Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
1317
Emergency MOTION to Strike DEFENDANTS' LATE-PRODUCED DOCUMENTS, VIDEO DEMONSTRATIONS, SOURCE CODE AND PREVIOUSLY UNIDENTIFIED PRIOR ART by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit 1, # 14 Exhibit 2, # 15 Exhibit 3, # 16 Exhibit 4, # 17 Exhibit 5, # 18 Exhibit 6, # 19 Exhibit 7, # 20 Exhibit 8, # 21 Exhibit 9, # 22 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)
EXHIBIT 9
Highly Confidential
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies
)
Incorporated,
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
VS.
) No. 6:09-CV-00445-LED
)
Adobe Systems, Inc.,
)
Amazon.com, Inc., Apple,
)
Inc., Blockbuster, Inc.,
)
CDW Corp., Citigroup,
)
Inc., eBay, Inc.,
)
Frito-Lay, Inc., Google,
)
Inc., J.C. Penney Company )
& Co., JPMorgan Chase &
)
Co., New Frontier Media,
)
Inc., Office Depot, Inc., )
Perot Systems Corp.,
)
Playboy Enterprises
)
International, Inc.,
)
Rent-A-Center, Inc.,
)
Staples, Inc., Sun
)
Microsystems, Inc., Texas )
Instruments, Inc., Yahoo! )
Inc., and YouTube, LLC,
)
Defendants.
)
)
______________________________________________________
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
DAVID M. MARTIN
JANUARY 17, 2012
VOLUME 5
Job No. SD132062
PAGES 791 - 1035
Page 791
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Highly Confidential
1
2
3
A.
My recollection of the dates associated with
it were in 1994 or in 1995, or possibly even later.
Q.
Okay.
Are there any versions of the Viola
02:19:42
02:19:53
02:19:58
4
code or browser that you attempted to compile or did
02:20:01
5
compile dated before May 12th, 1993?
02:20:08
6
MR. BURGESS:
Objection, form.
02:20:13
7
THE WITNESS:
I don't recall attempting
02:20:27
8
to compile a version of Viola that was dated prior to
02:20:28
9
May 12th, 1993.
02:20:33
10
Q.
(BY MS. DOAN)
And have you now told me about
02:20:35
11
all the versions of the Viola code or the Viola browser
02:20:38
12
that you've analyzed for this case?
02:20:41
13
A.
Those are the only versions that I can recall
14
analyzing for this case.
15
all of the analysis that I did with respect to Viola.
02:20:59
16
And so if I've overlooked a version it would have been
02:21:03
17
discussed in my rebuttal report, I think, in fairly
02:21:08
18
clear fashion.
02:21:11
19
Q.
Okay.
My rebuttal report describes
02:20:43
And those five versions are the
02:21:12
20
May 12th, '93 version -- or the -- sorry.
21
versions are dated with code dates of May 12th, '93;
02:21:19
22
May 27th, '93; October 16th, '93; February '94; and
02:21:24
23
March '94.
02:21:29
24
A.
25
Those five
02:20:54
Is that fair?
02:21:15
Those are the -- the main dates that I
02:21:30
associate with each one of those versions, yes.
02:21:35
Page 901
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Highly Confidential
1
upon for my opinion.
2
opinion.
3
Q.
It was merely consistent with my
02:47:17
02:47:24
(BY MS. DOAN)
So you may not have indeed
02:47:24
4
preserved these pages for which you're telling this
02:47:26
5
jury that the May 12th browser could not parse.
02:47:30
6
that fair?
Is
02:47:32
7
MR. BURGESS:
Objection, form.
02:47:33
8
THE WITNESS:
I don't recall having
02:47:34
9
specifically set aside these pages in order to produce
02:47:35
10
them.
02:47:40
11
relying upon them for my opinion.
12
Q.
And I wouldn't have done that because I was not
(BY MS. DOAN)
Are you aware of any other
02:47:42
02:47:46
13
Viola browsers prior to May 12th, 1993 that could fetch
02:47:53
14
HTML documents over HTTP?
02:47:59
15
A.
Could you just repeat, please?
02:48:03
16
Q.
Sure.
02:48:05
Are you aware of any other earlier
17
versions of Viola browsers prior to May 12th, 1993 that
02:48:08
18
could fetch HTML documents over HTTP?
02:48:13
19
MR. BURGESS:
Objection, form.
02:48:18
20
THE WITNESS:
I'm not positive about
02:48:21
21
that.
22
discussed along those lines in Dr. Phillips' report,
02:48:38
23
and so I didn't investigate such -- such versions.
02:48:41
24
25
Q.
Any versions of Viola prior to May 12th were not
(BY MS. DOAN)
02:48:27
Regardless of whether they were
02:48:44
discussed in Dr. Phillips' report, you haven't analyzed
02:48:46
Page 918
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Highly Confidential
1
any Viola browser prior to May 12th, 1993.
2
Is that
fair?
02:48:48
02:48:52
3
A.
That sounds correct, yes.
02:48:52
4
Q.
So you can't tell this jury whether or not
02:48:55
5
they actually could fetch HTML pages over -- over HTTP.
02:48:57
6
Is that fair?
02:49:04
7
A.
I do discuss in my report the problems in
02:49:05
8
receiving any file over HTTP in the May 12th and
02:49:20
9
May 27th versions.
02:49:26
10
Q.
You do.
02:49:27
11
A.
Yes.
02:49:27
12
Q.
And I'm talking about now prior to May 12th.
02:49:28
13
And I'm assuming since that's not part of your analysis
02:49:31
14
then you have no opinion as to whether there is a Viola
02:49:33
15
browser prior to May 12th, 1993 that indeed could fetch
02:49:38
16
HTML pages over HTTP.
02:49:42
17
18
MR. BURGESS:
Objection, form.
There is
no question pending.
02:49:49
02:49:50
19
Q.
(BY MS. DOAN)
Do you understand my question?
20
A.
If you could rephrase it for me, please.
02:49:56
21
Q.
Sure.
02:50:00
You haven't conducted any type of
02:49:55
22
analysis with respect to any Viola browsers prior to
02:50:05
23
May 12th, 1993, right?
02:50:10
24
25
A.
The earliest Viola code that I analyzed was
May 12th, 1993.
02:50:12
02:50:16
Page 919
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Highly Confidential
1
Q.
Sure.
And so you don't have an opinion as to
02:50:17
2
whether there's a Viola browser before May 12th, 1993
02:50:19
3
that indeed could fetch HTML pages over HTTP; is that
02:50:23
4
correct?
02:50:34
5
A.
One moment.
My analysis is that the -- the
02:50:34
6
two closest versions of the Viola browser that were
02:51:20
7
made available in this case, that is, the May 12th and
02:51:24
8
the May 27th, together with the testimony of Pei Wei
02:51:27
9
and Scott Silvey regarding the May 7th demonstration,
02:51:32
10
indicates that the May 7th demonstration was, likewise,
02:51:39
11
not even capable of receiving a hypermedia document
02:51:45
12
from the remote network server.
02:51:49
13
158 of my report.
14
15
16
This is in Paragraph
02:51:52
MS. DOAN:
Objection, nonresponsive.
Move to strike.
Q.
02:51:54
02:51:55
(BY MS. DOAN)
My question is different.
02:51:56
17
Prior to -- and the question is, have you
02:51:57
18
conducted any type of analysis of a Viola browser prior
02:51:58
19
to May 12th, 1993?
02:52:02
20
have not.
And I believe you answered that you
Is that fair?
02:52:06
21
A.
That sounds correct.
02:52:07
22
Q.
Okay.
02:52:08
So I'm assuming that you don't have any
23
opinion with respect to whether there is a Viola
02:52:10
24
browser dated prior to May 12th, 1993 that indeed could
02:52:13
25
fetch HTML documents over HTTP.
02:52:18
You just don't have an
Page 920
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Highly Confidential
1
opinion one way or the other.
Is that fair?
02:52:25
2
MR. BURGESS:
Objection, form.
02:52:27
3
THE WITNESS:
No, I don't think that's
02:52:28
4
5
6
7
8
9
fair.
Q.
02:52:29
(BY MS. DOAN)
What Viola browser code have
you analyzed prior to May 12th, 1993?
A.
02:52:32
I did not say that I have analyzed Viola code
base prior to May 12th, 1993.
Q.
02:52:30
02:52:36
02:52:40
And indeed you have not; is that fair?
02:52:43
10
MR. BURGESS:
Objection, form.
02:52:46
11
THE WITNESS:
That's correct.
02:52:46
12
Q.
(BY MS. DOAN)
So it's my understanding, then,
02:52:47
13
you don't have an opinion as to whether there is a
02:52:49
14
Viola browser dated prior to May 12th, 1993 that indeed
02:52:52
15
could fetch HTML pages over HTTP?
02:52:56
16
MR. BURGESS:
Objection, form.
17
THE WITNESS:
Again, I disagree.
02:53:04
This is
02:53:06
18
a topic that I took -- that I take up in Paragraph 158
02:53:08
19
of the report --
02:53:12
20
Q.
(BY MS. DOAN)
Right.
21
A.
-- with respect to the browser that I know
02:53:12
02:53:12
22
indicates existed, or that testimony indicates existed
02:53:15
23
on May 7th, which is prior to May 12th.
02:53:16
24
25
Q.
And you're telling me that that couldn't fetch
documents, right?
And my question is exactly the
02:53:19
02:53:20
Page 921
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Highly Confidential
1
opposite.
2
3
Okay?
Are we -- are you with me yet?
MR. BURGESS:
Objection -- objection,
form.
4
02:53:23
02:53:26
02:53:27
THE WITNESS:
The -- the way you've been
02:53:27
5
phrasing your question it does not appear to me to be
02:53:28
6
exactly the opposite.
02:53:31
7
and we'll agree.
8
9
10
Q.
(BY MS. DOAN)
So maybe we can just try again
02:53:34
Sure.
Can you tell me of a
02:53:34
Viola browser prior to May 12th, 1993 that indeed could
02:53:37
fetch HTML pages over HTTP?
02:53:41
11
MR. BURGESS:
Objection, form.
02:53:47
12
THE WITNESS:
I -- sitting here today, I
02:53:52
13
can't indicate a version of the Viola browser prior to
02:53:54
14
May 12th -- or the May 12th version, for that matter,
02:53:58
15
that could receive HTML documents over HTTP correctly.
02:54:01
16
Q.
(BY MS. DOAN)
Okay.
And the earliest
02:54:14
17
analysis that you've done is with respect to the
02:54:17
18
May 7th Sun demonstration.
02:54:20
19
A.
Is that fair?
That sounds correct.
I don't recall having
02:54:24
20
performed analysis of prior versions of Viola, that's
02:54:29
21
correct.
02:54:34
22
Q.
Is it your opinion that the Viola browser
02:54:35
23
could not parse an HTML document in -- the Viola
02:54:49
24
browser dated October 16th, 1993?
02:54:55
25
A.
October 16th?
02:55:00
Page 922
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Highly Confidential
1
Q.
Yes, sir.
02:55:22
2
A.
It's my recollection that the Viola alpha
02:55:24
3
version of October 16th, 1993 was able to parse and
02:55:48
4
render some HTML documents.
02:55:52
5
Q.
And is it fair that you don't have any opinion
02:55:57
6
about any type of Viola browser dated before the Sun
02:56:04
7
demonstration, May 7th, 1993, as to whether there was
02:56:07
8
such a browser that -- Viola browser that would parse
02:56:12
9
HTML documents?
02:56:17
Is that fair?
10
MR. BURGESS:
Objection, form.
02:56:20
11
THE WITNESS:
The earliest browser
02:56:22
12
that -- that I've expressed an opinion on is the May 7,
02:56:24
13
1993 browser --
02:56:29
14
Q.
(BY MS. DOAN)
15
A.
-- as far as I can recall, unless I'm
16
17
Okay.
So you --
02:56:30
02:56:31
forgetting something in my report, which I doubt.
Q.
I'm not trying to trick you.
02:56:34
I don't think --
18
I don't see one or I would show you.
19
point it out.
20
there's not something else as you sit here today for
21
which you have an opinion that I haven't explored.
22
trying to do my job.
Okay?
I -- we would
02:56:35
02:56:37
So I just want to make sure
02:56:40
02:56:42
I'm
Okay?
02:56:45
02:56:48
23
A.
I understand.
02:56:50
24
Q.
Okay.
02:56:50
25
So before May 7th, 1993, you don't have
any opinion one way or the other as to whether there's
02:56:53
Page 923
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Highly Confidential
1
a Viola browser that could parse HTML documents.
2
Is
that fair?
02:56:56
02:57:00
3
MR. BURGESS:
Objection, form.
02:57:01
4
THE WITNESS:
I have not offered an
02:57:03
5
opinion about that.
I did not set out to -- I did not
02:57:10
6
set out to form an opinion regarding that, and I guess
02:57:14
7
I don't understand you to be asking me to form one now.
02:57:19
8
9
10
Q.
(BY MS. DOAN)
I'm not.
I'm just trying to
02:57:22
make sure that I'm not going to be surprised at trial.
02:57:24
Is that fair?
02:57:27
11
A.
I understand, yes.
02:57:27
12
Q.
Okay.
02:57:28
Now, focusing on the October 16th, 1993
13
Viola browser code, you gave an opinion that it's not
02:57:33
14
prior art with respect to 102(a).
02:57:36
15
that?
Do you remember
02:57:39
16
A.
The October 16th Viola alpha code, yes.
02:57:41
17
Q.
Okay.
02:58:09
The October 16th, 1993 alpha code would
18
be prior art under 102(b), would it not?
02:58:14
19
MR. BURGESS:
Objection, form.
02:58:21
20
THE WITNESS:
I'm not positive.
02:58:32
21
22
23
Q.
(BY MS. DOAN)
way or the other.
A.
You don't have an opinion one
Is that fair?
Sitting here today, I can't say whether Viola
02:58:34
02:58:35
02:58:40
24
alpha from October of 1993 qualifies as prior art under
02:59:08
25
102(b).
02:59:13
Page 924
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?