Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
600
***FILED IN ERROR. SEE DOCUMENT 601 FOR CORRECT PLEADING*** MOTION to Compel PRODUCTION OF SOURCE CODE FROM GO DADDY by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike) Modified on 3/17/2011 (mll, ).
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Doc. 600 Att. 10
Exhibit J
Dockets.Justia.com
DLA Piper LLP (US) 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, California 94303-2214 www.dlapiper.com Robert Buergi robert.buergi@dlapiper.com T 650.833.2407 F 650.687.1144
December 9, 2010 VIA E-MAIL: mrappaport@mckoolsmith.com Matt Rappaport McKool Smith, P.C. 300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700 Austin, TX 78701 Re:
OUR FILE NO. 347155-51
Eolas Tech. Inc. v. Adobe Systems, Inc., et al.; Case No. 6:09-CV-446 (E.D. Tex.)
Dear Matt: With regard to Eolas's requests for source code for all versions of the accused web sites and the accused Java products, we have finished our collection of source code related to the accused web sites and products, and our identification of certain versions of the web site source code and product source code as being representative, subject to the limitations discussed in our previous correspondence. We are in the process of copying that source code to the source code inspection computer for your inspection, and we expect the copying to be completed shortly. Please let us know if you have any questions. Very truly yours, DLA Piper LLP (US)
Robert Buergi cc: eolas@mckoolsmith.com; oracle-eolas@dlapiper.com
WEST\222837450.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?