Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al
Filing
328
DEPOSITION of Vincent William Lloyd, Ph.D. taken on April 20, 2011 by Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc., Sage Publications, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit D-1, # 2 Exhibit D-2, # 3 Exhibit D-3, # 4 Exhibit D-4, # 5 Exhibit P-5, # 6 Exhibit P-6, # 7 Exhibit P-7, # 8 Exhibit P-8)(Rains, John)
E
X
H
I
B
I
T
3
CUPX
00290
Exhibit 3 - 1
Exhibit 3 - 2
The
This book
mental
is
vulnerable
the
original
deserve
addresses
aspects
Cooess
FragWi
and
classicists
interested
in the
preface
its
is
nor
problems
its
hook
This
interrelated
of
asks
in
how
views
recovers
contribution
of
them
central
of both
treatment
life
affects
this
ethical
contemporary
funda
the
well-lived
profound
Greek
the
thus
issues
major
at
the
has proven
nontechnical
difficult
literary
are
our
to
have
dimension
theory
One
and philo
University
to
style
problems
it
be
makes
tackles
important
it
This
for philosophers
reading
accessible
new
to
and
any educated
person
an
entirely
edition
features
Nussbaum
by Martha
Nussbaum
Martha
Ethics
they
and
and
control
examines
It
constituents
The Greeks made
their lives
the
moral luck
valued
texts
sophical
The
yet
the
persons
ncither
attention
thought
most
its
new
outside
questions
of Greek
of
factors
and
about
views
many of
that
of persons
received
ancient
problem
to
appraisal
these
of
study
ethical
of Goodness
Fragility
is
Ernst Frcund
Distinguished
Service
Prokssor
of Chicago
Exhibit 3 - 3
of
Law and
Exhibit 3 - 4
The
Luck
Fragility
and Ethics
in
of Goodness
Greek
Tragedy
and
Philosophy
Revised Edition
Nussbaum
Martha
Unisenigy
of Chicago
CAMBRIDGE
UNIVERSITY
PRESS
Exhibit 3 - 5
book
This
ethical
is
of
study
that
problem
to factors
outside
and
lives
their
neither
the
deserve
interrelated
The
and
treatment
is
the
is
questions
But
it
and
not
because
and
argument
also
is
Greek
she
the
Taylor
and
demanding
ical
gifted
can
profit
that
of the
afford
from
isa
that
of the
reafilrnution
exploration
ethIcs
way
in
reflection
ical
to
of Goodness
Fragility
is
kind
it
an
is
losophy
in
There
are
perception
it
rare in
which
subject
of
is
its
person
new
entirely
Law and
of
Professor
because
book
Journal
..required
one
than
to
grap
books
philosophy
more
in
of
of moral
grasp
ambitious
most
com
author
the
understanding
imaginative
very
debate
New
The
book
is
It
is in
it
is
field
of Philosophy
for
reading
which
and
is
Browne
and
inter
anyone
-Jasper
leave
This
is
fabric
of
human eth
philosophical
inheritance
quality
It
tradition
richly
responsive
No one with an
moral
pursues
to
interest
of
is
eth
sensitive
Greek
in
will
philosophy
Journal
Australasian
book
important
fur
Griffin in
which
altered
an
of Books
fail
book
In
unusual
to the
alert
itself
provides
persuasive
sadly
York Review
our Greek
book and no one who
account
work
an
our contemporary
Nussbaum
this
many books
of the
an
scholars
unlike
Canadian
in
that there
truth
become
has
single
not
addresses
aspects
for philosophers
features
partly
to write
rewarding
marvelous
powerfully
engrossing
world where
in
Knox
unsurpassed
miss
to
is
Derek
This
yet
they
or literature..
philosophy
experience
tenour
richly
is
with
And
issues
change
This
together
chosen
has
Bernard
The
book
these
pereniThtl
should
It
intellectually
in
and
any educated
to
Service
found together
often
Charles
ested
attention
original
reading
edition
Distinguished
stimulating
of
fundamental
read
to
delight
new
tackles.This
it
the
thought
accessible
it
persons
questions
texts
important
makes
these
most
its
vulnerable
of
appraisal
received
Greek
of
of
are
Chicago
qualities
degree
rigour
with some
One
be
to
to
have
philosophical
style
Freund
Ernst
rich
with
them
of
proven
our
this affects
fundamental
the
life
Nussbaum
an immensely
text
has
problems
difficult
of
rare
and
well-lived
cuntribution
theory
literary
examines
It
of
dimension
ccntral
ethical
both
University
to
views
nontechnical
Nussbaum
at the
This
of
its
by Martha
Ethics
ple
and
In the
Martha
recovers
of Goodness
Fragility
preface
bines
thus
how
asks
profound
Greek
the
constituents
and
control
contemporary
in
classicists
interested
nor
luck
about moral
valued
The Greeks made
book
This
of the
persons
problems
issues
major
views
ancient
many
scholar
The Times
the
reader
one
of
Its
to
with
is
scope
tackle
Literary
them-
of Philosophy
the
both
very
wide
tragedy
in
and phi
Supplement
of
sense
had
having
ChristopherTaylor
in
his
Mind
CAMERI GE
UNIVERSITY
PRESS
www.cambridqe.org
ISBN
Cover
illustration
J.M.W.Thrner
CloreCollcetionTate
Regulus
GaileryLondon/Art
1828
courtesy
Resource
9780-521
of
NY
780521
Cover
design
by
jamea
79472-5
Brisson
Exhibit 3 - 6
794725
CAMBRIDGE
UNIVERSITY
PRESS
New York
Cambridge
Cambridge
Melbourne
of
New
Americas
the
Town
Cape
Sic
Singapore
Paulo
Delhi
Press
University
32 Avenue
Madrid
NY
York
USA
10013-2473
www.cambridge.org
Information
it
Cambridge
no
the
to
23rd
record
for
Library of Congress
the
written
Press
University
of
fragility
Nusabaum
of America
States
this publication
is
in
Cataloging
Marsha
Ntsssbaurn
The
agreements
without
place
2001
United
the
catalog
exception
2009
printing
in
take
statutory
licensing
1986
edition
Printed
collective
may
part
to
Subject
relevant
of Cambridge
published
Revised
copyright
of
of any
permission
1986
Press
2001
in
is
provisions
reproduction
First
www.cambridge.org19780521794725
Nussbauni
publication
and
title
University
Martha
This
this
on
Pub
as al/able
British
the
front
Librant
Data
ication
1947
Craven
and
luck
goodness
ethics
Greek
in
and
tragedy
Martha
philosophy
ed
2nd
cm
Includes
ISBN
bibliographical
and indexes
references
79l26-X
hardcover
0-521
Greece
Ethict
Fortune
Ethics
in literature
RJl92.N87
ISBN
Greek
History
Ancient
pbk
79472-2
0-521
drama
Tragedy
and
History
criticism
Title
in literature
2000
l70.938dc2l
00-062128
ISBN
978-0-521-79126-7
hardback
ISBN
978-0-521-79472-5
paperback
Cambridge
URLs
will
remain
and
timetables
the
time
the
accuracy
of
first
of
has
for external
and
this publication
or
Press
University
of
accuracy
does
accurate
other
or
factual
printing
such
not
but
or
no
responsibility
guarantee
appropriate
that
information
any
given
the
in
University
sites
an
such
regarding
this
work
Press
or
perststcnce
Web
content
Information
information
Cambridge
for
Internet
third-party
Web
prices
are
does
to in
referred
correct
not
thereafter
Exhibit 3 - 7
sites
travel
at
guarantee
is
For Rachel
Exhibit 3 - 8
Some
for
pray
limbs
my
until
who
gold
to delight
pray
are
and sowed
blame
land
citizens
earth
in
deserves
But human
houndlesa
for
fellow
wrapped
what
praised
others
my
man
praise
excellence
like
grows
fed
for
tree
vine
dew
the green
by
raised
liquid
have
most
kinds
all
in
of needs
just
down
love
too
joy
shst
eyes
we
those
for
but
hardships
to track
strains
and
sky
all
of
men
wise
up among
to the
We
wrong-doers
an
it
trust
Nemeas
Pindsr
He
will
and
see
it
all
see
the
that
when
rn he
any
dear
as
if
Socrates
place
where
would
be
he
faculty
that
but
he
forth
brings
it
is
looked
way
and
he
since
and
out
with
sees
the
possible
it
he
is
is
can
it
Well
crsianzs
then
dont
what
know
is
human
what
it
think
Or dont
heautiftil
for
him
with
to give
he
truth
And
he
will
life
and
is
as
become
immortal
Plato
socltxras
you
my
the
simulacrum
grasping
nourishes
being
no
comes
place
being
there
was
be
will
this
Do
itself
who
since
tn
human
for
unitary
msnner
never
it
destroyed
beautiful
is
such
in
it
alterstinn
livable
visible
human
are
any
of excellence
ever
of
where
alone
true excellence
if
is
the
to true excellence
and
and
sufiĆrs
and
eternal
itself
partaking
appropriate
simulacra
to
grasping
to he
person
there
which
to
god-loved
an
in
understand
that
for
as
life
contemplates
it
you
birth not
anywhere
misersble
contemplated
come
or less nor
with
itself
hy
besutifula
the others
mnre
itself
being
other
Vtts
Symposius
lwri
to say
being
Plato
Exhibit 3 - 9
Aleibiades
129E
Contents
to
Prefaa
revised
the
editthn
aljj
xli
Preface
Acknowkdgemenzr
xlii
Abhrr via/ions
xlv
Luck
Chapter
on
through
modern
in
of
components
elements
an
of
good
lift
Chapter
Greek
without
remainder
she
the
and
of
dependent
seldom
are
into
the
ungoverned
these
of
literature
questions
and ambition
that
dilemmas
this
23
conflict
practical
pssctieal
charge
us
for
works
Why
inquiry
is
self-sufficiency
vulnerable
of values
argument
philosophical
fragility
depiction
important
conflict
of
life
for
sub-problems
contingent
Aeschylus
tragedf
search
questions
Three
Sketch
of
part
Tragedy
these
human
good
not control The
writing
pessonality
indispensable
Part
Why
the
thought
do
beings
ethical
the
the
ethics
ethical
limits
its
reason
treated
are
human
that
things
and
of Greek
preoccupation
is
as
of
sign
as
serious
and not
and
primitive
resolvable
illogical
thought
of
sketch
of
assessment
distinction
ill
before
1V
the
say
of
cases
The
to
our
This
implicit
these
II The
view
to
in
the
the
moral/non-moral
problem
30
Agamcmnon
Arschylua
might
confronted
positive
Chapter
of proper
experiences
view
tragic
Section
in
important
the
Aulis
as
Eteocles
gates
plays
that
not making
discussion
conflict
tragic
consider
usually
fir
solutions
philosophical
Two
Reasons
cases
so
we
Factors
problem
central
Some
II
the
these
with
achievement
What
cases
It
means
learning
the
of
theories
of
Anhgone
Sophocles
such
in
response
give
the
the
47
and
vision
conflict
of
philosophers
account
Aeschylesn
simplification
Could
far as
scope
The
II
I-lit
rational
of ones
guard
Creon
clever
motivation
person
One
possible
way
life
plan
of doing
so
as
this
to
avoid
would
be
the
to
of Chapters
situations
simplify
and
narrow
cosnmitnsenta
35
of
an example
Tension
among
redefinitions
for
this
as
the
ordinary
values
strange
strategy
its
practical
precluded
consequences
by
reason
torn
recognizing
for
love
and
only
and
conflicted
one
religion
33
value
The
Ilulure
34
vu
Exhibit 3 - 10
viii
Contents
HI
Her
Antigone
flawed
IV
is
done
scrusinize
of
ode
on
The
she
human
Danae
she
ode
she
play
in
difkrent
Why
The
parodos
she
being
isa
Her
way
her
though
strategy
the
of
itself
so
conflict
is
justice
lyrics
and
simple
grounds
relation
our
conflict
concerning
choral
and seeing
of
about
The
which
in
synthesis
value
Di
eyes
depth
pcssiniisos
to
points
spheres
competing
conflict
higher-order
narrows
and conceptions
63
that
claim
this
value
retina
Creons
suggestion
bosh
to
certain
to
superior
Hcgela
of
conception
of
re-intespretasioss
in
civic
to
us
help
The
complex
life
contingency
Schopenhauert
pessimistic
response
luck
The
Part
the
of
vulnerability
Plato
II
relation
Its
rasionalisy
harmony
so
79
Part
to
on
human
flexible
of Dionysus
invocation
Conclusion
Tragedy
Harmon
and
Tiresias
to
values
individual
without
goodness
83
fragility
Introduction
The
87
of
continuity
problems
The
she
saving
The
The
II
of
power
dramatic
IV
how
The
make
does
atesia
commensurability
Socratic
of
reaches
stylistic
The
dialogues
break
of
role
to
what
as
pleasure
he
standard
is
progress
could
How
of choice
io6
aksasia
557
myth
theater
debs
true
The
and
philosophical
and
to
moral
profound
Republic
does
techni
too
it
kind of writing
positive
expresses
science
What
problems
eliminate
new
she
our
mosivares
Protagorass
between
The
Chapter
what
as
19
Greek
over traM
with
and-tragic
dialogue
89
of
stories
mythic
95
progress
the
reasoning
practical
progress
Pre-Plascasic
its
works
so
distinction
human
for
form
dialogue
of traM
progress
values
Platos
antecedent
Platos
make
argument
philosophical
ethical
it
conclusion
Interlude
The
ferMi
human
of measurement
science
The
of
of
methodological
art or science and
techni
hope
of
story
rime
science
and
problems
concept
and
the
tsthsi
setting
general
teach
over
Aithf
Prosagorass
III
Two
Protagora.e
between
antithesis
wish riagedy
development
philosophical
Chapter
The
thought
Platos
absence
of
any
The
literary
of
repudiation
as
poet
tragedy
522
criticism
and
value
she
the
of
standpoint
s6
perfection
The
dialogues
The
alleged
opening
over
other
need and
concerning
of
insulliciency
contemplative
about
quesrion
Platos
lives
intrinsic
what
support
though
ix
Repablir
worth
truly
to
arguments
profound
value
is
pumuing
his
parallels
of
rassking
the
argument
puzzling
from
Gsras
Pbikbss
11
those
HI
that
of
are
How
Its
Phsds
relevance
lsssmorsy
how
asceticism
Questions about
reached
IV
sS
defense
and
the
so
activities
that
axe
not
truly
valuable
undercut
Itep4
is
from
standpoint
aesthetic
amung
values
which
judgment
is
to
true
mural
judgments
education
achieved
Exhibit 3 - 11
of
value
are
in
ts$
Content
The
of motivation
problem
Platos
of
use
and
negative
positive
i6o
arguments
of Alcibiades
The speech
Chapter
of
reading
the
s6
Sjmsium
The
that
charge
muat
this
The
be
Plato
and
prospect
of
one
of
rIsc
of unique
individual
unique
another
for
dialogue
Dramatic
dialogue
love
speech
iGj
dates
167
individuals
one
for
another
its
171
problems
and
she
of judgments
role
she
love
whole
the
against
of
irs
Diotima
the
neglects
assessed
construction
Arissophanes
Ill
of love
ascent
of
Its
motivations
practical
How
homogeneity
qualitative
she
The
lover
enabling
achieves
self-suffIciency
IV
The
The
images
two
176
of Alcibiades
entrance
The
of
place
and
love
argued
as
Socrates
in
life
of
poetic
IV
cdsicized
and
reason
middle
dialogues
dialogues
The
the
on
the
zoo
life
in
she
other
for
position
which
two
first
has
Plato
seriously
for
203
view
of
its
rihical
restored
this
so
the
even
of
valuable
and
soul
and
guiding
cognitive
and
love
of
part
personal
elements
the
bess
The
identity
action
views
253
of
of
place
The
recantation
AnBtotle
the
intellectual
non
interweaving
intrinsically
condemnation
the
The
good
an
as
so
in
the
The
Their
energy
towards
Platos
madness
of
sorts
motivational
relation
now
is
UI
good
is
passion
psychology
speech
the
certain
of
foe
in
Motivations
Part
of
Personal
dialogue
Moral
III
in
aspiration
Implications
she
between
dialogues
sources
understanding
154
knowledge
confrontation
and
Pbaednss
elements of
certain
our
for
through
zoo
the
howls
is
praise
important
flinesion
desire
true madness
isnt
between
it
middle
in
slavery
truth
Pbaedrn
madness
what
develop
speeches
lovers
the
tell
193
story
distance
Madness
the
will
valise
in the
apparent
he
that
Jr and
love
particular
This
recantation
His daim
of Aleibiades
of
Chapter
II
of
story
indienasent
conceptions
The
the
honor
exsenr
and
its
style
human
good
life
237
of
role
the
II
How
relevant
ill
The
defended
principle
The
intention
this
method
Puazles
The
as
necessary
method
Their
there
is
in
difficulty
connection
How
works
basic
rake
240
within
philosophize
the
of
confines
the
and
reconstructing
240
are
most
can
237
view
pheusomesa
she
and action
appearances
so
Why
appearances
appreciating
What
Aristotles
Saving
announced
phathomesa
of method
discuasiona
general
Chapter
Atissoeles
223
2a8
truths
its
of the
fragility
what
Philosophy
of
status
To
poets
Introduction
The
ix
return
to
appearances
for
place
defended
against
the
appearances
of
the
all
and
The
and
language
are
appearances
thought
within
with
discourse
and
gathered
of
role
principle
of
How
ordinary
the
which
belief
competent
judge
of
243
non-contradiction
refueaoon
of
23
appearances
charge
243
are
laziness
and
conservatism
The
Exhibit 3 - 12
Contents
and
negative
the
of
tasks
positive
Aristotelian
with
contrast
philosophy
Witrgenstein
Rational
Chapter
Connections
oddness
apparent
for
between
reducrionistic
of
of
issues
that
science
criticisms
its
defense
his
and
between
of
of
other
.nx
word
connection
combination
273
of
physiological
and
logical
seen
cxplanandum
Why
account
the
of self-sufficiency
The
and
caplanantia
The
desiring
inrentionality
absence
the
desire
from
intellect
isolates
conception
nooons
and
cognition
an advantage
as
not
is
description
a$
seen
to
attack
attack
III
The
the
The
these
claims
for
the
590
life
good
291
of values
294
of
defense
Aristotles
generality
the
of
priority
of
the
19$
non-intellectual
elements
deliberation
in
and
Aristotle
the
compared
The
307
person of
An
example
vulnerable
so
when
Two
what
this
of
versions
Partial
The
important
to
the
human
good
from
things
good
of
risk
luck
on
position
view
this
disruption
role
leans
the
309
agent
life
outside
which
things
31$
is
or
and
is
human
is
character
factor
in an
319
having
Aristotelian
inquiry
completely
invulnerable
on
case
to
of
dir
to
activity
Prism
322
Related
tragic
cases
in
ronsorutiog
317
33
themselves
hmiraoon
320
luck
good-condition
attack
the
decisive
value
impediment
activity
matenal
and
life
method
dialectical
single
Aristotles
severe
of
the
fact
rejected
of good
states
Aristotles
luck
good
position
of complete
Damage
of
of good
view
opposing
cases
view
358
need
positions
How
life
The
this
circularity
312
vulnerability
in
extreme
first
How
of
extent
rarrense
The
problem
apparent
disaster
stands
so
an
deliberation
Aristotelian
The
Eudsossssa
and
contingency
and
activity
wisdom
practical
of
Chapter
view
of
choice
correct
particular
role
Phaedras
of
criterion
connecoon
apparent
search
the
for
290
the
self-auffluency
commensurability
demand
Platonic
The
Platonic
of
the
on
concrete
IV
Two
on
aIr
understanding
wisdom
practical
Its connections
motion
deliberation
scientific
anthropocentnsm
The
good
not
is
of voluntary
assessment
legal
Non-scientific
Aristotles
The
an account
as
and
ethical
person of
the
with
VI
early
Platos
implications
generic
Aristotles
wisdom
Practical
IV
movement
animal
z66
in
explanation
their
motion
by
explanation
Chapter
III
of
explanation
explanation
with
II
explanation
desire
ordinary
goal-directed
This
VI
In
rescuing
connection
causal
causal
explanation
interest
in
dcct
not
II
coninwss
264
The
animal
Explanation
causal
the
causal
and
the
Aristotles
IV
of
psychological
of
between
and
belief
model
of
function
its
action
of action
theory
164
tendencies
model
faculties
is
of
physiological
III
of
explanation
and
of proceeding
way
about
beliefa
inrentionality
of
the
questions
Aristotles
Greek
Ordinary
II
ethical
animal movements
all
The
of
and
animals
our
the
virtues
value
of
certain
340
Exhibit 3 - 13
Contents
The
Chapter
relational
and
the
and
of
and
of an
in
Aristotles
ethical
controversial
Aristotles
the
value
the
phi/ia
in
the
of
connnuity
in
activity
lives
terms of
in
theft
divine
373
Plaeonitt
god-centered
their
position
The
goodness
with
uscompanbility
the
the
special
of
rest
and
for
action
the
theorist
being good
and
and
Luck
and
connection
the
well
living
of luck
opponents
but
of
Platonist
Why
pity
valuable
to
with
this
Tragedy
and
fear
are
of
sources
ha/barth
tragic
linked
action
tragic
The
eadeimonth
she
iS
of
primacy
in
Aristotelian
the
emotions
tragic
P.eek
rhe
good-condition
between
useless
for
recognition
341
of
nature
in
political
conflict
371
in
the
on
gap
and
irrational
of
x.6-8
and
character
attack
explores
for
she
thought
passage
about
thoughts
and
mote
for
ranking
Luck
Interlude
character
Human
Ethic
The
in
value
Aristotle
overall
of Nicomachesa
of
instrumental
Its
of good
value
Consequences
management
goods
343
instrumental
Its
character
external
vulnerability
III
evidence
Conflicting
the
intrinsic
Part
to
Appendix
Evidence
life
vulnerability
special
inasabulicy
political
maintenance
Its
self-knowledge
its
Its
their
of good
The
of
greateat
ilk
good
affiliation
value
sources
developnsene
the
maintenance
intrinsic
Its
Pbilsiaa
case
and
activity
development
types
human
good
343
of
constituenca
Political
II
the
goods
Relational
theory
of
vulnerability
own
Aristotles
378
writing
Epilogue
The
13
Corcysa
II
The
the
child
about
speech
in
position
of
the
plays
play
by
who
those
believe
397
an example
unity
this
of good
firmness
natureconvention
Polyxena
of
Rejecoon
decline
cannot
character
Hecuhas
reading
397
murdered
of
ghost
of convention
betrayal
Hecuba
Euripides
good
395
Tragedy
Chapter
The
debate
of noble
Poiymestors
character
Connections
flee
in adversity
with
Thucydides
crime
The
IV
on
399
simplicity
dislocation
of Hecubas
character
III
xi
406
Revenge
The
as
human
and
negative
new
connection
plays
Nothing
Hecubas
positive
is
convention
with
Aristotelian
The
enastwosthy
liecubas
rock
as
Its
structure
and
409
point
views
significance
guiding
418
of
mark
this
for
thought
tailors
both
419
Notes
422
Bibliograply
512
General
index
527
of passages
536
Index
Exhibit 3 - 14
Exhibit 3 - 15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?