Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 125

NOTICE by Microsoft Corporation re #124 Defendant's MOTION Claim Construction of Filing Exhibits (Attachments: #1 Appendix (Index to Exhibits), #2 Exhibit 101, #3 Exhibit 102, #4 Exhibit 201, #5 Exhibit 301, #6 Exhibit 302, #7 Exhibit 304, #8 Exhibit 305, #9 Exhibit 501, #10 Exhibit 502, #11 Exhibit 504, #12 Exhibit 601, #13 Exhibit 801 (Part 1), #14 Exhibit 801 (Part 2), #15 Exhibit 901, #16 Exhibit 902, #17 Exhibit 903, #18 Exhibit 904, #19 Exhibit 905, #20 Exhibit 1101, #21 Exhibit 1102, #22 Exhibit 1105, #23 Exhibit 1110, #24 Exhibit 1114, #25 Exhibit 1115, #26 Exhibit 1116, #27 Exhibit 1201, #28 Exhibit 1301, #29 Exhibit 1302, #30 Exhibit 1303, #31 Exhibit 1304, #32 Exhibit 1305, #33 Exhibit 1401, #34 Exhibit 1402, #35 Exhibit 1403, #36 Exhibit 1404, #37 Exhibit 1405, #38 Exhibit 1406, #39 Exhibit 1407, #40 Exhibit 1408, #41 Exhibit 1409)(Miner, Curtis)

Exhibit 903

a

document

Morgans

mailbox

Morgans document memory 203
Take

an

destinations

message

the recipients

on the other hand

recites

in a

Morgan makes

2546
lines

to

he discusses

4546

of

clear that

Office

describe

his

by

the

a

thereof

existing

108
are

the Office

the

that

indicates

that

The memory 203 has no

unit

Claim

which the email

to

and therefore

identities

3

5

not a mailbox in column

computers

Patent
could

Owner

servers

well

such

not

At

intended

could

recipient

then

There

it

as

to

to

Morgans

If

would

host

in

the

102

at

a

distinct

to

other servers

a

105

as

203

not

Action

at

skill

in

the

Morgan

of other computers

note column

3

2

and the

lines

would

5961

not

1330

lines

outside of the office

configuration

servers

Office

did

one having ordinary

storage

area network

`such

to

the data storage

art note column
or

Morgan

server

server for providing electronic

document

to

can access

states

server

providing mailbox storage

addition

Morgan

such as

components

thus

present

utilizing

any

great

page 6

submits

include

claimed

operate

could connect

Action

respectfully

reference could be modified

for

taught that

computers

Office

be modified

the

would have been obvious

was made

understood

take

potentially

document

with the communication

coupled or over the local

taught that

regarding

generally

1

lines

regarding

states that

explicitly

either directly

explicitly

the

that

the document

instead of or in

storage

technical difficulty

Morgan

multiple

send a document to an intended destination

to

second server in the office

1 Morgan

office

server

memory 203

to

in

server in communication

recognizes

document

2 Morgan

he never

but

the recipients

memory 203

stating

the art at the time the invention

system since
in

store

the failure of server 101

a host

5 However

message

forwarded

user of the communication

does not

it

in

memory 203

in

1

stored the document in a mailbox of the recipient then the intended recipient

B

page

document

original

converts

that

the document might have been forwarded
a

not have to ask the originator to retransmit

explicitly

required by Claim

the originating party and seek a retransmission of the

action to contact

The

as

data

payload

nothing

recipients mailbox

he concludes

memory 203

terminology

PD05514AW

submits that there

respectfully

never mind in

whom

the mailbox

Morgans memory 203

any document

storing

mailbox

document

stored anywhere

information about

was sent

a

Offices

Morgans

the

stores

is

destination

into

where

example

Morgan

the

in

or

Owner

Patent

No

is

into

an

that

points

additional

or that the modification

12
server

is

about

203

is

document storage

Docket

Attorney

is

90009286

is

No

it

Application

and

3

However

simply
the

within the capabilities

Page 7 of 18

suggest

mere

fact

that

that

a

of one of ordinary

therefore

establish a

The Office

also

is

there

as

a

between

computers

Action

page 6

mailbox

signal

However

the

at

host

F2d 488

4

reason

is

493

Fed

words

all

have been obvious

to

an additional

with

Owners

storage

that

principles

in

is

Patent

of hierarchical

scenario

memory
second

storage

storage

is

a

the Office

wasteful

hierarchical

a

The principles

server for providing
its

local

for

to

as

paths

signal

Office

that

specifically

modify

the

and

any

Vaeck

947

Morgan
In re

submits that the Offices

respectfully

Office

Action

efficient

of

Action

Office

at

is

data that

economical

Morgan

In response

create

statement

store

would

storage

the

in

would

certainly

page 21

Patent

frequently
for

to

the

states that

used

access

one

having

system while the

to

contrary

apply

to

duplicative

available

than

storage

in a large office

6

page

amount of data

and often more

hierarchical

memory

greater

document

In particular the Office

memory may

5

system since

efficient

at

would

document

message

message

Action

Owners

page 21

a

Morgan

hypothetical

Patent

at

the

electronic

Office

Offices

that

in

it

stating that

electronic

and prove more

justified

the

remarked

203

provide

requirements
that

modifying Morgan

storage
to

server

mailbox storage

document

recites

1

server for providing

memory may have

more

located

1

Figure

of the 899 patent

Owner

reason

smaller faster local

farther

usually

available

server keeps

fifth

203 may be

transfer

suggestion

specification

document

argument

previous

while a larger slower

Such

data

in

clear

as for

primafacie case of obviousness

andor dedicated

large

the

Patent

distinct

to

instead of local document storage
environment

a

operate

instead of or in addition

storage

a

note the

shown

Claim

214303

§

the

Therefore

provides

4

modifying Morgan

server

and server 101

Furthermore

1991

further

or in combination

claim must be considered in judging the patentability

in a

come from

cannot

for

communication

the

MPEP

insufficient to establish a

The Office

alone

either

§ 214301III

not important where the post office

or server 108

server

Cir

to

path

102 or 105

expectation of success

using

`899 patent

claim against the prior art

that

is

of

at

3

and

fourth reason

the following

provides

clear

12

MPEP

prima facie case of obviousness

the scope of this feature in the
long

obvious

modification

resulting

submits that reasons

respectfully

to

fail

the

PD05514AW

is

Owner

Patent

render

does not

art

it

the

in

No

Docket

Attorney

is

skill

90009286

is

No

Application

large

utilizing

a

communication

Owner

respectfully

disagrees
First
hypothetical

Morgans
distributed

invention

storage

not identified any evidence

has

a

goal

runs contrary

that a

to

of reducing

Morgans

person of ordinary skill

Page

8

of 18

network

invention

in

traffic

The

so

Office

the

Offices

has likewise

the art at the time of the invention

have

such

applied

is

Second the Offices
data that

Morgans

Attorney

leaves

frequently

101s document memory 203 some

7

col

3035

ll

at

The Office

are

fails

to

urgent documents

a

Owner

principle of operation

likewise

submits that the

respectfully

of the

to

motivation to

modify Morgan

person of ordinary skill
to

in

the

stored in the

why

that

position

a

time of the

the

at

a

would

In fact

Action

at

page

that

the

H

with

system seems

Office

The

this

recognized

Offices

suggested

2

would

transmission

server

108

3

of

a

combined

original

Thus
having

ordinary

communication
102105

1

the

request for the

of the

server 101

for

Owner

skill

in

system to

and operate them

art

at

duplicate
as

servers

are

would

the

find no

when

to

to

are

they

requirements

its

a

8

1

Office

of Morgan

of an annotation
to

the

filer

server at computer
server at computer

and

with the annotation

col

at

document storage 203 of

the

annotation

more

Second

of Claim

rejection

in

Owner

Patent

environment

office

move

a

distinct

document storage 203

communication

to

a

operate

minimized Morgan

in

document from

4

where

server

101

102 or 105

or

102 or 105

or

transmission of the

the intended recipient

time the

would not have been obvious

invention

move document

Patent

large

of the

submits that

the

or

process

document

combination

respectfully

the

to

original

original

alter

prima facie showing of

contrary to the stated advantage

transmission

document and annotation

Patent

a

benefit

would

server 101

file

require

transmission

server 108 to the filer

be

modification to

the number of transmissions required

transaction

to

specific

increase

server other than

to

well justified and proved

transfer

transmission resource requirements

to

the

data

large

already

Morgan

a

may have been

it

6465

goal

is

Morgans

would

so

environment

office

Morgans

First

disagrees

or

would move

an attempt

have been obvious

doing

system since
large

to

server

file

frequently

artisan

remote location

slow

the

a

are

invention

message document storage instead of

in

the

in

establish

server for providing electronic

efficient

storing

memory 203
it

Offices

rationale

to

at

art

documents

store

already being stored in the servers document

Morgan

memory

amounts of data has relevance

explain

Offices

art and therefore fails

prior

A

the

Morgans

as

slow remote memory

obviousness

Regarding

local

these documents

that

fails

such

memos for your approval Morgan

or

evidence

provide

of

advantage

document

a

PD05514AW

environment

larger

urgent memos

Morgans system and

Patent

storing

system where

a

infrequently used in
to

the purported

used and remote memory
describes

document

office

how

unexplained

Morgan

system

an

to

principles

No

Docket

ll

would

90009286

is

No

Application

Owner

further

Page 9 of 18

was

storage

made

203

to

to

a

person

modify

Morgans

one of the

computers

to

submits that even if the modification