Weather Underground, Incorporated v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated et al

Filing 201

DECLARATION by William A. Delgado re 193 Response to Motion filed by Connexus Corporation, Firstlook, Incorporated, Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit K, # 2 Exhibit L, # 3 Exhibit M, # 4 Exhibit N, # 5 Exhibit O, # 6 Exhibit P, # 7 Exhibit Q, # 8 Exhibit R, # 9 Exhibit S, # 10 Exhibit T, # 11 Exhibit U, # 12 Exhibit V, # 13 Exhibit W) (Delgado, William)

Download PDF
EXHIBITW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 1 2 3 Case No. 09-CV-I0756 U.S. Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan Detroit, Michigan May 19, 2010 2:29 p.m. WEATHER UNDERGROUND, INCORPORATED, 4 Plaintiff, 5 v 6 7 8 NAVIGATION CATALYST SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, Defendant. --------------------------/ 9 Ordered By: ENRICO SCHAEFER, ESQ. 10 MOTION HEARING 11 APPEARANCES: 12 For the Plaintiff: ENRICO SCHAEFER, ESQ. (P43506) Traverse Legal 810 Cottageview Drive Suite G-20 Traverse City, MI 49684 231-932-0411 For the Defendants: (By Phone) : WILLIAM DELGADO, ESQ. Willeken, Wilson, Loh & Lieb 707 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 3850 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-955-9240 Court Recorder: N/A Transcriber: Deborah Kremlick 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Proceedings recorded by electronic sound recording, transcript produced by transcription service. PAGE 33 1 are famous at the time of registration of such domain names 2 without regard to the goods or services of the party. 3 So your position that it would be limited only to ones 4 that are confusingly similar to the 51 domain names or 5 whatever at issue here, I think reads out the clear language 6 of -- of eight. 7 to give you say another 50 names and then you give us all the 8 domain names that are registered like that. So what I'm -- I'm willing to do is ask him MR. SCHAEFER: 9 Well, here's what -- here's the 10 problem. Part of it is we asked them for the other domains 11 that infringe our trademarks, okay. 12 by kind of random searching just last week found 11 more. 13 if we can't get the data base -- 14 MR. DELGADO: 15 MR. 16 MR. DELGADO: 17 MR. They said zero. We just So No,' that's not true. SCHAEFER: If we can't get the That's not true. SCHAEFER: -- if we can't get the data base, 18 Your Honor, we aim to identify th,e domains at issue in this 19 case. 20 Thewunderground.com. 21 wunderground. 22 Tropicalweatherunderground.com. 23 us to search on, it's impossible for us to -- and they refuse 24 to tell us what other domains they have of ours and they've 25 said none and we know it's not true. These are examples of the ones we found last week. Keep in mind our trademark is So this is registered to them. So without the data base for PAGE The other thing is, Your Honor, it's just data. 1 34 They 2 have affidavits from their people Seth Jacoby that said they 3 had 300,000 domain names as of two years ago. 4 down to something like 70,000 domain names as of this year. 5 So there's -- 6 THE COURT: 7 MR. SCHAEFER: And now they're I thought they had 16,000,000. Well, that's what he said, but I got 8 an affidavit that says completely otherwise as of -- as of a 9 couple years ago. MR. DELGADO: 10 11 Your Honor, can I respond to that? I disagree with a lot of what Mr. Schaefer is -MR. SCHAEFER: 12 13 grace Co. names. 14 I think he was talking about the ad Because that blossoms -- that blossoms the number. THE COURT: 15 Okay. stop talking. He's If you don't stop and give him a break, 16 already on the phone. 17 he can't be heard. 18 the telephone line, okay? It's already frustrating enough without MR. DELGADO: 19 All right. Mr. Delgado. Okay. So here's what I was going to 20 say. Mr. Schaefer made the statement that they asked us to 21 identify other domain names and we said zero. 22 case. 23 dispute as to how domain names at issue would be defined from 24 these requests. 25 resolve this dispute. That is not the What happened was there is -- there was a good faith I have proposed to Mr. Schaefer and to If you want me to identify other domain PAGE 35 1 names that you know, are possibly violative of your client's 2 mark, I will do that. 3 for as many 4 names to -- to basically disclose to them what it is that we 5 think that might arguably even be olose to that. 6 I will run, you know, as many searches as many strings to capture as many possible You know, so for example, if he wants to run a search for 7 under, you know, we'll disclose any domain name that has the 8 phrase under. 9 call the string eather, E-a-t-h-e-r which would capture If he wants to run it for you know what I would 10 Weather,. you know, Qeather, and it's the Q next to the W on 11 the keyboard. 12 an issue. 13 problem for us has always been you know, to go back six years 14 and divulge statistics for -- you know, for 16,000,000 and 15 that 16,000,000 number is essentially from 2004 forward, 16 that's why that number is as high as it is. Will be do that. We will happily do that. 17 THE COURT: 18 MR. DELGADO: 19 That -- you know, that is not Okay. The question or the Here's what -- here's -- And we can't do that without shutting down the system. THE COURT: 20 Okay. You have some choices here, Mr. 21 Schaefer. 22 in 38, or you can just have a list of domain names without any 23 of this crap. 24 25 You can have fewer domain names with all this crap MR. SCHAEFER: Honor. We'll take the domain names, Your And I think I'm -- I'm entitled to them under that PAGE 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I certify that the foregoing is a correct transcript from the 8 electronic sound recording of the proceedings in the 9 above-entitled matter. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IslDeborah L. Krem1ick, CER-4872 Dated: 6-14-10

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?