IconFind, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Filing 97

[DISREGARD - Attorney to Re-File per Judge's Request] BRIEF Opening Claim Construction Brief by Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Kenneth Maikish Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Maikish Declaration, # 3 Exhibit 2 to Maikish Declaration, # 4 Exhibit 3 to Maikish Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 4 to Maikish Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 5 to Maikish Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 6 to Maikish Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 7 to Maikish Declaration, # 9 Exhibit 8 to Maikish Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 9 to Maikish Declaration, # 11 Exhibit 10 to Maikish Declaration, # 12 Exhibit 11 to Maikish Declaration, # 13 Exhibit 12 to Maikish Declaration, # 14 Exhibit 13 to Maikish Declaration, # 15 Exhibit 14 to Maikish Declaration)(Maikish, Kenneth) Modified on 5/22/2012 (Michel, G).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 7 Case 2:09-cv-00109-WBS-JFM Document 53 Filed 12/18/09 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 2:09-CV-00109-WBS-JFM ICONFIND, INC., Plaintiff, v. YAHOO! INC., ORDER ON ICONFIND’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S DECEMBER 7, 2009 QUESTION REGARDING “NETWORK PAGE” Defendant. The court having ruled on the motion for claim construction, plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a supplemental response is moot and is therefore DENIED. DATED: December 16, 2009 [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?