MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 300

RESPONSE in Opposition re #294 MOTION for Protective Order for the Deposition of Plaintiffs' Litigation Counsel filed by ROBERT DEAN, MATTHEW DRUMMOND, DUKE UNIVERSITY, AARON GRAVES, GARY N. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Flannery Deposition Excerpt, #2 Exhibit 2 - 2007-01-31 Emails between Hendricks & Ekstrand, #3 Exhibit 3 - Tkac Deposition Excerpt, #4 Exhibit 4 - McDevitt Deposition Excerpt, #5 Exhibit 5 - 2012-02-14 Document Subpoena to Bob Ekstrand, #6 Exhibit 6 - 2012-02-14 Document Subpoena to Ekstrand & Ekstrand, #7 Exhibit 7 - 2012-02-14 Testimony Subpoena to Robert Ekstrand, #8 Exhibit 8 - 2012-03-14 Objections to Subpoenas, #9 Exhibit 9 - 2012-03-31 Email from Stefanie Sparks, #10 Exhibit 10 - 2012-08-14 Carrington Plaintiffs' Supplemental Initial Disclosures, #11 Exhibit 11 - 2012-08-17 Testimony Subpoena to Stefanie Sparks Smith, #12 Exhibit 12 - 2012-08-31 Objection to Subpoena, #13 Exhibit 13 - 2011-10-03 Duke's Defendants' Initial Disclosures in Carrington, #14 Exhibit 14 - Dowd Deposition Excerpt, #15 Exhibit 15 - Schoeffel Deposition Excerpt, #16 Exhibit 16 - Koesterer Deposition Excerpt, #17 Exhibit 17 - 2007-02-15 Letter from Cheshire to Coman, #18 Exhibit 18 - Catalino Deposition Excerpt, #19 Exhibit 19 - Clute Deposition Excerpt, #20 Exhibit 20 - Jennison Deposition Excerpt, #21 Exhibit 21 - Archer Deposition Excerpt, #22 Exhibit 22 - Oppedisano Deposition Excerpt, #23 Exhibit 23 - Sherwood Deposition Excerpt, #24 Exhibit 24 - Common Representation Agreement, #25 Exhibit 25 - McFadyen Deposition Excerpt)(FALCONE, JEREMY)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 21 Page 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 1:07-CV-00953 RYAN MCFADYEN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________/ *** ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY *** VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF BRECK BERNARD ARCHER (Taken by Defendants) Durham, North Carolina Thursday, April 19th, 2012 Reported in Stenotype by Sophie Brock, RPR, CRR Transcript produced by computer-aided transcription Page 234 1 time to review every single piece of -- you know, 2 every single document related to the -- you know, not 3 just the Judicial Board process, but the university 4 policies. 5 Even though, I mean, I've been provided, 6 but, as I said, I've -- I've been in a training 7 program. 8 when I was done, but I've been living in a barracks 9 for a month without Internet access or phone I was trying to do this deposition in June 10 reception, so -- and I got married last week, for the 11 record. I've said it before, I'm sorry. 12 But I just wish I -- I could have. I -- 13 from -- from the extent of my knowledge, I mean, those 14 are just a few I'm listing, and I wish we could 15 just -- I mean, if I had more time to -- to review 16 everything with counsel, obviously, I could bring up 17 more specific incidents -- more specific grounds -- 18 BY MR. SEGARS 19 Q. Just sitting here today, though, unaided by 20 anything else, can you tell me any other things that 21 you think were breaches of contract? 22 MS. SMITH: I mean -- objection. 23 To the extent that that is calling for work 24 product and opinion from counsel, things that we have 25 discussed, I'd instruct you not to answer.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?