MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 300

RESPONSE in Opposition re #294 MOTION for Protective Order for the Deposition of Plaintiffs' Litigation Counsel filed by ROBERT DEAN, MATTHEW DRUMMOND, DUKE UNIVERSITY, AARON GRAVES, GARY N. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Flannery Deposition Excerpt, #2 Exhibit 2 - 2007-01-31 Emails between Hendricks & Ekstrand, #3 Exhibit 3 - Tkac Deposition Excerpt, #4 Exhibit 4 - McDevitt Deposition Excerpt, #5 Exhibit 5 - 2012-02-14 Document Subpoena to Bob Ekstrand, #6 Exhibit 6 - 2012-02-14 Document Subpoena to Ekstrand & Ekstrand, #7 Exhibit 7 - 2012-02-14 Testimony Subpoena to Robert Ekstrand, #8 Exhibit 8 - 2012-03-14 Objections to Subpoenas, #9 Exhibit 9 - 2012-03-31 Email from Stefanie Sparks, #10 Exhibit 10 - 2012-08-14 Carrington Plaintiffs' Supplemental Initial Disclosures, #11 Exhibit 11 - 2012-08-17 Testimony Subpoena to Stefanie Sparks Smith, #12 Exhibit 12 - 2012-08-31 Objection to Subpoena, #13 Exhibit 13 - 2011-10-03 Duke's Defendants' Initial Disclosures in Carrington, #14 Exhibit 14 - Dowd Deposition Excerpt, #15 Exhibit 15 - Schoeffel Deposition Excerpt, #16 Exhibit 16 - Koesterer Deposition Excerpt, #17 Exhibit 17 - 2007-02-15 Letter from Cheshire to Coman, #18 Exhibit 18 - Catalino Deposition Excerpt, #19 Exhibit 19 - Clute Deposition Excerpt, #20 Exhibit 20 - Jennison Deposition Excerpt, #21 Exhibit 21 - Archer Deposition Excerpt, #22 Exhibit 22 - Oppedisano Deposition Excerpt, #23 Exhibit 23 - Sherwood Deposition Excerpt, #24 Exhibit 24 - Common Representation Agreement, #25 Exhibit 25 - McFadyen Deposition Excerpt)(FALCONE, JEREMY)

EXHIBIT 23

Page 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

EDWARD CARRINGTON, et al.,

)
)
Plaintiffs,
) Civil Action No.
)
v.
) 1:08-CV-00119
)
DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
________________________________/

Videotaped Deposition of DEVON D. SHERWOOD
(Taken by Defendant)
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Washington, DC

Reported By: Lee Bursten, RPR, CRR

Page 126
1

Q

Sure.

When did you decide that you were

2

not going to retain a lawyer in connection with

3

Ms. Mangum's allegations?

4

MR. GUSTAFSON:

5
6

I have the same objection,

that it mischaracterizes the testimony.
A

I wasn't going to -- I wasn't charged at

7

that moment with any kind of -- I wasn't accused of

8

raping anyone at the moment.

9

I didn't need a lawyer at that particular time, at

10

that moment.

11

So at that time, I felt

BY MR. SEGARS:

12

Q

In your answer to interrogatory number 9,

13

you make reference to the meetings that were held by

14

Mr. Ekstrand; do you see that?

15

A

I do.

16

Q

How many meetings did you attend that were

17
18

held by Mr. Ekstrand?
A

I don't remember the exact number of

19

meetings.

I would say I attended about anywhere from

20

two to four meetings.

21

Q

And where did those meetings take place?

22

A

In his office on 9th Street.

23

Q

And who else participated in the meetings?

24

A

In terms of who?

25

Q

Who else was present at the meetings?

With regards to who?