Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1244

Proposed Pretrial Order by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27)(McKool, Mike) Modified on 1/17/2012 (mjc, ). Modified on 1/17/2012 (mjc, ).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ) Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446 Jury Demanded DEFENDANT STAPLES, INC.’S WITNESS LIST COMES NOW defendant and counterclaim plaintiff Staples Incorporated (“Staples”), and files its Trial Witness List and hereby identifies the following trial witnesses whom Staples will or may call to testify before the jury during the trial commencing October 11, 2011. I. WITNESSES STAPLES WILL CALL Staples will call the following witnesses live to testify before the jury at the trial of this matter: • Michael Doyle; • Nicholas Godici; • Richard Phillips; • Brian Tilzer; • Adam Candela; • Adam Chace; -1- • Steve Gribble; and • Julie L. Davis. Staples reserves the right to supplement its Trial Witness List as allowed by law. II. WITNESSES STAPLES MAY CALL Staples may call the following witnesses live to testify before the jury at the trial of this matter: • David Mastovsky; • Benjamin Peck; • Thomas Tobin; • Mark Connolly; • Karyn King; • Robert Vareschi; • Carrie Bourke; • Kavita Baball; • Scott Zakrajsek; • Anabela Perozek; • Cheong S. Ang; • David C. Martin; • Charles E. Krueger; • Marc Andreessen; • Eric Bina; • Tim Berners-Lee; • John Cahill; • Dale P. Dougherty; -2- • Alicia Gackle; • Brandy Hernandez; • Jim Stetson; • George Toye; • Karl A. Jacob; • Tony Johnson; • Bill Janssen; • Charles Kulas; • Dave Raggett; • Scott Silvey; • Mark Swords; • Danny Goodman; • Joseph Hardin; • Pei-Yuan “Perry” Wei; • Terry Winograd; and • Michael Woods. Staples reserves the right to supplement its Trial Witness List as allowed by law. III. WITNESSES STAPLES EXPECTS TO PRESENT BY DEPOSITION Staples may call by deposition each and every Eolas or third-party witness deposed by defendants during discovery. Staples may also call by deposition Staples witnesses who have been or may be deposed. Staples notes that not all noticed depositions have occurred as of this date, and specifically reserves the right to supplement its Trial Witness List accordingly. Staples further reserves the right to supplement its Trial Witness List as allowed by law. -3- Date: August 12, 2011 /s/ Kate Hutchins Michael E. Richardson (TX Bar No. 24002838) mrichardson@brsfirm.com Beck Redden & Secrest 1221 McKinney, Suite 4500 Houston, TX 77010 Telephone: (713) 951-6284 Facsimile: (713) 951-3720 Mark G. Matuschak (admitted pro hac vice) mark.matuschak@wilmerhale.com Donald R. Steinberg (admitted pro hac vice) don.steinberg@wilmerhale.com Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 60 State Street Boston , MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 Kate Hutchins (admitted pro hac vice) kate.hutchins@wilmerhale.com Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 230-8800 Facsimile: (212) 230-8888 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT STAPLES, INC. -4- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served on all counsel of record by e-mail on this the 12th day of August, 2011. /s/ Richard Ewenstein Richard Ewenstein -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?