Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 125

NOTICE by Microsoft Corporation re #124 Defendant's MOTION Claim Construction of Filing Exhibits (Attachments: #1 Appendix (Index to Exhibits), #2 Exhibit 101, #3 Exhibit 102, #4 Exhibit 201, #5 Exhibit 301, #6 Exhibit 302, #7 Exhibit 304, #8 Exhibit 305, #9 Exhibit 501, #10 Exhibit 502, #11 Exhibit 504, #12 Exhibit 601, #13 Exhibit 801 (Part 1), #14 Exhibit 801 (Part 2), #15 Exhibit 901, #16 Exhibit 902, #17 Exhibit 903, #18 Exhibit 904, #19 Exhibit 905, #20 Exhibit 1101, #21 Exhibit 1102, #22 Exhibit 1105, #23 Exhibit 1110, #24 Exhibit 1114, #25 Exhibit 1115, #26 Exhibit 1116, #27 Exhibit 1201, #28 Exhibit 1301, #29 Exhibit 1302, #30 Exhibit 1303, #31 Exhibit 1304, #32 Exhibit 1305, #33 Exhibit 1401, #34 Exhibit 1402, #35 Exhibit 1403, #36 Exhibit 1404, #37 Exhibit 1405, #38 Exhibit 1406, #39 Exhibit 1407, #40 Exhibit 1408, #41 Exhibit 1409)(Miner, Curtis)

Exhibit 902

No

90009286

In addition
did not explicitly

it

Attorney

with regard

describe

second

a

would have been obvious

made

to

Action

at

in

storage

message

and prove more
the motivation

server in the office

to

rationale

document storage instead of
in

as

a

a large office

the

Morgan

states that

server for providing

that

the

in

Morgan

electronic

Office

server to provide

203 may be

storage

was

message

system

using an additional

document

local

Office

PD05514AW

the art at the time the invention

in

203

environment

modify the communication

1

No

Docket

providing mailbox storage but that

for

skill

of document storage

The Offices

efficient

of Claim

one having ordinary

the manner

pages 6 and 7

electronic

to

server

one of the computers 102 or 105

operate

document

the host

to

is

Application

juste

iied

with large data transfer requirements

Morgan

system taught by

Office

Action

at

as

page 7

emphasis added

the

destination

originating

computers

102 or

203

a

Third

105

would provide

person of ordinary

was made note
costly

is

remote location

that

that

compared

to

in

that

in

the

create

a

statements

made

in

15

line

the

that

sends

unclear

both
the

in

in

the

document

Offices

addition

to

hypothetical
the

during

line

54

Second
separate

why

the

document memory

would

that

create

duplicative

storage

wasteful

If

of the document received by the server 101

was

filed

in late

1995

today would have been discouraged

analysis of the pending

and

the

was made would have

application

Detailed

Column 5

to

submitted that a person of ordinary skill

Description
the

4

document by the originating party

system

only storage

requires additional

part to the Detailed

hindsight

or suggest

the art at the time the invention

the

the art at the time

in

when communications

to store

the documents

at

network transmissions

For the host server limitation of Claim

citing

Column

at

document storage

hypothetical

computer 102 or 105 then

were slow and
a

skill

instead suggesting that the

the invention

101

server

it

in

of Morgans

the

recognized that the Offices
Office

Morgan

affirmatively given the

party

information to

See

it

because

teach

to

is

mode

is

server

Morgans

Instead

fails

sends a request for a data unit to another server or any other computer

document transmission

the

Morgan

First

is

server 101

is

office

disagrees

respectfully

is

Owner

Patent

1

the Office

of the 899 patent
Description
claims

Page 10 of 13

bases

its

Patent

position

Owner

on obviousness

respectfully

by

submits

of the `899 patent should not be used

to

ordinary skill

person having

communication
102105

art at

the

art

unit

fails

still

as

to

submits that

teach

to

203

or

a

modify Morgans

to

one of the

computers

even if such suggested

a

suggest

1 Thus Claim

recited in Claim

to

mailbox
1

of

a

user

not obvious and

patentable over the prior art of record

In regard to Claim
inter

a

alia

for storing

host server

the

first

2

the Office

repeats the

communication

in

same

a

with

server

forwarding

the

wherein the store comprises a clientserver program

above

with regard to the

communication
for

the

is

communication
respectfully

New

server

art

prior

communication

Claims

among

Claims

and

2

the

14

and

16

recite

communication

New

respectively

claims recite patentable features
respective parent claims

reply

on

original

Allowance

Claim
is

based

to

of record

to

server

2

request for the

data unit

first

communication

the

store

server

The arguments presented

teach

or suggest

forwarding

the

a

host server

first

data

to

a

unit

in

request
the

to

and other reasons Claim

for this

Therefore

a

comprising

being operable for in response

server

the

unit

7

the

communication

Claim 15 recites
Patent

New

including

Claim 17
a

also

requested

11

of 13

server

alia a

and
and the

sessionoriented
server

of

whether

to

host

determination

submits that these

respectfully

and nonobvious combinations

recites a

determination

Page

inter

Owner

addition to the novel

in

respectfully

of sessionlessoriented

use

forward the optimized reply or a replica reply

their

a

memory

apply to Claim

similarly

unit

file

communication

by the

data

to

server

Claim 2 recites

submitted as patentable over the prior art of record

protocols
1

unit

of the

failure

a

with

data

first

communication

first

Claim 1

as

rejections

data unit and being operable for in response

communication

by the

2

was made

storage

further

PD05514AW

would not have been obvious

invention

document

Owner

Patent

prior

with the communication

associated

the time the

duplicate

servers

as

made

were

the

in

submits that

respectfully

move or

system to

and operate them

modification

is

Owner

Patent

Therefore

No

Docket

Attorney

is

90009286

it

No

Application

novel

whether

to

new

found

in

and nonobvious combination
send

a

reply or an optimized