Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
1244
Proposed Pretrial Order by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27)(McKool, Mike) Modified on 1/17/2012 (mjc, ). Modified on 1/17/2012 (mjc, ).
EXHIBIT 6
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC.,
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC.,
ARGOSY PUBLISHING, INC.,
BLOCKBUSTER INC., CDW CORP.,
CITIGROUP INC., EBAY INC., FRITOLAY, INC., THE GO DADDY GROUP,
INC., GOOGLE INC., J.C. PENNEY
COMPANY, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE
& CO., NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC.,
OFFICE DEPOT, INC., PEROT
SYSTEMS CORP., PLAYBOY
ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
RENT-A-CENTER, INC., STAPLES,
INC., SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC.,
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC., YAHOO!
INC., and YOUTUBE, LLC
DEFENDANTS.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-CV-446
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. AND YOUTUBE LLC’S FIRST AMENDED TRIAL
WITNESS LIST
Pursuant to the Court’s Discovery Order and Rule 26(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, Defendants Google Inc. and YouTube LLC (“together, “Google”) submit the following
lists of witnesses whom Google expects to present at trial, may call if the need arises, or expects to
present by deposition testimony. Google hereby incorporates by reference the witness lists of the
other defendants in this case. Google also reserves the right to call any Google, other Defendant,
Eolas, or third party witness who has been or may be deposed in this case. Google reserves the right
to call as witnesses any individuals found on Plaintiff Eolas Technologies Inc.’s (“Eolas”) witness
list, or the witness list of any of the other defendants in this lawsuit, and reserves the right to call
additional rebuttal witnesses. Google further identifies any persons identified in Eolas’ initial
disclosures, interrogatory responses, and expert reports not identified below.
Google reserves the right so supplement, augment, or otherwise modify this list based on
circumstances as they may evolve. At this time, Google identifies the following witnesses for trial:
Witness
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Albert Bodenhamer
Google, Inc.
Keith Coleman
Google, Inc.
Jonathan Effrat
Google, Inc.
Matthew Gray
Google, Inc.
Mark Martel
Google, Inc.
Shishir Mehrotra
Google, Inc.
Jason Miller
Google, Inc.
Sundar Pichai
Google, Inc.
Brian Rakowski
Google, Inc.
Bart Sears
Google, Inc.
Hunter Walk
Google, Inc.
Peter Alexander
Expert Witness
M. Ray Perryman
Expert Witness
Dan Sadowski
Expert Witness
Richard Phillips
Expert Witness
Expect to
Present at
Trial
Topic
Google Products &
Services
Google Products &
Services
Google Products &
Services
Google Products &
Services
Google Products &
Services
Google Products &
Services
Google Products &
Services
Google Products &
Services
Google Products &
Services
Google Products &
Services
Google Products &
Services
Expect to
Present by
Deposition
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Non-Infringement
X
Damages
X
Prior Art & Invalidity
X
Prior Art & Invalidity
X
2
May Call if
Need Arises
X
Nick Godici
Expert Witness
Tim Berners-Lee
17. Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, W3C
Chris McRae
18.
NetApp, Inc.
Bill Janssen
19. Palo Alto Research
Center, Inc.
16.
Invalidity/Inequitable
Conduct
X
Prior Art & Invalidity
X
X
Prior Art & Invalidity
X
X
Prior Art & Invalidity
X
X
20. Eric Bina
Prior Art & Invalidity
X
X
21. Pei-Yuan Wei
Prior Art & Invalidity
Prior Art & Invalidity
X
X
Prior Art & Invalidity
X
X
David Raggett
W3C
Dale Dougherty
O’Reilly & Associates
23.
Publishing; Maker
Media
Scott Silvey
24. Ohio St. University
Medical Ctr.
Karl Jacob
25.
Coveroo, Inc.
22.
Prior Art & Invalidity
X
X
Prior Art & Invalidity
X
26. Bill Tucker
X
27. Bill Baker
X
28. Chuck Rzeszutko
X
29. Sunita Rajdev
X
30. Charles Krueger
X
31. Charles Kulas
X
32. Cheong Ang
X
33. James Stetson
X
34. Mark Swords
X
36. Michael D. Doyle
X
37. David C. Martin
X
38. Alicia Gackle
X
39. Brandy Hernandez
X
3
X
X
Dated: January 16, 2012
/s/ Brandon H. Stroy
Douglas E. Lumish
dlumish@kasowitz.com
Jeffrey G. Homrig
jhomrig@kasowitz.com
Jonathan K. Waldrop (pro hac vice)
jwaldrop@kasowitz.com
Joseph H. Lee (pro hac vice)
jlee@kasowitz.com
Parker C. Ankrum (pro hac vice)
pankrum@kasowitz.com
KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES & FRIEDMAN
LLP
333 Twin Dophin Dr., Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 453-5170
Facsimile:
(650) 453-5171
James R. Batchelder (pro hac vice)
james.batchelder@ropesgray.com
Sasha G. Rao (pro hac vice)
sasha.rao@ropesgray.com
Mark D. Rowland
mark.rowland@ropesgray.com
Brandon Stroy (pro hac vice)
brandon.stroy@ropesgray.com
Rebecca R. Hermes (pro hac vice)
rebecca.hermes@ropesgray.com
Lauren N. Robinson (pro hac vice)
lauren.robinson@ropesgray.com
Han Xu (pro hac vice)
han.xu@ropesgray.com
ROPES & GRAY LLP
1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor
East Palo Alto, California 94303-2284
Telephone: (650) 617-4000
Facsimile: (650) 617-4090
Michael E. Jones (Bar No. 10929400)
mikejones@potterminton.com
Allen F. Gardner (Bar No. 24043679)
allengardner@potterminton.com
POTTER MINTON
4
A Professional Corporation
110 N. College, Suite 500
Tyler, TX 75702
Telephone: (903) 597-8311
Facsimile:
(903) 593-0846
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
GOOGLE INC. & YOUTUBE LLC
5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local
Rule CV-5(a)(3), on this 16th day of January, 2012.
_/s/ Brandon H. Stroy_________
Brandon H. Stroy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?