsung Showcase i500

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Showcase i500

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

n.

Samsung Vibrant

16

D’334 Patent Claim

Samsung Vibrant

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
143

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

7.

The D’305 Patent5

2
Each accused Samsung product incorporates an array of icons that is substantially the

3
4

same in overall visual appearance as the design claimed in the D’305 Patent.

5

a.

6

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Captivate
Samsung Captivate

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
5

27

In the charts below with respect to the D’305 patent, only one figure is presented out of the two figures in the
design patent. Each figure in the design patent is substantially the same, and the comparison herein applies equally
to each figure.

28
144

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

b.

2

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Continuum
Samsung Continuum

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

c.

Samsung Droid Charge

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Droid Charge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
145

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

d.

2

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Epic 4G
Samsung Epic 4G

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

e.

Samsung Fascinate

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Fascinate

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
146

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

f.

2

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Gem
Samsung Gem

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

g.

Samsung Galaxy S i9000

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S i9000

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
147

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

h.

2

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Galaxy S 4G
Samsung Galaxy S 4G

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

i.

Samsung Indulge

13
14

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Indulge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
148

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

j.

2

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Infuse 4G
Samsung Infuse 4G

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

k.

Samsung Mesmerize

13

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Mesmerize

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
149

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

l.

2

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Showcase Galaxy S
Samsung Showcase Galaxy S

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

m.

Samsung Showcase i500

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Showcase i500

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
150

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

n.

2

D’305 Patent Claim

Samsung Vibrant
Samsung Vibrant

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
151

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

the extent such patents are substantially embodied in chipsets that Apple buys from licensed
suppliers authorized by Samsung to sell such chipsets for incorporation into Apple’s products;
(b) Apple is impliedly licensed to sell products, as to which Samsung was involved and
acquiesced for many years in their production without claiming infringement; and (c) Apple is
licensed or, in the alternative, has the right to a FRAND license to Samsung’s Declared Essential
Patents in Suit by virtue of Samsung’s FRAND commitments; (iv) acting unfairly and
unreasonably towards and discriminating against Apple in its licensing practices because Apple
owns designs, trade dress, trademarks, and non standards-essential patents that Samsung wishes
to infringe with impunity.
Apple reserves the right to supplement and/or amend its response as appropriate.
INTERROGATORY NO. 80:
IDENTIFY with particularity all alleged trade dresses that YOU claim are infringed by
SAMSUNG, including each and every element alleged to be a component thereof.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 80
Apple objects to this Interrogatory as unduly burdensome, overbroad, and impracticable
to the extent that it requests Apple to state “all facts” supporting Apple’s contention “fully and in

18

detail,” especially given the late date in the discovery period at which this Interrogatory was

19

propounded. Apple further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information that:

20

(i) would require Apple to draw a legal conclusion to respond; (ii) is outside of Apple’s

21

possession, custody, or control; (iii) can be obtained as easily by Samsung, is already in

22

Samsung’s possession, or is publicly available; or (iv) is subject to a confidentiality or

23

nondisclosure agreement or governed by a protective order preventing its production.

24
25
26

Subject to and incorporating its General Objections and its specific objections, Apple
responds as follows:
The trade dress Apple alleges are infringed by Samsung are as follows:

27
28
166

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

The “Original iPhone Trade Dress,” which means the following elements of Apple’s
product designs: a rectangular product with four evenly rounded corners; a flat clear surface
covering the front of the product; the appearance of a metallic bezel around the flat clear surface;
a display screen under the clear surface; under the clear surface, substantial black borders above
and below the display screen and narrower black borders on either side of the screen; when the
device is on, a matrix of colorful square icons with evenly rounded corners within the display
screen; and when the device is on, a bottom dock of colorful square icons with evenly rounded
corners set off from the other icons on the display, which does not change as other pages of the
user interface are viewed.
The “iPhone 3G Trade Dress,” which means the following elements of Apple’s product
designs: a rectangular product with four evenly rounded corners; a flat clear surface covering the
front of the product; the appearance of a metallic bezel around the flat clear surface; a display
screen under the clear surface; under the clear surface, substantial black borders above and below
the display screen and narrower black borders on either side of the screen; when the device is on,
a row of small dots on the display screen; when the device is on, a matrix of colorful square
icons with evenly rounded corners within the display screen; and when the device is on, a bottom

18

dock of colorful square icons with evenly rounded corners set off from the other icons on the

19

display, which does not change as other pages of the user interface are viewed.

20

The “iPhone 4 Trade Dress,” which means the following elements of Apple’s product

21

designs: a rectangular product with four evenly rounded corners; a flat clear surface covering the

22

front of the product; a display screen under the clear surface; under the clear surface, substantial

23

neutral (black or white) borders above and below the display screen and narrower black borders

24

on either side of the screen; a thin metallic band around the outside edge of the phone; when the

25

device is on, a row of small dots on the display screen; when the device is on, a matrix of

26

colorful square icons with evenly rounded corners within the display screen; and when the device

27
28
167

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

is on, a bottom dock of colorful square icons with evenly rounded corners set off from the other
icons on the display, which does not change as other pages of the user interface are viewed.
The “iPhone Trade Dress,” which means the following elements of Apple’s product
designs: a rectangular product with four evenly rounded corners; a flat clear surface covering the
front of the product; a display screen under the clear surface; under the clear surface, substantial
neutral (black or white) borders above and below the display screen and narrower neutral borders
on either side of the screen; when the device is on, a matrix of colorful square icons with evenly
rounded corners within the display screen; and when the device is on, a bottom dock of colorful
square icons with evenly rounded corners set off from the other icons on the display, which does
not change as other pages of the user interface are viewed.
The “iPad Trade Dress,” which means the following elements of Apple’s product
designs: a rectangular product with four evenly rounded corners; a flat clear surface covering the
front of the product; the appearance of a metallic rim around the flat clear surface; a display
screen under the clear surface; under the clear surface, substantial neutral (black or white)
borders on all sides of the display screen; and when the device is on, a matrix of colorful square
icons with evenly rounded corners within the display screen.

18

The “iPad 2 Trade Dress” means the following elements of Apple’s product designs: a

19

rectangular product with four evenly rounded corners; a flat clear surface covering the front of

20

the product; the appearance of a metallic rim around the clear flat surface; a display screen under

21

the clear surface; under the clear surface, substantial neutral (black or white) borders on all sides

22

of the display screen; and when the device is on, a matrix of colorful square icons with evenly

23

rounded corners within the display screen.

24

The trade dress registered in U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 3,470,983, which consists of the

25

image shown in the registration, is described as follows in the trademark registration: The

26

color(s) black, blue, brown, brown-gray, gray-green, green, orange, red, silver, tan, white and

27

yellow is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of the configuration of a

28
168

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

rectangular handheld mobile digital electronic device with rounded silver edges, a black face,
and an array of 16 square icons with rounded edges. The top 12 icons appear on a black
background, and the bottom 4 appear on a silver background. The first icon depicts the letters
“SMS” in green inside a white speech bubble on a green background; the second icon is white
with a thin red stripe at the top; the third icon depicts a sunflower with yellow petals, a brown
center, and a green stem in front of a blue sky; the fourth icon depicts a camera lens with a black
barrel and blue glass on a silver background; the fifth icon depicts a tan television console with
brown knobs and a gray-green screen; the sixth icon depicts a white graph line on a blue
background; the seventh icon depicts a map with yellow and orange roads, a pin with a red head,
and a red-and- blue road sign with the numeral “280” in white; the eighth icon depicts an orange
sun on a blue background, with the temperature in white; the ninth icon depicts a white clock
with black and red hands and numerals on a black background; the tenth icon depicts three
brown-gray circles and one orange circle on a black background with a white border, with the
mathematical symbols for addition, subtraction, multiplication, and the equal sign displayed in
white on the circles; the eleventh icon depicts a portion of a yellow notepad with blue and red
ruling, with brown binding at the top; the twelfth icon depicts three silver gears over a thatched

18

black-and-silver background; the thirteenth icon depicts a white telephone receiver against a

19

green background; the fourteenth icon depicts a white envelope over a blue sky with white

20

clouds; the fifteenth icon depicts a white compass with a white- and-red needle over a blue map;

21

the sixteenth icon depicts the distinctive configuration of applicant's media player device in

22

white over an orange background.

23

The trade dress registered in U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 3,457,218, which consists of the

24

image shown in the registration, is described as follows in the trademark registration: Color is

25

not claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of the configuration of a rectangular

26

handheld mobile digital electronic device with rounded corners. The matter shown in broken

27

lines is not part of the mark.

28
169

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

The trade dress registered in U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 3,475,327, which consists of the
image shown in the registration, is described as follows in the trademark registration: The
color(s) gray, silver and black is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of the
configuration of a handheld mobile digital electronic device. The material shown in dotted lines,
namely, the buttons and openings on the device show the position of the mark in relation to the
device and are not considered a part of the mark. The color gray appears as a rectangle at the
front, center of the device. The color black appears on the front of the device above and below
the gray rectangle and on the curved corners of the device. The color silver appears as the outer
border and sides of the device. The color white is shown solely to identify placement of the
mark and is not claimed as a part of the mark.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
170

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

Dated: March 10, 2012

/s/ Mark D. Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn (SBN 244180)
([e-mail])
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3
4
5
6

William F. Lee (admitted pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10

Harold J. McElhinny (SBN 66781)
([e-mail])
Michael A. Jacobs (SBN 111664)
([e-mail])
Richard S.J. Hung (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: ( 415) 268-7000
Facsimile: [phone]

11
12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
171

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2
3

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

4

document has been served on March 10, 2012 by electronic mail upon the following:

5

Charles Kramer Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
([e-mail])
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
([e-mail])
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
([e-mail])
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Edward J. DeFranco (Cal. Bar No. 165596)
([e-mail])
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10010
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
([e-mail])
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

22
/s/ Mark. D Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn

23
24
25
26
27
28
172

APPLE INC.’S RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S
FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

OPPOS
FOR