Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 352

NOTICE by Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc., Sage Publications, Inc. Evidentiary Proffer in Support of the Trial Testimony of Jodi Kaufmann (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 806, # 2 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 804, # 3 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 723, # 4 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 803, # 5 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 995, # 6 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 996, # 7 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 997, # 8 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 998, # 9 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 999, # 10 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 710A)(Krugman, Edward)

EXHIBIT 806

INQUIRY PROGRAM

QUALITATIVE

EPRS

8500

Research

Qualitative/Interpretive

CEN

Jodi

Education

2007

Spring

Dr

in

16475

Kaufmann

E-mail jkaufiuianngsu.edu
410 College

Office
Office

of Education

Hours Thursdays 2-330

or by appointment

Required Texts
and

Bogdan
to

and methods

theories

The foundations

Thousand

research process

Wallace

and

Thousand Oaks

SAGE

Oaks

CA

ONE of

Critical

Lather

and

Boulder

Malinowski

2004

CO

Book

in the

for

writing

postgraduates

Reviews

Ethnographic

schools

Echoes of Brown

1922

stories

of mental

in the

making of black masculinity

Ann

Youth

documenting

College

Troubling

the

Angels

of the western Pacific

Being white

Stories

Women

New

of race and racism

Writing in the s/and Autoethnography

are available

performing

the

legacy of

Press

Living with

Press

Argonauts

Creek AltaMira

above

Teachers

1997

Westview

2006

Tomaselli

listed

Public

New York

Smithies

2004

McKinney

Books

and

reading

house

Opportunity

Bad boys

Board of Education

Walnut

and perspective

of Michigan Press

et al

Fine

Africans

Meaning

Creek Altamira Press

2001

Arbor University

HIVIAIDS

introduction

Publishing

1998

Walnut

Ferguson

Brown

An

the following

Angrosino
retardation

for education

Sage

2007

Wray

research

of social

Own Choke
Choose

Research

Qualitqtive

Boston Pearson

1998

Crotty

2007

Bilden

York Dutton
London

among

Routledge

indigenous

South

Press

online at

Amazon.com

ALEXHiBiT
GaState0003745

Additional
All

are

readings

and

is

available

located

on

located

on our

the

from

available

the

electronically
library

PDF

as

WebCT

To

file

Each

format

for these

article

documents

the

access

The password

homepage

Readings

in electronic

Library

go

be given

will

reserves

scanned

has been
Course

to

Reserves
and

in class

is

page

Course Description
This
and

course reviews
nature

current

and

research

of qualitative

issues

in

literature

Jt

the field

As
the

is

situated

is

research

review

and

research methodologies

qualitative

qualitative

literature

the history philosophy

investigating

design

covers different

research

in qualitative

empirical

of qualitative

the foundations

within

the

the theoretical

covered

also

Course Objectives

As

in this

learner

dealing with
qualitative

course you will investigate

procedural

philosophical

research projects

What

How

is

educational

range

your

own

What

by

different

various

ways of

undertaking

ways

research

qualitative
it

conceptualized

is

origins

its

are

examined

and

in

subjectivities

regard to the

What

goals does

Formulate

appropriate

qualitative

research strategies

data sources and

identify

exemplars and

assess

such

examining

issues

the goals

critically

human phenomena

the

nature

of

does qualitative

attempt to achieve

and

methods

of qualitative

exemplars

traditions

for

dilemmas and

it

of

research problems design relevant

qualitative

data collection

ethical

research and

in qualitative

kinds

What

generated

research examine

and

addressed

are the

presuppositions

of analysis

the explanations

Recognize

relate to

research processes

the units

Examine

issues

do the following

What

problems

and

possibilities

ethical

of problems

research

define

it

Clearly articulate

Specify

the

explain

qualitative

does

and

will

you

Specifically

and

Identify

methodological

analytical

problems

related

efforts

from varying

approaches

of these different

presuppositions

the

pertinent

the research process

to

research derived

and

select

the results of such

assess

of

designs for their accomplishment

research goals

specified

Develop

research process through

of educational

of the relationship

an understanding

an examination

of

variety

theorizing

to

the

of theoretical

orientations

Describe

and

define

constructionism

your

epistemological stance

subjectivism

research within the literature
of these

developments

and

assumptions
and

Describe
social

limitations

10

Describe
critical

define

You

will

and

You

will

be

the

be

able to

ontological

the

origins

and

limitations

stance

able to identify

identify

underlying values and

epistemologies
and

objectivism

epistemological stance of empirical

the

your ontological

and

relativism

literature

varying

their strengths

--

stance
the

realism

nave

realism

and/or

of empirical research in the

assumptions

strengths

and

of these ontologies
and

define

feminist

your theoretical

postmodern

and

framework-others

and

positivist
the theoretical

post-positivist

framework of

aState0003746

empirical research

the

iii

You

literature

developments underlying values and
of these

limitations

11

and

Define

following

describe the identified

on which

what type of questions does
rely what

it

12

Write

13

Write

and

strong

review

the

design to answer

are

and

and

to

ground

the

it

most rely
does

data

strengths

review
introduction

proposal

problem

discuss

does

literature

research

the

to

on what type of

and

integrated

qualitative

able

the epistemological and

perspective

limitations

its

critically

cohesive

literature

problem

and

cohesive

theoretical

are

allow you to answer

it

goal what

is its

clear

Be

methodologies

methodology what

identified

assumptions

ontological

and

assumptions

the origins

identify

the strengths

approaches

varying

of each

be able to

will

and

qualitative

to the

research

problem

Course Structure
This

of

course will consist
and

activities

group

demonstrations

small

discussions

experiences

participatory

attendance

expect regular

into

course

course activities

me

please see

of mini-lectures

and Participation

Attendance

credit

combination

is

and

account
essential

final

Your
with

conflict

not to use our limited

as

missing more than

absences

course grade

you have

If

so

privately

take excessive

will

in the

in class

participation

due

session

to

prior

time with individual

class

hours

3-

of

and

discussion

commitments
scheduling

concerns
people to come

expect
all

completing

to

course activities

lack of preparation

class

and

prepared

to contribute

contribute

or failure to

will

read

having
to

class

be taken

all

assigned reading
and

discussions

in

account

into

and

activities

Frequent

the final course grade

WebCT
WebCT

be the source of most of our out of class communication

will

syllabus rubrics example papers

course materials
research posted
and

questions
your

communicate

will

announcements

Submission

Electronic

You

will

turn in each

assignment

is

due

of

sure

assignment

Make

accepted

order

that

your
check

to

Along with the

many

resources

central

for qualitative

WebCT email whole class discussions
WebCT discussion page You will turn

WebCT mail
our Web CT

will

page

return

your

in

papers to you with

daily

Assignments

sure

may

to

you

me

using

WebCT

the document

label

Turn

example Kaufmann_subjectivity
in

you

via

be posted on the

will

through

papers electronically

comment via the same Be

individually

will find

in

assignments

use track changes

for

email prior class
with your
as

on the date the

name and

assignment

Word documents

no

PDF

for

files

will

be

comments

Assignments
All

assignments

Exceptions

may

are due
be

before

made

for

class

on the assigned due

documented

emergencies

date

No

late

work

will

be

accepted

oy

GaState000374T

for Qualified

Accommodations
It

is

the policy of The
with

individuals

complete

Non-Native

review

disabilities

information
course

to

what

in

differences

As

then on

to

student
the

believe

is

central

recruit

to

an editor

the

discuss

to

request

your

of class

outside

to

Arendt

Hannah

in interactive

with

We

discussed

we

and

others

may
Sound

disagree

It

disagreement
is

visiting

listening

strong

in this

encouraged

inquiry

respectful

visiting

dialogue

scholarly

with which

sometimes

called

People

other

of views

variety

have

topics

and

scientific

viewpoint

and

listening

respectful

controversial

the scholarly

to
the

represent

accurately

carefully

respecting

free

are

are

that

is

will

that

no

experience

commitment

for

consequences

opinions

without

your views

not challenge

should be

have

or disagreement

agreement

we may

of ideas

We

necessary for learning

express either

of course

you

this

violating

to

discourse

the free

University

of ideas

open exchange

You

does mean

it

State

Georgia

at

This does not mean

we

feel that

to

they interpret

be able to express

say engaging

express those

will

qualified

perspectives

consequences
with them But
you

to

we must

graduate

We

expected
and

have

others

soon

involves

often

how

of opinions

on what the philosopher

depends

as possible

for

accommodations

desire

Classroom Climate

affect

diversity

but

depends

scholarship

and

disability
as

encouraged

experience

that

expected

is

disagree

of Ideas

human

beliefs

Although

everyone

to

agree

and

values

me

notify

please

accommodations

reasonable

work

written

research on

feelings

you

Disabilities

make

person with

are

are strongly

speakers

Free and Open Exchange
Qualitative

with
to

of English

Speakers
English

their

If

course requirements

your

Non-native

Individuals
of Georgia

University

with us If

disagreeing

please arrange an appointment

to

of

fear

or disagree

the

discuss

issue

As

Numerous

and

of

all

scholars

that

we

loudly

all

goal

sensitive

appreciative

to

should

in

not become

tend to

be

environments

not unfairly

psychologically

to

space

matter

not discuss

how

education

forum

disagree

it

does

strongly

problems
It

is

we

for

be respected

discussion

graduate

of political

issues

and

or talking

is

facing

at

too

does not mean
that

we

all

need

to

agree

inappropriate to mention

class

is

they can

school districts

The

female
Certainly

feels that

This

might

of the

important issue

much

mean

of local

or school districts in class discussions
should

too

talking

some

little

very

The

which everyone

words What

argument they are presenting

teachers

by
in

to

our participation

both male

participate

of participation

dominating

their

no

respectful
students

others

in

unless many

some students

while
level

safe

are unfair

sensitive

other races

not mean people cannot

connected

and

an

are

lower

that

we must all be

dominate

discussions

choose

This does

request that

highlight

of administrators
our colleagues

we

create

emotions

we

class

reasons

that

to

easily

of those other races In addition

discussion

have

Finally
attempting

is

in the

people cannot
be

various

be sensitive

The

participate

for

whites

that

tend to dominate

races

can

research university

major

members

are

some people

at

have found

studies

discussants

discussions

class

Additionally
students

professional

Georgia

State

when
the

names

integrity

of

University

school district

GaState0003748

Academic

IJonesty
State

Georgia

University

students

among

has been developed
of

performance
any

seeks

to

work

members of

and

the

understanding

system and

honesty

due

while ensuring

are

The

functioning

The

academic

involved

responsible

in

policy

violations

system

is

an

and

All

and

an

code

of

and

knowing

procedures

will

be

of the academic

works together

of the academic

the academic

to protect

must

students

bringing about

University Community

suspected

honesty

on

All

the

from

or attributed

of the policy
for

--

of honest behavior

ensure understanding

entire

designed

are

are

statement

to

faculty

The

code

honesty

simply

assistance

authorized

ensure the success

to

and

or receiving

and

and

personal integrity

broadly

of the University
policy

for

community

and

procedures

honesty

responsible

system Where

honesty

process

defined

is

and

policy on academic

stealing

lying

integrity

academic

together

students

proper

occur appropriate

policy

sound

community

all

honesty

community

honesty

cheating

on academic honesty

to

its

the academic

operate

and

of the University

policy

available

readily

without

must work

all

Academic

the very fabric and

to

University

members

All

behavior

vital

appropriate

the

honest university

made

is

honesty

comply with an

ensure academic

of the University

source of information not appropriately

other person or using any

Academic

and

promote

these goals

serve

academic

all

to

other members

arid

to

honesty

process and

academic process

integrity

not

court

of

law
students are responsible

All

every phase
ignorance

for

is

the highest standards of honesty

maintaining

of their academic

careers

not an

The

for

academic

and

are

integrity in

severe and

defense

acceptable

penalties

dishonesty

Requirements and Grading
All Students are required

to

based

indicated

on the

distribution

written

Subjects

Subjectivities

Due Date

10 points

Statement

Problem

Literature

Review

Epistemology

February

10 points

Certificate

Research

February

15

March

jppoints
points

March

15

20

points

March

29

10

points

April 12

20

points

April 26

20

and

with the final grade

assignments

below

Points

Project

Human

the following

complete

Theoretical

Perspective

Book Review

Presentation

Final Research

Proposal

100

Total

CITI Course
According
can

access

to

this

course free

https/Iwww
you may

Human

researcher

from the following

org/default asp

certificate

completion

of Human Subjects

Subjects

of charge

citiprogra.m

print out

successful

the Protection

in

Office of

the

points

Bring

When

Certificate

10

points

must pass the online CITI course

You

website

you have

this certificate

to

successfully
class

as

passed

evidence

the course

of your

of the course

GaState0003749

StateinentWho

Subjectivities

your

experiences

positionality

and/or

self

What

identify

yourself as ernie

position

When/where

stable

references

are

do

is

you

in relation

to

etic to

sets

construct

will

and

research problem

you wish to

out the problem
Statement

of

the

What

literature

the

purpose

address in your

ProblemWhat
is

you

construct

yourself

Do

subjectivities

your

are these

you

categories

work

function in your

Include

page

essay that

pages

Research Problem Statement

You

Describe

project

When/where

roles

these

rio

do

are

work

your

How

they slide

Approximately

How

What

your positionality

research

your

training

disciplinary

and

or

10

Statement

Subjectivities

the

in

gap

TJis will be

How

Why

literature

has

been

it

the problem

is

3-5

contain the following

should

It

study

the problem

is

poin

10

statement

addressed

sections

in

the

your work

and

significant

about

good

clear

the purpose

clearly

should be

This

is

one

StudyWhat

Purpose of/he

stated

construct

will

research

What

What

this

will

3-4 page

discussion

situate this

study

sentence

What do you want

learn

to

statement followed

purpose

by

2-3

research questions

and Theoretical

Epistemology

You

of your

in

the

are the key

essay that

describes

context of your

own theoretical
What theoretical

framework allow you

do

to

reading

in

perspectives

your

How

within this framework

concepts

20

Perspective

perspective/s

does

it

What

your research project

inform

You

will

inform you

work

your

questions

will

it

enable you to pursue

Literature

You

construct

will

and

succinctly
rationale

literature

thematically

reviews

guidelines

Specific

review

for

the

for this

your

review will be

students

review

of the books listed above

read one

will

who
is

to

have

Research

10

grounds

presented

and

the

well-organized

your

discussed and

Presentation

under

review

study and

review
It

page

distributed

builds
in

which
your

class

10

choices

read the same text you will present

be clearly

20

This will be

literature that

Book Review
You

Review
study

book

circle

of your

book

In

small group
to

the class

should address the following

of

Your

elements

Purpose/Questions

Theoretical

Conceptual

Framework

Methodology
Data Collection Methods
Data Analysis Methods
Findings/Conclusions
Personal Reactions/Critique

GaState000375O

Final Research

You

will

design

research study for

courses

qualitative
dissertation

etc

This

Introduction

to

the

do
in

do

we

the

graduate

your

article

What

the

is

know

already

you hope

will

this

the

is

what

so

work

What

problem

your study contribute

What

learn

to

research about

from

to

you propose

informs this

literature that

scholarly

How

the literature

the problem

is

What

are the

What makes

your

gaps

What

to this literature

study

unique

Statement of the Problem and Res..arch
your study What

are

your

What

Questions

the

is

purpose

of

research questions

specific

Review

What

Framework

Theoretical
substantive

theories

that

conversation

are

are the

macro-level

mid-level

and

work

inform your

What

Conversation

Empirical

Research

dissertation

sections

following

of the Pro blem-What

important and

Literature

process additional

study for your

pilot

problem

Background
examine

in

publishable

include

will

proposal

20

Proposal

can be used

that

research project

empirical work

grounds

your

study

What

you entering

Design
methodology informs your work

MethodologyWhat

and/or structures

your process
Site

and

Describe

of Research

site

are

ParticipantsWho

is

your

your rationale

Methods for

for selecting

What

will

you

your

insure

you engage

in this

How

study

ethical
will

is

your

your

this

this

site

rationale

criteria

selection

Why

working

for

What

is

not others

methods

you use

will

to

questionls

quality

Considerations What

Ethical

What

specific

be

will

for selecting

people and

these

data to answer

How

Quality

are

data What

collecting

collect/generate

where you

site

our rationale

participants

these participants

selecting

to

the

What

not another

in

your

and

you

work

political

build

issues

strategies

may emerge

into

your

as

design

address these issues

RepresentationHow
consider

your

might

audiences

you
What

write

up your study

genres

will

be

Who

do you

most appropriate

Course Outline

Introduction

Considering

January 11
Qualitative

Bogdan
theories

and

and

methods

Crotty
research process

Research

Biklen

January 18

2007

Boston Pearson

1998

The foundations

Thousand

Oaks

CA

research for education

Qualitative

pp

introduction

to

3-47

of social

Sage

An

research

Chapter

Meaning

Introduction

and perspective

in the

The research process

GaState000375l

and

Denzin
research

qualitative

Denzin and

Wallace

and

SAGE

Publications

London

Research

1998

Press

University

and

methods

and

research

The

process

and

Bogdan
and

theories

2000

Chaudhry
In

tale

reflexive

CITI Course
IRB Website

in the

Protection of

for research

Lapan

modulating

of inquily

Eds

Mahwah NJ

Wanda

Publications

Epistemologies

research process

Eds

An

introduction

the

Working

New York

ruins

to

of

myself Fragments

researching

96-113

Feminist

Routledge

https//www.citiprogram.org/default.asp

and

positionality

forces

de Marrais

In

and

education

power

in narrative

and

Lapan

sciences

the social

and

work

Eds

Foundations

Mahwah NJ

being ethical with/in research

Methods

Erlbaum Associates

2006

Wray

Lawrence

education

pp

and

deMarrais
the social

13-30

of inquiry

Publishers

In

and writing for post graduates

reading

Frameworks February

CA

research

of social

The foundations

Thousand Oaks

Critical

in

and

Chapters

and Theoretical

1998

Crotty

in the

march of science

subj ects.html

for research

Lawrence

SAGE

The

research for education

Pillow

Subjects

vulnerable

Being

and

to

123-138

Foundations

Wallace

London

in

introduction

and writing for post graduates

reading

education

Enjoining

Publishers

2004

Tisdale
and

and

Methods

Erlbaum Associates

sciences

Critical

http//www.gsu.edu/research/human

contentious

An

and perspective

Meaning

Positivism

Chapter

my people

Human

2004

Oxford

February

and

in

New York

evidence

and

Researching

and methods

Johnson-Bailey
Balancing

research

2007 Qualitative
Pearson pp 48-52

Elizabeth St Pierre

theory

postslructural

Sage

Subjectivities

Boston

methods

research for education

of social

Chapters

Biklen

methods

1-32

21-3

Qualitative

2006

Wray

and

Ethics

of qualitative

Chapter

CA

Thousand Oaks

SAGE

Positioning

2007

The foundations

and

of

practice

and writing for post graduates

reading

of inquiry Theories

Boston Pearson

Publications

London

pp

Handbook

and

research project

Wallace

and

discipline

The Sage

January 25
craft

Bikien

1998

Crotty

Eds

Critical

Chapters

Designing

Bogdan
theories

2006

Wray

and Design

Topics

Alford

The

Introduction
Lincoln

Thousand Oaks Sage Publications

edition

research

2005

Lincoln

In

Sage

Meaning

and perspective

Constructionism

Chapter

The

in the

making of

meaning
Schwantdt
Interpretivism

2000

hermenutics

Handbook of qualitative
Wallace

London SAGE

and

Three
and

research

Wray

Publications

epistemological

social

ed
2006

Chapters

stances

constructionism

ppl 89-214
Critical

for qualitative

In Denzin

Thousand

reading

inquiry

Lincoln

Eds.

Oaks Sage

and writing for posigraduates

and

GaState0003752

HUMAN
CITI

citipro

gram

Ethnography Fieldwork Studies and Symbolic
and Bilden
Bogdan
2007 Qualitative
methods

and

theories

In

observation
inquiry

pp

Publishers

certury

Publishers

research

for

traditions

Eds

and

Lapan
sciences

pp

and

Martin

Ritzer and

February 15

An introduction

education

to

Mahwah NJ

and

Ethnography

Foundations

participant

Methods

for research

of

Eribaum Associates

Lawrence

2001

Fine

Symbolic

Handbook

Eds.

Smart

of Social

Interactionism at the end

of the

SAGE

London

Theory

217-228

2000

Villenas

and

Latina

othering

asp

161-1180

Sandstrom
In

Subjects

Interactionism

Fieldwork

the social

and

org/default

Chapter

2004

Grant

de Marrais

education

in

Boston Pearson

and

Preissle

Human

Protection of

in the

//www

https

CERTIFICATE DUE

SUB.JTECTS

Course

This ethnography

of the exotic

Writings

In Elizabeth St Pierre

Xicanism

recuperating

my back

called

Wanda

and

gaze

Eds

Pillow

74-96 New York Routledge
and

Wallace

SAGE

London

2006

Wray

Publications

Critical

Chapters

and Interpretivism

1998

Crotty
research

process

Handbook

Sage

Chapter

case studies In

Qualitative

Research

of Qualitative

DUE

22

of social research

CA

Thousand Oaks

2005

Stake
The Sage

February

The foundations

and writingfor post graduates

STATEMENT

SUBJECTWITIES
Case Studies

reading

10

and

and perspective

Meaning

For and

Interpretivism

Norman Denzin and

Thousand

Oaks SAGE

in the

culture

against

Yvonna

Lincoln

pp

Publications

Eds

443-

465
2005

Vanderstaay

Contemporary Ethnography
and

Wallace

SAGE

London

March

research process

like

Madison

Critical

2005
In

what

Journal

Critical

Eds.

Approaches

University

Press

reading

The Journal

of

to

pp

to

Meaning

Theory

and perspective

inquiry The Marxist

race theory

and

whats

Studies in Education

of Qualitative
as

Race

Critical

Critical

Chapter

Lincoln

end

and writingforpostgraduates

and

is critical

ethnography

Denzin

3rd ed pp 537-546
Van Maanen
2004 An
Leavy

man

12

Sage

Just

Thousand

York Oxford

dead

of social research

Oaks

research

and

Ethnography

CA

International

race murder and justice

Patricia

11

Chapters

and

1998

Thousand

education

dollars

Critical

The foundations

Ladson-Billings
field

hundred

371-409

2006

Inquiry

1998

Crotty

344

Wray

Publications

Critical

One

Street

it

in the
heritage

doing in

111

nice

7-24

performance Reflection of home

Eds.

Sage handbook

of qualitative

Oaks Sage
innocence

qualitative

In

research

Sharlene
reader

Nagy

Hesse-Biber

and

on theory and practice

New

427-446

GaState0003753

Wallace

and

SAGE

Publications

London

2006

Wray

Critical

13

Chapters

and writingforposlgraduates

reading

14

and

RESEARCH PROBLEM STATEMENT

Spring Break

March

March 15

Postmodernism

1998

Crotty
research
or

and Feminist Research

Poststructuralism

The foundations

Thousand

process

moment

DUE

CA

Oaks

research

social

of

Sage

and perspective

Meaning

Postmodernism

Chapter

in the

of confidence

crisis

of truth

2005

Johnson

The

2000

St Pierre

and

feminism

Poststructural

135

Studies in Education

Qualitative

of bodies

problem

in

in

teaching

Teaching

10 March 22

Narrative

2005

Beverley

Eds.

International

Journal

of

REVIEW DUE

and Queer Theory

Inquiry

Testimonio

Sage handbook

education

447-515

LITERATURE

Lincoln

desires

pp 131-149

16

Education

and

subalternity

of qualitative

narrative

research

3rd

authority

ed pp

In Denzin

547-558

Thousand

Oaks Sage

2005

Chase
and

Yvonna Lincoln

Multiple

The Sage Handbook

Kaufmann

Oaks SAGE

Maori approach

pp

Publications

and

Ellis

as

ed pp

73

Vitdal-Ortiz
understand

to

creating

knowledge

Research

of Qualitative

Researcher

2N1

Research

Norman Denzin

In

SAGE

Thousand Oaks

international

transsexual

Journal

of

Studies in Education

11 March 29 Autoethnography
and
BishopR 2005 Freeing ourselves
Handbook

voices

approaches

Transfiguration of male-to-female

in press

Plummer
2005 Critical humanism
Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln Eds
Thousand

lenses

of Qualitative

651-679

Publications

Qualitative

Narrative inquiry

Eds

Subject

3-768

2004

On

Puerto Ricans

being

theory

Living

Handbook of

Indigenous
from

Session

In

Research

In

Epistemologies

neocolonial

domination

Norman Denzin

Lincoln

SAGE

and

in

Yvonna

research

Lincoln

Publications

Eds.

Handbook

Kaupapa

Eds

The

Sage

119-138

Personal Narrative

Reflexivity

of qualitative

research

Oaks Sage
white

racialization

person

Qualitative

of color

Using Autoethnography

Sociology

27

42

EPISTEMOLOGY AND THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
12 Working

with the tensions

Qualitative

57-375

Autoethnography

In Denzin

Thousand

queer
Sage

Thousand Oaks

2000

Bochner

and
The

to

179-201

STATEMENT

DUE

April

10

GaState0003754

13 Book

Circles

12

April

BOOK REVIEW PRESENTATION
14

19

Apr11

Quality

and

Bogdan

Oaks

CA

Boston Pearson

2002

Patton

pp

Sage

Ed

Denzin and Yvonna

Oaks SAGE

15

Lincoln

April
and

and

methods

in

the

Methods

deconstructive

postmodern

New York

2005

Hodkinson

Representation

theories

method

Eds

The

Relativism

Sage

Handbook

criteria

pp

politics

pp
In

Research

80-93
Norman

Thousand

26

2007

Bikien

Boston Pearson

2000

Richardson

Eds

Thousand

In

investigation

of Qualitative

Qualitative

research for education

Writing

The Sage Handbook

An

introduction

to

Chapter

N.2004 The art and politics of interpretation.
research
to qualitative
Patricia Leavy Eds. Approaches
New York Oxford University Press
447-472

Lincoln

edition

Routledge

and

In

Denzin

and

to

915-932

Publications

Bogdan

and Evaluation

of validity

1997/2001.Masks
Research
and

Smith

introduction

Chapter

Research

Qualitative

An

research for education

Qualitative

544.545

Scheurich
Scheurich

2007

Bikien

methods

and

theories

DUE

as

method of inquiry

of Qualitative

Research

Sharlene Nagy

reader

In

Norman

Thousand

Hesse-Biber

on theory and practice

Denzin

and

Yvonna

Oaks SAGE

9523-48

Publications

Whitney

2004

Dont you

wish

you had

blonde

hair

Qualitative

Inquirylo5

788-

793

FINAL RESEARCH

NOTE

The course

the instructor

syllabus

may be

is

PROPOSAL DUE

general plan for the course

deviations

announced

to the

class

by

necessary

11

GaState0003755