Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 973

Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of #930 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Declaration Of Mark D. Selwyn In Support Of Samsungs Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #19 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Samsungs Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment)(Related document(s) #930 ) (Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 5/24/2012)

Download PDF
Exhibit 3 EXHIBIT 39 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 1 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION APPLE INC., a California corporation, 5 Plaintiff, Case No. 6 vs. 11 CV 01846 LHK 7 8 9 10 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 15 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 16 17 18 19 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF RICHARD HOWARTH San Francisco, California Monday, October 31, 2011 20 21 22 23 24 25 REPORTED BY: CYNTHIA MANNING, CSR No. 7645, CLR, CCRR JOB NO. 43007 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 91 6 7 MR. MONACH: Objection; vague and compound. 8 THE WITNESS: 9 Could you repeat the question? 23 24 25 Yeah, I'm sorry. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. But in general, you don't think that those terms are precise enough or clear enough TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 92 1 that you could be -- you'd be able to say it's 2 really definite; right? 3 4 MR. MONACH: Objection; vague and ambiguous. 5 THE WITNESS: 6 people think. 7 I don't know what other BY MR. ZELLER: 8 9 Q. Well, I'm not asking about what other people think. 10 I'm asking you. Do you think that the word "border" or 11 "mask" is a clear term to you as to what it is 12 referring to in the context of tablet computer 13 designs that Apple has made? 14 MR. MONACH: Objection; vague and 15 ambiguous, both a compound and incomplete 16 hypothetical. 17 18 19 THE WITNESS: It could be. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. I'm going to show you what was previously 20 marked as Exhibit 8, which for the record is 21 United States Design Patent 504,889. 22 23 24 25 And please let me know when you've had an opportunity to review the '889 design patent. A. (Witness reviewing document.) Okay. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 93 1 Q. 2 design? 3 A. 4 You're named as an inventor of the '889 I was one of the industrial design team that worked on this product. 5 Q. Looking at the drawings, these figures 6 that are in the '889 design patent, do any of 7 those drawings show what you, in your view -- 8 well, I'm sorry. 9 10 Directing your attention to the figures and drawings in the '889 design patent. 11 12 Let me rephrase it. Do any of those drawings show a mask area? 13 MR. MONACH: Objection; lack of 14 foundation. 15 calls for a legal conclusion by a nonlawyer 16 witness. 17 18 19 Objection; compound. THE WITNESS: Objection; I'm not a patent lawyer. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. I'm not asking you as a patent lawyer. 20 I'm asking you as an inventor of the '889 design 21 patent. 22 23 24 25 Do any of the drawings or figures in the '889 design patent depict a mask area? MR. MONACH: Same objection; lack of foundation -TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 94 1 THE WITNESS: 2 MR. MONACH: 3 Lack of foundation. 4 As -Hang on a second. Objection, to the extent it calls for a legal conclusion. 5 THE WITNESS: As an industrial designer, 6 and not a patent lawyer, it isn't clear to me that 7 there is an area here that is definitely a mask or 8 border. 9 BY MR. ZELLER: 10 Q. Directing your attention to Figure 1. 11 A. Yes. 12 Q. You'll see that on the interior of 13 Figure 1, that there is a rectangular line. 14 Do you see that? 15 A. I see a dotted line. 16 Q. Do you know, is that -- is that a broken 17 line? 18 MR. MONACH: Objection; lack of 19 foundation. 20 document speaks for itself. 21 Under the Best Evidence Rule the THE WITNESS: 22 line. 23 Vague. It looks like a dotted BY MR. ZELLER: 24 25 It looks like an inconsistent dotted line. Q. Do you know why it's in that form? you have an understanding? TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Do Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 95 1 2 MR. MONACH: Objection; lack of foundation. 3 And let me just caution you. I'm not 4 saying you did have any such communications, but I 5 don't want you, in answering any of these 6 questions, to reveal any attorney-client 7 communications. 8 9 10 11 THE WITNESS: Okay. I'm not exactly sure what that rectangle is depicting. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Do you know if that dotted line that you 12 were talking about that's in that rectangular 13 shape on the interior of Figure 1 has some 14 relationship to separating the active area of the 15 display from the mask or nonactive areas of the 16 display? 17 MR. MONACH: Objection; lack of 18 foundation, calls for speculation. 19 extent it's asking for a legal conclusion. 20 THE WITNESS: 21 I'm not sure what that line represents. 22 Object, to the BY MR. ZELLER: 23 Q. And I take it you don't have an 24 understanding as to whether or not that particular 25 line, this rectangular line on the interior of TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 96 1 Figure 1 that's dotted, is part of the claimed 2 design here? 3 MR. MONACH: 4 foundation. 5 Objection; lack of a legal conclusion. 6 Objection, to the extent it calls for THE WITNESS: 7 represents. 8 I'm not sure what that line BY MR. ZELLER: 9 10 Q. Directing your attention to Figure 2 of the '889 design patent. 11 12 You'll see that there are three sets of diagonal lines on the interior of this. 13 A. Yes. 14 Q. And then directing your attention to 15 Figure 4. 16 17 You'll see that it doesn't have those diagonal lines. 18 A. Okay. 19 Q. Do you see that? 20 A. Yes, I see that. 21 Q. Do you have any understanding or 22 explanation as to why those diagonal lines don't 23 appear in Figure 4 but they do appear in Figure 2? 24 25 MR. MONACH: foundation. Objection; lack of Objection, to the extent it calls for TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 97 1 a legal conclusion. 2 THE WITNESS: I'm not sure why those 3 lines are in one view and not in another. 4 BY MR. ZELLER: 5 Q. Do you know if the design that's shown 6 here in the '889 design patent is showing a back 7 surface or bottom surface that is flat and clear? 8 9 10 MR. MONACH: foundation. Same objection; lack of Object, to the extent it calls for a legal conclusion. 11 THE WITNESS: 12 depicting. 13 I'm not sure what that is BY MR. ZELLER: 14 Q. Is the design that's shown here in the 15 '889 design patent, by your understanding, does 16 it -- well, I'm sorry. 17 18 19 Let me rephrase that. Directing your attention to the '889 design patent. In your view, as an inventor and a 20 designer, does this design show a clear front 21 surface of the device? 22 MR. MONACH: 23 foundation. 24 Objection; lack of a legal conclusion. 25 Objection, to the extent it calls for You can give your understanding, if you TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 99 1 the device that's shown there is 2 orientation of the individual holding it 3 somewhat wedge shaped, or it tapers? 4 MR. MONACH: from the is Objection; mischaracterizes 5 the evidence, assumes facts not in evidence, 6 argumentative. 7 BY MR. ZELLER: 8 Q. 9 10 Do you see that? MR. MONACH: Object, to the extent it calls for a legal conclusion. 11 THE WITNESS: 12 to. 13 I see what you're referring BY MR. ZELLER 14 15 I see it's an object that the guy is holding. Q. Well, from the perspective of the guy whose holding it 16 A. 17 Q. 18 Yes. how would you describe the shape of the top of the device? 19 A. 20 What MR. MONACH: 21 ambiguous. 22 Objection; vague and legal conclusion. 23 Object, to the extent it calls for a THE WITNESS: 24 as "the top"? 25 What are you referring to // TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 100 1 2 3 BY MR. ZELLER: Q. The top, from the orientation of the individual holding it, which would be your right. 4 MR. MONACH: 5 Objection; vague. 6 Objection. BY MR. ZELLER: 7 Q. If you could hand me your copy. 8 A. Okay. 9 MR. ZELLER: Let's please mark as Exhibit 10 1132 a copy of the '889 design patent with a 11 marking that I'm about to give it. 12 arrow consisting of an X on Figure 9, and then two 13 arrows with the Figure X, Label X, in Figure 2. It will be an 14 (Deposition Exhibit 1132 was marked for 15 identification) 16 BY MR. ZELLER: 17 Q. So directing your attention to Figure 2. 18 A. Okay. 19 Q. You'll see that what I did there is, I 20 put two arrows with the Label X on there. 21 A. Mm hmm. 22 Q. And you'll see that those portions, those 23 24 25 sides, appear to taper, or narrow? MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the question as mischaracterizing the evidence; TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 101 1 assumes facts not in evidence. 2 THE WITNESS: To me, it looks like a 3 slightly perspective drawing of a rectangular 4 object. 5 BY MR. ZELLER: 6 Q. Do you have an understanding as to 7 whether or not those lines taper because of 8 perspective or because the design that is being 9 communicated here has tapering sides? 10 A. I couldn't say for certain. To me 11 personally, as an industrial designer, it looks to 12 me like they're tapering because of perspective. 13 Q. 14 perspective? 15 16 And in your view, is that an accurate MR. MONACH: Objection; vague and ambiguous. 17 THE WITNESS: 18 accurate perspective. 19 that's what was intended. 20 BY MR. ZELLER: 21 Q. I don't know about an It looks, perhaps, like And if I asked you the same questions 22 about that edge that I labeled as X in Figure 9, 23 you'd give me the same answers? 24 MR. MONACH: 25 calls for a legal conclusion. Objection, to the extent it TSG Reporting - Worldwide But you can give 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 103 1 2 3 BY MR. ZELLER: Q. And from your perspective, is that is that an accurate depiction of perspective? 4 MR. MONACH: Objection; lack of 5 foundation, incomplete hypothetical. 6 vague. 7 8 9 THE WITNESS: Objection; Yes, it could be. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Can you say with any certainty if it is? 10 MR. MONACH: 11 THE WITNESS: Same objection. I can't say with any 12 certainty without 13 accurate perspective view. 14 looks possible. 15 BY MR. ZELLER: 16 Q. whether that's an absolutely But it looks okay. It You'll see also in Figure 9 that there is 17 a portion of it that has a thicker, darker line 18 that runs around the perimeter of the front. 19 Do you see that? 20 A. Yes, I see that. 21 Q. What does that depict? 22 MR. MONACH: 23 foundation. 24 Objection; lack of legal conclusion. 25 Object, to the extent it calls for a THE WITNESS: It's unclear to me exactly TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 104 1 what that is trying to depict. 2 BY MR. ZELLER: 3 Q. 4 Does it depict a gap or a groove? MR. MONACH: 5 foundation. 6 Same objection; lack of a legal conclusion. 7 Objection, to the extent it calls for THE WITNESS: I'm not sure what that 8 precise detail is trying to depict. 9 like the separation between two parts to me. But it looks Not 10 the separation; it looks like the joint between 11 two parts. 12 BY MR. ZELLER: 13 Q. And directing your attention to Figure 1, 14 you'll see that also at least on part of the 15 perimeter of this front surface there is a darker 16 line there as well, darker, thicker line? 17 A. I see that. 18 Q. And do you have an understanding as to 19 what that's depicting? 20 MR. MONACH: 21 foundation. 22 Objection; lack of legal conclusion. 23 Object, to the extent it calls for a THE WITNESS: I couldn't tell you exactly 24 what that's trying to depict. 25 // TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 105 1 BY MR. ZELLER: 2 3 Q. Is that darker, thicker line depicting a gap or a groove? 4 5 MR. MONACH: Same objection. Lack of foundation, calls for a legal conclusion. 6 THE WITNESS: In my opinion as an 7 industrial designer, it doesn't look like that's 8 trying to depict a groove or a gap. 9 it's perhaps trying to show a radius or an 10 intersection of the rear housing, perhaps. 11 BY MR. ZELLER: 12 Q. But you're not certain? 13 14 MR. MONACH: Same objection. Asked and answered. 15 16 It looks like THE WITNESS: I'm not certain. BY MR. ZELLER: 17 Q. You'll see that the date of this design 18 patent for filing 19 page 20 A. 21 Q. 22 and this is on the first Okay. in the middle of the first column, March 17th, 2004. 23 Do you see that date there? 24 A. Yes, I do. 25 Q. Prior to March 17th, 2004, which is the TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 106 1 filing date of the '889 design patent, 8 BY MR. ZELLER: 9 Q. You just don't recall one way or another? 10 A. I don't recall. 19 20 21 BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Do you recall generally that occurring at some him point? 22 MR. MONACH: 23 THE WITNESS: 24 25 Same objection. It might have been. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Let me try something a different way. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 1 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION APPLE INC., a California corporation, 5 Plaintiff, Case No. 6 vs. 11 CV 01846 LHK 7 8 9 10 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 15 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 16 17 18 19 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF RICHARD HOWARTH San Francisco, California Monday, October 31, 2011 20 21 22 23 24 25 REPORTED BY: CYNTHIA MANNING, CSR No. 7645, CLR, CCRR JOB NO. 43007 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 91 1 tablet designs that you worked on there for Apple. 6 7 MR. MONACH: Objection; vague and compound. 8 THE WITNESS: 9 Could you repeat the question? 10 11 MR. ZELLER: Yeah, I'm sorry. Yes. If you could read it back, please. 12 (Whereupon the reporter read the record 13 as follows: 18 MR. MONACH: 19 And I objected; vague and compound. 20 THE WITNESS: 21 to 22 a border. 23 Sometimes some people refer BY MR. ZELLER: 24 25 or I refer to the area around the display as Q. But in general, you don't think that those terms are precise enough or clear enough TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 92 1 that you could be 2 really definite; right? 3 4 MR. MONACH: you'd be able to say it's Objection; vague and ambiguous. 5 THE WITNESS: 6 people think. 7 I don't know what other BY MR. ZELLER: 8 9 Q. Well, I'm not asking about what other people think. 10 I'm asking you. Do you think that the word "border" or 11 "mask" is a clear term to you as to what it is 12 referring to in the context of tablet computer 13 designs that Apple has made? 14 MR. MONACH: Objection; vague and 15 ambiguous, both a compound and incomplete 16 hypothetical. 17 18 19 THE WITNESS: It could be. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. I'm going to show you what was previously 20 marked as Exhibit 8, which for the record is 21 United States Design Patent 504,889. 22 23 24 25 And please let me know when you've had an opportunity to review the '889 design patent. A. (Witness reviewing document.) Okay. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 93 1 Q. 2 design? 3 A. 4 You're named as an inventor of the '889 I was one of the industrial design team that worked on this product. 5 Q. Looking at the drawings, these figures 6 that are in the '889 design patent, do any of 7 those drawings show what you, in your view 8 well, I'm sorry. 9 10 Directing your attention to the figures and drawings in the '889 design patent. 11 12 Let me rephrase it. Do any of those drawings show a mask area? 13 MR. MONACH: Objection; lack of 14 foundation. 15 calls for a legal conclusion by a nonlawyer 16 witness. 17 18 19 Objection; compound. THE WITNESS: Objection; I'm not a patent lawyer. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. I'm not asking you as a patent lawyer. 20 I'm asking you as an inventor of the '889 design 21 patent. 22 23 24 25 Do any of the drawings or figures in the '889 design patent depict a mask area? MR. MONACH: Same objection; lack of foundation TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 94 1 THE WITNESS: 2 MR. MONACH: 3 Lack of foundation. 4 As Hang on a second. Objection, to the extent it calls for a legal conclusion. 5 THE WITNESS: As an industrial designer, 6 and not a patent lawyer, it isn't clear to me that 7 there is an area here that is definitely a mask or 8 border. 9 BY MR. ZELLER: 10 Q. Directing your attention to Figure 1. 11 A. Yes. 12 Q. You'll see that on the interior of 13 Figure 1, that there is a rectangular line. 14 Do you see that? 15 A. I see a dotted line. 16 Q. Do you know, is that 17 is that a broken line? 18 MR. MONACH: Objection; lack of 19 foundation. 20 document speaks for itself. 21 Under the Best Evidence Rule the THE WITNESS: 22 line. 23 Vague. It looks like a dotted BY MR. ZELLER: 24 25 It looks like an inconsistent dotted line. Q. Do you know why it's in that form? you have an understanding? TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Do Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 95 1 2 MR. MONACH: Objection; lack of foundation. 3 And let me just caution you. I'm not 4 saying you did have any such communications, but I 5 don't want you, in answering any of these 6 questions, to reveal any attorney client 7 communications. 8 9 10 11 THE WITNESS: Okay. I'm not exactly sure what that rectangle is depicting. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Do you know if that dotted line that you 12 were talking about that's in that rectangular 13 shape on the interior of Figure 1 has some 14 relationship to separating the active area of the 15 display from the mask or nonactive areas of the 16 display? 17 MR. MONACH: Objection; lack of 18 foundation, calls for speculation. 19 extent it's asking for a legal conclusion. 20 THE WITNESS: 21 I'm not sure what that line represents. 22 Object, to the BY MR. ZELLER: 23 Q. And I take it you don't have an 24 understanding as to whether or not that particular 25 line, this rectangular line on the interior of TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 96 1 Figure 1 that's dotted, is part of the claimed 2 design here? 3 MR. MONACH: 4 foundation. 5 Objection; lack of a legal conclusion. 6 Objection, to the extent it calls for THE WITNESS: 7 represents. 8 I'm not sure what that line BY MR. ZELLER: 9 10 Q. Directing your attention to Figure 2 of the '889 design patent. 11 12 You'll see that there are three sets of diagonal lines on the interior of this. 13 A. Yes. 14 Q. And then directing your attention to 15 Figure 4. 16 17 You'll see that it doesn't have those diagonal lines. 18 A. Okay. 19 Q. Do you see that? 20 A. Yes, I see that. 21 Q. Do you have any understanding or 22 explanation as to why those diagonal lines don't 23 appear in Figure 4 but they do appear in Figure 2? 24 25 MR. MONACH: foundation. Objection; lack of Objection, to the extent it calls for TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 97 1 a legal conclusion. 2 THE WITNESS: I'm not sure why those 3 lines are in one view and not in another. 4 BY MR. ZELLER: 5 Q. Do you know if the design that's shown 6 here in the '889 design patent is showing a back 7 surface or bottom surface that is flat and clear? 8 9 10 MR. MONACH: foundation. Same objection; lack of Object, to the extent it calls for a legal conclusion. 11 THE WITNESS: 12 depicting. 13 I'm not sure what that is BY MR. ZELLER: 14 Q. Is the design that's shown here in the 15 '889 design patent, by your understanding, does 16 it 17 18 19 well, I'm sorry. Let me rephrase that. Directing your attention to the '889 design patent. In your view, as an inventor and a 20 designer, does this design show a clear front 21 surface of the device? 22 MR. MONACH: 23 foundation. 24 Objection; lack of a legal conclusion. 25 Objection, to the extent it calls for You can give your understanding, if you TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 98 1 have one. 2 THE WITNESS: 3 this document 4 could be. 5 I'm not exactly sure what BY MR. ZELLER: 6 Q. what this figure is showing. It And you're not sure one way or another 7 whether what's shown here in the design shows a 8 clear, flat, continuous surface on the front? 9 10 MR. MONACH: Objection, to the extent it calls for a legal conclusion. 11 THE WITNESS: I didn't create these 12 drawings, so I don't know if that's what that is 13 supposed to represent. 14 BY MR. ZELLER: 15 Q. And even apart from the fact that you 16 didn't create the drawings, you still don't know; 17 is that true? 18 MR. MONACH: Same objection. Object, to 19 the extent it calls for a legal conclusion; asked 20 and answered. 21 THE WITNESS: It isn't completely clear 22 to me that that's what that is representing. 23 BY MR. ZELLER: 24 25 Q. Directing your attention to Figure 9. You'll see in Figure 9 that the top of TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 99 1 the device that's shown there is 2 orientation of the individual holding it 3 somewhat wedge shaped, or it tapers? 4 MR. MONACH: from the is Objection; mischaracterizes 5 the evidence, assumes facts not in evidence, 6 argumentative. 7 BY MR. ZELLER: 8 Q. 9 10 Do you see that? MR. MONACH: Object, to the extent it calls for a legal conclusion. 11 THE WITNESS: 12 to. 13 I see what you're referring BY MR. ZELLER 14 15 I see it's an object that the guy is holding. Q. Well, from the perspective of the guy whose holding it 16 A. 17 Q. 18 Yes. how would you describe the shape of the top of the device? 19 A. 20 What MR. MONACH: 21 ambiguous. 22 Objection; vague and legal conclusion. 23 Object, to the extent it calls for a THE WITNESS: 24 as "the top"? 25 What are you referring to // TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 100 1 2 3 BY MR. ZELLER: Q. The top, from the orientation of the individual holding it, which would be your right. 4 MR. MONACH: 5 Objection; vague. 6 Objection. BY MR. ZELLER: 7 Q. If you could hand me your copy. 8 A. Okay. 9 MR. ZELLER: Let's please mark as Exhibit 10 1132 a copy of the '889 design patent with a 11 marking that I'm about to give it. 12 arrow consisting of an X on Figure 9, and then two 13 arrows with the Figure X, Label X, in Figure 2. It will be an 14 (Deposition Exhibit 1132 was marked for 15 identification) 16 BY MR. ZELLER: 17 Q. So directing your attention to Figure 2. 18 A. Okay. 19 Q. You'll see that what I did there is, I 20 put two arrows with the Label X on there. 21 A. Mm hmm. 22 Q. And you'll see that those portions, those 23 24 25 sides, appear to taper, or narrow? MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the question as mischaracterizing the evidence; TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 101 1 assumes facts not in evidence. 2 THE WITNESS: To me, it looks like a 3 slightly perspective drawing of a rectangular 4 object. 5 BY MR. ZELLER: 6 Q. Do you have an understanding as to 7 whether or not those lines taper because of 8 perspective or because the design that is being 9 communicated here has tapering sides? 10 A. I couldn't say for certain. To me 11 personally, as an industrial designer, it looks to 12 me like they're tapering because of perspective. 13 Q. 14 perspective? 15 16 And in your view, is that an accurate MR. MONACH: Objection; vague and ambiguous. 17 THE WITNESS: 18 accurate perspective. 19 that's what was intended. 20 BY MR. ZELLER: 21 Q. I don't know about an It looks, perhaps, like And if I asked you the same questions 22 about that edge that I labeled as X in Figure 9, 23 you'd give me the same answers? 24 MR. MONACH: 25 calls for a legal conclusion. Objection, to the extent it TSG Reporting - Worldwide But you can give 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 102 1 your understanding. 2 THE WITNESS: My understanding is that's 3 what that is trying to represent. 4 BY MR. ZELLER: 5 6 Q. It is perspective, but you're not certain? 7 8 MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the question. 9 THE WITNESS: 10 what that represents. 11 BY MR. ZELLER: 12 Q. It's possible that that's But, again, you can't say with certainty 13 whether or not that's 14 of perspective, as opposed to whether or not the 15 design is actually showing that there is some kind 16 of tapering? 17 MR. MONACH: that tapering is because Objection; lack of 18 foundation. 19 a legal conclusion; asked and answered. Objection, to the extent it calls for 20 You can do it again. 21 THE WITNESS: In my opinion, as an 22 industrial designer and not a patent lawyer, I 23 think that that looks like it is an object with 24 perspective and not a tapering geometry. 25 // TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 103 1 2 3 BY MR. ZELLER: Q. And from your perspective, is that is that an accurate depiction of perspective? 4 MR. MONACH: Objection; lack of 5 foundation, incomplete hypothetical. 6 vague. 7 8 9 THE WITNESS: Objection; Yes, it could be. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Can you say with any certainty if it is? 10 MR. MONACH: 11 THE WITNESS: Same objection. I can't say with any 12 certainty without 13 accurate perspective view. 14 looks possible. 15 BY MR. ZELLER: 16 Q. whether that's an absolutely But it looks okay. It You'll see also in Figure 9 that there is 17 a portion of it that has a thicker, darker line 18 that runs around the perimeter of the front. 19 Do you see that? 20 A. Yes, I see that. 21 Q. What does that depict? 22 MR. MONACH: 23 foundation. 24 Objection; lack of legal conclusion. 25 Object, to the extent it calls for a THE WITNESS: It's unclear to me exactly TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 104 1 what that is trying to depict. 2 BY MR. ZELLER: 3 Q. 4 Does it depict a gap or a groove? MR. MONACH: 5 foundation. 6 Same objection; lack of a legal conclusion. 7 Objection, to the extent it calls for THE WITNESS: I'm not sure what that 8 precise detail is trying to depict. 9 like the separation between two parts to me. But it looks Not 10 the separation; it looks like the joint between 11 two parts. 12 BY MR. ZELLER: 13 Q. And directing your attention to Figure 1, 14 you'll see that also at least on part of the 15 perimeter of this front surface there is a darker 16 line there as well, darker, thicker line? 17 A. I see that. 18 Q. And do you have an understanding as to 19 what that's depicting? 20 MR. MONACH: 21 foundation. 22 Objection; lack of legal conclusion. 23 Object, to the extent it calls for a THE WITNESS: I couldn't tell you exactly 24 what that's trying to depict. 25 // TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 105 1 BY MR. ZELLER: 2 3 Q. Is that darker, thicker line depicting a gap or a groove? 4 5 MR. MONACH: Same objection. Lack of foundation, calls for a legal conclusion. 6 THE WITNESS: In my opinion as an 7 industrial designer, it doesn't look like that's 8 trying to depict a groove or a gap. 9 it's perhaps trying to show a radius or an 10 intersection of the rear housing, perhaps. 11 BY MR. ZELLER: 12 Q. But you're not certain? 13 14 MR. MONACH: Same objection. Asked and answered. 15 16 It looks like THE WITNESS: I'm not certain. BY MR. ZELLER: 17 Q. You'll see that the date of this design 18 patent for filing 19 page 20 A. 21 Q. 22 and this is on the first Okay. in the middle of the first column, March 17th, 2004. 23 Do you see that date there? 24 A. Yes, I do. 25 Q. Prior to March 17th, 2004, which is the TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 106 1 filing date of the '889 design patent, 5 6 MR. MONACH: Lack of foundation. 7 8 Object to form. THE WITNESS: I don't recall. BY MR. ZELLER: 9 Q. You just don't recall one way or another? 10 A. I don't recall. 19 20 21 BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Do you recall generally that occurring at some him point? 22 MR. MONACH: 23 THE WITNESS: 24 25 Same objection. It might have been. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Let me try something a different way. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 107 7 8 9 BY MR. ZELLER: Q. vents, V E N T S. 10 11 And for the record, the word I'm using is MR. ZELLER: mockup. Maybe we could see the That would be helpful. 12 MS. TIERNEY: 13 MR. MONACH: 14 When you're done with this, maybe we 15 16 17 Absolutely. Sure. should take a lunch break. MR. ZELLER: Sure. We'll just wrap up this line and show him the model and take a break. 18 (Pause in the proceedings) 19 MR. ZELLER: Thank you. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 108 3 4 BY MR. ZELLER Q. 5 And I'll hand that mockup to you. And if you could do me a tremendous 6 favor, if you could hold that up for the camera, 7 too, so we'll have a depiction of it. 8 A. (Witness complies.) 9 Q. And could you also show the sides with 10 the ports. 11 A. (Witness complies.) 12 Q. Thank you. 13 And then there's some writing on the back 14 on the label. 15 that for the record for us. And if you could, please just read 16 A. "Apple proto 035." 17 Q. And first let me ask you, with respect to 18 the model that you have in your hands, had you 19 seen that before? 20 MR. MONACH: Instruct the witness not to 21 answer with respect to any communications you had 22 with counsel in connection with the deposition or 23 any other communications with counsel. 24 25 But if you have a recollection of seeing it independently or a recollection that you don't, TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 109 1 you can answer. 2 THE WITNESS: 3 maybe. 4 I think so, a long time ago BY MR. ZELLER: 25 // TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 110 1 2 BY MR. ZELLER: Q. You'll see that there's a gap, or a 3 groove, that runs the perimeter of the front 4 there. 5 A. 6 Mm hmm. 7 MR. MONACH: question. 8 9 10 11 Object to the form of the THE WITNESS: something here, a gap. I do see that there's I see that. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. And then if you look inside that opening, 12 you'll see something that appears to be the 13 depiction of vents or some kind of openings? 14 15 MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the question. 16 THE WITNESS: I see some sort of 17 detailing of something down there. 18 BY MR. ZELLER: 19 Q. Do you know what that detailing is? 20 A. I don't. I couldn't be sure. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 111 1 BY MR. ZELLER: 21 BY MR. ZELLER: 22 Q. And why do you think it's different? 23 A. Well, I see a number of differences. 24 25 I don't see this detailing that you're referring to around the outside perimeter. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 112 8 9 Q. And all that leads you to conclude that it's a different design? 10 MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the 11 question as vague and ambiguous. 12 extent it's calling for a legal conclusion about 13 the scope of the patented design. 14 THE WITNESS: Object, to the I'm not exactly sure. 15 don't believe that this is the product that is 16 being covered by this. 17 BY MR. ZELLER: I 25 Q. It could be. But you're not certain one way or TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 113 1 another? 2 MR. MONACH: 3 answered, lack of foundation. 4 extent it calls for a legal conclusion. 5 THE WITNESS: Objection; asked and 6 That's correct. I'm not certain. 7 Object, to the BY MR. ZELLER: 8 9 Q. I'm going to show you what was previously marked as Exhibit 841. 10 A. Mm hmm. 11 Q. And please let me know when you've had an 12 opportunity to review those pages. 13 A. 14 (Witness reviewing document.) Okay. 15 Q. I take it generally speaking, at some 16 point, you became aware that there was a dispute 17 between Apple and Samsung, a legal dispute? 18 19 MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the question as vague. 20 In answering this question, I'll instruct 21 the witness not to reveal any attorney client 22 communications. 23 THE WITNESS: 24 was 25 I can't remember when I // when I first found out. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 114 1 BY MR. ZELLER: 2 Q. Right. I'm not quite at that question 3 yet. 4 generally. 5 the questions I'm going to ask. I'm just trying to understand something It's to help put some time periods on 6 A. Okay. 7 Q. So at some point, did you become aware 8 that there was a lawsuit between Apple and 9 Samsung, just generally speaking? 10 11 MR. MONACH: yes, no, or I don't recall. 12 13 You can answer that question THE WITNESS: At some point, yes. BY MR. ZELLER: 14 Q. Now, prior to the time that you became 15 aware that there was a lawsuit between Samsung and 16 Apple, had you seen these pages that were marked 17 as Exhibit 841 before that time? 18 A. I don't recall. 19 Q. Do you recognize what's depicted here in 20 Exhibit 841? 21 22 MR. MONACH: Objection; vague and ambiguous. 23 THE WITNESS: 24 what this 25 I'm not I'm not clear on // on what's depicted in these pages. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 269 1 inventors here on the '889 design patent, that the 2 design that's shown here in the '889 design patent 3 is the design of the first iPad? 4 MR. MONACH: Objection; vague and 5 ambiguous. 6 conclusion about the scope of the '889. 7 Objection; lacking in foundation, in light of the 8 prior testimony; asked and answered. 9 Objection; calls for a legal THE WITNESS: I'm not an expert in 10 reading patent drawings, so I couldn't tell you if 11 this represents the exact design of the iPad that 12 was launched. 13 BY MR. ZELLER: 14 15 Q. My question is a very specific one. I'd appreciate if you'd answer it. 16 Do you need it read back? 17 MR. MONACH: Is that a question to the 19 MR. ZELLER: Yes. 20 MR. MONACH: Objection; asked and 18 21 22 witness? answered. Object to the argumentative commentary. The question was asked and answered. 23 calls for a legal conclusion about the scope of 24 the patent. 25 you're just badgering him. It The witness gave his answer and now TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 270 1 Object that it's vague. 2 lacking in foundation. 3 Object that it's answered. Object that it's asked and 4 Do you have anything else to add? 5 MR. ZELLER: 6 to answer? 7 8 MR. MONACH: No, I am not. Did you hear me instruct him not to answer? 9 10 Are you instructing him not MR. ZELLER: Well, you're interrupting my questioning. 11 MR. MONACH: No, I'm objecting to your 12 badging of the witness and characterizing his 13 response because, apparently, you don't care for 14 it, so you keep asking him the same question over 15 and over. 16 MR. ZELLER: Let the record reflect that 17 counsel directed a question to the witness. 18 BY MR. ZELLER 19 Q. Do you believe, as one of the named 20 inventors here on the '889 design patent 21 not asking you as an expert, but as a named 22 inventor 23 the '889 patent is the design of the first iPad? that the design that's shown here in 24 25 I'm MR. MONACH: answered. Objection; asked and Objection; vague. TSG Reporting - Worldwide Objection; lacking 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 271 1 in foundation. 2 calls for a legal conclusion. 3 And objection, to the extent it THE WITNESS: In my opinion, I cannot be 4 certain that this 5 this document here represents the exact design of 6 the iPad 1. 7 BY MR. ZELLER: 8 9 Q. that the design of that Again, I didn't ask about the, quote, exact same design. 10 You see that there's a design that's 11 reflected here in the '889 design patent that 12 you're identified as one of the people who 13 invented it; right? 14 A. I am. 15 Q. And so my question is: In your view, as 16 a named inventor on the '889 design patent, do you 17 think that the iPad has this design that's shown 18 here in the '889 design patent, or do you think 19 it's a different design? 20 MR. MONACH: 21 ambiguous. 22 a legal conclusion. 23 foundation. Objection; vague and 24 25 Objection, to the extent it calls for Objection; lacking in Objection; asked and answered. THE WITNESS: I see some similarities and differences, but I couldn't tell you if this TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 272 1 I'm not 2 BY MR. ZELLER: 3 Q. I'm really not a patent reading expert. Do you have anything else to add to your 4 answers to my questions on the comparison between 5 the iPad design and the '889 design patent? 6 A. No. 7 Q. Directing your attention to the design in 8 the '889 design patent, is this the design of the 9 iPad2? 10 MR. MONACH: Objection; vague and 11 ambiguous. 12 a legal conclusion from a nonlawyer witness. Objection, to the extent it calls for 13 THE WITNESS: 14 MR. MONACH: 15 Go ahead. 16 THE WITNESS: I'm not Lack of foundation. Sorry. I'm not a patent reading 17 expert, so it is makes it difficult to answer your 18 question. 19 BY MR. ZELLER: 20 Q. Do you believe that, in order for someone 21 to understand the design that's shown here in the 22 '889 design patent, that one would have to be a 23 patent expert? 24 25 MR. MONACH: Objection; vague. Objection; calls for speculation, incomplete TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 273 1 hypothetical. 2 THE WITNESS: 3 take. 4 I don't know what it would BY MR. ZELLER: 5 6 Q. Well, is the design that's shown here in the '889 patent understandable to you? 7 MR. MONACH: Objection; vague and 8 ambiguous. 9 for a legal conclusion. 10 11 Objection, to the extent it's calling THE WITNESS: Not completely. BY MR. ZELLER: 12 Q. 13 do you mean? 14 A. And when you say "not completely," what I'm not a patent lawyer. I'm not a 15 patent reading expert. 16 about this that I can say seem different to me 17 than the final design of the iPad. 18 Q. So to me, there are things And again, as I've been telling you, I'm 19 not asking you an expert. 20 someone who is named as an inventor on this 21 design. 22 I'm asking you as Please tell me what parts of the design 23 that's shown in this '889 design patent is not 24 completely understandable to you. 25 MR. MONACH: Object TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 274 1 BY MR. ZELLER: 2 Q. 3 perspective. 4 I'm talking about your own individual MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the 5 question as vague and ambiguous. 6 extent it calls for a legal conclusion. 7 THE WITNESS: Object, to the I find it hard to translate 8 these drawings, as an individual. 9 BY MR. ZELLER: 10 11 Q. And what is it about the drawings that make it not possible for you to translate them? 12 MR. MONACH: 13 the prior testimony. 14 Objection; mischaracterizes THE WITNESS: That I work with 3D objects 15 usually, and two dimensional drawings are a little 16 bit harder to understand for me. 17 BY MR. ZELLER: 18 Q. Well, setting aside that this is what we 19 have to work with, in terms of a design patent, 20 are these two dimensional drawings, are there 21 let me ask it this way. 22 Again, I'm not asking you as an expert. 23 I'm not asking you as patent law or anything else. 24 I'm just asking you, as your own personal 25 understanding when you look at these drawings, do TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 275 1 you feel like you completely understand the design 2 that is being communicated through these drawings, 3 or does it seem uncertain to you in certain 4 respects? 5 MR. MONACH: Objection; vague and 6 ambiguous. 7 incorporates or asks for a legal conclusion. 8 9 10 Objection, to the extent it THE WITNESS: BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Other parts don't seem clear to you? 11 MR. MONACH: 12 THE WITNESS: 13 14 Some parts seem clear. Same objection. Yes. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. And what parts are you referring to that 15 don't seem clear to you? 16 about your own individual perspective. 17 MR. MONACH: 18 THE WITNESS: Again, we're talk solely Same objection. Well, I'm not sure what 19 these lines represent (indicating). 20 BY MR. ZELLER: 21 Q. And what figure are you pointing to? 22 A. Figure 6. 23 Q. And you're referring to the those 24 lines that run horizontally from the perspective 25 of the viewer, or the reader? TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 276 1 2 A. Just those that couple of those ones in particular. 3 Q. Are there other portions of the design 4 shown in the '889 design patent that aren't clear 5 to you? 6 7 Again, we're talking totally about your own individual perspective. 8 MR. MONACH: 9 THE WITNESS: Same objections. From my perspective, I 10 can 11 the same as the iPad which is what your question 12 was, the iPad 1. 13 BY MR. ZELLER: 14 15 yes, it doesn't seem like this is exactly Q. Well, I'm asking a slightly different question at this point. 16 You had mentioned, with respect to Figure 17 6, some lines that you thought were unclear to 18 you. 19 Are there other aspects of the design 20 that's shown here, other than what we've talked 21 about, that you think is unclear? 22 MR. MONACH: Objection; vague. 23 Objection, to the extent it calls for a legal 24 conclusion or incorporates legal terms. 25 THE WITNESS: It seems TSG Reporting - Worldwide seems like what 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 277 1 I'm looking at in these drawings is a housing 2 coming around, one piece housing coming around to 3 a piece of glass. 4 these drawings. 5 BY MR. ZELLER: 6 Q. That's what I interpret from But you're not sure about that? 7 MR. MONACH: 8 question; asked and answered. 9 THE WITNESS: 10 That's what it looks like to me. 11 Object to the form of the BY MR. ZELLER: 12 Q. But are you certain that's the design 13 that's being communicated here, or are you just 14 telling me that that's how it seems to you? 15 16 MR. MONACH: question. Object to the form of the It's badgering the witness. 17 You've asked him to give his own opinion, 18 and now when he gives it, you seem to be objecting 19 to his own opinion. 20 21 22 MR. ZELLER: I'm asking him how certain he is that that's what the design is. MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the 23 question as vague, asked and answered. 24 the extent you're incorporating a legal term or 25 legal conclusion. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Object, to Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 278 1 BY MR. ZELLER: 2 Q. You can go ahead and answer. 3 A. That's how it appears to me, judging from 4 5 6 these drawings. Q. And how certain are you that that's what the drawings show? 7 MR. MONACH: 8 THE WITNESS: 9 but it appears that way to me. 10 11 Objection; vague. I'm not absolutely certain, BY MR. ZELLER: Q. To go back to the question I was asking, 12 other than what we've talked about, are there 13 other aspects of what's shown here in the '889 14 design that are unclear to you personally? 15 16 MR. MONACH: question for the reasons previously stated. 17 18 19 Object to the form of the THE WITNESS: Not really. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Directing your attention to Figure 6, 20 you'll see that there is the circular form there 21 on the right hand side, from the perspective of 22 the person looking at it. 23 Do you see that? 24 A. Yes. 25 Q. What is that? TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 279 1 A. 2 It's 3 MR. MONACH: question. 4 5 6 Object to the form of the THE WITNESS: It looks like a circle. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. 7 What's it depict? MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the 8 question as vague and ambiguous. 9 extent it calls for a legal conclusion. 10 THE WITNESS: Object, to the 11 it's trying to depict. 12 I'm not exactly sure what BY MR. ZELLER: 13 Q. Do you have any idea what it is? 14 MR. MONACH: 15 THE WITNESS: 16 17 Same objection. Not for certain. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. I'm not asking for certain. I'm asking: 18 Do you have any understanding as to what that 19 circle depicts? 20 MR. MONACH: 21 You can answer. 22 THE WITNESS: 23 circular 24 Same objections as before. I'm not sure what that BY MR. ZELLER: 25 Q. what that circle is depicting. Is that circle being presented with TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 280 1 broken lines? 2 MR. MONACH: Objection; lack of 3 foundation. 4 for a legal conclusion. 5 Evidence Rule. 6 And object, to the extent it calls THE WITNESS: Objection under the Best I don't know. 7 like there's 8 some dotted lines or dots around it. 9 It looks BY MR. ZELLER: 10 Q. it looks like there's a line and Does the design that's showing here in 11 the '889 design patent 12 moment. 13 let me step back for a Do you see here on the first page the 14 phrase 15 says, "The broken lines being shown for 16 illustrative purposes only and form no part of the 17 claimed design." this is under "description" 18 Do you see that? 19 MR. MONACH: where it Object to the reading of 20 only a portion of the sentence which says, 21 "Figure 9 is an exemplary diagram of the use of 22 the electronic device thereof, the broken lines 23 being shown for illustrative purposes only and 24 form no part of the claimed design." 25 // TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 281 1 BY MR. ZELLER: 2 Q. Do you see that part? 3 A. I do. "Figure 9 is an exemplary diagram 4 of the use of the electronic device thereof, the 5 broken lines being shown for illustrative purposes 6 only form no part of the claimed design." 7 Q. Directing your attention to Figure 6. 8 9 Okay. Is that circle being shown as broken lines? 10 MR. MONACH: Objection under the Best 11 Evidence Rule, that the document is the best 12 evidence of whether the lines are broken or not. 13 14 15 THE WITNESS: BY MR. ZELLER: Q. Directing your attention to Figure 8. 16 17 I can't say for certain. You'll see in the center there, there is a smaller rectangular shape. 18 Do you see that? 19 A. Right. 20 Q. Do you see that? 21 A. Yes. 22 Q. What's that depict? 23 MR. MONACH: 24 question. 25 Object to the form of the legal conclusion. Object, to the extent it calls for a TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 282 1 THE WITNESS: 2 depicting. 3 I'm not sure what it's BY MR. ZELLER: 4 Q. Are those broken lines? 5 6 MR. MONACH: Rule. Objection; vague. 7 8 9 THE WITNESS: Q. Do you consider those to be broken lines? MR. MONACH: 14 Object to the form of the question. 12 13 They look like dots to me. BY MR. ZELLER: 10 11 Objection; Best Evidence THE WITNESS: They look like dots to me. BY MR. ZELLER: Q. 15 Do you consider dots to be broken lines? MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the 16 question. 17 a legal conclusion; lacks foundation. 18 And object, to the extent it calls for THE WITNESS: 19 by "broken lines." 20 I'm not sure what you mean BY MR. ZELLER: 21 Q. You see the words "broken lines" that are 22 used under the description heading that we talked 23 about on the first page? 24 A. Yes. 25 Q. Do you know what broken lines means in TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 283 1 this context, or have any understanding as to what 2 it means? 3 A. Sometimes it can mean there's a dashed 4 line, dot dash, dot dash. 5 different things. 6 Q. "Broken" can be So then specifically, with respect to 7 that smaller rectangular shape there in Figure 8 8 9 A. 10 Q. Right. are those broken lines that are being 11 shown for illustrative purposes only and form no 12 part of the claimed design, as you understand 13 those terms, as you understand this drawing? 14 MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the 15 question as vague, lacking in foundation, and, 16 plainly, just calling for a legal conclusion. 17 THE WITNESS: 18 trying to represent. 19 patent drawings. 20 I don't know what they're BY MR. ZELLER: 21 Q. I'm not an expert at reading Do you have any understanding in that 22 regard as an inventor, a named inventor, of the 23 '889 design patent? 24 25 MR. MONACH: Same objections; asked and answered. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 284 1 THE WITNESS: I was an inventor of the 2 product, not the patent drawing. 3 BY MR. ZELLER: 4 Q. Setting aside because I'm not asking 5 you as an expert, again. 6 have been about how you understand these. 7 All my questions here Do you have an understanding as to 8 whether that 9 for that rectangular area in Figure 8 is the same what you call those dotted lines 10 as these broken lines that form no part of the 11 claim design or are they something different? 12 MR. MONACH: Objection; asked and 13 answered, vague, lack of foundation, calls for a 14 legal conclusion. 15 16 THE WITNESS: those dotted lines mean. 17 18 MR. ZELLER: Okay. Let's take a few minutes. 19 20 I'm not exactly sure what THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're off the record at 6:51 p.m. 21 (Recess taken) 22 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: 23 record at 7:07 24 25 We are back on the 7:03 p.m. You may proceed. // TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 285 1 2 BY MR. ZELLER: Q. I'm going to show you what's previously 3 marked as Exhibit 6, which is a copy of United 4 States Design Patent 593,087. 5 6 7 Can you let us know when you've had a chance to look at the '087 design patent. A. 8 9 10 (Witness reviewing document.) Okay. Q. Do you recognize the '087 design patent as a patent that you're a named inventor on? 11 A. Yeah, looks like it. 12 Q. What, from your perspective as an 13 inventor of the design that's shown here on the 14 '087 design patent, was new or original about this 15 design? 16 MR. MONACH: Object to the form of the 17 question as vague, lacking in foundation, and 18 incorporating or requesting a legal conclusion. 19 THE WITNESS: 20 iPhone? 21 What was new about the BY MR. ZELLER: 22 Q. What was new about this patent? What was new and original about the 23 design that's shown here in these drawings that 24 make up the '087 design patent? 25 MR. MONACH: Same objection. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?