Hooper v. Ryan, et al
Filing
76
MOTION by Petitioner Murray Hooper for judgment (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit State Notice Declining Evidentiary Hearing, # 2 Exhibit Indictment, # 3 Exhibit Judgment and Order, # 4 Exhibit Order of Sentence and Commitment, # 5 Exhibit 9 23 1981 Hearing Tr., # 6 Exhibit Order of Sentence and Commitment, # 7 Exhibit Postconviction Opinion and Order)(Love, Nathaniel)
EXHIBIT 4
•3-D
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
DEPARTMENT
^ounty)
«(3;iItt»ei^J)
CLum
./-y^/
(Division)^
-t©istTfttT
People of the State of Illinois
V.
^ - iV e /zo4
^
Defendant
i^yU
a/Ier-
f 4.1,^^-7 -A-.^
•e
¥-^
ORDER OF SENTENCE AND COMMITMENT TO
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
The defendant having been adjudged guilty of conamitting the offenses^rumerated below,
IT IS ORDERED that ihe defendant ____/^f,/r:2!5i^,^,^:l____.^,,^^^^
e and he is he/eby sentenced to the Illinois Department^of G6'rrections as lo-Qows:
7 /
-/
/
/}
/
//
.A^
f /
/•
.
T
-—7
/
^
f
/
' ,
> ^
-^^
•ad?.^^
y-
.,kL v-cyo!/ the Illinois Department of Corrections.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Illinois Department of Corrections shall take the defendant into custody and
)nfine him in the manner provided by law until the above sentence is fulfilled
ENTER:
^' 1M].{l^(y'l
/
/
/
ated:
^MA/
INSTRUCTIONS
C RK is^ requested to insert in the appropriate spaces above (1) each sentence and the conditions thereof, including
e condition that the sentence shall run concurrently or consecutively, as the case may be, with other sentences imposed
T the court in this case, or other sentences imposed by courts in other cases; and (2) fill in the followmg information:
//fry
ime and address of counsel for defendant.
"TT A - T ^ / ^
3_4__j^,._i.,^X_
•lice Individual Record No.
'^
C^ ^ ^
Illinois Bureau Identification No.
MORGAN M. FINLEY, CLERK
K.FILE RECORD-COUR' CLERK V/ILL A T T A C H ^ ^
URT
C:UIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
0
f
/:
'^
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?