WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 329

NOTICE by Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Ericsson Inc., Exedea INC., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, WI-LAN Inc. re 99 Order JOINT REBUTTAL DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS TO DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Wi-LAN's rebuttal deposition designations and objections to Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson and Sony Mobiles deposition designations, # 2 Exhibit B - Wi-LANs rebuttal deposition designations and objections to HTCs deposition designations, # 3 Exhibit C - Defendants Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Sony Mobile and HTCs rebuttal deposition designations and objections to Wi-LANs deposition designations)(Weaver, David)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION WI-LAN INC., Plaintiff, v. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.; et al. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-521-LED JURY TRIAL DEMANDED JOINT REBUTTAL DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS TO DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS Please take notice that Plaintiff and Defendants hereby makes the following objections and rebuttal-designations to trial deposition designations served upon each party February 13, 2013: A. Rebuttal Deposition Designations and Objections The parties’ rebuttal deposition designations and objections are attached as exhibits. Wi-LAN’s rebuttal deposition designations and objections to Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson and Sony Mobile’s deposition designations are attached as Exhibit A. Wi-LAN’s rebuttal deposition designations and objections to HTC’s deposition designations are attached as Exhibit B. Defendants Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Sony Mobile and HTC’s rebuttal deposition designations and objections to Wi-LAN’s deposition designations are attached as Exhibit C. Approved as to both form and substance: Dated: February 25, 2013 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Akshay S. Deoras (with permission) Gregory S. Arovas (pro hac vice) Robert A. Appleby (pro hac vice) Jeanne M. Heffernan (pro hac vice) Akshay S. Deoras (pro hac vice) Ryan P. Kane (pro hac vice) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 Tel: (212) 446-4800 Fax: (212) 446-4900 greg.arovas@kirkland.com robert.appleby@kirkland.com jeanne.heffernan@kirkland.com akshay.deoras@kirkland.com ryan.kane@kirkland.com Alcatel-Lucent-Wi-LANDefense@kirkland.com By: /s/ David B. Weaver David B. Weaver (TX Bar 00798576) Lead Attorney Avelyn M. Ross (TX Bar 24027817) Ajeet P. Pai (TX Bar 24060376) Syed K. Fareed (TX Bar 24065216) Jeffrey T. Han (TX Bar 24069870) Seth A. Lindner (TX Bar 24078862) VINSON & ELKINS LLP 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100 Austin, TX 78746 Tel: (512) 542-8400 Fax: (512) 236-3476 dweaver@velaw.com aross@velaw.com apai@velaw.com sfareed@velaw.com jhan@velaw.com slindner@velaw.com Local Counsel Michael E. Jones (TX Bar 10929400) Allen F. Gardner (TX Bar 24043679) John F. Bufe (TX Bar 03316930) POTTER MINTON PC 110 N. College, Suite 500 P.O. Box 359 Tyler, TX 75710-0359 Tel: (903) 597-8311 Fax: (903) 593-0846 mikejones@potterminton.com allengardner@potterminton.com johnbufe@potterminton.com Steve R. Borgman (TX Bar 02670300) Gwendolyn Johnson Samora (TX Bar 00784899) VINSON & ELKINS LLP 1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2500 Houston, TX 77002-6760 Tel: (713) 758-2222 Fax: (713) 758-2346 sborgman@velaw.com gsamora@velaw.com Constance S. Huttner (NY Bar 1722024) VINSON & ELKINS LLP 666 Fifth Avenue 26th Floor New York, New York 10103 Tel: 212-237-0040 Fax: 917-846-5339 chuttner@velaw.com Attorneys for Defendant Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. /s/ Martin R. Bader (with permission) Stephen S. Korniczky (pro hac vice) Martin R. Bader (pro hac vice) Daniel N. Yannuzzi (pro hac vice) -2- Lee Hsu (pro hac vice) Graham M. Buccigross (pro hac vice) SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 12275 El Camino Real, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92130 Tel: (858) 720-8924 Fax: (858) 847-4892 skorniczky@sheppardmullin.com mbader@sheppardmullin.com dyannuzzi@sheppardmullin.com lhsu@sheppardmullin.com gbuccigross@sheppardmullin.com LegalTm-WiLAN-Alcatel@sheppardmullin.com Local Counsel Johnny Ward (TX Bar 00794818) Wesley Hill (TX Bar 24032294) WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM 111 W. Tyler Street Longview, TX 75601 Tel: (903) 757-6400 Fax: (903) 757-2323 jw@jwfirm.com wh@jwfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Wi-LAN Inc. Local Counsel Eric Hugh Findlay (TX Bar 00789886) Brian Craft (TX Bar 04972020) FINDLAY CRAFT 6760 Old Jacksonville Hwy, Suite 101 Tyler, TX 75703 Tel: (903) 534-1100 Fax: (903) 534-1137 efindlay@findlaycraft.com bcraft@findlaycraft.com Attorneys for Defendants HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., and Exedea Inc. /s/ Richard L. Wynne, Jr. (with permission) Bruce S. Sostek (TX Bar 18855700) Lead Attorney Richard L. Wynne, Jr. (TX Bar 24003214) Adrienne E. Dominguez (TX Bar 00793630) J. Michael Heinlen (TX Bar 24032287) Timothy E. Hudson (TX Bar 24046120) Justin S. Cohen (TX Bar 24078356) THOMPSON KNIGHT LLP 1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201 Tel: (214) 969-1700 Fax: (214) 969-1751 bruce.sostek@tklaw.com richard.wynne@tklaw.com adrienne.dominguez@tklaw.com -3- michael.heinlen@tklaw.com tim.hudson@tklaw.com justin.cohen@tklaw.com Ericsson-WI-LAN-Defense@tklaw.com Local Counsel William J. Cornelius (TX Bar 04834700) Jennifer Ainsworth (TX Bar 00784720) Wilson Robertson & Cornelius PC 909 ESE Loop 323, Suite 400 P.O. Box 7339 Tyler, TX 75711-7339 Tel: (903) 509-5000 Fax: (903) 509-5092 wc@wilsonlawfirm.com jainsworth@wilsonlawfirm.com Attorneys for D efendants E ricsson I nc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM E ricsson, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., and Sony Mobile Communications AB CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The u ndersigned cer tifies t hat the foregoing document was filed e lectronically in compliance w ith L ocal Rule C V-5(a) o n t his t he 25t h da y o f February, 2013. A s s uch, t his document was s erved o n all co unsel w ho ar e dee med t o h ave co nsented t o el ectronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). /s/ David B. Weaver David B. Weaver -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?