Rockstar Consortium US LP et al v. Google Inc
RESPONSE in Opposition re 122 MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' Patent Rule 3-1 Infringement Contentions filed by NetStar Technologies LLC, Rockstar Consortium US LP. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Shawn D. Blackburn, # 2 Exhibit 1 - Rockstar's P.R. 3-1 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions, # 3 Exhibit 2 - Rockstar's P.R. 3-1 Infringement Claim Chart for '065, # 4 Exhibit 3 - Rockstar's P.R. 3-1 Infringement Claim Chart for '969, # 5 Exhibit 4 - Rockstar's P.R. 3-1 Infringement Claim Chart for '245, # 6 Exhibit 5 - Rockstar's P.R. 3-1 Infringement Claim Chart for '970, # 7 Exhibit 6 - Rockstar's P.R. 3-1 Infringement Claim Chart for '178, # 8 Exhibit 7 - Rockstar's P.R. 3-1 Infringement Claim Chart for '183, # 9 Exhibit 8 - Rockstar's P.R. 3-1 Infringement Claim Chart for '883, # 10 Exhibit 9 - 4-14-14 email between counsel, # 11 Exhibit 10 - 4-18-14 email between counsel, # 12 Exhibit 11 - 7-3-14 email between counsel, # 13 Exhibit 12 - 7-8-14 email between counsel, # 14 Exhibit 13 - 7-24-14 email between counsel, # 15 Exhibit 14 - 8-27-14 email between counsel, # 16 Exhibit 15 - 6-23-14 email between counsel, # 17 Text of Proposed Order)(Blackburn, Shawn)
Tuesday, July 08, 2014 2:59 PM
Andrea P Roberts; Lance Yang; John Lahad; Justin A. Nelson
Alexander L. Kaplan; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'; 'email@example.com';
'firstname.lastname@example.org'; 'email@example.com'; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'; Max L. Tribble;
Kristin Malone; Parker Folse; Cyndi Obuz; John Dolan; Shawn Blackburn; QE-GoogleRockstar; 'James Mark Mann'; 'Andy Tindel'; 'Gregory Blake Thompson'; Stacy Schulze;
Tammie J. DeNio
RE: Rockstar v. Google
Edward D Ioli Trust v Avigilon Corp.pdf
Per David’s request on today’s call, please see the attached case regarding Google’s obligation to produce source code
along with its invalidity contentions per the Patent Local Rules. Judge Gilstrap held that “[t]his District’s P.R. 3-4(a)
requires the alleged infringer to produce any and all documents describing the operation of any aspects or elements of
an accused instrumentality,” and that P.R. 3-4(a) “clearly covers source code, regardless of what additional materials
may exist to disclose the functionality of the technology at issue.” Edward D. Ioli Trust v. Avigilon Corp., No. 10-CV-605JRG, 2012 WL 5830711, at *3 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2012) (Gilstrap, J.) (emphasis added).
Amanda Bonn | Susman Godfrey LLP
1901 Ave. of the Stars, Suite 950 | Los Angeles, CA 90067
(T) 310-789-3131 | (M) 408-832-5193 email@example.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?