IconFind, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Filing 97

[DISREGARD - Attorney to Re-File per Judge's Request] BRIEF Opening Claim Construction Brief by Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Kenneth Maikish Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Maikish Declaration, # 3 Exhibit 2 to Maikish Declaration, # 4 Exhibit 3 to Maikish Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 4 to Maikish Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 5 to Maikish Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 6 to Maikish Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 7 to Maikish Declaration, # 9 Exhibit 8 to Maikish Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 9 to Maikish Declaration, # 11 Exhibit 10 to Maikish Declaration, # 12 Exhibit 11 to Maikish Declaration, # 13 Exhibit 12 to Maikish Declaration, # 14 Exhibit 13 to Maikish Declaration, # 15 Exhibit 14 to Maikish Declaration)(Maikish, Kenneth) Modified on 5/22/2012 (Michel, G).

EXHIBIT 8

Case 2:09-cv-00109-WBS-JFM Document 61

1
2
2
3
4
3
5
6
4
7
8
5
9
10
11
6
12
13
7
14
15
8
16
17
9
18
10
19
20
11
21
22
12
23
24
13
25
26
14
27
28
15

Filed 03/26/10 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ICONFIND, INC.,

Case No. 2:09-CV-00109-WBS-JFM
Plaintiff,

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER OF
DISMISSAL

v.
YAHOO! INC.,
Defendant.

16

This Civil Action has come before the Court, upon the pleadings and proceedings of

17

record, and it has been represented to the Court that Plaintiff IconFind, Inc. ("IconFind") and

18

Defendant Yahoo! Inc. ("Yahoo") have entered into a Settlement and License Agreement and

19

have agreed to a compromise and settlement of this Civil Action.

20

WHEREFORE, with the consent of the above-identified parties, through their

21

undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,

22

ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:

23

1.

The Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.

24

2.

All claims that were or could have been alleged in the Complaint that relate to the

25

patent in suit are hereby dismissed with prejudice. All counterclaims and defenses are dismissed

26

without prejudice.

27
28

Case 2:09-cv-00109-WBS-JFM Document 61

1
2

3.

Filed 03/26/10 Page 2 of 2

The December 14, 2009 Memorandum and Claim Construction Order [Doc. 50]

remains in full force and effect.

3

4.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

4

SO ORDERED:

5

Date: March 25, 2010

6
7
8
9
10

STIPULATED AND AGREED TO ON MARCH 24, 2010:

11

/s/ Raymond P. Niro Jr.
Thomas G. Redmon (SBN 47090)
Daniel L. Baxter (SBN 203862)
WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD &
BIRNEY, LLP
400 Capitol Mall, 22nd Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

12
13
14
15
16
17

24

Raymond P. Niro (Pro Hac Vice)
Raymond P. Niro, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice)
Tahiti Arsulowicz (Pro Hac Vice)
Brian E. Haan (Pro Hac Vice)
Anna B. Folgers (Pro Hac Vice)
NIRO, SCAVONE, HALLER & NIRO
181 West Madison, Suite 4600
Chicago, IL 60602-4515
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

25

/s/ Kevin A. Smith
Charles K. Verhoeven (SBN 170151)
Jennifer A. Kash (SBN 203679)
Richard H. Doss (SBN 204078)
Kevin A. Smith (SBN 250814)
QUINN, EMANUEL, URQUHART, OLIVER
& HEDGES, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Plaintiff, IconFind Inc.

18
19
20
21
22
23

Attorneys for Defendant, Yahoo! Inc.

26
27
28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

-2-