Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 973

Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of #930 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Declaration Of Mark D. Selwyn In Support Of Samsungs Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #19 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Samsungs Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment)(Related document(s) #930 ) (Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 5/24/2012)

Download PDF
Exhibit 2 EXHIBIT 38 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 5 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs. 8 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 9 10 11 12 Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK Defendants. ---------------------------------/ 13 14 15 16 17 CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 18 19 20 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF DANIELE De IULIIS Redwood Shores, California Friday, October 21, 2011 21 22 23 Reported by: LORRIE L. MARCHANT, CSR No. 10523, RPR, CRR, CCRR,CLR JOB NO. 43000 24 25 TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 186 1 Q. Did you work on the design of this tablet? 2 A. I worked alongside my colleagues in the 3 industrial design department as a collective and as 4 a team on this. 18 MR. MONACH: Objection. Vague. TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 187 20 Q. You've been handed what has been marked as 21 Exhibit 8, Lutton Exhibit 8. 22 Do you have that in front of you? 23 A. Yes. 24 Q. Do you -- and that is US Design Patent 25 504889 -- TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 188 1 A. Yes. 2 Q. -- correct? 3 4 You're named as an inventor of this design; is that correct? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. Did you participate in the team that 7 8 created this design? A. 15 I did. BY MS. CARUSO: 16 Q. Do you see Figure 6 of the D889 patent? 17 A. I do. 18 Q. There's a circular element on that. 19 Do you see it? 20 A. I do. 24 Q. In Figure 1 of the D889 patent, there's 25 a -- a line that's thicker than the other lines. TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 Do CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 189 1 you see that? 2 MR. MONACH: Objection. Vague. Objection 3 to the extent it may not accurately reflect the 4 drawing. 5 THE WITNESS: 6 BY MS. CARUSO: 7 Q. I see a bad photocopy. Starting at the left, do you see three 8 parallel lines on the left-hand side of the top 9 drawing? 10 A. I do. 11 Q. Do you see the middle line of those three? 12 A. I do. 13 Q. Does it appear to you to be thicker than 14 the other two? 15 A. Yes. 16 Q. Do you have an understanding of why it's 17 thicker? 18 MR. MONACH: 19 foundation. 20 Objection. Lack of Objection to the extent it calls for a legal conclusion. 21 THE WITNESS: 22 BY MS. CARUSO: 23 24 25 Q. I don't. Do you have any understanding of what that middle line represents? MR. MONACH: Same objection. TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 190 1 2 THE WITNESS: 5 6 What was your question. 3 4 One more time. BY MS. CARUSO: Q. Do you have any understanding of what that middle line represents? A. No. TSG Reporting 877-702-9580 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 191 8 Q. If you'd look at this -- 9 A. Thank you. 10 Q. -- and if you could just hold that up again 11 12 13 for the camera. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: the front. I didn't get a shot of You have to hold it longer for me. 14 Thank you. Great. 15 BY MS. CARUSO: TSG Reporting 877-702-9580

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?