Flournoy, Michael v. Winnebago County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 22

Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Docket Sheet and Judgment to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re 20 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: # 1 Order, # 2 Judgment, # 3 Order, 3/27/15, # 4 Docket sheet) (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
•I • ·" ·, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Mr. Flournoy, Michael E., Plaintiff, v. 14-cv-528-pdp WINNEBAGO COUNTY; WINNEBAGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S POLICE/OFFICE; ROBERT BOB BAUDELIO JUANEZ; LARRY MARINO; DANIEL FREEDLUND; PETER DALPRA; JOSEPH BOOMER; BRAD KISER; DOMINIC IASPARRO; NICK CUNNINGHAM; JULIE DODD; NEAL C. GRUHN; WAYNE JACKOWSKI; CRAIG SMITH; ADAM KING; JOHN D. RICHARDSON; DAN IVANCICH, Defendant(s). NOTICE OF APPEALS Notice is hereby given that Plaintiff, Mr.Flournoy, Michael E., Pro-se, hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit from the finial order/judgment dismissing his suit, entered in this action on the 27th day of March, 2015. 1. The order appealed is a final and appealable order and provides that Plaintiff be denied his statutory right to be afforded Full Faith and Credit to the State of Illinois Court Order and meaning. The District Court further, without authority or jurisdiction to do so, rejected and changed the meaning of the relevant Illinois statute(s), from which the Plaintiff complained of in reaching its factually and legally erroneous conclusion. 2. This appeal is made to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit from the finial order entered by this WESTERN DISTRICT COURT OF WISCONSIN, District Judge James D.Peterson presiding. 3. Plaintiff respectfully request to be appointed legal counsel for this appeal. STATEMENT Plaintiff has been denied~S constitutional First Amendment right to petition the Court and GRIEVANCE, by and through the courts refusal to adhear to the Superior Courts instruction for determining the preclusive effect of judgements in this circuit. The court has been called over and again to abandoned its practice of changing the meaning of Illinois statutory meaning of its order. While making note of Plaintiffs reliance on "Illinois statutes and the Rooker-Feldman doctrine'', for a controlling Illinois law matter, this court has used Wisconsin and Indiana findings, based on their state(s) law to deny statutory relief to the plaintiff's Illinois suit. Respectfully submitted, 1000, OXFORD, WI. 53952

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?