Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al
AFFIDAVIT in Support re 108 MOTION for Summary Judgment DEFENDANT LEE ENTERPRISES INC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON REMAINING COUNTS FOUNDATIONAL AFFIDAVIT OF JEFFREY B SMITH IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT LEE ENTERPRISES INC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON REMAINING COUNTS filed by Lee Enterprises Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J) (Smith, Jeffrey)
cause No. DV-L0-224
Taken at the Ravalli County Courthouse
205 Bedford Street, Hami.l-ton, Montana
Friday, August 6,
The Honorable John W. Larson Presidinq.
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEED I
appearing pro se.
FOr thc DEfCNdANI: NATASHA PRINZING
201 lfesc Main Street, Suite
Mi-ssoula, MT 59802
fanmy stuckey, RPR
FRIDAY, PiUGUST 6,2011
There was, I believe, another
case where I indicated there \^rould be some opportunity
to discuss schedulingr the spreadbury v. Roddy case,
Dv-I0-224. we don't have a scheduling -- we do have
MS, JONES: Your Honorr I brought with
today a Proposed Scheduling Order, I presented that to
Mr. Spreadbury. We have agreed to the deadlines. We
have not set forth a date for a settfement master, We
wouLd ask the Court's permissicn to consult by the
deadline, which is in December, and then add that
That's agreeable to you,
Mr. Spreadburyr to work out the date and time for a
set.tlement master by the deadline in December?
MR. SPREADBURY: Yes, your Hono.r. I did
speak with Ms, .lones and I do feel the sett.Lement time
is something we need to work out. I,m noticing now that
the September 3rd might be a fittle bit early for me. I
original-ly thought everything woul-d be fine. I would
I j-ke to get everything accompl ished within six months.
and i t annears
doinq thaL, but. then the Iast date that I saw
Here it is,
F rr.r\, y vrvDr
ask that the September date be moved back by a week, to
'l nl- h
objection Ms, Jones?
MS. JONES: No obj ection.
THE COURT: So l'l-I lnterlineate three
THE COURT: Any
MR. SPREADBURY: Yes, sir.
order that at this time
9 and allow you/ then, up until the December date
10 hopefully -- I mean, you do need to schedule these
l-1 settlement conferences $,ith the settlement maste.rs
12 because their schedules are just like everyone elsers
13 and the more lead tine they have, the more flexibility
14 there is. And certainlyr if your settlement master
15 j-sn'L quite available wi!hin that time frame, I
16 regularly amended Orders to meeL Lhe scheduling issues
Il that the settl,ement master miqht have, So there's
built Ln, and just as you
18 alvJays a L itrle flexibility
20 certainly try to work it out with opposing counsel. If
2I you can't, t'hen you need to file a w.ritten notion.
MR. SPREADBURY: Thank you, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Thank Vou. So I think we have
24 handfed afl matters this morning that we were going to
25 handLe, and Itve handled other matters in chambers, We
TaNny Stuckey, RPR
COUNTY OF RAVALLI
I, Tamara Stuc L^., a\€€i ^i r'l a^.rr+ L r\!yv!
the state of Montana, rln horahrr narfi f rr.
That I was dul y auEhorized to and did report the
proceedings in the ab ove-entitled cause i
That the f oreg oing pages of thi s t ranscrlpt
constitute a t rue and
i further ce rt ify that I am not an attorney, nor
n.)r r rFl atiVe Or
counseL of any of the nartipsemployee of any attor ney o! counsel connected with the
aeti.on, nor financial lv interested in the act ion.
IN WITNESS WHE REOF, I have hereunto set my hand
on this 19th day of S eptenber, 201. 1..
Official qourt Report. er
State of Montana
Twenty-First Judicial District
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?