Dish Network L.L.C. v. ABC, Inc. et al
Filing
12
DECLARATION of Elyse D. Echtman in Support re: 3 Order to Show Cause,,,,,,,,. Document filed by Dish Network L.L.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17)(Echtman, Elyse)
EXHIBIT 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL COVER SHEET
I (a) PLAINTIFFS (Check box if you are represent"
DEFENDANTS
urselfO)
CBS BROADCASTING INC.; CBS STUDIOS INC.;
SURVIVOR PRODUCTIONS LLC
-
( !)
0=:
o
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION; DISH NETWORK L.L.C.
Attorneys (Finn Name, Address and Telephone Number. If you are representing
yourself, provide same.)
Attorneys (If Known)
ROBERT H. ROTSTEIN (SBN 72452) rxr@msk.com
MITCHELL, SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
11377 West Olympic Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90064-1683
(310) 312-2000
III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES - For Diversity Cases Only
(Place an X in one box for plaintiff and one for defendant.)
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in one box only.)
o I U.S. Government Plaintiff
[8] 3 Federal Question (U.S.
o 2 U.S. Government Defendant
0
Government Not a Party
PTF DEF
01 01
Citizen of This State
4 Diversity (Indicate Citizenship Citizen of Another Stlte
of Parties in Item III)
02 02
Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country 0
3 0
3
Incorporated or Principal Place
of Business in this State
Incorporated and Principal Place 05 05
of Business in Another State
Foreign Nation
IV. ORIGIN (Place an X in one box only.)
[8] I Original
Proceeding
02 Removed from 03 Remanded from 0
State Court
Appellate Court
V. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: JURY DEMAND: 0
CLASS ACTION under F.R.C.P. 23: 0
Yes
4 Reinstated or 0
Reopened
Yes
PTF DEF
04 04
5 Transferred from another district (specifY): 0
6 MultiDistrict
Litigation
o 7 Appeal to District
Judge from
Magistrate Judge
[8] No (Check 'Yes' only if demanded in complaint.)
[8] No
0
MONEY DEMANDED IN COMPLAINT: $
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION (Cite the U. S. Civil Statute under which you are filing and write a brief statement of cause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity.)
17 U.S.c. § 101, et seq. Copyright Infringement; Inducement of Copyright Infringement; Contributory Copyright Infringement; Vicarious
Copyright Infringement
VII. NATURE
o F SUlT( PI ace an X in one box only.)
CONTRACT
TORTS
PERSONAL INJURY
310 Airplane
315 Airplane Product
Liability
320 Assault, Libel &
Slander
330 Fed. Employers'
Enforcement of
0470 Racketeer Influenced
Liability
Judgment
and Corrupt
0340 Marine
lSI Medicare Act
Organizations
345 Marine Product
152 Recovery of Defaulted
480 Consumer Credit
Liability
Student Loan (Excl.
490 Cable/Sat TV
350 Motor Vehicle
Veterans)
810 Selective Service
153 Recovery of
355 Motor Vehicle
850 Securities/Commoditiesl
Overpayment of
Product Liability
Exchange
Veteran's Benefits
360 Other Personal
875 Customer Challenge 12
160 Stockholders' Suits
Injury
USC 3410
190 Other Contract
362 Personal Injury890 Other Statutory Actions
Med Malpractice
195 Contract Product
0891 Agricultural Act
365 Personal InjuryLiability
892 Economic Stabilization
Product Liability
196 Franchise
Act
368 Asbestos Personal
REAL PROPERTY
893 Environmental Matters
Injury Product
210 Land Condemnation
894 Energy Allocation Act
Liability
220 Foreclosure
895 Freedom oflnfo. Act
IMMIGRATION
230 Rent Lease & Ejectment
0900 Appeal of Fee Detenni462 Naturalization
nation Under Equal
240 Torts to Land
Application
Access to Justice
0245 Tort Product Liability
463 Habeas Corpus950 Constitutionality of State
290 All Other Real Property
Alien Detainee
Statutes
465 Other Immigration
Actions
OTHER STATUTES
o 400 State Reapportionment o 110 Insurance
o 120 Marine
o 41 0 Antitrust
o 430 Banks and Banking o 130 Miller Act
o 140 Negotiable Instrument
0450 CommercellCC
Rates/etc.
o 150 Recovery of
o 460 Deportation
Overpayment &
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
TORTS
PERSONAL
PROPERTY
370 Other Fraud
371 Truth in Lending
380 Other Personal
Property Damage
385 Property Damage
Product Liability
BANKRUPTCY
22 Appeal 28 USC
158
0423 Withdrawal 28
USC 157
CIVIL RIGHTS
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0441 Voting
o 442 Employment
0443 HousingiAccommodations
0444 Welfare
445 American with
Disabilities Employment
446 American with
Disabilities Other
440 Other Civil
Rights
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
PRISONER
LABOR
PETITIONS
0710 Fair Labor Standards
510 Motions to Vacate
Act
Sentence Habeas
720 LaborfMgmt.
Corpus
Relations
530 General
730 Labor/Mgmt.
535 Death Penalty
Reporting &
Disclosure Act
540 Mandamusl
Other
740 Railway Labor Act
550 Civil Rights
790 Other Labor
Litigation
555 Prison Condition
0791 Empi. Ret. Inc.
FORFEITURE 1
Security Act
PENALTY
PROPERTY RIGHTS
610 Agriculture
[8] 820 Copyrights
620 Other Food &
0830 Patent
Drug
840 Trademark
625 Drug Related
SOCIAL SECURITY
Seizure of
Property 21 USC
61 HIA(l395ff)
881
862 Black Lung (923)
630 Liquor Laws
863 DlWCIDIWW
640 R.R.& Truck
405(g»
650 Airline Regs
864 SSlD Title XVI
660 Occupational
865 RSI (405(g»
Safety IHealth
FEDERAL TAX SUITS
690 Other
870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff
or Defendant)
0871 IRS-Third Party 26
USC 7609
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
_C.A
p " , '7 - JI h !J .I.,
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
Case Number:
\I ,
....
--."
~
AFTER COMPLETING THE FRONT SIDE OF FORM CV-71, COMPLETE THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW.
CV-71 (05/08)
CIVIL COVER SHEET
American LegalNet, Inc
WoNVV.FormsWorkflow.com
Page I of2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL COVER SHEET
.
VIIICa). IDENTICAL CASES: Has this action been
"'wIll
~USIY filed in this court and dismissed, remanded or closed?
[2J No 0
Yes
If yes, list case number(s):
VIII(b). RELATED CASES: Have any cases been previously filed inthis court that are related to the present case?
[2J
No
0
Yes
If yes, list case number(s):
Civil cases are deemed related if a previously filed case and the present case:
(Check all boxes that apply)
0
A. Arise from the same or closely related transactions. happenings, or events; or
o B. Call for determination of the same or substantially related or similar questions of law and fact; or
D c. For other reasons muld entail substantial duplication oflahor if heard by different judges; or
D D. Involve the same patent, trademark or copyright, and one of the factors identified above in a, b or c also is present.
---=--=-=---=------------~--
..
IX. VENVE: (When completing the following information. use an additional sheet if necessary.)
List the County in this District; California County outside of this District; State if other than California; or Foreign Country, in which EACH named plaintiff resides.
State, if other than Cal ifornia; or Foreign Country
(b)
o
List the County in this District; California County outside of this District; State if other than California; or Foreign Country, in which EACH named defendant resides.
Check here if the government, its agencies or employees is a named defendant. If this box is checked, go to item (c).
County in this District:·
I California cou~ty outside of this District; St~te, if other than California; or Foreign Country
-
Los Angeles
(c)
List the County in this District; California County outside of this District; State if other than California; or Foreign Country, in which EACH claim arose.
Note: In land condemnation cases, use the location of the tract of land involved.
_""_M_
------.
___.___
1
m
-
~ty in this District:·
outside of this District; State, if otherthan California; or Foreign Coun~
i
Los Angeles
• Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, Santa Barbara, or San Luis Obis
Note: In land condemnation cases, use the location of the tfa
fland involved
X. SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY (OR PRO PER):
Notice to CounsellParties: The CV-71 (JS-44) Civil Cover Sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings
or other papers as required by law. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required pursuant to Local Rule 3 -I is not filed
but is used by the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of statistics, venue and initiating the civil docket sheet. (For more detailed instructions, see separate instructions sheet.)
- - -..- - - - - - -
...
Key to Statistical codes relating to Social Security Cases:
Nature of Suit Code
Abbreviation
Substantive Statement of Cause of Action
861
HIA
All claims for health insurance benefits (Medicare) under Title 18, Part A, of the Social Security Act, as amended.
Also, include claims by hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, etc., for certification as providers of services lIlder the
program. (42 U.S.c. 1935FF(b))
862
BL
All claims for "Black Lung" benefits under Title 4, Part B, of the Federal Coal Mile Health and Safety Act of 1969.
(30 U.S.c, 923)
863
D1WC
All claims filed by insured workers for disability insurance benefits under Title 2 of the Social Security Act, as
amended; plus all claims filed for child's insurance benefits based on disability. (42 U.S.c. 405(g))
863
D1WW
All claims filed for widows or widowers insurance benefits based on disability under Title 2 ofthe Social Security
Act, as amended. (42 U.S.c. 40S(g))
864
SSID
All claims for supplemental security income payments based upon disability filed under Title 1601' the Social Security
Act, as amended.
865
Rsr
All claims for retirement (old age) and survivors benefits under Title 2 ofthe Social Security Act, as amended. (42
U.S.c. (g))
CV-71 (05/08)
CIVIL
Page 2 of2
AmerICan LegalNet, tnc.
VIWW.FormsWorkflowcom
-:z:
a::
c
c:J
0
.
1 ROBERT H. ROTSTEIN (SBN 72452)
rxrCCUmsk.com
2 PATRICIA H. BENSON (SBN 60565)
phbCCUmsk.com
3 JEAN PIERRE NOGUES (SBN 84445)
jp!lCCUmsk.com
4 MIICHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
11377 West Olympic Boulevard
5 Los Angeles, California 90064-1683
Telephone: (310) 312-2000
6 FacsImile: (J 10) 312-3100
7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CBS Broadcasting, Inc.,
8 CBS Studios Inc.: and
Survivor ProductIons LLC
/
aI
-<
I
I.
(")
01-
mm
Z:;')
-IX
: -
ZV'Vl
(;") -1-1
t
r'!""'''~
I ,., ...
•
;-0:':::
n
V'n-l
... ~ C)
,
0
!:c
:-r' -I
;;;
\
=
;- .... ,"}
..
,-:lOc:
;;)O~~
~ ~~'"
I
.....>
-
N
-,
CJ
N
\.0
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
CASE
14 CBS BROADCASTING INC.,
CBS STUDIOS INC., SURVIVOR
15 PRODUCTIONS LLC,
COMPLAINT FOR:
(2) INDUCEMENT OF COPYRIGHT
17
ilt
18
INFRINGEMENT
v.
(3) CONTRIBUTORY COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION,
DISH NETWORK L.L.C.,
(4) VICARIOUS COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT
Defendants.
22
()(9
(1) COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
Plaintiffs,
16
~V 12 - 45~ 1: fY-+
~------------------------~
23
24
Plaintiffs CBS Broadcasting Inc., CBS Studios Inc., and Survivor
25 Productions LLC, by their counsel, allege against Defendants DISH Network
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
26 Corporation and DISH Network LLC:
27
28
4650068.6
1
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
NATURE OF ACTION
2
1.
Plaintiffs bring this action for preliminary and permanent injunctive
3
relief against Defendants' unlawful scheme to profit from a new system for
4
violating Plaintiffs' copyrights in prime-time, network television programming.
5 Defendants market this infringing system in connection with their satellite
6
broadcast services and digital video recorder ("DVR") called "the Hopper." As
7
described more fully below, through the infringing functions of the Hopper, all of
8
Plaintiffs' prime-time, network television programs (along with the shows aired on
9
the other national broadcast networks) are copied, on a continuous basis, and
10 stored for eight days, to the Hopper - which provides massive storage capabilities
11
during which the customer can permanently store that programming and view it
12
with all of the individual commercials automatically skipped in their entirety.
13 Significantly, when the viewer is in PrimeTime Anytime mode, the viewer is not in
14 any way selecting the individual programs to be copied or the individual
15 commercials to be skipped.
16
2.
Plaintiffs are among the largest and most successful producers and
17 distributors of television programming in the United States and the world.
18 Plaintiffs are engaged in the business of developing, producing, and/or distributing
19 television programming for exhibition and dissemination, and of licensing those
20 activities to others. In addition to producing (and owning the copyrights in)
21
thousands of television programs, Plaintiff CBS Broadcasting Inc. ("CBS") owns
22 and operates television program services that delivers that programming (or
23 programming created by third parties) to the American public.
24
3.
The Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq., provides Plaintiffs with
25 the exclusive rights to reproduce, adapt, distribute, and publicly perform and
Mitchell
Silberberg &
26 display their copyrighted television programming. Plaintiffs exercise these rights
Knupp LLP
27 in an ever-expanding variety of ways, including commercially supported broadcast
28
4650068.6
2
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1
television, syndicated television, Internet-based streaming and download services,
2 video-on-demand access via licensed via multichannel video programming
3 distributors ("MVPDs"), and Digital Versatile Discs ("DVDs") and Blu-Ray Discs.
4 At this moment, consumers have access to network television programming
5 through more authorized avenues than ever before. Through the unlawful
6 functions of the Hopper, Defendants are infringing, and threaten to infringe,
7 Plaintiffs' rights to exploit their copyrighted works in these legitimate markets. In
8 doing so, Defendants deprive Plaintiffs of a fair return on their investments in
9 creating and distributing some of the most valuable programming on television.
10
11
Defendants' conduct is exactly what the copyright laws are intended to prevent.
4.
Defendants violate Plaintiffs' exclusive rights by copying, without
12 authorization, Plaintiffs' television programs and delivering these copies to
13
computer hard drives resident in the homes of Defendants' subscribers. This
14 conduct violates Plaintiffs' exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute copies
15 under sections 106(1) and 106(3) of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 106(1) and
16 106(3). Through their conduct, Defendants provide their customers with unlawful
17 copies of works. That is straight-forward infringement.
18
5.
To the extent that Defendants claim their customers create the
19 infringing copies, Defendants' scheme is nevertheless unlawful. Defendants
20 knowingly provide ongoing and material technological support to their customers
21
in order to facilitate the automatic creation of infringing copies of prime-time
22 shows and skipping commercials, which renders Defendants contributory
23
infringers. Defendants induce, through their technology, advertising and other
24 conduct, their customers to create unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs' programming
25
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
in prime time and skip commercials, without viewers selecting which programs to
26 record of which commercials to skip. Finally, Defendant are vicariously liable for
27 their subscribers' conduct, to the extent that is relevant, because Defendants have
28
4650068.6
3
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VrCARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1 the legal and practical right and ability to control the creation of infringing copies
2 of Plaintiffs' works and skipping commercials, from which Defendants obtain
3 direct financial benefits. Defendants' contracts with subscribers allow Defendants
4 to control all programming and service options. In addition, subscribers cannot
5 accomplish the systematic comprehensive prime time copying and commercial
6 skipping at issue without the technological system from Defendants.
7
6.
The Hopper allows Defendants and their customers to infringe
8 Plaintiffs' copyrights through the following interrelated features:
9
• The Hopper provides a "PrimeTime Anytime" feature, which copies
10
to the customers' DVR the prime-time TV programming aired on
11
CBS and on the ABC, Fox, and NBC television networks, every
12
evening, on an eight-day rolling basis. Significantly, this feature
13
copies the entire prime-time schedule of all the major networks,
14
without the viewer selecting the specific programs to be copied.
15
• The Hopper provides what Defendants call the "Auto Hop" feature,
16
which enables the customer to watch the copied PrimeTime Anytime
17
programming with all commercial advertising automatically skipped
18
- and as more fully detailed below, Defendants market and actively
19
encourage the use of Auto Hop for that purpose. Thus, significantly,
20
the viewer is not in any way selecting the individual commercials to
21
be skipped.
22
• The Hopper provides a memory capacity of two terabytes (i.e., 2,000
23
24
of recorded video, thus allowing the creation of large libraries of
25
Mitchell
Silberberg &
gigabytes), which, Defendants boast, is capable of storing 2,000 hours
prime-time television. As Defendants themselves acknowledge, "no
26
other company offers" such capacity.
Knupp LLP
27
28
4650068.6
4
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
7.
Thus, the Hopper effectively provides Defendants' customers with a
2 premium commercial-free channel consisting, at any given point in time, of the
3 copyrighted programming that aired in prime time on all four national broadcast
4 networks in the past eight days, including without limitation, series currently airing
5 on CBS, such as 60 Minutes, Blue Bloods, CSI: Crime Scene Investigation,
6 Survivor, NCIS and The Good Wife, along with the ability to create huge
7 permanent, commercial-free libraries of those works.
8
9
8.
Plaintiffs have invested billions of dollars in their copyrighted content.
the Hopper's methods of copying will deprive Plaintiffs of a vital means of
10
payment for their works and erode the value of Plaintiffs' copyrighted
11
programming. "Prime time" is the bloc of the television programming schedule
12 that attracts the most viewers, and advertisers therefore are willing to pay the
13 highest prices to have their commercials shown during this time. Television
14 networks and local broadcast stations generally derive significant percentages of
15 their advertising revenues from selling the right to advertise before, during or
16 immediately after the prime-time television programming airs. Advertisers will
17 not pay, or will pay less, to have their advertisements placed within and around
18
Plaintiffs' television programming if the advertisements will be made invisible to
19
viewers. Further, Plaintiffs recoup part of their substantial investments in creative
20 programming by disseminating their prime-time programming, at a premium, in
21
commercial-free formats, such as the sale of DVDs and Blu-Ray Discs. The
22 Hopper directly undercuts these legitimate markets for paid access to Plaintiffs'
23 programming. Moreover, the Hopper interferes with Plaintiffs' efforts to make
24 their prime-time programming available to consumers for free through advertising25 supported services, such as Internet streaming websites. Views of such websites
Mitchell
Silberberg &
26 will decline if Defendants' subscribers have access to commercial-free copies of
Knupp LLP
27 Plaintiffs' prime-time shows. As a result, Defendants' unlawful conduct impairs
28
4650068.6
5
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
the value of Plaintiffs' works and reduces the incentive for their creation and
2 dissemination. Indeed, Defendants' unlawful conduct attacks the fundamental
3 economic underpinnings of television programming delivery and therefore the very
4
means by which Plaintiffs' copyrighted works are paid for. In this way,
5 Defendants cause harm not only to Plaintiffs, but also to consumers.
6
THE PARTIES
7
8
9.
Plaintiff Survivor Productions, LLC is a Delaware limited liability
9 company with its principal place of business at 7800 Beverly Blvd. Los Angeles,
10 California. Plaintiff Survivor Productions LLC is actively engaged in the
11
12
13
production of television programming.
10.
Plaintiff CBS Broadcasting Inc. is a New York corporation with its
principal place of business at 51 West 52nd Street, New York, New York. Plaintiff
14 CBS Broadcasting is actively engaged in the production and distribution of
15 television programs and other copyrighted works.
16
11.
Plaintiff CBS Studios Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal
17 place of business at 51 West 52nd Street, New York, New York. Plaintiff CBS
18 Studios Inc. is actively engaged in the worldwide production and distribution of
19
20
21
copyrighted entertainment products.
12.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and therefore allege, that
Defendant DISH Network Corporation is organized under the laws of the State of
22 Nevada and has its principal place of business in Englewood, Colorado. Plaintiffs
23
are informed and believe, and therefore allege, that Defendant DISH Network LLC
24 is a wholly owned subsidiary of DISH Network Corporation, is organized under
25 the laws of the State of Colorado, and has its principal place of business in
Mitchell
Silberberg &
26 Englewood, Colorado. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and therefore allege,
KnuppLLP
27 that each Defendant was the agent, joint venture and/or employee of the other
28
4650068.6
6
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1 Defendant, and in doing the things hereinafter alleged, each was acting within the
2
course and scope of said agency, employment and joint venture with the advance
3 knowledge, acquiescence, and subsequent ratification of the other Defendant.
4
13.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and therefore allege, that DISH
5
Network Corporation and DISH Network LLC operate the third largest pay
6
television transmission system in the United States, servicing approximately 14
7
million customers as of September 30, 2011.
8
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
9
10
11
12
14.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331
and 1338, and under the Copyright Act, 17U.S.C. § 101 etseq.
15.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants, and venue is
13
proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 139I(b). Defendants
14
conduct extensive commercial activities in this State, including in this Judicial
15
District. Further, a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to this
16
lawsuit, as well as substantial injury to Plaintiffs, have occurred or will occur in
17 this District as a result of Defendants' acts of copyright infringement and
18
impending acts of copyright infringement, as alleged in detail below. Venue is
19
also proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400(a) in that
20
Defendants may be found in this District in light of their extensive commercial
21
activities in this District.
22
23
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
24
Free Over-The Air, Commercially Supported Broadcasting
25
16.
CBS is one of the four major over-the-air television networks that
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
26 transmit programming to the public via hundreds of free, local, terrestrial broadcast
27 stations that carry the networks' content. The networks' content is also
28
4650068.6
7
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1 transmitted to the public by subscription-based cable and satellite companies,
2
including Defendant DISH Network, which pay license fees to retransmit the
3
content carried on local broadcast stations. The networks, including Plaintiff CBS,
4
both create and license copyrighted content -largely entertainment, news and
5 sports programming
6
on which the public has come to rely for information and
entertainment. Despite constant advances and developments in technology, the
7 four major networks and their affiliated local stations continue to account for a
8
large percentage of all television viewing in the United States, and each attracts
9
more viewers than any network distributed only by cable or satellite providers.
10
17.
A nationwide system of free, over-the-air local television stations,
11
which makes news, information, and entertainment available to virtually all
12
Americans without any need to pay subscription fees, has been a crucial public
13
policy goal in the United States since the advent of television. The creation and
14
acquisition of the copyrighted content that has come to define free, over-the-air
15
television is made possible through commercial advertisements that are shown in
16
each program. Whether viewers watch programming for free over-the-air or
17 through pay services (such as Defendants' service) that retransmit broadcast
18
19
works that the public views. As alleged more fully below, Defendants' infringing
20
system completely blocks the delivery of advertising to viewers and thereby
21
deprives copyright owners of the means by which they are paid for their works.
22
Defendants' conduct diminishes both the value of the works and the incentive to
23
create and distribute original content over the medium. By undermining the
24
economic engine supporting the production of content, Defendants' system
25
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
signals, advertisements provide the primary means of payment for the copyrighted
threatens to diminish the quantity and the quality of the programming Americans
26
have come to expect and demand.
27
28
4650068.6
8
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
Plaintiffs' Dissemination of Prime-Time Television Content
1
2
18.
The majority of Plaintiffs' most valuable programming airs during
3 "prime time," which on the east and west coasts falls between the hours of eight
4 p.m. and eleven p.m. Monday through Saturday, and seven p.m. to eleven p.m. on
5 Sunday (and one hour earlier in the Central and Mountain time zones). Plaintiffs
6 own the United States copyrights in a substantial number of prime-time programs,
7 including successful series currently airing on CBS, such as those listed in
8 Paragraph 7 above. Plaintiffs have registered or filed applications to register with
9 the United States Copyright Office their copyrights in each of the works identified
10 herein, as well as in each of the works listed in the schedule attached hereto as
11 Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.
12
13
19.
After a program airs on prime-time television, it is, in most cases,
made available for viewing via another market, including through on-demand
14 access on MVPD services; online purchase or rental by download (e.g., iTunes and
15 Amazon); mobile phone services; pay-per-view and location-based (e.g., airline)
16 services; and portable media (e.g., DVDs and Blu-Ray Discs); as well as
17 subscription streaming services over the Internet (e.g., Netflix). Further, the
18 programs are often available on authorized Internet sites the day after airing in
19 prime time, supported by unique commercial advertising. Offerings in other media
20 with differing characteristics also exist and are designed to maximize revenues for
21
22
the copyright owner and any profit participants.
20.
Plaintiffs have invested (and continue to invest) substantial sums of
23 money and effort each year to develop, produce, and distribute television
24 programs. The public benefits from Plaintiffs' creative activities, as intended by
25 the U.S. Constitution and the Copyright Act. Plaintiffs recoup their substantial
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
26 investments in creative programming in a number of ways, including the
27 following:
28
4650068.6
9
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
• Advertiser Supported Broadcasts. National networks, including the
2
one owned and operated by Plaintiff CBS Broadcasting Inc., and their
3
owned television stations and independently-owned local affiliates,
4
derive substantial value by selling advertising time during the
5
programs they have created or licensed at enormous cost. Additional
6
revenues are earned by broadcast television networks and their parent
7
companies through fees paid by network-affiliated stations and by
8
licensees of their copyrighted programs in the off-network syndication
9
market. More income is generated by the licensing of programs
10
produced and owned by Plaintiff CBS Studios Inc. to other television
11
networks. These sources of revenue as well are ultimately dependent
12
on the ability of the licensee broadcasters to sell commercial
13
advertising in or adjacent to the programs.
14
• Video On-Demand ("VOD") Television Access. Plaintiffs license
15
cable operators to make copyrighted works available for viewing on
16
demand by their customers as an added benefit of their subscriptions.
17
In addition to license fees from these MVPDs, these arrangements
18
allow for the sale of unique advertising in the VOD versions of the
19
programs owned by Plaintiffs.
20
• On-Demand Online Access. Plaintiffs earn revenue by providing
21
22
their affiliates, and the websites and services of licensees. Some of
23
these models involve showing advertisements to consumers before,
24
after, or during viewing. These advertisements cannot be skipped or
25
fast forwarded. Other models involve subscription payments to
26
services (such as Netflix) that license Plaintiffs' content to offer to
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
access to their copyrighted works via their websites, the web sites of
their subscribers commercial-free, payments for the purchase of
Knupp LLP
28
4650068.6
10
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1
downloaded copies (also generally without advertising), or rental
2
payments (for time-limited windows to view content).
3
• Domestic Syndication. Plaintiffs generate revenue by licensing their
4
copyrighted works for "syndicated" exhibition on both broadcast and
5
non-broadcast television channels. For Plaintiffs, most syndication
6
activity involves delivery of programming that has already aired on
7
the CBS Television Network at an earlier date. In addition to fees
8
paid to Plaintiffs by broadcast and non-broadcast television channels,
9
an additional significant means by which Plaintiffs generate revenue
10
from syndication is through sharing in the advertising revenue
11
resulting from ads within the syndicated programs.
12
• Fixed Media. Plaintiffs generate substantial revenue from the sale or
13
rental for home viewing of authorized copies of their copyrighted
14
works in various formats, including DVD and Blu-Ray Discs.
15
Plaintiffs offer these formats at various price points, with different
16
offerings providing different levels of access to content. These
17
formats typically do not include advertisements, other than occasional
18
"trailers" at the beginning of a disc.
19
Defendants' Infringing Service
20
21
21.
On or about March 15,2012, Defendants made the Hopper available
22 to its customers. The Hopper's "PrimeTime Anytime" option automatically
23 records prime-time programming shows on CBS, NBC, ABC, and Fox, every day,
24 to the customers' DVR, which as alleged above, stores up to 2000 hours of content.
25 (Significantly, the feature copies the prime-time schedule of all the major
Mitchell
Silberberg &
26 networks, without the viewer selecting the specific programs to be copied.) The
Knupp LLP
27 prime-time programming, including that of Plaintiffs, is automatically stored on
28
4650068.6
11
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1 the DVR for eight days and can be stored permanently. On or about May 10,2012,
2 Defendants began offering a companion service, called "Auto Hop," which
3 automatically skips commercials during viewing.
4
22.
The Hopper is thus specifically designed to function as an on-demand
5 video, and a video library, service. Defendants boast that the Hopper is unlike any
6
other DVR offered by a television service provider. On their website, an image
7
from which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated by reference,
8
Defendants refer to the Hopper as an "on-demand" service that permits the creation
9
of video "libraries" of copyrighted prime-time content commercial free. For
10
example, Defendants market the Hopper as follows:
11
With the Hopper's exclusive feature, PrimeTime Anytime™, three
12
hours ofHD primetime programming are available to you On Demand
13
for up to 8 days from initial air date. Plus you can save your favorite
14
primetime content forever. You can also automatically skip
15
commercials in primetime TV - ABC, CBS, FOX and NBC in HD.
16
23.
During an interview while demonstrating the Hopper, a representative
17
of Defendants stated: "I don't think you'd need Hulu or Hulu Plus after this." In
18
other words, Defendants tell their customers that the Hopper can be used as a
19
substitute for Internet-based on-demand services. On legitimate services similar to
20
Hulu, Plaintiffs make their programming available in advertising-supported, rental,
21
purchase, and subscription models.
22
24.
Defendants also tout the Hopper's ability to provide commercial-free,
23 on-demand program libraries to their customers:
24
Hate commercials? DISH created commercial-free TV so you can
25
save an hour each night! Now you can automatically skip
26
commercials in primetime TV-on ABC, CBS, FOX and NBC in HD.
27
Only on the Hopper. Only from DISH.
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
4650068,6
12
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1
25.
Vivek Khemka, vice president of DISH Product Management,
2 described the infringing service as follows:
3
With the Auto Hop capability of the Hopper, watching your favorite
4
shows commercial-free is easier than ever before. It's a revolutionary
5
development that no other company offers and it's something that sets
6
Hopper above the competition. . .. With Hopper, you have access to
7
all primetime HD programs broadcast by the four major networks.
8
Now you can watch many of those shows commercial-free, with Auto
9
Hop.
10
11
12
13
Irreparable Harm to Plaintiffs As a Result of Defendants' Infringement
26.
Defendants' brazen copyright infringement threatens Plaintiffs' ability
to earn revenue from their copyrighted works through existing and potential
14 methods of dissemination. Unless enjoined, Defendants' illegal conduct will
15 irreparably injure Plaintiffs in numerous ways that are incapable of calculation or
16 redress through monetary damages. Defendants' unlawful scheme will also
17 ultimately harm the public, because it will divert revenue from the creators and
18 licensors of original programming to Defendants, thereby threatening to decrease
19 the output of copyrighted works and the investment therein.
20
21
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
22
COUNT I
23
(COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IN VIOLATION OF THE
24
COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101,ETSEQ.)
25
Mitchell
Silberberg &
KnuppLLP
27.
Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every allegation set forth
26 in paragraphs 1 through 4 and paragraphs 6-26, as though fully set forth herein.
27
28
4650068.6
13
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1
28.
Plaintiffs are the copyright owners of the works listed in Exhibit A, as
2 well as many other television programs telecast in the United States, each of which
3 contains a large number of creative elements wholly original to Plaintiffs and
4 which are copyrightable subject matter under the laws of the United States.
5
29.
Plaintiffs have obtained (or have applied for) copyright registration
6
certificates for each work listed in Exhibit A. In doing so, Plaintiffs have complied
7
in all respects with 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. and all other laws governing federal
8 copyrights.
9
30.
Each of the works listed in Exhibit A, has, with authorization of
10
Plaintiffs, been exploited in strict conformity with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. §§
11
401 and 409, et seq., and all other laws governing federal copyright.
12
31.
DISH creates Primetime Anytime's "on demand library of
13
approximately 100 hours primetime of TV shows" by recording, without
14
authorization, all programming aired by the four national broadcast networks
15
during primetime hours every night. On information and belief, the programming
16
recorded by DISH through the Primetime Anytime service consists exclusively of
17
copyrighted network programming, including Plaintiffs' copyrighted content. On
18
further information and belief, Defendants' copying in connection with PrimeTime
19
Anytime occurs on a partitioned section of The Hopper's hard drive that is fully
20 under Defendants' ongoing remote control. By creating and distributing
21
unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs' works (including the works listed on Exhibit A)
22
through PrimeTime Anytime in the manner described above, Defendants are
23
engaging in and imminently will engage in a vast number of direct copyright
24
infringements, in violation of sections 106(1), 106(3) and 501 of the Copyright
25
Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 106(1), 106(3) and 501.
Mitchell
Silberberg &
26
Knupp LLP
27
28 •
4650068.6
14
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1
32.
The foregoing acts of direct infringement by Defendants are
2 unauthorized and unlicensed by Plaintiffs and are not otherwise permissible under
3 the Copyright Act. Plaintiffs did not consent to Defendants' copying.
4
33.
These acts of infringement have been willful, intentional, and
5 purposeful, in disregard of Plaintiff's rights under the Copyright Act. Defendants
6 know that their acts are infringing and intentionally or recklessly disregard the law
7 by their conduct.
8
34.
These acts have caused and will continue to cause substantial
9 irreparable harm to Plaintiffs that cannot fully be compensated or measured in
10 money to Plaintiffs unless further infringement is enjoined and restrained by this
11
Court. Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law because damages would be
12 difficult to ascertain and Plaintiffs should not be expected to suffer the blatant
13
infringement in which Defendants are engaging or threatening to engage. The
14 balance of equities favors Plaintiffs because Defendants could easily cease their
15 operation of the infringing services whereas Plaintiffs' rights will be permanently
16 devalued if the infringing conduct continues. Finally, the public interest favors
17 injunctive relief because the goals of the Copyright Act, including increased
18 creation and output of creative works, will be undermined by the persisting
19 infringements committed by Defendants. Accordingly, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §
20 502, Plaintiffs are entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting
21
further infringements of Plaintiffs' copyrights.
22
23
24
(INDUCEMENT OF COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IN VIOLATION OF
25
Mitchell
Silberberg &
COUNT II
THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, ET SEQ.)
26
35.
Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every allegation set forth
Knupp LLP
27 in paragraphs 1 through 3 and paragraph 5 through 30, as though fully set forth
28
4650068.6
15
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1 herein.
2
36.
Users of the Hopper's PrimeTime AnyTime feature who record
3
Plaintiffs prime-time shows and use the Hopper's Auto Hop feature to
4
automatically skip commercials otherwise contained in those recordings infringe
5 Plaintiffs' exclusive reproduction rights under section 106 of the Copyright Act, 17
6
U.S.C. § 106(1).
7
37.
Users of the Hopper's PrimeTime Anytime feature who record
8
Plaintiffs prime-time shows and who store said recordings permanently or for long
9
periods of time for commercial-free viewings at times of their choosing infringe
10
Plaintiffs' exclusive reproduction rights under section 106 of the Copyright Act, 17
11
U.S.C. § 106(1).
12
38.
13
14
Plaintiffs have not authorized persons to engage in the acts described
in paragraphs 36 and 37 or consented to such acts.
39.
Defendants have induced the infringing acts, and the threatened
15 infringing acts, of their customers described above, in violation of sections 106 and
16 501 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 106 and 501. Defendants provide the
17 Hopper and its PrimeTime Anytime and Auto Hop features with the object of
18 promoting their use for infringement.
19
40.
Defendants' conduct demonstrates Defendants' purposeful promotion
20 of infringement. Among other things:
21
• Defendants have marketed the Hopper expressly for copying and
22
creating libraries of Plaintiffs' works and then viewing them
23
commercial free.
24
25
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
• Defendants' marketing efforts have included targeting known markets
for infringement, including consumers who wish to obtain access to
26
commercial-free programming without payment and consumers who
27
28
4650068.6
16
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1
wish to avoid paying market prices for permanent copies of
2
commercial-free programs.
• Defendants have expressly marketed their services as substitutes for
3
4
licensed methods of accessing Plaintiffs' works, including iTunes and
5
other video-on-demand services.
• Defendants have refused to use readily available technological means
6
7
to limit or prevent infringement by their customers. In fact,
8
Defendants expressly designed their services to facilitate infringement
9
and make infringing acts virtually effortless.
10
11
41.
Defendants' inducement of their customers' infringement is, and at all
times has been, willful, intentional, and purposeful, in knowing disregard of
12 Plaintiffs' rights under the Copyright Act. Defendants know that their acts are
13 inducing infringing conduct. Defendants intentionally or recklessly disregard the
14 law by their conduct. Plaintiffs have not authorized or consented to defendants'
15 conduct.
16
42.
Defendants' acts have caused and will continue to cause substantial
17 irreparable harm to Plaintiffs that cannot fully be compensated or measured in
18 money unless further infringement by Defendants is enjoined and restrained by this
19 Court. Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law because damages would be
20 difficult to ascertain and Plaintiffs should notbe expected to suffer Defendants'
21
blatant infringement. The balance of equities favor Plaintiffs because Defendants
22 could easily cease their operation of the infringing services whereas Plaintiffs'
23 rights will be permanently devalued if the infringing conduct continues. Finally,
24 the public interest favors injunctive relief because the goals of the Copyright Act,
25 including increased creation and output of creative works, will be undermined by
Mitchell
Silberberg &
26 the persisting infringements committed by Defendants' customers. Pursuant to 17
Knupp LLP
27
28
4650068.6
17
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1 U.S.C. § 502, Plaintiffs are entitled to preliminary and pennanent injunctions
2
prohibiting further infringements of Plaintiffs' copyrights.
3
4
COUNT III
5
(CONTRIBUTORY COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IN VIOLATION OF
6
THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, ET SEQ.)
7
43.
Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every allegation set forth
8
in paragraphs 1 through 3, paragraphs 5 through 30, and paragraphs 36 through 37,
9
as though fully set forth herein.
10
11
44.
By participating in, facilitating, assisting, enabling, materially
contributing to, and encouraging the infringing reproductions of Plaintiffs' works
12 described above in paragraphs 36 through 37, with full knowledge of their illegal
13 consequences, and with the ability to take simple measures to prevent or limit
14 infringement, Defendants are contributing to infringements of Plaintiffs'
15 copyrighted works, in violation of sections 106 and 501 of the Copyright Act, 17
16 U.S.C. §§ 106 and 501. Defendants make the infringement described above in
17
paragraphs 36 through 37 possible and provide the site and facilities for the
18
infringements.
19
45.
Defendants know or have reason to know of the actual or imminent
20 infringement of Plaintiff s copyrights. Indeed, on infonnation and belief,
21
Defendants monitor their customers' infringing activity and technologically and
22 personally assist their customers throughout their illegal acts. DISH Networks'
23 service agreement with its customers states that it collects infonnation regarding
24 "the programming service options [customers] have chosen." The agreement also
25 states: "When you use our interactive or other transactional television services, the
Mitchell
Silberberg &
26 satellite system automatically collects certain infonnation on your use of these
Knupp LLP
27
28
4650068,6
services."
18
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1
46.
Defendants' contributions to their customers' infringement have been
2 willful, intentional, and purposeful, in knowing disregard of Plaintiffs rights under
3 the Copyright Act. Defendants know that their acts are contributing to infringing
4
conduct and Defendants intentionally or recklessly disregard the law by their
5 conduct. Plaintiffs have not authorized or consented to Defendants' conduct.
6
47.
Defendants' acts have caused and will continue to cause substantial
7 irreparable harm that cannot fully be compensated or measured in money to
8 Plaintiffs unless further infringement by Defendants is enjoined and restrained by
9 this Court. Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law because damages would be
10
difficult to ascertain and Plaintiffs should not be expected to suffer Defendants'
11
blatant infringement. The balance of equities favors Plaintiffs because Defendants
12
could easily cease their operation of the infringing services whereas Plaintiffs'
13
rights will be permanently devalued if the infringing conduct continues. Finally,
14
the public interest favors injunctive relief because the goals of the Copyright Act,
15
including increased creation and output of creative works, will be undermined by
16
the persisting infringements committed by Defendants' customers. Pursuant to 17
17
U.S.C. § 502, Plaintiffs are entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctions
18
prohibiting further infringements of Plaintiffs' copyrights.
19
20
COUNT IV
21
(VICARIOUS COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IN VIOLATION OF THE
22
COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, ET SEQ.)
23
48.
Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every allegation set forth
24
25
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
in paragraphs 1 through 3, paragraphs 5 through 30, and paragraphs 36 through 37,
as though fully set forth herein.
26
27
28
4650068.6
49.
Defendants have the right and ability to supervise and control the
infringing conduct of their customers described above in paragraphs 36 and 37.
19
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1 DISH Networks' contract with their customers states:
2
We may add, delete, rearrange and/or change any and all
3
programming, programming packages and other Services that we
4
offer, as well as the prices and fees related to such programming,
5
programming packages and Services, at any time, including without
6
limitation, during any term commitment period to which you have
7
agreed.
8
50.
Defendants' regular involvement in their customers' copying is an
9 indispensable link in such infringing conduct. Defendants control their customers'
10 ability to record prime-time content and go to great lengths and efforts to enable
11
their customers to skip entire commercial segments. In order to achieve this goal,
12 Defendants must study the shows that are transmitted and make certain data
13
available to the devices resident in the homes of customers. Absent Defendants'
14 conduct, customers simply could not automatically skip commercials.
15
51.
On information and belief, all of the infringing activity is actively
16 monitored by Defendants. DISH Networks' service agreement with its customers
17 states that it collects information regarding "the programming service options
18 [customers] have chosen." The agreement also states: "When you use our
19 interactive or other transactional television services, the satellite system
20 automatically collects certain information on your use of these services."
21
52.
Defendants also receive a direct financial benefit from the
22 infringement described above in paragraphs 36 through 37 above. Plaintiffis
23
informed and believes, and therefore alleges, that Defendants have attracted,
24 obtained and retained customers as a result of their infringing offerings. The
25 PrimeTime Anytime and Auto Hop features constitute draws to Defendants'
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
26 services. Defendants actively advertise the infringing capabilities of the Hopper.
27 And, Defendants receive subscription payments from customers who possess the
28
4650068.6
20
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1 Hopper.
2
53.
Defendants' refusal to stop or limit its customers' infringements has
3 been willful, intentional, and purposeful, in knowing disregard of Plaintiffs' rights
4 under the Copyright Act. Defendants know that their acts are contributing to
5 infringing conduct and Defendants intentionally or recklessly disregard the law by
6 their conduct. Plaintiffs have not authorized or consented to Defendants' conduct.
7
54.
Defendants' acts have caused and will continue to cause substantial
8 irreparable harm to Plaintiffs that cannot fully be compensated or measured in
9 money unless further infringement by Defendants is enjoined and restrained by this
10 Court. Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law because damages would be
11
difficult to ascertain and Plaintiffs should not be expected to suffer Defendants'
12 blatant infringement. The balance of equities favor Plaintiffs because Defendants
13 could easily cease their operation of the infringing services whereas Plaintiffs'
14 rights will be permanently devalued if the infringement continues. Finally, the
15 public interest favors injunctive relief because the goals of the Copyright Act,
16 including increased creation and output of creative works, will be undermined by
17 the persisting infringements committed by Defendants' customers. Pursuant to 17
18 U.S.C. § 502, Plaintiffs are entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctions
19 prohibiting further infringements of Plaintiffs' copyrights.
20
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
21
22
23
24
25
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that this Court enter judgment in their favor
and against Defendants, and each of them, as follows:
(a)
On Counts I through IV, preliminarily and permanently enjoin,
pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502, Defendants, their respective officers, agents, servants,
26 employees, and those persons in active concert or participation with Defendants, or
27 any of them, from inducing infringement or directly, contributorily, and/or
28
4650068.6
21
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
1 vicariously infringing by any means, including but not limited to specifically in
2
connection with the Hopper's PrimeTime Anytime and Auto Hop features,
3 Plaintiffs' exclusive rights under the Copyright Act, including, but not limited to
4
any of Plaintiffs' rights in any of the works listed on Exhibit A, and from licensing
5
any other person to do the same;
6
7
8
9
10
11
(b)
award Plaintiffs statutory damages in accordance with 17 U.S.C. §
504 and other applicable law;
(c)
award Plaintiffs costs and reasonable attorneys' fees in accordance
with 17 U.S.C. § 505, and other applicable law; and
(d)
award Plaintiffs such further and additional relief as the Court may
deem just and proper.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DATED: May 24, 2012
ROBERT H. ROTSTEIN
PATRICIA H. BENSON
JEAN PIERRE NOGUES
MITCHE)f SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
'--;/~
R~~~~
A~rneyS for Plaintiffs,
Survivor Productions LLC, CBS
Broadcasting Inc., and CBS Studios Inc.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Mitchell
Silberberg &
26
Knupp LLP
27
28
4650068.6
22
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INDUCEMENT, CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT,
AND VICARIOUS INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT
EXHIBIT A - SCHEDULE OF WORKS
1. 60 Minutes: May 13,2012 (application for copyright registration submitted May 22,
2012) - CBS Broadcasting Inc.
2. Blue Bloods, Black and Blue (copyright registration no. PA 1-768-102, Dec. 19, 2011)
CBS Studios Inc.
3. Blue Bloods, Lonely Hearts Club (copyright registration no. PA 1-768-012, Dec. 19,
2011) - CBS Studios Inc.
4. CSI: Miami, By the Book (copyright registration no. PA 1-766-l33, Nov. 23,2011)
CBS Broadcasting Inc.
5. CSI: NY, Officer Involved (copyright registration no. PA 1-759-640, November 7,2011)
- CBS Broadcasting Inc.
6. CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, Genetic Disorder (copyright registration no. PA 1-771490, Jan. 17,2012) CBS Broadcasting Inc.
7. CSI: NY, Air Apparent (copyright registration PA 1-765-824, Nov. 16,2011) - CBS
Broadcasting Inc.
8. The Good Wife, Get A Room (copyright registration no. PA 1-768-219, Dec. 12,2011)CBS Studios Inc.
9. NCIS, Secrets (copyright registration no. PA 1-778-988, Mar. 13,2012) - CBS Studios
Inc.
10. NCIS: Los Angeles, Greed (copyright registration no. PA 1-768-118, Dec. 19,2011)CBS Studios Inc.
11. NCIS, Engaged Part 1 (copyright registration no. PA 1-768-452, Dec. 19,2011) - CBS
Studios Inc.
12. NCIS, Engaged Part 2 (copyright registration no. PA 1-768-447, Dec. 19,2011)
Studios Inc.
CBS
13. Survivor: One World, Perception is Not Always Reality (application for copyright
registration filed May 24, 2012) - Survivor Productions LLC
4653327.1
ExhibkA
Pa~e.e5 '2
'l
)
r
tI'lillwl' OVR
__
D!<:'H ti'JPI)t'r
....
Hopp .. r \t.'hok HOI1lf" DIIR
r...
dish
[)I~H
Window .. Inlt>tlu" f )(11Iorf"r prc.vKit'd by '-lSI(
_ ~~:_~~__~____~_~~_:~_""'_.:=_::~__________________
_____
MOVIES
_ ___________________________________
Music
Q.
CURRENT CUSTOMER
L_l
APPS
OlshLATINO
SEARCH
REVIEWS
J
FEATURES
SUPPORT
PRIMEllME ANYTIME
ENTERTAINMENT
WHOLE-HOUE HD DVR
~~Lj~_:,~~:_~~~--,"~:_~':'.:::.:':~::~_________________________ __________________________
fill
4650336.1/44025·00003
,.~
~
~~
:s
ta~
)
,)
£H"-H
WItW'lWS hlt~m~t f)(~r~t' ptovKfe-d by MSk
'f,
X
"'CJI:SI<_~: ....... "",:,::"l&i
MOVIES
WHOLE-HOME HO OVR SERVICE.
tmked It: {'upper
UPlO
-.x.D
""'III
,. ~
~t».2P,
Ueqwtf;s d
REVIEWS
you can record a movie in the living room, start watching it in the bedroom and then finish in the kitchen. Watch our video to learn more
Full HD DVR functionality on every TV, so you can pause, rewind and record live TV in any room. Plus, you can access your DVR library on all TVs so
I" m':"li Hopp .... " H!>PPl't llVR l1oPPt>r Wnol~ t1nrth~ fWQ.
4650336.1/44025-00003
.".~
_-- iII.
i'!,jf;~i;';~1!.1
........
x ••
~
tIl
t
~ f
')
,)
r
OiSH Hoppe," H()ppcr{)Vk
~
Hopper whole Horne [)Vk
fa
A
DISH
WHOLE·HOME HO DVR
Wmdows lntel'o('t (xplQrcrpflbvKled by f1SK
OVERVIEW
$!Jllffl'r::r !;) tJ\tfj.tapill(/' CJnly
Massive 2 TB Hard Drive.
miss less of your favorite programs.
TVs simultaneously. That means you can watch more and
choosing, and stream four recorded HD programs to different
including your 4 local HD networks and 2 channels of your
Record up to six live HD channels at once during primetime,
TM.
Record up to 6 HD Channels at Once with
PrimeTime Anytime
F{)t}/(iil:1 mus[ 0& enabiefl!Jj, cuswrr;m drllj
awuiabfe U'IU~ f)idyb~f'::k :]t Sl)j(~ct stlnlVS
NBC in HD. Only on the Hopper. Only from DISH.
skip commercials in primetime TV· on ABC, CBS, FOX and
can save an hour each night" Now you can automatically
Hate commercials? DISH created commercial-free TV so you
WATCH COMMERICAL-FREE TV
HOPPER
0'\;. _ _ _
..
4650336.1/44025-00003
't X ..
FEAIDRES
APPS
~Il':5H~~ ....... "",~,:,xl~l
PRIMElIME ANY11ME
PopMech
MOVIES
REVIEWS
.~
'h~;;li-' rWR
•
01st1
WHOt.E-HOME HD DVR
¥,b'Hk.w'~!flt('nwt E-'q)I(.n·~ pf'<;)vld~ by NS-
OVERVIEW
a urlve.
..................... X .•..
.-
APPS
MOVIES
Watch our video to learn more
t{t~..Jti!I
..:d
j
x • • t!I...... _..... __..._... __................._............._..._.. _...........:::J
REVIEWS
ABC, CBS, FOX and NBC in HD.
can also automatically skip commercials in primetime TV -
you can save your favorite pnmetime content forever. You
you On Demand for up to 8 days from initial air date. Plus
three hours of HD primetime programming are available to
With the Hopper's exclusive feature, PrimeTime Anytime TM,
PHIMETIME ANYTIMFM.
FEAlURES
~.~_·_-:·:·~W
.I
PRIMElIME ANYlIME
I
I
,
,
..
.... '"
....
.....
TV
_ CIIIlIlI •• dIII
from any TV provider! Plus, hundreds of On Demand titles are
Record and store up to 2,000 hours - the most available
available for instant viewing.
NEVER MISS
A SHOW WITH
HO,... . .COtlOS
UP TO • SHOWS DUAIIiIG
PRtMITIMI HOURS
-~~~~~~~~----~------------~I~
.!.I-
4650336.1/44025-00003
~~I
=Silt
'tltf
)
)
r
OT"H H(~pf.li'r
Hoppl't ovn
H'!fJp.·.- WtH'k" HU!ll~ f)VR
m....
""'A(
PRIMEl1ME ANYllME
FEATURES
MOVIES
REVIEWS
....._..__....... _.~...............__ .. _______ ......
APPS
can also automatically skip commercials in primetime TV
ABC, CBS, FOX and NBC in HD.
Watch our video to learn more
w:
_
_
COfmnercidU1BB TV feature Off!)' avail3b{e f;x playtJacr. of CB(1810 HD pfimAtinw
ShOWS on ABC. CBS rox and NBC with Pnme Time Anvt:me teatwB. FunctiO.ns
must be (mat)/f!(j by custorner and £}ff) subject to (1wJliablit:y
srs@
TruVolume
WHOLE-HOME HD DVR
WU'Idrw.o;: Intt'frH't f)(lm)f(~r ~u'ovtdt!d by
FEATURES.
"U"...,....."'·......,K...UP TO I PlOWS DUllIIIG
PRlIlPIMI HOURS
OVERVIEW
~~~~~~~~~==================~~--~~:.~.rr~.X~ii~I~~~.~~~~:~:~~
--.-.--.
. ~-.~:. ...
.j
4650336.1/44025-00003
••
~
W'
~.~~,~
l(
-- . .
1£
bO
G)
~J~
~
)(
u:.lJ:
)
)
I'
Huppl>' nVR
_
I'4()PPt'r Wtl(."· Hom+' OVR
OISH
WlIldov.,; Internf't fH I1(JI'P,'f
FIoIlclt
<,
4650336.1/44025-00003
~~
111-
l:1W.ctI.!!J
••
~.~.~.".
..l<
J
1£
~
~ ~
PJIf
")
)
I'
A
OVERVIEW
.oiJ!"t";,X;, ., ..iJDl!l'iti!:ll:lPCr~~O.h •• )(I~{W,I.. _
.. ,_ ,.....,. __._ _
.. ..... LJt.:a
SIRIUSXM SATELLITE RADIO
REVIEWS
Music lovers will love this. Only DISH offers
MOVIES
TV Everywhere'" Technology.
over 70 channels of SiriusXM satellite radio, the
APPS
Connect your Hopper to the Sling® Adapter and
same music channels available in your car, with
FEATURES
experience TV Everywhere 1M brand technology
America's Top 120, DishLATINO Clasico, and
PRIMEllME ANYTIME
from DISH. Watch live TV programming and
higher packages. DISH is the only pay TV
provider to give you SiriusXM satellite music.
DVR recordings anywhere you travel. Watch
AijHVft:f '!<'ClilJ separately
•
Video
WHOLE-HOME HD DVR
DI"'~l Hnppef" t10pp ... r DVR· lipppel Wh{)~j> t!OIHt' IJVR - DI'!oti" Wf!ldow.. \r,tt'vtjlf,:t b
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?