WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Filing
329
NOTICE by Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Ericsson Inc., Exedea INC., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, WI-LAN Inc. re 99 Order JOINT REBUTTAL DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS TO DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Wi-LAN's rebuttal deposition designations and objections to Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson and Sony Mobiles deposition designations, # 2 Exhibit B - Wi-LANs rebuttal deposition designations and objections to HTCs deposition designations, # 3 Exhibit C - Defendants Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Sony Mobile and HTCs rebuttal deposition designations and objections to Wi-LANs deposition designations)(Weaver, David)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
WI-LAN INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.; et al.
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-521-LED
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
JOINT REBUTTAL DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS TO
DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS
Please take notice that Plaintiff and Defendants hereby makes the following objections
and rebuttal-designations to trial deposition designations served upon each party February 13,
2013:
A.
Rebuttal Deposition Designations and Objections
The parties’ rebuttal deposition designations and objections are attached as exhibits.
Wi-LAN’s rebuttal deposition designations and objections to Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson
and Sony Mobile’s deposition designations are attached as Exhibit A.
Wi-LAN’s rebuttal deposition designations and objections to HTC’s deposition
designations are attached as Exhibit B.
Defendants Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Sony Mobile and HTC’s rebuttal deposition
designations and objections to Wi-LAN’s deposition designations are attached as Exhibit C.
Approved as to both form and substance:
Dated: February 25, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Akshay S. Deoras (with permission)
Gregory S. Arovas (pro hac vice)
Robert A. Appleby (pro hac vice)
Jeanne M. Heffernan (pro hac vice)
Akshay S. Deoras (pro hac vice)
Ryan P. Kane (pro hac vice)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Tel: (212) 446-4800
Fax: (212) 446-4900
greg.arovas@kirkland.com
robert.appleby@kirkland.com
jeanne.heffernan@kirkland.com
akshay.deoras@kirkland.com
ryan.kane@kirkland.com
Alcatel-Lucent-Wi-LANDefense@kirkland.com
By: /s/ David B. Weaver
David B. Weaver (TX Bar 00798576)
Lead Attorney
Avelyn M. Ross (TX Bar 24027817)
Ajeet P. Pai (TX Bar 24060376)
Syed K. Fareed (TX Bar 24065216)
Jeffrey T. Han (TX Bar 24069870)
Seth A. Lindner (TX Bar 24078862)
VINSON & ELKINS LLP
2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100
Austin, TX 78746
Tel: (512) 542-8400
Fax: (512) 236-3476
dweaver@velaw.com
aross@velaw.com
apai@velaw.com
sfareed@velaw.com
jhan@velaw.com
slindner@velaw.com
Local Counsel
Michael E. Jones (TX Bar 10929400)
Allen F. Gardner (TX Bar 24043679)
John F. Bufe (TX Bar 03316930)
POTTER MINTON PC
110 N. College, Suite 500
P.O. Box 359
Tyler, TX 75710-0359
Tel: (903) 597-8311
Fax: (903) 593-0846
mikejones@potterminton.com
allengardner@potterminton.com
johnbufe@potterminton.com
Steve R. Borgman (TX Bar 02670300)
Gwendolyn Johnson Samora (TX Bar
00784899)
VINSON & ELKINS LLP
1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2500
Houston, TX 77002-6760
Tel: (713) 758-2222
Fax: (713) 758-2346
sborgman@velaw.com
gsamora@velaw.com
Constance S. Huttner (NY Bar 1722024)
VINSON & ELKINS LLP
666 Fifth Avenue
26th Floor
New York, New York 10103
Tel: 212-237-0040
Fax: 917-846-5339
chuttner@velaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant Alcatel-Lucent USA
Inc.
/s/ Martin R. Bader (with permission)
Stephen S. Korniczky (pro hac vice)
Martin R. Bader (pro hac vice)
Daniel N. Yannuzzi (pro hac vice)
-2-
Lee Hsu (pro hac vice)
Graham M. Buccigross (pro hac vice)
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
12275 El Camino Real, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92130
Tel: (858) 720-8924
Fax: (858) 847-4892
skorniczky@sheppardmullin.com
mbader@sheppardmullin.com
dyannuzzi@sheppardmullin.com
lhsu@sheppardmullin.com
gbuccigross@sheppardmullin.com
LegalTm-WiLAN-Alcatel@sheppardmullin.com
Local Counsel
Johnny Ward (TX Bar 00794818)
Wesley Hill (TX Bar 24032294)
WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM
111 W. Tyler Street
Longview, TX 75601
Tel: (903) 757-6400
Fax: (903) 757-2323
jw@jwfirm.com
wh@jwfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Wi-LAN Inc.
Local Counsel
Eric Hugh Findlay (TX Bar 00789886)
Brian Craft (TX Bar 04972020)
FINDLAY CRAFT
6760 Old Jacksonville Hwy, Suite 101
Tyler, TX 75703
Tel: (903) 534-1100
Fax: (903) 534-1137
efindlay@findlaycraft.com
bcraft@findlaycraft.com
Attorneys for Defendants HTC Corporation,
HTC America, Inc., and Exedea Inc.
/s/ Richard L. Wynne, Jr. (with permission)
Bruce S. Sostek (TX Bar 18855700)
Lead Attorney
Richard L. Wynne, Jr. (TX Bar 24003214)
Adrienne E. Dominguez (TX Bar 00793630)
J. Michael Heinlen (TX Bar 24032287)
Timothy E. Hudson (TX Bar 24046120)
Justin S. Cohen (TX Bar 24078356)
THOMPSON KNIGHT LLP
1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201
Tel: (214) 969-1700
Fax: (214) 969-1751
bruce.sostek@tklaw.com
richard.wynne@tklaw.com
adrienne.dominguez@tklaw.com
-3-
michael.heinlen@tklaw.com
tim.hudson@tklaw.com
justin.cohen@tklaw.com
Ericsson-WI-LAN-Defense@tklaw.com
Local Counsel
William J. Cornelius (TX Bar 04834700)
Jennifer Ainsworth (TX Bar 00784720)
Wilson Robertson & Cornelius PC
909 ESE Loop 323, Suite 400
P.O. Box 7339
Tyler, TX 75711-7339
Tel: (903) 509-5000
Fax: (903) 509-5092
wc@wilsonlawfirm.com
jainsworth@wilsonlawfirm.com
Attorneys for D efendants E ricsson I nc.,
Telefonaktiebolaget LM E ricsson, Sony
Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., and Sony
Mobile Communications AB
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The u ndersigned cer tifies t hat the foregoing document was filed e lectronically in
compliance w ith L ocal Rule C V-5(a) o n t his t he 25t h da y o f February, 2013. A s s uch, t his
document was s erved o n all co unsel w ho ar e dee med t o h ave co nsented t o el ectronic service.
Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A).
/s/ David B. Weaver
David B. Weaver
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?