Bormuth v. Jackson, City of et al

Filing 48

ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Limit Ex Parte Communications with Court Staff. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A Email of 7/25/12, # 2 Exhibit B Email of 7/28/12, # 3 Exhibit C Email of 7/28/12, # 4 Exhibit D Email of 7/30/12, # 5 Exhibit E Email of 7/30/12, # 6 Exhibit F Email of 7/30/12, # 7 Exhibit G Email of 7/30/12, # 8 Exhibit H Email of 7/30/12, # 9 Exhibit I Email of 7/31/12) (LWag)

To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject:
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:

peter bormuth <[e-mail]>
lisa wagner <[e-mail]>
07/25/2012 12:19 PM
preliminary witness lists

Ms. Wagner
i received a copy of Mr. Gillooly's filing (by e-mail from his associate) and i note that the proof of service
just claims electronic filing. No doubt Mr. Gillooly also took your order stating that all filings must be
made electronically seriously, as i did. Since we communicated on the matter and you told me that as a
pro se litigant, i was still allowed to file hard copy with the Court, would you be kind enough to inform
Mr. Gillooly that he must still serve me directly - either by e-mail or by post - i am fine with either
method.
Also i wish to reaffirm my objection to #20 of Ms. Forbush's filing. Do i need to make a motion to do this
or is it enough that i have contacted both her and the Court and explained my objection?
Peter Bormuth