Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 847

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Trac Declaration in Support of Motion to File Under Seal, #2 Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, #3 Hecht Declaration in Support of Opposition to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, #4 Ex A, #5 Ex B1, #6 Ex B2, #7 Ex C1, #8 Ex C2, #9 Ex D, #10 Ex E, #11 Ex F1, #12 Ex F2, #13 Ex F3, #14 Ex F4, #15 Ex G, #16 Ex H, #17 Ex I, #18 Ex J1, #19 Ex J2, #20 Ex J3, #21 Ex J4, #22 Ex J5, #23 Ex J6, #24 Ex J7, #25 Ex J8, #26 Ex J9, #27 Ex J10, #28 Ex J11, #29 Ex K1, #30 Ex K2, #31 Ex K3, #32 Ex L, #33 Ex M, #34 Ex N, #35 Ex O1, #36 Ex O2, #37 Ex P1, #38 Ex P2, #39 Ex Q1, #40 Ex Q2, #41 Ex Q3, #42 Ex Q4, #43 Ex Q5, #44 Ex Q6, #45 Ex Q7, #46 Ex R, #47 Ex S1, #48 Ex S2, #49 Rosenbrock Declaration in Support of Opposition to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, #50 Ex 1, #51 Ex 2, #52 Ex 3, #53 Ex 4, #54 Ex 5, #55 Ex 6, #56 Ex 7, #57 Ex 8, #58 Ex 9, #59 Ex 10, #60 Ex 11, #61 Ex 12, #62 Ex 13, #63 Ex 14, #64 Ex 15, #65 Ex 16, #66 Ex 17, #67 Ex 18, #68 Proposed Order Denying Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment, #69 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Administrative Motion to File Under Seal)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 4/2/2012) Modified on 4/3/2012 Attachment #1 Trac Declaration placed under seal. Posting of attachments #16, 18, 19, 20 through 33, 37, 38, 47 and 48 are NOT in compliance with General Order 62 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com  50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129 kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603)  victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor  Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 (650) 801-5000  Telephone: Facsimile: (650) 801-5100   Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417) michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017  Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100   Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,  INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION   APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK  DECLARATION OF BILL TRAC IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL  Plaintiff, vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendant.   02198.51855/4687018.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF BILL TRAC IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 I, Bill Trac, declare:  1. I am an associate in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP,  counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung      Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). Unless otherwise indicated, I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and, if called upon as a witness, I could and would testify as follows. 2. The requested relief is necessary to protect the confidentiality of information  contained in Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, the  Declaration of David Hecht (“Hecht Declaration”), and Exhibits H, J1-J11, K1-K3, L, M, P1-P2,  and S1-S2 to the Hecht Declaration.  3. Exhibit H to the Hecht Declaration is a presentation made by Samsung to Apple,    and contains information about licensing proposals that Samsung made to Apple. This document, which Samsung has designated “Confidential Business Information – Subject to Protective Order”  in the 337-ITC-796 action between Samsung and Apple, contains information that is confidential  and proprietary to Samsung, and could be used to its disadvantage by competitors if it were not  filed under seal.   4. Exhibits J1-J11 to the Hecht Declaration are letters between Apple and Samsung discussing licensing to Samsung’s patents. These documents, which Samsung has designated    “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Samsung, and could be used to its disadvantage by competitors if it  were not filed under seal.  5. Exhibits K1-K3 to the Hecht Declaration are license agreements between Samsung  and Intel. These documents, which Samsung has designated “Confidential Business Information –  Subject to Protective Order” in the 337-ITC-794 action between Samsung and Apple, contains  02198.51855/4687018.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF BILL TRAC IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 information that is confidential and proprietary to Samsung, and could be used to its disadvantage 2 by competitors if it were not filed under seal. 3 4 6. Exhibit M is a declaration and attachments from Carl D. Herbert, an employee of Intel. It contains confidential third-party sales information relating to Intel’s sales to Apple. This 5 6 7 document, which Samsung has designated “Confidential Business Information – Subject to Protective Order” in the 337-ITC-794 action between Samsung and Apple, contains information 8 that is confidential and proprietary to Intel, and could be used to its disadvantage by competitors if 9 it were not filed under seal. 10 11 7. Exhibit P2 is an excerpt from the deposition of Gert van Lieshout. It contains confidential information related to Samsung’s internal intellectual property policies. This 12 deposition was designated by Samsung as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 13 14 ONLY,” contains information that is confidential and proprietary to Samsung, and could be used 15 to its disadvantage by competitors if it were not filed under seal. 16 8. The confidential, unredacted version of the Hecht Declaration discusses and 17 references the information contained in the documents described in paragraphs 3-7 above, and 18 should therefore be sealed for the same reasons. 19 9. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion 20 for Partial Summary Judgment discusses and references the information contained in paragraphs 21 22 3-7 above, and should also therefore be sealed for the same reasons. 23 24 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in 25 Redwood Shores, California on April 2, 2012. 26 27 /s/ Bill Trac__________________ Bill Trac 28 02198.51855/4687018.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2DECLARATION OF BILL TRAC_IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION 1 2 I, Victoria Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the 3 foregoing document. I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the 4 electronic filing of this document has been obtained from Bill Trac. 5 /s/ Victoria Maroulis 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4687018.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -3DECLARATION OF BILL TRAC_IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?