Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Declaration of Todd M. Briggs in Support of #56 MOTION to Compel Apple to Produce Reciprocal Expedited Discovery filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28)(Related document(s) #56 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/27/2011)
Bartlett, Jason R. [JasonBartlett@mofo.com]
Friday, May 27, 2011 10:06 AM
Charles K Verhoeven; Kevin Johnson; Margret Caruso; Michael T Zeller; McElhinny, Harold
J.; Jacobs, Michael A.; Taylor, Jennifer Lee (SF); Kim, Grant L.; Todd Briggs; Victoria
RE: Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (N.D. Cal.): Correspondence
We are not comfortable stipulating to a hearing date that the court did not allow you to reserve. Also, it looks like the court
wants to consider the timing of the hearing after the moving papers are filed. If you want to file a motion to set a schedule
consistent with our earlier exchange (i.e., you file on May 27, we file a response on June 2, you file a reply on June 7) we
will not oppose it.
From: Erik Olson [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 2:08 PM
To: Bartlett, Jason R.
Cc: Charles K Verhoeven; Kevin Johnson; Margret Caruso; Michael T Zeller; McElhinny, Harold J.; Jacobs, Michael A.;
Taylor, Jennifer Lee (SF); Kim, Grant L.; Todd Briggs; Victoria Maroulis
Subject: Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (N.D. Cal.): Correspondence
Attached is a draft stipulated request to shorten the briefing schedule on Samsung’s motion to compel. Please
let us know by 10 a.m. tomorrow morning whether Apple will join the stipulation, and if so, whether you have
any edits to it.
We spoke to Judge Koh’s courtroom deputy yesterday morning. She instructed us to notice the motion for
September 1, and that chambers will decide whether to grant the shortened schedule after receiving the moving
papers and the request to shorten time.
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
415.875.6600 Main Office Number
NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message
may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any
review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail, and delete the original message.
--------------------------------------------------------------------To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Morrison & Foerster LLP informs you that, if any
advice concerning one or more U.S. Federal tax issues is contained in this communication (including any
attachments), such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
For information about this legend, go to
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or
authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any
information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by
reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?