Google Inc. v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-8252154.). Filed byGoogle Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Warren, Matthew) (Filed on 12/23/2013)
EXHIBIT B
US006037937A
Ulllted States Patent [19]
[11] Patent Number:
Beaton et al.
[45]
[54]
Date of Patent:
6,037,937
*Mar. 14, 2000
NAVIGATION TOOL FOR GRAPHICAL
5,745,716
4/1998 Tchao et al. .......................... .. 345/350
USER INTERFACE
5,748,926
5/1998 Fukuda et al. ..
5,760,773
6/1998 Berman et al.
[75] Inventors: Brian Finlay Beaton, Orleans; Colin
-
’
[73]
,
25521212165555: Dale
,
1e
9/1998 Moran et al. ......................... .. 345/358
5,812,134
’
9/1998
Pooser et al. ......................... .. 345/356
FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
This patent issued on a continued pros-
8
13;
European 5“?
-
uropean a‘
"
ecution application ?led under 37 CFR
1.53(d), and is subject to the tWenty year
0 684 543 11/1995
patent term provisions of 35 U.S.C.
154 a
2 .
( )
[21] AppL NO‘: 08/985,265
-
[22]
European Pat‘ Off’ '
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “Scroll Control Box,”
vol. 36, No. 4, Apr. 1993, pp. 399—403.
_
Flled'
.................................... ..
5,809,267
Assignee: Nortel Networks Corporation, CAX
[ * ] Notice:
345/347
g?ig?matsu 9t 91
_
223$?
. 345/358 X
Primary Examiner—Raymond J. Bayerl
Dec‘ 4’ 1997
Assistant Examiner—Thomas Nguyen
[51]
Int. Cl.7 ............................... .. G06F 3/14; G06F 3/02
Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Finnegan, Henderson, FaraboW,
[52]
US. Cl. ........................ .. 345/339; 345/352; 345/347;
Garrett & Dunner, L~L-P
345/341; 345/358
[58]
[57]
ABSTRACT
Field of Search ................................... .. 345/358, 352,
345/353, 341, 354, 350, 348, 347, 356
The system and method consistent With the present inven
tion provides improved graphical navigation tool for elec
[56l
References Cited
Us‘ PATENT DOCUMENTS
tronic devices. The graphical navigation tools may be used
to navigate through documents at any direction at varying
speeds. The navigation tool is preferably transparent to
4,954,967
9/1990 Takahashi ............................. .. 364/518
prevent obscuring the teXt of the underlying document.
5,297,253
3/1994 Meisel
395/348
Accordingly, the navigational tool does not take up addi
5a563a996 10/1996 Tchao
345/341
tional screen real estate. The GUI of the present invention
575707109 10/1996 Jens?“
345/146
5,590,257
12/1996
may be especially useful in portable electronic devices With
Forcler ....... ..
.. 707/530
Small dis 1a S
5,592,195
1/1997 Misono e161.
345/146
p y‘
5,600,765
2/1997 Ando et al. ....................... .. 345/326 X
5,745,116
4/1998 Pisutha-Armond ................... .. 345/358
24 Claims, 11 Drawing Sheets
MACROMEDI
SEARCH] BRAIN | lNDU
l l
MACROMEDIA
SHOCKWAVE
:EHAND
U.S. Patent
Mar. 14,2000
Sheet 1 0f 11
FIG. 1
FIG. 2
6,037,937
U.S. Patent
Mar. 14, 2000
_
:8
2a
.%ovD63aa
L
Sheet 2 0f 11
05.3%
2a3.5“ N-215m 8m2- 128
6,037,937
_
J
m
m
GI
mm.
U.S. Patent
Mar. 14, 2000
Sheet 4 0f 11
6,037,937
MEMORY 440
STATIC RAM 442
FLASH ROM 444
PROGRAM
510
TOUCH
SCREEN
PROGRAM
520
NAVIGATION
PROGRAM
530
FIG. 5
DRAWING
PROGRAM
540
U.S. Patent
Mar. 14, 2000
(430
FEATURE
PROCESSOR
Sheet 5 0f 11
[460
‘ ‘
‘
'
ANALOG
CONTROLLER
6,037,937
(474
H
SEQUECEHN
PANEL
FIG. 6
4}
06>
FIG. 7A
ACTIVATION
AREA
FIG. 7B
U.S. Patent
Mar. 14, 2000
'
Sheet 6 0f 11
MACROMEDI
SIJIEARCH BRAIN INDU
O
MACROMEDIA
SHOCKWAVE
FIG. 8
6,037,937
U.S. Patent
Mar. 14, 2000
Sheet 7 0f 11
6,037,937
WITHIN-PAGE
GATION
RCLE
0111
"U m lT'l S
PAG
_/E§€§E
FIG. 98
ADDITIONAL CONTROLS
FORWARD TO
T DOC
Bil
BAC K, HOME,
IIHI
FIG. 9C
.
NT,
U.S. Patent
Mar. 14, 2000
Sheet 8 0f 11
6,037,937
HDMEOU<
_O_DZI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?