Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 352

NOTICE by Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc., Sage Publications, Inc. Evidentiary Proffer in Support of the Trial Testimony of Jodi Kaufmann (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 806, # 2 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 804, # 3 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 723, # 4 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 803, # 5 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 995, # 6 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 996, # 7 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 997, # 8 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 998, # 9 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 999, # 10 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 710A)(Krugman, Edward)

EXHIBIT 723

QUALITATIVE INQUIRY PROGRAM
EPRS

8500
Research

Qualitative/Interpretive

CRN

Jodi

Education

2007

Fall

Dr

in

86890

Kaufmann

E-mail [e-mail]

Office

of Education

410 College

Office

Hours Thursdays 2-330

or by appointment

Required Texts

1998

Crotty

Thousand Oaks

research process
Willis
Interpretive

The foundations

of social research

2007

of qualitative

Foundations

Thousand Oaks Sage Publications

approaches

critical

and perspective

Meaning

in the

Sage

and Nilakanta

Jost

and

CA

research

1SBN

978-1-4129-

2741-3

Own
Choose

ONE

1998

Angrosino
retardation

Walnut

Health Care
to

CU

2006

publisher website

to

Books

Walnut

listed

Press

Troubling

and

readings

are

is

available

located

on the

Lesbians and

Alberta

Edmontoin

Writing in the s/and

AltaMira

are available

available

Living with

Gays

Experiences

with Mental

award winner

Canada

go

as

homepage

Autoethnography

among

indigenous

South

Press

online at

from the Library

electronically
library

Women

Angels

ethnography

Amazon.com

Additional
All

the

Press

order

Creek

above

of mental

stories

Ethnographic
fiction

Positioning Identities

2006

Tomaselli
Africans

Westview

Institute

Qual

1997

Smithies

Boulder

Platzer

house

Opportunity

Creek Altamira Press

and

Lather

HIV/AJDS

Choice Book Reviews

of the fol lowing

PDF

file

Readings

in electronic

To

The password

access
is

format Each
the documents

article

go

to

has been
Course

scanned

Reserves

KE8SOOGBB

PLAI

TRIAL
PLAINTIFFS
EXHIBIT

NTIFFS
EXHIBIT
723

108-cv-1425-ODE

1os-___--

-L

GaState0003776

Course
This
and

course reviews

research

nature of qualitative

current

and

the foundations

issues

in the

empirical literature

As

Course

As

learner

dealing

in this

with procedural

qualitative

philosophical

research projects

What

review

is

and

you

the

issues

of problems

by

different

various

ways of

undertaking

research

qualitative

ways

it

conceptualized

is

origins

it

and

in

subjectivities

regard to the

research processes
of analysis

examined

generated

What

the units

the explanations

research examine

What

goals

Formulate

appropriate

qualitative

research strategies

does

Examine

dilemmas and

ethical

Recognize

traditions

identify

exemplars and

critically

specified

an understanding

and

issues

related

the

assess

select

the research

to

pertinent

of such

results

process

research derived from varying

the

efforts

approaches

of these different

presuppositions

of

designs for their accomplishment

research goals

Develop

assess

such problems

examining

goals and

the

qualitative

achieve

to

attempt

methods

of qualitative

exemplars

the nature of

research problems design relevant

for

data collection

it

research and

phenomena does

in qualitative

kinds of human

qualitative

data sources and

and

relate to

addressed

What are the
qualitative
How does define problems What are its
Clearly articulate your own presuppositions
Specify

the

following

research

educational

and

possibilities

ethical

do

will

explain the range

is

and

within the theoretical

situated

covered

is-also

methodological

analytical

Specifically

and

Identify

research

history philosophy

methodologies

Objectives

will investigate

course you

research

qualitative

qualitative

the literature

field

the

investigating

design

covers different

It

research

in qualitative

Description

of qualitative

research process through

of the relationship
an examination

of educational

of

theorizing to the

of theoretical

variety

orientations
Describe

and

define

constructionism

epistemological stance

your

subjectivism

-developments

assumptions and
Describe
social

and

You

limitations

10

Describe
critical

will

of these
and

the

and

stance

11

Define

in the

and

the

following

ontological

assumptions

identified

assumptions

--

others

You

literature

and

realism

research

in

and/or
the

and

strengths

and

will

be

positivist

post-positivist

framework

the theoretical
able

assumptions

to

and

identify
the

of

the origins

strengths

and

and

approaches

describe the identified
of each

the origins

identify

realism nave

framework--

your theoretical

of these varying

and

to

underlying values and

stance of empirical

ontological

developments underlying values and
limitations

able

limitations

be able to identify

postmodern

empirical research

be

epistemologies

ontologies

define

feminist

will

objectivism

epistemological stance of empirical

the

your ontological
and

relativism

literature

varying

their strengths

define

and

You

research within the literature
of these

--

methodologies

methodology

on which

what

theoretical

Be

able to

are the

discuss the

epistemological and

perspective

does

it

most rely

GaState0003777

what type of

does

questions

rely what

it

12

Write

clear cohesive

13

Write

strong

review

the

answer

to

and

critically

review

research proposal

the problem

ground

strengths

literature

integrated

qualitative
to

what type of data does

on

and

limitations

its

are

cohesive

literature

problem
design

and

allow you to answer

it

goal what

its

is

and

to the

introduction

research

qualitative

problem

Course Stru cture
This

course

will

and

activities

group

Attendance

course

me

see

demonstrations

small

discussions

experiences

participatory

attendance

and

account

into
is

course activities
please

of mini-lectures

combination

and Participation

expect regular
credit

of

consist

essential

If

so

privately

take excessive

will

in the

have

you

Your
with

conflict

use our limited

as not to

missing sore than

absences

course grade

final

participation

session due

to

prior

individual

time with

class

hours

of

3-

discussion

in class

and

commitments
scheduling

concerns
people to come

expect
all

completing
lack

of preparation

to

class

and

will

files

for

to

prepared

to

be

will

class

taken

assigned reading and

all

and

discussions

activities

in the

account

into

final

Frequent

course

grade

Assignments

me

to

assignment

via Georgia

electronically

Make

due

is

in

accepted

order

that

may

State

Turn
use

track

in

prior

your name

with

as

assignments

Word

documents

comments

for

changes

email

University

sure you label the document

example Kaufmann_subjectivity

be

read

having

contribute

contribute

on the date the assignment

assignment

PDF

no

turn in each

will

and

failure to

of

Submission

Electronic

You

or

class

to

course activities

Assignments
All

are

assignments

Exceptions

may

due

before

be

made

for

Accommodations
It

is

the policy

individuals

qualified

accommodations
discuss

your

Non-Native
Non-native

to

Speakers
English

Free and Open

course

If

you

will

be accepted

Disabilities

to make

are

work

late

reasonable

person with

your course requirements

please

accommodations

disability

notir

me

and

as

for

desire

soon

as

possible to

of English

speakers

are

strongly

encouraged

to

recruit

an editor

Exchange of Ideas Classroom Climate
on human experience often involves controversial
and

beliefs

Although

everyone

is

outside

of class

to

work

research

feelings values
information

disabilities

complete

with

No

only

emergencies

University

date

request

review their written

Qualitative

State

Georgia
with

the assigned due

Individuals

for Qualified

of The

on

class

documented

that

diversity

expected

to

affect

how

of opinions
accurately

they interpret
is

central

scientific

to the

scholarly

represent the variety

topics
and

inquiry

of views

have

People

strong

other scholarly
encouraged

discussed

We

in

this

may

GaState0003778

to

agree

to

what others have

differences

in

As

will

student
the

This does
does

it

are

Georgia State

at

sometimes

is

visiting

with others

dialogue

disagreement

respectful

visiting

called

and

listening

It

carefully

respecting

are free

that

express

of course

not mean

mean

to

you

will

we may
no

experience

can

opinions

without

views

your
for

consequences

should be

have

disagreement

not challenge

please arrange an

commitment

discussions

or

agreement

of ideas

We

necessary for learning

either

that

this

violating

is

discourse

the free

University

of ideas

open exchange

You

those

we

that

Arendt

in interactive

say engaging

believe

express

feel

and

listening

Hannah

Sound

disagree

perspectives

consequences
with them But
you

to

graduate

We

expected
and

respectftil

on what the philosopher

depends

we

with which

be able to express the viewpoint

must

then on

dpends

scholarship

we

but

disagree

with us If

disagreeing
to

appointment

of

fear

or disagree

discuss

the

issue
class

Additionally

As

students

Numerous

of

all

races tend

some people
that

we

goal

be sensitive

we

attempting

our colleagues

not unfairly

connected

their

to

students

not discuss
are

they

cannot

words What

no matter how

respectfUl

participate

we

It

is

forum

should
for

be respected

graduate

of political issues

discussion

is

might

of local

that

they can

not mean

we

The

need

all

to

agree

when

school districts
mention

to

inappropriate

class at

feels that

is

too

or talking

This does

does mean

strongly

problems

presenting

disagree

it

Certainly

important issue

much

too

female

little

very

The

by talking

the

both male and

space in which everyone

safe

some

to

our participation

many of

unless

races

some students

dominating

in

professional

integrity

State

Georgia

the names

of

performance

to

all

other person

seeks to promote

serve

these goals

work

academic

or using

honesty

and

University

school district

facing

ensure academic

other members of the University

and

has been developed

is

Academic

without

and

defined

integrity

and

broadly

honesty

simply

or receiving assistance

lying stealing

cheating

the very fabric

is

personal

policy on academic

community

honesty

source of information

any

vital to

honesty and

not appropriately

authorized

integrity of the University

All

--

honest university
All

all

readily available to

honesty

system

and

operate the academic
policy occur

must work

its

together to

of the University

the policy on

understanding

made

and

members

or attributed

students must

academic

all

students

proper

honesty

appropriate

honesty
and

The

faculty

functioning

The

are

are

for

policy

to ensure understanding

entire

designed

responsible

statement on

to

violations

protect

the

knowing
and

academic

code of

will

be

academic

works together

of the academic

All

and

procedures

of the

Community

University

system Where suspected

procedures

of the policy and

ensure the success

community

the

from

and code
of honest behavior
honesty policy
comply with an appropriate and sound academic
members of the University community are responsible for and involved in bringing about an

behavior

of

Honesty

students

Academic

other

of participation

level

This does not mean people

education

State University

Georgia

lower

are unfair

that

be sensitive

all

or school districts in class discussions

teachers

in

must

while others

discussions

psychologically

request that

not become

environments

we

tend to dominate

choose

highlight an argument

to

of administrators

Academic

are

and

appreciative

Finally

any

create

have emotions

people cannot

among

we

that

to

is

be

races In addition

class

reasons

in the discussion

participate

should

dominate

to

sensitive

whites

that

of those other

various

for

be

all

The

loudly

members

are

3asily

major research university

at

have found

studies

discussants
and

scholars

to

honesty

process and

integrity

GaState0003779

The academic

due process

while ensuring

honesty

is

system

an academic

of

court

not

process

Law
All students

not an

is

for

responsible

of their academic

every phase
ignorance

are

the highest

maintaining

The

careers

penalties

of honesty and

standards

academic

for

dishonesty

in

integrity

severe and

are

defense

acceptable

Requirements and Grading
All

Students

based

are

on the

points
points

October

Proposal

November
December

points

100

access

Human

oLHuman

you may

successful

When

StatementWho

position

stable

self

identify

What

yourself as emic or

When/where

references

is

will

you wish

of the

literature

What

You

as

the

course

of your

evidence

to

the

20

etic to

do

What

yourself

Do

your subjctivities

When/where

roles

Describe

do you construct

are

work

these

research project

How

training

your

How

your

are

you

these categories

function in your

work

Include

pages

Problem Statement
purpose

address in your

ProblemWhat
is

points

CITI course

passed

successfully
class

to

to

positionality

research problem and

sets out the problem

in relation

disciplinary

your

they slide

do

Approximately

construct

Statement

you

and

Research

You

are

experiences

positionality

and/or

you have

Statement

Subjectivities

your

online

of the course

completion

Subjectivities

the

website

Bring this certificate

certificate

10

Certificate

must pass

from the following

https//www.citiprogram.orgfdefault.asp
print out

Subjects

researcher

Subjects

of charge

course free

13

points

the Protection

in

to the Office of
this

30

10 points

Total

According

25

October

20

CITI Course

grade

18

September

20

Presentation

Research

points

20

Framework

Book Review

September

20

Statement

Problem

Theoretical

final

Due Date

10 points

Certificate

Subjects

Research

can

with the

assignments

Points

Subjectivities

Final

written

following

below

indicated

distribution

Project

Human

the

required to complete

gap

in the

is

the

study

It

problem

literature

20

points

statement

Why

This will be

should

How
is

the

3-5

page

has

it

been

problem

addressed

and

that

essay

contain the following

sections

in the

your work

significant

Pui pose of the StudyWhat
about

good

This
clear

should be

is

clearly

the

purpose

stated

one

of your study
sentence

purpose

What

do

you want

to

statement followed

learn

by

2-3

research questions

GaState000378O

You

will

construct

page

essay

inform

work

your

You

your work and

framework

will

describes

theoretical

you will discuss the epistemology
underpin

that

describe

the

What

will

who

students

review

is

to

have

be

read the same

Research

text you

presented and

clearly

well-organized

how

discuss

each

what questions

In

will

will this

book

small group

circle

of your book to the class

should address the following

It

paper

10

review

will present

this
that

do

choices

the

In

theories

micro

of each

benefits

Presentation

under

read one of the books listed above

will

of each

features

and

and

macro

not allow you to

it

Book Review
You

your

major

framework

theoretical

perspective

the limitations

examine

allow you to answer

20

Framework

Theoretical
10-15

of

Your

elements

Purpose/Questions

Theoretical

Framework

Conceptual

Methodology
Data Collection Methods
Data Analysis Methods
Findings/Conclusions
Personal

Reactions/Critique

You

will

research project

design

qualitative
dissertation

courses

etc

research study for
This

to

Introduction

in

your graduate
article

publishable

include

will

proposal

be used

can

that

20

Research Proposal

Final

the following

process additional

study for your

pilot

dissertation

sections

the

problem
Background of the ProblemWhat is the problem you propose to
What
examine What is the scholarly
literature that informs this work

we

do

in the

know from

already

How

literature

important and

your
Theoretical

so

what

What

problem

the gaps

are

What

this literature

to

What makes

your

study

unique

study What

are

is

the purpose

of

research questions

specific

your

What

Questions

Framework
macro and

perspective
Empirical

What

Framework

Theoretical

Conversation

conversation
Research

the

is

of the Problem andResearch

Statement

this

your study contribute

What

do you hope to learn

about

research

will

are

micro

is

the

theories

What

theoretical

epistemology
that

inform

empirical work

your

grounds

work
your

study

What

you entering

Design

MethodologyWhat
your

of Research

site

and

and/or

structures

process

Site

methodology informs your work

Describe

not another

ParticipantsWho
selecting

these

your rationale

What
are

is

site

where you

our rationale

your participants

participants
for

the

selecting

What
these

are

be

will

What

your

people and

is

Why

working

for selecting

this

your rationale

selection

criteria

this

site
for

What

is

not others

GaState0O 03781

Methods for

data to answer

collect/generate

How

Quality
Ethical

will

you

in this

insure

will

to

you use

will

work

your

and

ethical

build

you

may emerge

issues

political

into

strategies

as

design

your

issues

address these

RepresentationHow
consider your

in

quality

How

study

methods

specific

your question/s

Considerations What

you engage
to

What

data

collecting

you write up your study

might

What genres

audiences

Who

be most

will

do you

appropriate

Course Outline

August 21

Introduction

and

Willis

Research

Willis

poststructural

CITI

theory

Course

JRB Web

in

site

Balancing

and

Pierre

Foundations

of qualitative

research

Chapter

New York

evidence

methods

Theories

Oxford

21-31
research

of social

Sage

and perspective

Meaning

The

Positivism

Chapter

2007

Foundations

my people
Wanda Pillow

in the

march of science

of qualitative

researching

Eds

research

Chapter

myself
the

Working

96-113 New York

education

in

Human

2004
and

contentious

Methods

Lapan

Subjects

Fragments of
Feminist

ruins

Routledge

https//www.citiprograrn.org/default.asp

in

Publishers
Being

Eds Foundations

Mahwah NJ
and

Jost
critical

Lawrence
and

and

Enjoining positionality

modulating

of inquiry

2004

Willis
Interpretive

qualitative

1-32

http//www.gsu.edu/research/human_subjects.html

Tisdale

sciences

Handbooloof

Sage

of

practice

September 11

Researching

the Protection of

Erlbaum Associates

and

and

discipline

Thousand Oaks Sage Publications

and methods

Johnson-Bailey

for research

CA

Subjectivities

In Elizabeth St

tale

reflexive

2007

research project

The foundations

2000

Chaudhry

pp

Publications

of inquiry

approaches

and

Ethics

Positioning

Eds The

Lincoln

and Nilakanta

critical

The

September
craft

Thousand Oaks
Jost

and

The

Designing

research process

Interpretive

1998

Chapter

in the

The research process

Thousand Oaks Sage Publications

approaches

1998

Crony

and

and perspective

Meaning

Introduction

Introduction

Nilakanta

Topics and Design

Press

University

and

Jost

Alford it

Sage

Thousand Oaks Sage

critical

and

Interpretive

Denzin

research

of social

2005

Lincoln

In

research

3S edition

research

CA

Thousand Oaks

Denzin
qualitative

The foundations

1998

Crotty
research process

August 28

Research

Considering Qualitative

forces

education

and

the

in

and

Lapan

social sciences

work

narrative

power

Eds Foundations

Mahwah NJ

Lawrence

123-138
vulnerable

and being

for research

ethical

Methods

Erlbaum Associates

Nilakanta

approaches

de Marrais

In

2007

Publishers

Foundations

Thousand Oaks Sage

research

with/in

of inquiry

in

In

and

education

pp

13-3

of qualitative

Publications

deMarrais
the social

research

Chapter

GaState00037B2

The foundations

1998

Crotty
research

Frameworks

and Theoretical

Epistemologies

Thousand Oaks

process

CA

of

September 18
research

social

Chapter

Sage

and perspective

Meaning

in the

of

The making

Constructionism

meaning

2000

Schwantdt
Interpretivism

Handbook

Three
and

hermenutics

Ethnography Fieldwork
In

Course

inquiry

pp

Publishers

in the

and

September 25

Eds Foundations

Lapan

the social

sciences

Mahwah NJ

and

Ethnography

for research

participant

Methods

of

Lawrence Eribaum Associates

161-180

pp

and

Martin

Smart

2001

Fine

Eds.

Interactionism

Symbolic

Handbook

the

at

of the

end

Theory London SAGE

of Social

217-228

2000

Villenas

and

Latina

othering

Subjects

asp

traditions

Fieldwork

and

Ritzer and

In

century

Human

of

Protection

citiprogram.orgldefault

and Symbolic Interactionism

2004

Grant

Sandstrom

Publishers

Studies

de Marrais

education

in

Eds.

ed ppl89-2l4
HUMAN SUBJECTS CERTifICATE DUE
httpsI/www

observation

inquiry
Lincoln

Thousand Oaks Sage

CITI

and

Denzin

In

constructionism

research

of qualitcitive

Preissle

for qualitative

epistemological stances

social

recuperating

Xicanism

Writings of the exotic

my back

called

This ethnography

Wanda

and

Elizabeth St Pierre

In

gaze

Eds

Pillow

74-96 New York Routledge
and

Interpretive

and

Jost

Willis

approaches

critical

2007

Nilakanta

Thousand Oaks Sage

and Interpretivism

1998

Crotty

2005

Stake

The Sage Handbook

Oaks

Qualitative

CA

of social

Sage

research

Chapter

case studies In

Research

of Qualitative

research

Chapter

DUE

October

The foundations

Thousand

research process

of qualitative

Publications

STATEMENT

SUBJECTWITIES
Case Studies

Foundations

and jerspective

Meaning

Norman Denzin

SAGE

culture

For and

Interpretivism

Thousand Oaks

in the

against

Yvonna

Lincoln

and

Publications

pp

Eds

443-

465
2005

Vanderstaay

44

Contemporary Ethnography
Willis
Interpretive

Critical

and

Inquiry

Crotty
research process

Critical

like

dollars

2007

Thousand

Sage

man

The

Journal

CA

Sage

1998

Just

what

Critical

Chapter
is

of qualitative

Publications

Race

of social research

Thousand Oaks

education

dead

Foundations

Oaks

and

Ethnography

The foundations

International

and

of

371-409

Nilakanta

approaches

1998

Ladson-Billings
field

and

Jost
critical

One hundred

critical

Jour nal of Qualitative

research

Chapter

Theory October

Meaning

Critical

and perspective

inquiry The

race theory

and

whats

Studies in Education

in the

Marxist heritage
it

doing in

111

nice

7-24

GaState0003783

2005

Madison
race

murder and

Critical

In Denzin

justice

as street

ethnography

Eds.

Lincoln

3rd ed pp 537-546 Thousand Oaks Sage
In
Van Maanen
2004 An end to innocence

handbook

Sage

home

Reflection of

performance

of qualitative

research

Eds.

Leavy

Patricia

York Oxford

and

Jost

and

critical

to

pp

Press

University

Willis
Interpretive

Approaches

qualitative

2007

B..

of qualitative

Foundations

Thousand Oaks Sage

Publications

or

moment

Thousand Oaks

2005

16

DUE

CA

research

of social

Sage

16

October

and perspective

Meaning

Postmodernism

Chapter

in the

of confidence

crisis

2000

Willis
Interpretive

critical

135

in

teaching

Teaching

education

International

Journal

of

447-515

2007

Foundations

subalternity

of qualitative

research

of qualitative

Chapter

23

Theory October

Testimonio

Sage handbook

Eds.

desires

Thousand Oaks Sage Publications

approaches

2005

Beverley

in

Nilakanta

Inquiry and Queer

Narrative

Lincoln

and

Jost

and

and

feminism

Poststructural

Studies in Education

Qualitative

of bodies

The problem

131-149

pp

St Pierre

10

The foundations

research

Chapter

of truth

Johnson
Education

and Feminist Research

Poststructuralism

research process

New

427-446

NiIa.kanta

approaches

1998

Crotty

and

reader on theory and practice

RESEARCH PROBLEM STATEMENT

Postmodernism

Hesse-Biber

Sharlene Nagy

research

and

narrative

research

3rd

authority

ed pp

In Denzin

547-5

58

Thousand

Oaks Sage

2005

Chase

Narrative inquiry Multiple

Yvonna

Lincoln

Eds

Publications

65

lenses

approaches

voices

In

Norman

Denzin

Oaks SAGE

1-679

and

Plummer
Norman Denzin
Thousand

and

Handbook

Publications
and

critical

approaches

to

creating

theory

Foundations

knowledge

Epistemologies
from
In

neocolonial

of qualitative

research

Chapter

October 30
domination

Norman Denzin

Thousand Oaks

In

Research

of Qualitative

Thousand Oaks Sage Publications

ourselves

Thousand

Living with the tensions

Sage Handbook

2007

Nilakanta

of Qualitative Research

queer

Eds
pp 357-375
The

and Indigenous
Freeing

Research

of Qualitative

and

humanism

Lincoln

Jost

11 Autoethnography
BishopR 2005
Maori approach

Critical

Yvonna

Oaks SAGE

Willis
Interpretive

2005
and

The Sage Handbook

SAGE

and

in

research

Yvonna Lincoln

Publications

Kaupapa

Eds

The

Sage

119-138

GaState00037B4

and

Ellis
Researcher

ed

2m1

as

2000

Bochner
In

Subject

Puerto Ricans

understand

Willis

and

13 Book

14

Quality

Break

November

2007

Foundations

Oaks

CA

Ip

Sage

Scheurich

Ed

Seheurich

Thousand Oaks Sage Publications

Denzin and

Oaks SA
15

pp

Lincoln

Eds

Methods

Thousand

edition

of validity
the

Eds

The

deconstructive

New York

postmodern

Sage

Relativism

Handbook

criteria

pp

Routledge

and

In

investigation

politics

In

Research

of Qualitative

0-93
Norman

Thousand

915-932

December

2004

The

art

and

politics

of interpretation

Eds. Approaches to qualitative
New York Oxford University Press

2000

Richardson
Lincoln

and Evaluation

Leavy

447-472

DUE

20

November

2005

Hodkinson

Representation

Patricia

Chapter

FRAME WORK DUE

Research

Qualitative

GE Publications

Denzin
and

NO CLASS

1997/2001.Masks
Research method in

Yvonna

research

544-545

and

Smith

of qualitative

27

2002

Patton

to

179-201

13

November

Thanksgiving

Autoethnography

42

27

BOOK REVIEW PRESENTATION
14

research

November

Session

Circles

Reflexivity

of qualitative

Using

Sociology

Qualitative

Nilakanta

THIEORETICAL
12 Working

of color

white person

being

approaches

critical

Narrative

Handbook

Sage

racialization

Jost

and

Interpretive

On

2004

Vitdal-Ortiz

Eds.

Lincoln

Denzin

Thousand Oaks

pp 733-768

Personal

Autoethnography

Writing as

The Sage Handbook

research

of Qualitative

Sharlene

reader

method of inquiry
Research

In

In

on

Nagy

Hesse-Biber

theory and practice

Norman Deazin

Thousand Oaks

and

Yvonna

SAGE

9523-48

Publications

Whitney

2004

Dont you

wish

you had

blonde

hair

Qualitative

Inquiry

105

788-

793

FINAL RESEARCH

NOTE

The course

the instructor

may

syllabus

be

is

PROPOSAL DUE

general plan for the course

deviations

announced

to

the class by

necessary

10

State

037