Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 845

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Invalidity (Renewed) by Yahoo! Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Alexey Kuznetsov - DX-48, #3 Exhibit 2 - Source Code - key.c - DX-37, #4 Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent 5,121,495 - DX-65, #5 Exhibit 4 - Application Approval for Filing - DX-57, #6 Exhibit 5 - U. S. Patent 6,119,214 - DX101, #7 Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent 4,996,663 - DX-64, #8 Exhibit 7 - Donald Knuth, Sorting and Searching, vol. 3, of The Art of Computer Programming - DX-98, #9 Exhibit 8 - Kruse, "Data Structures and Program Design" - DX-108, #10 Exhibit 9 - Daniel F. Stubbs and Neil W. Webre, Data Structures with Abstract Data Types and Pascal - DX-118, #11 Exhibit 10 - Kuznetsov email to Day re contact request - DX-436, #12 Exhibit 11 - Absher email to Kuznetsov re Linux route.c question - DX-440, #13 Exhibit 12 - Kuznetsov email to Absher re Linux route.c question - DX-441)(Doan, Jennifer)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES
LLC,
PLAINTIFF

§
§
§
§
VS.
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-cv-269-LED-JDL
§
SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., §
§
DEFENDANTS
§

ORDER
Before the Court is Yahoo! Inc.’s (“Yahoo!”) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter
of Law Regarding Invalidity. The Court, having reviewed the motion and being well-advised,
finds that the motion should be GRANTED.
It is therefore ordered that claims 1 and 2 of the ’120 patent are invalid.
SO ORDERED.

ORDER – Solo Page