Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1020

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Under Seal Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration Of Jason R. Bartlett In Support Of Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #3 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 8, #4 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 9, #5 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 10, #6 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 11, #7 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 17, #8 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 18, #9 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 19, #10 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 23, #11 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 26, #12 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 30, #13 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 31, #14 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 32, #15 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 53, #16 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 54, #17 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 55, #18 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 57, #19 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 58, #20 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 59, #21 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 60, #22 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 61, #23 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 62, #24 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 64, #25 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 67, #26 Bartlett Decl. Ex. 80)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/1/2012)

Exhibit 67

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

APPLE INC.,
Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK
V.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC. AND SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC

EXPERT REPORT OF JEFFREY JOHNSON, PH.D.
REGARDING NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,469,381

02198.51855/4689328.4

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
7

Galaxy Ace

2.3.4

8

Galaxy Prevail

2.3.5

9

Galaxy S (i9000)

2.3.4

10

Galaxy S II

2.3.5

X

11

Galaxy S 4G

2.3.6

X

12

Galaxy S Showcase (i500)

2.3.5

X

13

Galaxy Tab 7.0

2.2

X

14

Galaxy Tab 10.1

3.1

X

15

Gravity Smart

2.2.2

X

X

16

Indulge

2.2.1

X

X

17

Infuse 4G

2.2.1

X

X

18

Mesmerize

2.1-update1

X

X

19

Nexus S

2.3.1

X

X

20

Nexus S 4G

2.3.4

X

X

21

Replenish

2.2.2

X

X

22

Sidekick

2.2.1

X

X

23

Vibrant

2.1-update1

X

X

64.

X

X
X

X

X

X

Gallery Feature 1: General snapping behavior. In horizontal filmstrip mode

in Gallery, other than the “edge” or “corner cases” of the left edge of the first image and the right
edge of the last image, all of the left and right edges exhibit general snapping behavior, not the
more limited ‘381 style snapback. Depending on whether the user translates the image past a
threshold beyond the edge of the document, the Gallery application can snap-forward to the next
image or snap-back to the current image.
“zoomed-out” modes.

This same behavior occurs both in “zoomed-in” and

Because the Court has interpreted the ’381 Patent claims to require ’381

Style Snap-back for all potentially scrollable edges, including ones Apple previously tried to rule
out as interior edges, devices with Gallery that include Gallery Feature 1 (general snapping
behavior) do not infringe the independent claims of the ’381 Patent.

02198.51855/4689328.4

Page 22

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
65.

Gallery Feature 2: Hold still behavior.

In “zoomed-in” mode of Gallery, a

user can translate an image beyond the edge of the document, show an area beyond the edge, and
upon lifting her finger, the image will hold still and does not snap back, thus continuing to show
area beyond the edge. Because there is no translation of the document in the second direction
after the user lifts her finger, devices with Gallery that include Gallery Feature 2 (hold still
behavior) do not infringe the independent claims of the ’381 Patent.
66.

Gallery Feature 3: Hard stop. In “zoomed-out” mode of Gallery, when the

user attempts to translate the image past the edge of the document, the user encounters a hard
stop.

No area beyond the edge of the electronic document is displayed, and no translation of

the document occurs in the second direction when the finger is lifted off. Because devices with
Gallery that include Gallery Feature 3 (hard stop) do not display an area beyond the edge of the
electronic document and do not translate the electronic document in a second direction, , they do
not infringe the independent claims of the ’381 Patent.
67.

Gallery Feature 4: Blue glow.

In devices with blue glow, when the user

attempts to translate the image past the edge of the document, the user encounters a hard stop but
a blue (or other color) glow is overlaid near the edge of the document to provide a visual
indicator that an edge has been reached.

No area beyond the edge of the electronic document is

displayed, and no translation of the document occurs in the second direction when the finger is
lifted off.

Because devices with Gallery that include Gallery Feature 4 (blue glow) do not

display an area beyond the edge of the electronic document and do not translate the electronic
document in a second direction, they do not infringe the independent claims of the ’381 Patent.
Contacts
At least 1 Non-infringing Feature in Contacts

02198.51855/4689328.4

Page 23

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER

April 16, 2012
Jeffrey Johnson, Ph.D.

02198.51855/4689328.4

Date

Page 43