Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1244

Proposed Pretrial Order by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27)(McKool, Mike) Modified on 1/17/2012 (mjc, ). Modified on 1/17/2012 (mjc, ).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 6 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED PLAINTIFF, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., ARGOSY PUBLISHING, INC., BLOCKBUSTER INC., CDW CORP., CITIGROUP INC., EBAY INC., FRITOLAY, INC., THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC., GOOGLE INC., J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC., OFFICE DEPOT, INC., PEROT SYSTEMS CORP., PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC., RENT-A-CENTER, INC., STAPLES, INC., SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC., TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC., YAHOO! INC., and YOUTUBE, LLC DEFENDANTS. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-CV-446 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. AND YOUTUBE LLC’S FIRST AMENDED TRIAL WITNESS LIST Pursuant to the Court’s Discovery Order and Rule 26(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants Google Inc. and YouTube LLC (“together, “Google”) submit the following lists of witnesses whom Google expects to present at trial, may call if the need arises, or expects to present by deposition testimony. Google hereby incorporates by reference the witness lists of the other defendants in this case. Google also reserves the right to call any Google, other Defendant, Eolas, or third party witness who has been or may be deposed in this case. Google reserves the right to call as witnesses any individuals found on Plaintiff Eolas Technologies Inc.’s (“Eolas”) witness list, or the witness list of any of the other defendants in this lawsuit, and reserves the right to call additional rebuttal witnesses. Google further identifies any persons identified in Eolas’ initial disclosures, interrogatory responses, and expert reports not identified below. Google reserves the right so supplement, augment, or otherwise modify this list based on circumstances as they may evolve. At this time, Google identifies the following witnesses for trial: Witness 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Albert Bodenhamer Google, Inc. Keith Coleman Google, Inc. Jonathan Effrat Google, Inc. Matthew Gray Google, Inc. Mark Martel Google, Inc. Shishir Mehrotra Google, Inc. Jason Miller Google, Inc. Sundar Pichai Google, Inc. Brian Rakowski Google, Inc. Bart Sears Google, Inc. Hunter Walk Google, Inc. Peter Alexander Expert Witness M. Ray Perryman Expert Witness Dan Sadowski Expert Witness Richard Phillips Expert Witness Expect to Present at Trial Topic Google Products & Services Google Products & Services Google Products & Services Google Products & Services Google Products & Services Google Products & Services Google Products & Services Google Products & Services Google Products & Services Google Products & Services Google Products & Services Expect to Present by Deposition X X X X X X X X X X X Non-Infringement X Damages X Prior Art & Invalidity X Prior Art & Invalidity X 2 May Call if Need Arises X Nick Godici Expert Witness Tim Berners-Lee 17. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, W3C Chris McRae 18. NetApp, Inc. Bill Janssen 19. Palo Alto Research Center, Inc. 16. Invalidity/Inequitable Conduct X Prior Art & Invalidity X X Prior Art & Invalidity X X Prior Art & Invalidity X X 20. Eric Bina Prior Art & Invalidity X X 21. Pei-Yuan Wei Prior Art & Invalidity Prior Art & Invalidity X X Prior Art & Invalidity X X David Raggett W3C Dale Dougherty O’Reilly & Associates 23. Publishing; Maker Media Scott Silvey 24. Ohio St. University Medical Ctr. Karl Jacob 25. Coveroo, Inc. 22. Prior Art & Invalidity X X Prior Art & Invalidity X 26. Bill Tucker X 27. Bill Baker X 28. Chuck Rzeszutko X 29. Sunita Rajdev X 30. Charles Krueger X 31. Charles Kulas X 32. Cheong Ang X 33. James Stetson X 34. Mark Swords X 36. Michael D. Doyle X 37. David C. Martin X 38. Alicia Gackle X 39. Brandy Hernandez X 3 X X Dated: January 16, 2012 /s/ Brandon H. Stroy Douglas E. Lumish dlumish@kasowitz.com Jeffrey G. Homrig jhomrig@kasowitz.com Jonathan K. Waldrop (pro hac vice) jwaldrop@kasowitz.com Joseph H. Lee (pro hac vice) jlee@kasowitz.com Parker C. Ankrum (pro hac vice) pankrum@kasowitz.com KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP 333 Twin Dophin Dr., Suite 200 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 453-5170 Facsimile: (650) 453-5171 James R. Batchelder (pro hac vice) james.batchelder@ropesgray.com Sasha G. Rao (pro hac vice) sasha.rao@ropesgray.com Mark D. Rowland mark.rowland@ropesgray.com Brandon Stroy (pro hac vice) brandon.stroy@ropesgray.com Rebecca R. Hermes (pro hac vice) rebecca.hermes@ropesgray.com Lauren N. Robinson (pro hac vice) lauren.robinson@ropesgray.com Han Xu (pro hac vice) han.xu@ropesgray.com ROPES & GRAY LLP 1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor East Palo Alto, California 94303-2284 Telephone: (650) 617-4000 Facsimile: (650) 617-4090 Michael E. Jones (Bar No. 10929400) mikejones@potterminton.com Allen F. Gardner (Bar No. 24043679) allengardner@potterminton.com POTTER MINTON 4 A Professional Corporation 110 N. College, Suite 500 Tyler, TX 75702 Telephone: (903) 597-8311 Facsimile: (903) 593-0846 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. & YOUTUBE LLC 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3), on this 16th day of January, 2012. _/s/ Brandon H. Stroy_________ Brandon H. Stroy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?