Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1317

Emergency MOTION to Strike DEFENDANTS' LATE-PRODUCED DOCUMENTS, VIDEO DEMONSTRATIONS, SOURCE CODE AND PREVIOUSLY UNIDENTIFIED PRIOR ART by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit 1, # 14 Exhibit 2, # 15 Exhibit 3, # 16 Exhibit 4, # 17 Exhibit 5, # 18 Exhibit 6, # 19 Exhibit 7, # 20 Exhibit 8, # 21 Exhibit 9, # 22 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 9 Highly Confidential 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies ) Incorporated, ) Plaintiff, ) ) VS. ) No. 6:09-CV-00445-LED ) Adobe Systems, Inc., ) Amazon.com, Inc., Apple, ) Inc., Blockbuster, Inc., ) CDW Corp., Citigroup, ) Inc., eBay, Inc., ) Frito-Lay, Inc., Google, ) Inc., J.C. Penney Company ) & Co., JPMorgan Chase & ) Co., New Frontier Media, ) Inc., Office Depot, Inc., ) Perot Systems Corp., ) Playboy Enterprises ) International, Inc., ) Rent-A-Center, Inc., ) Staples, Inc., Sun ) Microsystems, Inc., Texas ) Instruments, Inc., Yahoo! ) Inc., and YouTube, LLC, ) Defendants. ) ) ______________________________________________________ HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF DAVID M. MARTIN JANUARY 17, 2012 VOLUME 5 Job No. SD132062 PAGES 791 - 1035 Page 791 Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services 866 299-5127 Highly Confidential 1 2 3 A. My recollection of the dates associated with it were in 1994 or in 1995, or possibly even later. Q. Okay. Are there any versions of the Viola 02:19:42 02:19:53 02:19:58 4 code or browser that you attempted to compile or did 02:20:01 5 compile dated before May 12th, 1993? 02:20:08 6 MR. BURGESS: Objection, form. 02:20:13 7 THE WITNESS: I don't recall attempting 02:20:27 8 to compile a version of Viola that was dated prior to 02:20:28 9 May 12th, 1993. 02:20:33 10 Q. (BY MS. DOAN) And have you now told me about 02:20:35 11 all the versions of the Viola code or the Viola browser 02:20:38 12 that you've analyzed for this case? 02:20:41 13 A. Those are the only versions that I can recall 14 analyzing for this case. 15 all of the analysis that I did with respect to Viola. 02:20:59 16 And so if I've overlooked a version it would have been 02:21:03 17 discussed in my rebuttal report, I think, in fairly 02:21:08 18 clear fashion. 02:21:11 19 Q. Okay. My rebuttal report describes 02:20:43 And those five versions are the 02:21:12 20 May 12th, '93 version -- or the -- sorry. 21 versions are dated with code dates of May 12th, '93; 02:21:19 22 May 27th, '93; October 16th, '93; February '94; and 02:21:24 23 March '94. 02:21:29 24 A. 25 Those five 02:20:54 Is that fair? 02:21:15 Those are the -- the main dates that I 02:21:30 associate with each one of those versions, yes. 02:21:35 Page 901 Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services 866 299-5127 Highly Confidential 1 upon for my opinion. 2 opinion. 3 Q. It was merely consistent with my 02:47:17 02:47:24 (BY MS. DOAN) So you may not have indeed 02:47:24 4 preserved these pages for which you're telling this 02:47:26 5 jury that the May 12th browser could not parse. 02:47:30 6 that fair? Is 02:47:32 7 MR. BURGESS: Objection, form. 02:47:33 8 THE WITNESS: I don't recall having 02:47:34 9 specifically set aside these pages in order to produce 02:47:35 10 them. 02:47:40 11 relying upon them for my opinion. 12 Q. And I wouldn't have done that because I was not (BY MS. DOAN) Are you aware of any other 02:47:42 02:47:46 13 Viola browsers prior to May 12th, 1993 that could fetch 02:47:53 14 HTML documents over HTTP? 02:47:59 15 A. Could you just repeat, please? 02:48:03 16 Q. Sure. 02:48:05 Are you aware of any other earlier 17 versions of Viola browsers prior to May 12th, 1993 that 02:48:08 18 could fetch HTML documents over HTTP? 02:48:13 19 MR. BURGESS: Objection, form. 02:48:18 20 THE WITNESS: I'm not positive about 02:48:21 21 that. 22 discussed along those lines in Dr. Phillips' report, 02:48:38 23 and so I didn't investigate such -- such versions. 02:48:41 24 25 Q. Any versions of Viola prior to May 12th were not (BY MS. DOAN) 02:48:27 Regardless of whether they were 02:48:44 discussed in Dr. Phillips' report, you haven't analyzed 02:48:46 Page 918 Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services 866 299-5127 Highly Confidential 1 any Viola browser prior to May 12th, 1993. 2 Is that fair? 02:48:48 02:48:52 3 A. That sounds correct, yes. 02:48:52 4 Q. So you can't tell this jury whether or not 02:48:55 5 they actually could fetch HTML pages over -- over HTTP. 02:48:57 6 Is that fair? 02:49:04 7 A. I do discuss in my report the problems in 02:49:05 8 receiving any file over HTTP in the May 12th and 02:49:20 9 May 27th versions. 02:49:26 10 Q. You do. 02:49:27 11 A. Yes. 02:49:27 12 Q. And I'm talking about now prior to May 12th. 02:49:28 13 And I'm assuming since that's not part of your analysis 02:49:31 14 then you have no opinion as to whether there is a Viola 02:49:33 15 browser prior to May 12th, 1993 that indeed could fetch 02:49:38 16 HTML pages over HTTP. 02:49:42 17 18 MR. BURGESS: Objection, form. There is no question pending. 02:49:49 02:49:50 19 Q. (BY MS. DOAN) Do you understand my question? 20 A. If you could rephrase it for me, please. 02:49:56 21 Q. Sure. 02:50:00 You haven't conducted any type of 02:49:55 22 analysis with respect to any Viola browsers prior to 02:50:05 23 May 12th, 1993, right? 02:50:10 24 25 A. The earliest Viola code that I analyzed was May 12th, 1993. 02:50:12 02:50:16 Page 919 Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services 866 299-5127 Highly Confidential 1 Q. Sure. And so you don't have an opinion as to 02:50:17 2 whether there's a Viola browser before May 12th, 1993 02:50:19 3 that indeed could fetch HTML pages over HTTP; is that 02:50:23 4 correct? 02:50:34 5 A. One moment. My analysis is that the -- the 02:50:34 6 two closest versions of the Viola browser that were 02:51:20 7 made available in this case, that is, the May 12th and 02:51:24 8 the May 27th, together with the testimony of Pei Wei 02:51:27 9 and Scott Silvey regarding the May 7th demonstration, 02:51:32 10 indicates that the May 7th demonstration was, likewise, 02:51:39 11 not even capable of receiving a hypermedia document 02:51:45 12 from the remote network server. 02:51:49 13 158 of my report. 14 15 16 This is in Paragraph 02:51:52 MS. DOAN: Objection, nonresponsive. Move to strike. Q. 02:51:54 02:51:55 (BY MS. DOAN) My question is different. 02:51:56 17 Prior to -- and the question is, have you 02:51:57 18 conducted any type of analysis of a Viola browser prior 02:51:58 19 to May 12th, 1993? 02:52:02 20 have not. And I believe you answered that you Is that fair? 02:52:06 21 A. That sounds correct. 02:52:07 22 Q. Okay. 02:52:08 So I'm assuming that you don't have any 23 opinion with respect to whether there is a Viola 02:52:10 24 browser dated prior to May 12th, 1993 that indeed could 02:52:13 25 fetch HTML documents over HTTP. 02:52:18 You just don't have an Page 920 Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services 866 299-5127 Highly Confidential 1 opinion one way or the other. Is that fair? 02:52:25 2 MR. BURGESS: Objection, form. 02:52:27 3 THE WITNESS: No, I don't think that's 02:52:28 4 5 6 7 8 9 fair. Q. 02:52:29 (BY MS. DOAN) What Viola browser code have you analyzed prior to May 12th, 1993? A. 02:52:32 I did not say that I have analyzed Viola code base prior to May 12th, 1993. Q. 02:52:30 02:52:36 02:52:40 And indeed you have not; is that fair? 02:52:43 10 MR. BURGESS: Objection, form. 02:52:46 11 THE WITNESS: That's correct. 02:52:46 12 Q. (BY MS. DOAN) So it's my understanding, then, 02:52:47 13 you don't have an opinion as to whether there is a 02:52:49 14 Viola browser dated prior to May 12th, 1993 that indeed 02:52:52 15 could fetch HTML pages over HTTP? 02:52:56 16 MR. BURGESS: Objection, form. 17 THE WITNESS: Again, I disagree. 02:53:04 This is 02:53:06 18 a topic that I took -- that I take up in Paragraph 158 02:53:08 19 of the report -- 02:53:12 20 Q. (BY MS. DOAN) Right. 21 A. -- with respect to the browser that I know 02:53:12 02:53:12 22 indicates existed, or that testimony indicates existed 02:53:15 23 on May 7th, which is prior to May 12th. 02:53:16 24 25 Q. And you're telling me that that couldn't fetch documents, right? And my question is exactly the 02:53:19 02:53:20 Page 921 Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services 866 299-5127 Highly Confidential 1 opposite. 2 3 Okay? Are we -- are you with me yet? MR. BURGESS: Objection -- objection, form. 4 02:53:23 02:53:26 02:53:27 THE WITNESS: The -- the way you've been 02:53:27 5 phrasing your question it does not appear to me to be 02:53:28 6 exactly the opposite. 02:53:31 7 and we'll agree. 8 9 10 Q. (BY MS. DOAN) So maybe we can just try again 02:53:34 Sure. Can you tell me of a 02:53:34 Viola browser prior to May 12th, 1993 that indeed could 02:53:37 fetch HTML pages over HTTP? 02:53:41 11 MR. BURGESS: Objection, form. 02:53:47 12 THE WITNESS: I -- sitting here today, I 02:53:52 13 can't indicate a version of the Viola browser prior to 02:53:54 14 May 12th -- or the May 12th version, for that matter, 02:53:58 15 that could receive HTML documents over HTTP correctly. 02:54:01 16 Q. (BY MS. DOAN) Okay. And the earliest 02:54:14 17 analysis that you've done is with respect to the 02:54:17 18 May 7th Sun demonstration. 02:54:20 19 A. Is that fair? That sounds correct. I don't recall having 02:54:24 20 performed analysis of prior versions of Viola, that's 02:54:29 21 correct. 02:54:34 22 Q. Is it your opinion that the Viola browser 02:54:35 23 could not parse an HTML document in -- the Viola 02:54:49 24 browser dated October 16th, 1993? 02:54:55 25 A. October 16th? 02:55:00 Page 922 Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services 866 299-5127 Highly Confidential 1 Q. Yes, sir. 02:55:22 2 A. It's my recollection that the Viola alpha 02:55:24 3 version of October 16th, 1993 was able to parse and 02:55:48 4 render some HTML documents. 02:55:52 5 Q. And is it fair that you don't have any opinion 02:55:57 6 about any type of Viola browser dated before the Sun 02:56:04 7 demonstration, May 7th, 1993, as to whether there was 02:56:07 8 such a browser that -- Viola browser that would parse 02:56:12 9 HTML documents? 02:56:17 Is that fair? 10 MR. BURGESS: Objection, form. 02:56:20 11 THE WITNESS: The earliest browser 02:56:22 12 that -- that I've expressed an opinion on is the May 7, 02:56:24 13 1993 browser -- 02:56:29 14 Q. (BY MS. DOAN) 15 A. -- as far as I can recall, unless I'm 16 17 Okay. So you -- 02:56:30 02:56:31 forgetting something in my report, which I doubt. Q. I'm not trying to trick you. 02:56:34 I don't think -- 18 I don't see one or I would show you. 19 point it out. 20 there's not something else as you sit here today for 21 which you have an opinion that I haven't explored. 22 trying to do my job. Okay? I -- we would 02:56:35 02:56:37 So I just want to make sure 02:56:40 02:56:42 I'm Okay? 02:56:45 02:56:48 23 A. I understand. 02:56:50 24 Q. Okay. 02:56:50 25 So before May 7th, 1993, you don't have any opinion one way or the other as to whether there's 02:56:53 Page 923 Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services 866 299-5127 Highly Confidential 1 a Viola browser that could parse HTML documents. 2 Is that fair? 02:56:56 02:57:00 3 MR. BURGESS: Objection, form. 02:57:01 4 THE WITNESS: I have not offered an 02:57:03 5 opinion about that. I did not set out to -- I did not 02:57:10 6 set out to form an opinion regarding that, and I guess 02:57:14 7 I don't understand you to be asking me to form one now. 02:57:19 8 9 10 Q. (BY MS. DOAN) I'm not. I'm just trying to 02:57:22 make sure that I'm not going to be surprised at trial. 02:57:24 Is that fair? 02:57:27 11 A. I understand, yes. 02:57:27 12 Q. Okay. 02:57:28 Now, focusing on the October 16th, 1993 13 Viola browser code, you gave an opinion that it's not 02:57:33 14 prior art with respect to 102(a). 02:57:36 15 that? Do you remember 02:57:39 16 A. The October 16th Viola alpha code, yes. 02:57:41 17 Q. Okay. 02:58:09 The October 16th, 1993 alpha code would 18 be prior art under 102(b), would it not? 02:58:14 19 MR. BURGESS: Objection, form. 02:58:21 20 THE WITNESS: I'm not positive. 02:58:32 21 22 23 Q. (BY MS. DOAN) way or the other. A. You don't have an opinion one Is that fair? Sitting here today, I can't say whether Viola 02:58:34 02:58:35 02:58:40 24 alpha from October of 1993 qualifies as prior art under 02:59:08 25 102(b). 02:59:13 Page 924 Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services 866 299-5127

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?