Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 352

NOTICE by Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc., Sage Publications, Inc. Evidentiary Proffer in Support of the Trial Testimony of Jodi Kaufmann (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 806, # 2 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 804, # 3 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 723, # 4 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 803, # 5 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 995, # 6 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 996, # 7 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 997, # 8 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 998, # 9 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 999, # 10 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 710A)(Krugman, Edward)

EXHIBIT 803

INQUIRY PROGRAM

QUALITATIVE

EPRS
Qualitative/Interpretive

CRN

in

Education

85407
2008

Fall

Dr

8500
Research

Kaufmann

Jodi

E-mail [e-mail]
410 College

Office
Office

Hours By

of Education

appointment

Required Texts

1998

Crotty

Thousand Oaks

research process

dough

CA

The foundations

and

CA

of social

ONE

Choose

student

retardation

1998

Walnut

methodology Thousand Oaks

Ann Arbor The

2001

Boulder

Health

Care

Qual

publisher website

Tomaselli
Africans

Books

Walnut

1997

CO

Westview

Troubling

are

available

masculinity

Press

the

Women

Angels

Living with

Edmontoin

Alberta

Canada

with Mental

award winner

go

order

2006

Writing in the s/and Autoethnography

Creek AltaMira

available

from

as

located on the library homep

age

among

indigenous

South

Press

Amazon.com

at

the Library

electronically

is

of black

Lesbians and Gays Experiences

Additional
readings

of mental

ethnography

Positioning Identities

Institute
to

stories

schools in the making

Press

above are available online

listed

Ethnographic
fiction

Bad boys Public

Smithies

2006

Platzer

house

Opportunity

of Michigan Press

University

and

Lather

HIV/AIDS

Reviews

Creek Altamira Press

Ferguson Ann

and

to

guide

of the following

Angrosino

All

in the

Sage Publications

Own Choice Book

to

and perspective

Meaning

Sage

2007

Nutbrown

research

PDF

in

file

Readings

electronic

To

The password

access

format
the

Each

documents

article

go

to

has been
Course

scanned

Reserves

is

PLAINTIFFS
TRIAL

EXHIBIT
803

108-cv-1425-ODE

GaState0003756

Course
This
and

course reviews

nature of qualitative

current

and

foundations

the

issues

in

empirical

research

literature

the

in

field

As

literature

the

learner

dealing

in this

qualitative

philosophical

research projects
Identif

and

What

qualitative

is

How

does

define

educational

the

research

Formulate

Examine

various

ways of

undertaking

by

research

qualitative

ways

is

it

conceptualized

origins

its

and

in

subjectivities

regard to the

for

such

and

methods
issues

related

problems

assess

nature of

qualitative

to the

select

results

the

research

research derived

goals and

assess

does

phenomena

attempt to achieve

examining

of qualitative

critically

it

the

research and

qualitative

research problems design relevant

qualitative

the

in

kinds of human

does

goals

dilemmas and

identify

and

exemplars

are

examined
What

strategies

exemplars

traditions

addressed

are the different

What

and

relate to

following

of problems

data collection

ethical

Recognize
and

What

research

sources and

covered

issues

presuppositions

generated

appropriate

qualitative

the

processes

research examine

data

own

the units of analysis

explanations

the

What

problems
your

and

within the theoretical

situated

possibilities

ethical

do

will

you

research

Clearly articulate

Specify

and

explain the range

it

also

is

methodological

analytical

Specifically

is

history philosophy

research methodologies

Objectives

course you will investigate

with procedural

research

review

the

investigating

qualitative

qualitative

Course

As

design

covers different

It

research

qualitative

Description

of qualitative

from

approaches

different

of

designs for their accomplishment

the

efforts

process
varying

of these

presuppositions

pertinent

of such

research goals

specified

an

Develop

of the relationship

understanding

research process through

an examination

of educational

of

variety

to

theorizing

the

of theoretical

orientations

Describe

and

define

constructionism

your

epistemological stance
--

subjectivism

You

research within the literature
of these

developments
assumptions

and

Describe

define

social

and

You

Describe
critical

and

to

and

define

feminist

the

limitations

Define

and

following

assumptions

framework--

your theoretical

postmodern and

of these

varying

realism

research
strengths

and/or

in the

and

You

identified

and

will

positivist

post-positivist

framework of

the theoretical

be able to identify

assumptions

and

the

the

strengths

origins

and

and

approaches

describe the identified

of each

--

others

developments underlying values and

11

nave

of empirical

stance

identify

research in the literature

empirical

and

underlying values and

realism

stance

ontological

able

origins

limitations

ontological

be

the

to identify

epistemologies

the

will

be able

of these ontologies

limitations

10

will

objectivism

epistemological stance of empirical

the

and

relativism

literature

varying

their strengths

your

and

methodologies

methodology

what

Be

able

are the

to

discuss

the

epistemological and

GaState0003757

on which theoretical

assumptions

ontological

what type of questions does
it
rely what is its goal what
12

Write

clear

13

Write

strong and

design

review

the

answer

to

critically

cohesive

literature

problem

and

cohesive

most rely
does

strengths

review
introduction

research proposal

problem and

the

ground

it

type of data

what

literature

integrated

qualitative
to

on

and

limitations

its

are

does

perspective

allow you to answer

it

to

the

research

qualitative

problem

Course Structure
This

course will consist
and

activities

group

Attendance

credit

activities

me

please see

demonstrations

small

discussions

experiences

participatory

attendance

is

the

in

essential

privately

If

so

have

you
to

missing more than

absences

Your

course grade

final

not

as

take excessive

will

and

account

into

course

course

of mini-lectures

combination

and Participation

regular

expect

of

use our limited

due

to

prior

time with individual

class

discussion

class

in

participation
session

with

conflict

3-

hours of

and

commitments
scheduling

concerns
come

expect people to

You

will

on

class

to

and

turn

in

the

no PDF

me

to

assignment

be

assigned reading and

discussions

class

to

be taken

will

and

account

into

Make

due

is

in

accepted

via

electronically
sure

example Kaufmann_subjectivity

for

will

files

each

date the assignment

assignment

contribute

all

activities

Frequent

final

course grade

University

email

the

in

of Assignments

Submission

Electronic

to

read

having

prepared

or failure to contribute

of preparation

lack

and

course activities

all

completing

class

to

order that

may

Georgia
label the

you
Turn

use track

in

State

prior

document with your name

assignments
for

changes

as

Word

documents

comments

Assignments
All

Exceptions

may

is

the

policy

accommodations
your

Non-Native
Non-native
review

for

to

documented

Georgia

you

to

are

work

late

will

be

accepted

Disabilities

make

reasonable accommodations

person with

your course requirements

complete

please

disability and
notify

me

as

for

desire

soon

as

to

possible

of English

Speakers
English

are strongly

speakers

values

encouraged

to

recruit

an editor

outside

of class

to

work
of Ideas

research on human

information

with

No

only

emergencies

University
if

date

assigned due

Individuals

State

with disabilities

Free and Open Exchange

feelings

the

on

request

their written

Qualitative

class

for Qualified

of The

individuals

qualified

discuss

made

be

Accommodations
It

due before

are

assignments

and

Although

beliefs

experience

that

diversity

Classroom Climate

affect

how

of opinions

often

involves

they interpret
is

central

to

controversial
scientific
the

scholarly

topics
and

People

have

strong

other scholarly

inquiry

encouraged

in

this

GaState0003758

course
agree

depends
what

differences

in

As

and

student

believe

Arendt

Hannah
in

we

with

is

visiting

and

others

may
Sound

disagree

disagreement

respectful

visiting

dialogue

We

discussed

with which

sometimes

called

interactive

we

are free

listening

It

carefully

respecting

are

to

that

violating

for

necessary

we may

that

no

experience

commitment

learning

not challenge

should be

have

opinions

without

views

your
for

consequences

arrange an

please

of ideas

We

or disagreement

express either agreement

will

you

this

is

discourse

the free

University

of ideas

mean of course

not

does mean

it

Georgia State

at

You

This does

But

feel that

and

listening

the open exchange

express those

with them

respectful

say engaging

graduate

We

will

on

philosopher
to

of views

the variety

represent

be able to express the viewpoint

perspectives

consequences

you

the

accurately

must

then

have

others

expected

we

depends

on what

to

expected

but

disagree

scholarship

to

is

everyone

to

or disagree
with us If

disagreeing

discuss

to

appointment

of

fear

the

issue

As

students

Numerous

scholars

at

found

discussants are members
and

of

all

that

we

be sensitive

all

The goal

loudly

in

participate

have

to

attempting

our colleagues

University

to

developed
of

performance

Academic

for

the

is

graduate

of political issues

All

understanding

is

vital to

readily

and

policy

available

honesty system and
the

academic

to

its

the

and

is

might

The

class

at

mean

not

we

that

they can

need

all

to

agree

when
the names

to mention

inappropriate

integrity

professional
State

Georgia

of

University

school district

facing

Academic

goals

without

very
sound

the

on
all

work

are

students

defined

lying

honesty

and

policy

for

and

are responsible

community
The statement on

and

faculty

The

are

to

All

to

violations

protect

the

honesty

simply

--

or attributed

must

students

in

bringing about

of the policy

knowing

for

policy

and

code

All

an
of

and
will

be

academic

works together

of the academic
academic

and

procedures

of the

the

from

of honest behavior

University Community

suspected

designed

code

ensure understanding

entire

integrity

assistance

authorized

involved

ensure the success

honesty

and

broadly

or receiving

stealing

not appropriately

responsible

honesty system Where
procedures

is

integrity of the University

together to

University

academic

and

academic

proper functioning

occur appropriate

honesty

personal

policy on academic

community

cheating

fabric

honesty and

ensure academic

of the University

community
must

all

members of
the

promote and

information
any source of

University

honest university

to

work

academic

all

honesty

members of

policy

be respected

discussion

these

serve

comply with an appropriate

operate

It

This does

is

too

or talking

of local school districts

school districts in class discussions

seeks

other person or using

made

we

female
Certainly

feels that

does mean

strongly

problems

they are presenting

other members

and

students

behavior

how

matter

too much

disagree

the

and

important issue

which everyone

it

of

little

very

The

by talking
in

words What

not discuss

students

should

forum

no

respectful

space

our participation

both male

participate

of participation

level

in

unless many

some students

dominating

their

sensitive

some

to

Honesty

State

has been

to

are unfair

races

while others

safe

that

be

all

other

mean people cannot

not

connected

or

teachers

lower

not unfairly

are

an argument

education

not become

Academic

any

in

environments

we must

discussions

choose

This does

and

be

tend to dominate

psychologically

request that

highlight

of administrators

among

create

emotions

we

Finally

Georgia

we

that

to

is

easily

races In addition

class

reasons

appreciative

sensitive

should

of those other

the discussion

people cannot
be

various

for

whites

that

tend to dominate

races

some people

can

research university

major

have

studies

discussions

class

Additionally

to

honesty

process and

integrity

GaState0003759

due

while ensuring

The

process

academic

honesty

system

is

academic

an

not

process

of

court

law
students are responsible

All

of their academic

every phase
is

ignorance

the

maintaining

The

penalties

the

Students are required to complete

based

Book Review

22

points

September

29

points

October

points

November

20

Proposal

December

points

100

CITJ Course
According
access

to

this

Human

course

Human

from

the

following

you may
successful

When

StatemenlWho

and/or
position

stable

self

identify

What

is

references

sets

will

research

Statement

of the

literature

What

as

evidence

course

of your

to

the

20

to

your

How

How

What

are

work

do these

Describe

your research project

training

Problem Statement
and

purpose

address in your

ProblemWhat
is

class

the

passed

successfully

do you construct
your

When/where

roles

yourself

Do

subjectivities
are these

function in your

you

categories

work

Include

pages

problem

you wish

out the problem

etic

do they slide

Approximately

construct

to

to

positionality

your

Research

You

in relation

disciplinary

and

yourself as emic or

When/where

you

are

experiences

positionality

you have

Statement

Subject.ivities

your

You

of the course

completion

Subjectivities

points
CITI course

website

Bring this certificate

certificate

10

pass the online

must

https//www.citiprogramorg/default.asp
print out

Certfica1e

Subjects

researcher

Subjects

of charge

free

17

points

the Protection of

in

Office of

the

13

November

10 points

Total

can

September

20

Presentation

Research

points

20

Framework

Theoretical

Due Date

20

Statement

Problem

Research

in

with the final grade

assignments

10

Certificate

Subjects

Subjectivities

Final

written

following

Points

Project

Human

integrity

severe and

below

indicated

the distribution

on

are

dishonesty

and Grading

Requirements
All

academic

for

of honesty and

standards

highest

acceptable defense

an

not

for

careers

gap

is

in the

the

study

points
This will be

Why

3-5 page

essay that
sections

should contain the following

It

problem

literature

20

statement

How
is

the

has

it

been

problem

addressed

and

your

in the

work

significant

Purpose of the StircWhat
about

good

This
clear

should

be

is

clearly

the

purpose

stated

one

of your study
sentence

purpose

What

do you want

statement

to

followed

learn

by 2-3

research questions

GaState000376O

You
you

10-15

will construct

essay

underpin

your

work

your

framework

work

You

the

allow you to answer

What

and

will

You

who

students
review

is

to

have

read

be clearly

Research

the

above

listed

and

will

It

book

In

review

present

this

paper

that

each

will

will this

questions

10

choices

well-organized

how

discuss

what

In

theories

do

to

Presentation
the

micro

of each

allow you

under

same text you

presented

of each

features
benefits

not

it

Book Review
of the books

read one

will

macro and

perspective

limitations

framework

theoretical

your

describe the major

will

examine

and

describes

theoretical

discuss the epistemology

will

inform

page

that

20

Franework

Theoretical

small group

circle

of your book

to the

class

of

Your

elements

should address the following

Purpose/Questions

Theoretical

Framework

Conceptual

Methodology
Data Collection Methods
Data Analysis Methods
Findings/Conclusions
Personal Reactions/Critique

Final

You

will

research project

design

qualitative
dissertation

courses

etc

to

the

do we
in

the

your

the

graduate process additional

article

study for your

pilot

of the

What

is

ProblemWhat
the

know

already

the

research about

will

this

the

is

so

what

to

you propose

problem

informs this

work

problem What

What

are the

What makes

your

gaps

What

to this literature

your study contribute

What

learn

to

important and

from

is

literature that

scholarly

How

literature

do you hope

study

unique

What
Statement of the Problem and Research
Questions
What are your specific research questions
your study

is

the

purpose

of

Framework

Theoretical

Theoretical

Framework

perspective

macro and

Empirical

What
micro

Conversation

conversation
Research

dissertation

sections

following

problem

Background
examine

in

publishable

include

will

proposal

introduction

can

20

Proposal

be used

study for

research

This

Research

that

are

is

the

theories

What

epistemology
that

theoretical

inform your

empirical work

grounds

work
your

study

What

you entering

Design

MethodologyWhat
your

of Research

site

and

work

and/or

structures

process

Sire

informs your

methodology

Describe

not another

What

the
is

site

our

where you

rationale

for

will

be working

selecting

this

Why

this

site

GaState000376

ParticipantsWho
these

selecting

your

for

will

you
to

in this

engage

What

data

your

insure

you

Ethical Considerations

your

will

What

criteria

is

others

not

methods

will

you

use to

questionls
in

ethical

How

for

your rationale

is

selection

specific

quality

What

study

are

people and

these

data to answer

How

Quality

What

selecting

collecting

collect/generate

What

your participants

participants

rationale

Methods for

are

you

work

your

and

political

build

issues

strategies

may emerge

into

as

your design

address these issues
might

RepresentationHow

up your study Who do you
will be most appropriate

write

you

What

audiences

consider your

genres

Course Outline

August 18

Introduction

1998

Crotty
research

process

and

Research

University

and Design

Topics

1998

Alford
Press

research process

The

2007

Ethics

tale

poststructural

CITI Course
IRB

Web

In

and

of

practice

of qualitative

1-32

Sage

Theory

and Praxis

Subjectivities

Researching
and

Protection

of

Human

New York

evidence

methods

research

In

and perspective

Meaning

Positivism

Chapter

Sharlene

Nagy

The

Oxford

in the

march of science

Ed Hand

Hesse-Biber

SAGE

Thousand Oaks

29-44

September 15
my people researching myself Fragments of
Wanda Pillow Eds Working the ruins Feminist

theory and methods in education

96-1

Subjects

York

13 New

Routledge

https//www.citiprogram.orgldefault.asp

site

2004

Johnson-Bailey
Balancing

CA

Elizabeth St Pierre

in the

Sage Handbook

and

21-3

of social

Feminist empiricism

2000

Chaudhry
reflexive

The

Theories

of inquiry

The foundations

book of Feminist Research

Positioning

research process

discipline

pp

in the

September
craft

Thousand Oaks

Hundleby

The

Introduction

The

Eds

Lincoln

research project

Designing

1998

Crotty

and

and perspective

Meaning

LABOR DAY

NO CLASS

September

research

Thousand Oaks Sage Publications

3r edition

research

Denzin

of social

CA Sage Chapter
2005 Introduction

Lincoln

In

research

qualitative

The foundations

Thousand Oaks

Denzin

August 25

Research

Considering Qualitative

contentious

for research

Methods

Erlbaum Associates
Preissle

and

modulating

of inquiry
Publishers

2007

Enjoining positionality

in

forces

education

and

the social

power
and

sciences

in narrative

Lapan

work

Eds 1bundations

Mahwah NJ

123-138

Feminist research ethics

book of Feminist ResearchTtheoiy

and

de Marrais

In

and Praxis

In

Sharlene Nagy

Thousand Oaks

Hesse-Biber

SAGE

Lawrence

Ed

I-land

515-534

GaState0003762

Frameworks September 22

and Theoretical

Epistemologies

1998

Crotty

The foundations

Thousand Oaks

research process

CA

research

of social

Sage

and perspective

Meaning

Chapter

in the

of

The making

Constructionism

meaning

2000

Schwantdt
Interpretivism

Handbook

inquiry

Eds.

Lincoln

Denzin

ed pp1
14
HUMAN SUBJECTS CERTIFICATE DUE

Ethnography Fieldwork
and

In

2008

Human

Subjects

September 29

and Symbolic Interactionism
The underlife of kids school lunchtime
Studies

food exchange

in

identity

Protection of

in the

Course

Oaks Sage

Thousand

89-2

CITI

boundaries

constructionism

social

research

of qualitative

Nukaga

epistemological stances for qualitative

Three
and

hermenutics

Journal

ethnic

Negotiating

of Contemporary Ethnoraphy

373

pp

342-380
and

Preissle
observation

and

inquiry in education

pp

Publishers

Sharlene Nagy

and

pp

2007

Mayo

of

Erlbaum Associates

Lawrence

of feminist

understandings

Theory

In

ethnography

and Praxis

155-172
and

Martin

Smart

2001

Fine

Eds.

Handbook

Symbolic

of Social

Interactionism

at

the

of the

end

London SAGE

Theory

217-228

and Interpretivism

1998

Crotty

STATEMENT

Stake

2005

Sage Handbook

Oaks

CA

of social
Sage

Research

and perspective

research Meaning

Chapter

case studies In

Qualitative

of Qualitative

DUE

October

The foundations

Thousand

research process

The

participant

Methods

for research

book of Feminist Research

SUBJECTIVITIES
Case Studies

and

Ethnography

Foundations

Mahwah NJ

Toward

Ed Hand

Ritzer and

In

Publishers

sciences

SAGE

Sandstrom
century

Eds

Lapan

the social

Hesse-Biber

Oaks

traditions

Fieldwork

and

161-180

Pillow

Thousand

2004

Grant

de Marrais

In

Thousand

For and

Interpretivism

Norman Denzin

and

in the

culture

against

Yvonna Lincoln

Oaks SAGE

Publications

man

The Journal

pp

Eds

443-

465
Vanderstaay

2005

Contemporary Eihnography

Critical

Theories

Crotty
research process

344

dollars

1998

The foundations

Thousand Oaks

2007

of truth

performance

The

and

dead

of

371-409

and Critical/performance

Denzin
politics

One hundred

CA

secret

text

Ethnography

of social research

Sage

downing
Symbolic

Chapter

October 13

Meaning

Critical

inquiry The Marxist

memo the One
Interaction
304 pp
street

and perspective

percent doctrine

in the
heritage

and

the

447-461

GaState0003763

1998

Ladson-Billings
field

education

like

race

murder and justice

research

ed pp

3rd

Journal

lilernational

2005

Madison

what

Just

Critical

as

street

handbook

Sage

1998

or

moment of

and

Oaks

SAGE
2006

Gubrium

Narrative Inquiry

Ed

DUE

Sage

and perspective

Meaning

Postmodernism

Chapter

in the

of confidence

crisis

Postmodern

Hand book

and

poststructural

of Feminist Research

theories

critical

In

and Praxis

Theory

1-106
was my momma baby
162 pp 231-253

2005

Johnson

2000

desires

teaching

in

stories

Strategic

of

Teaching

pp 131-149

St Pierre

gal

was my daddy

of bodies and

The problem

16

Education

Qualitative

10

CA

2007

Davies

Hesse-Biber

Sharlene Nagy

success

home

of qualitative

truth

Gannon
Thousand

of social research

The foundations

Thousand Oaks

research process

111

nice

7-24

October 20

and Feminist Research

Poststructuralism

Crotty

in

doing

Thousand Oaks Sage

537-546

RESEARCH PROBLEM STATEMENT

Postmodernism

it

Reflection of

performance

Eds.

Lincoln

whats

and

theory

Studies in Education

qf Qualitative

ethnography

Denzin

In

race

is critical

135

Studies in Education

Queer Theory and

Eds.

Lincoln

Narrative

2005

Beverley

handbook

International

education

in

Journal

of

447-515

October 27

Inquiry

Testimonio

Sage

feminism

Poststructural

narrative

and

subalternity

of qualitative

authority

ed pp

3rd

research

In

Denzin
Thousand

547-558

Oaks Sage
and

Clandinin
spaces

and tensions

Plummer
Norman Denzin

2005
and

11 Autoethnography
BishopR 2005
Maori approach
Handbook

to

and

Researcher

as

2d ed pp

Subject

733-768

Vitdal-Ortiz
understand

Puerto

In

from
In

Norman

Denzin

Living

with the tensions

In

Research

of Qualitative

domination

Denzin

SAGE

Autoethnography
Lincoln

Mapping

Inquiry

November

neocolonial

Thousand Oaks

2000

Bochner

theory

Handbook

Epistemologies

ourselves

Research

queer

Eds
pp 57-375

knowledge

creating

and

of Narrcztive

inquiry Borderland

5-75

p.

The Sage

and Indigenous
Freeing

Ed Handbook

Publishing

humanism

Lincoln

Publications

of Qualitative

Ellis

Critical

Yvonna

Oaks SAGE

SAGE

of narrative

landscape

Mapping

Jean Clandinin

In

Thousand Oaks

Methodology

Thousand

2007

Rosiek

and

in

research
Lincoln

Yvonna

Publications

Handbook

The

Sage

119-138

Personal Narrative

Eds.

Kaupapa

Eds

Reflexivity

of qualitative

research

Thousand Oaks Sage

2004
Ricans

On

being

racialization

white

person

Qualitative

of color

Sociology

Using Autoethnography
27

42

to

179-20

GaState0003764

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK DUE
12 Working
13 Book

Session

Circles

November

10

17

November

BOOK REVIEW PRESENTATION

14

November

Quality

Oaks

CA

pp

Sage

Ed

Denzin

and

Yvonna

Oaks SAGE
15

pp

Lincoln

deconstructive

postmodern

New York

Eds

Relativism

The Sage Handbook

The

art

and

politics

Eds. Approaches
New York Oxford University

criteria

In

investigation

Routledge

and

politics

of Qualitative

of interpretation

to qualitative

and

Richardson

Lincoln

Publications

Whitney

Thousand

edition

pp
In

Research

80-93
Norman

Thousand

December

2004

Denzin and Yvonna

3td

915-932

Leavy

447-472

Oaks SAGE

in the

2005

Hodkinson

Representation

Patricia

method

Publications

Denzin
and

of validity

1997/2001.Masks
Research
and

Smith

Methods

and Evaluation

Research

Qualitative

544-545

Scheurich
Scheurich

24

2002

Patton

DUE

2004

St Pierre

Eds

The

research

In

Sharlene

reader

Nagy

1-lesse-Biber

on theory and practice

Press

2005

Writing

Sage Handbook

9523-48
Dont you wish you

had

as

method of inquiry

of Qualitative

blonde

hair

Research

Qualitative

In

Norman

Thousand

Inquiry

105

788-

793

FINAL RESEARCH

NOTE
the

The

instructor

course syllabus

may

be

is

general

PROPOSAL DUE

plan for the course

deviations

announced

to

the class by

necessary

10

GaState0003765