Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 352

NOTICE by Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc., Sage Publications, Inc. Evidentiary Proffer in Support of the Trial Testimony of Jodi Kaufmann (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 806, # 2 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 804, # 3 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 723, # 4 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 803, # 5 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 995, # 6 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 996, # 7 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 997, # 8 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 998, # 9 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 999, # 10 Exhibit Trial Exhibit 710A)(Krugman, Edward)

EXHIBIT 804

P1

QU4LITATIVE INQUIRY PROG1tM
EPRS
Qualitative/Interpretive

8500
Research

in

EducatLon

CRN 53240
Summer 2007

Dr

Kaufmann

Jodi

B-mail jkaufmanngsu.edu
Office

410 College of Education

Office Hours

By

appointment

Required Texts
and

Bogdan

and methods

to theories

Recommended
writing

for

CA

ONE

1998

Walnut

Lather

and

Boulder

Malinowski

McKinney
Tomaselli

1ooks

Walnut

listed

Meaning

and perspective

in the

Choice

Wray

2007

Critical

reading

and

Publishing

Book Reviews

house

Opportunity

stories

Ethnographic

of menial

Bad boys

Public

schools in the making

Ann

of black masculinity

of Michigan Press

Arbor University

Africans

introduction

Creek Altamira Press

2001

Ferguson

H.IVIAJDS

An

of the following

Angrosino
retardation

and

SAGE

Thousand Oaks

Own
Choose

for education

Sage

not required Wallace

postgraduates

research

of social

The foundations

Thousand Oaks

research process

Research

Qualitative

Boston Pearson

1998

Crotty

2007

Bikien

1997

Smithies

CO

Westview

1922
2004
2006

the

of the western

Women

Angels

Pacific

Troubling

Living with

Press

Argonauts

Being while

Stories

Writing in the s/and

New York

of race and racism

Autoethnography

Dutton

London

among

Routledge

indigenous

South

Creek AltaMira Press

above are available online

at

Amazon.com

PLAJNFp

EXHrnff
PLAINTIFFS
TRIAL

EXH

BIT

108-cv-1425-ODE

GaState0003766

Additional
All

readings

and

is

located

available

on

from

are available

the

the

library

PDF

as

electronically

The

homepage

Readings
format Each

Library in electronic

To access

file

article

documents

go to

the

has been
Course

scanned

Reserves

is

password

Course Description
This
and

course reviews

foundations

nature of qualitative

current

and

the

issues

research

It

the

in

As
the

field

design

different

covers

research

in qualitative

empirical literature

of qualitative

review

is

and

the

within the theoretical

situated

covered

also

is

history philosophy

research methodologies

qualitative
research

qualitative

literature

the

investigating

Course Objectives
As

in this

learner

dealing with
qualitative

will investigate

course you

procedural

philosophical

research projects

What

is

How

articulate

Clearly

educational
Specify
the

your

own

its

are

explanations

examined
What

generated

What

goals

Formulate

appropriate

qualitative

research strategies

data sources and

and

to

by

different

undertaking

research

qualitative
it

ways

is

conceptualized

origins
and

presuppositions

of analysis

units

research examine

in

subjectivities

regard to the

traditions

identify

and

the

critically

issues

such

and

related

problems
the

assess

relevant
select

results

pertinent

of such

from varying

efforts

approaches

of these different

presuppositions

of

designs for their accomplishment

the

of

qualitative

research process

to the

research derived

goals and

assess

problems design

examining

the nature

phenomena does
achieve

attempt to

methods

of qualitative

exemplars

exemplars

for

dilemmas and

it

research

qualitative

research and

in qualitative

kinds of human

does

data collection

ethical

Recognize

addressed

are the

What

relate

research processes

the

Examine

issues

ways of

following

of problems

What

research

define problems

it

the

various

and

possibilities

ethical

do

will

you

explain the range

qualitative

does

and

analytical

Specifically

and

Identify

methodological

research goals

specified

Develop
research

process through

of the relationship

an understanding

of educational

of

an examination

variety

theorizing

to

the

of theoretical

orientations

Describe

and

define

constructionism

the

literature

of these varying

developments
assumptions

and

Describe

define

social

and

10

their strengths

Describe
critical

You

will

of these
and

define

feminist

empirical

your

and

relativism

limitations

epistemological stance

subjectivism

research within

literature

your

the

--

and

You

the

will

objectivism
stance of empirical

episteniological

be able to identify

the

origins

and

underlying values and

epistemologies
limitations

and

stance

ontological

realism

ontological

be able to identify

the

nave

realism

and/or

of empirical research in the

stance

assumptions

strengths

and

ontologies
your theoretical

postmodern

and

research in the literature

framework-others

You

--

and

will

be

positivist

post-positivist

the theoretical

able to

identify

framework of
the origins

and

GaState0003767

underlying values and

developments
limitations

Define

11

of these
describe

and

of each

following

identified

rely what

Write

clear cohesfve

13

Write

strong

and

are

review

the

its

and

strengths

are the

does

it

most rely
does

strengths
review

literature

problem

the

epistemological and

research proposal

the

ground

discuss

to

on what type of data

and

integrated

qualitative
to

able

perspective

limitations

critically

cohesive

literature

design to answer

and

theoretical

allow you to answer

it

goal what

is its

12

problem

which

on

what type of questions does
it

Be

methodologies

methodology what

identified

assumptions

ontological

the

approaches

varying
the

and

assumptions

and

introduction

to the

research

qualitative

problem

Course Structure
This

of

course will consist
and

activities

group

Attendance

course

small

discussions

demonstrations

experiences

participatory

attendance
into

course activities
please see

of mini-lectures

and Participation

expect regular
credit

combination

me

is

and

account

in

If

essential

absences

Your

you have

with

conflict

as not to use our limited

so

privately

take excessive

will

the final course grade

missing more than

due

session

time with

class

in class

participation
to

prior

individual

hours of

3-

and

discussion

commitments
scheduling

concerns
expect people to come
all

completing

You

will

Make

or failure to

Submission

Electronic

turn in each

sure

and

course activities

lack of preparation

of

assignment

contribute

to

class

be taken

will

assigned reading and

all

discussions

into

me

to

and

activities

in the

account

final

email prior class on the date the

using

document with your name and

Mylasiname_subjectivity
order that

may use

accepted

to

contribute

Turn

in

having read

prepared

Frequent

course grade

Assignments

label the

you

class

to

in

assignments

track

for

changes

assignment

for

Word documents

as

assignment

is

due

example

no

PDF

will

files

be

comments

Assignments
All assignments

are

may

Exceptions

Accommodations
It

is

due before

be made

with

complete

your

Non-Native
Non-native
review

class

If

of Georgia
you

course requirements

Speakers
English

their written

emergencies

individuals

University

disabilities

on the assigned due

documented

for Qualified

the policy of The

individuals

for

are

with
to

No

date

late

work

will

be

Disabilities

make reasonable accommodations

person with

please notify

accepted

only

me

disability
as

soon

as

and

desire

for qualified

accommodations

possible to discuss

to

your request

of English

speakers

are

strongly

encouraged

to

recruit

an editor

outside

of class to

work

GaState000376B

Free and

research on human

Qualitative

information

agree

Although

what

differences

in

As

the

believe

Hannah

the

in

and

Arendt

scholarly

other

sometimes

in this

encouraged

We

discussed

with which

we

may
Sound

disagree

respectftzl disagreement

visiting

dialogue with

is

visiting

and

others

strong

scholarly

inquiry

of views

variety

called

interactive

listening

It

carefblly

respecting

are

free

does mean

it

we

that

for

necessary

will

we may

that

commitment

learning

not challenge

no consequences

experience

of ideas

We

to

of

fear

or disagree

disagreeing

arrange an appointment

please

opinions

without

your views
for

should be

have

or disagreement

express either agreement

of course

you

this

are violating

to

is

discourse

the free

University

of ideas

exchange

open

You

State

Georgia

at

This does not mean

But

feel that

you

student

graduate

consequences
with them

to the

represent

listening

respectfi.il

say engaging

express those

will

and

central

be able to express the viewpoint

philosopher
to

is

have

topics People
and

scientific

perspectives

We

expected

the

have

others

accurately

controversial

they interpret

of opinions

must

then on

depends

on what

depends

we

involves

often

how

affect

to

expected

Classroom Climate

experience

that

diversity

but

disagree

scholarship

to

is

everyone

to

beliefs

and

values

feelings

course

of Ideas

Open Exchange

with

us

If

the

discuss

issue

As

students

Numerous
discussants
and

of

some
that

scholars

all

races

for

we

loudly

be

sensitive

The goal

is

all

participate

in

the

sensitive

attempting

to

of administrators
our colleagues
should

in

not become

class

are

not unfairly

to

forum

all

that

be

are unfair

sensitive

other races

by

talking

mean people cannot
their

words What

respectfUl

matter

students

not

discuss

The

districts

in class

be respected

for discussion

strongly

It

is

of political

issues

feels that

class

facing

The
at

is

too

they can

This does not mean

might

inappropriate

female
Certainly

or talking

is

that

we

all

need

to

agree

of local school districts

discussions

graduate

and

important issue

much

does mean

we

of the

little

very

too

disagree

it

problems

they are presenting

or school
should

how

some

to

our participation

both male

participate

of participation

dominating

in

unless many

some students

while others

level

no

an argument

teachers

lower

choose

connected

and

education

we must

races In addition
discussions

not

request that

highlight

be environments

tend to dominate

This does

emotions

we

easily

psychologically safe space in which everyone

create

appreciative

Finally

we

that

to

other

reasons

discussion

have

people cannot
be

various

whites

that

dominate

tend to

can

research university

major
found

members of those

are

people

at

have

studies

discussions

class

Additionally

to mention

State

the names

integrity

professional

Georgia

when

of

University

school district

GaState0003769

Academic

among

Honesty
State

Georgia

and

students

has been

of

seeks

to

other person or using

Academic

honesty

comply with an

made

available

readily

system and

honesty

policy occur

is

honesty
lying

defined

very
sound

work

and

fabric

are

honesty

and

for

responsible

All

due

--

the

from

or attributed

students

must

of honest behavior
bringing about

in

involved

and

of the policy

ensure the success

to

together

code

honesty

simply

assistance

authorized

and

policy

and

or receiving

stealing

integrity

academic

broadly

integrity of the University

academic

personal

on

policy

All

an

code

of

the

all

to

and

students

honesty

appropriate

ensuring

community

cheating

The

process

The

system Where
are

procedures

to

faculty

proper functioning

its

operate the academic

while

Academic

and

honesty

University community are responsible for knowing and
and procedures
academic
policy on
honesty The statement on policy

the

understanding

ensure academic

University

without

community

must

all

members of

All

behavior

and

the

and

appropriate

honest university

the

source of information not appropriately

any

of the University

members

work

vital to

is

and

promote

these goals

serve

academic

all

to

members of

other

developed

performance
any

University

violations

to

is

honesty system

of the academic

the academic

protect

be

works together

Community

University

suspected

designed

academic

ensure understanding

entire

will

of the academic

process and

an academic

to

honesty
integrity
court

of

integrity

in

not

process

law
All

students

are

responsible

for

maintaining

every phase

of their academic

careers

ignorance

not an acceptable

The

the

highest
for

standards of honesty

academic

are

severe and

defense

is

penalties

dishonesty

and

Requirements and Grading
All

Students

based

the

on

are

required

distribution

to

the following

complete

written

assignments

with the final grade

below

indicated

Points

Human

Certificate

Subjects

Subjectivities

Due Date

10 points

Project

May
May

21

24

10 points

Statement

22

Research

Problem

10 points

Literature

Review

20

points

May
May

20

points

May31

Epistemology

and

Theoretical

29

Perspective

Book Review

10 points

Final Research

Proposal

June

points

100

Total

CITI Course
According
can

June

20

Presentation

access

to

the

this

course free

the Protection of

in

Office of

points

Human

Human

researcher

from

following

of charge

the

When

ps//www.citiprogram.orgJdefault.asp

you may
successful

print

out

certificate

completion

Subjects

Subjects

Bring

this

certflcate

must pass

the

10

online

points
CITI

course

You

website

you have

certificate

to

successfully

class

passed

as evidence

the

course

of your

of the course

GaState000377O

StatementWho

Subjectivities

experiences

your positionality
and/or

self

What

identify

as ernie

position

yourself

stable

When/where

references

are

and

sets

you wish
the

Statement of

What

Literature

and

address

to

the

How

What

work

your

do these

are

Describe

project

do you

construct

yourself

Do

your subjectivities

When/where

roles Ilinction

gap

10

Problem Statement

PmblemW
is

How

your research

training

are
in

you

these categories

your

work

Include

pages

research problem

out the problem

etic to

do they slide

Approximately

will construct

to

your positionality

is

or

in relation

disciplinary

Research

You

you

10

Statement

ivities

Subject

in

your study

is

hat

the

This will be

should contain

It

How

problem

Why

literature

in the

points

statement

purpose

is

has

the

been

it

3-5

the problem

page

that

essay

sections

following

addressed

in

the

your work

and

significant

Pwpose of the
about

This

good

clear

StucWhat

should be

is

the

clearly

You

situate

What

3-4 page

construct

What

are

essay

describes

the key

and

succinctly

rationale

to

review

literature

thematically reviews
guidelines

Specific

for

the

for this

students
review

of the books

read one

will

who

is

to

by

2-3

20

Perspective

own

your

What

theoretical
theoretical

How

You

perspectives
perspective/s

does

it

What

do in your research project

have

be

will

inform you

inform your

work

questions will

it

literature that

review

will

Theoretical

above

presented and

20

This will be
grounds

Presentation

under

the

well-organized

study

review

and

distributed

which

builds
in

your

class

10

choices
review
It

10 page

your

be discussed and

read the same text you will present

clearly

Research

listed

Review

your study

Book Review
You

learn

to

pursue

construct

will

do you want

statement followed

purpose

within this framework

concepts

Literature

You

sentence

and Theoretical

that

framework allow you

will this

enable you to

stated

What

of your study

in the context of your reading

discussion

this

research

one

research questions

Epistemology
will

purpose

In

book

circle

small

group

of your book to the class

should address the following

of

Your

elements

Purpose/Questions

Conceptual

Framework

Methodology
Data

Collection

Methods

Data Analysis Methods
Fin clings/Conclusions
Personal

Reactions/Critique

GaState000377l

Final

You

will

design

qualitative

research project
research

courses

dissertation

etc

This

Research

that
for

study

Introduction

to

the

do we
in the

the

is

know

already

following

dissertation

problem

your

What

is

what

the so

to

propose

work

What

problem

this

contribute

study

you

informs this

What

are the

What

gaps

What

to this literature

makes your study

unique
Problem andResearch

oft/ic

study What

are

What

Questions

the

is

purpose

of

research questions

your specific

Review

Literature

Theoretical

Framework

substantive

theories

What

conversation

are

macro-level

are the

What

and

mid-level

work

inform your

that

Conversation

Empirical

Research

about

research

will

learn

to

important and

from

the

is

literature that

scholarly

How

literature

do you hope

your

the

study for your

pilot

sections

of the ProblemWhat

What

Statement

article

process additional

pro bleni

Background
examine

your graduate

in

publishable

proposal will include

2O

Proposal

be used

can

work

empirical

grounds

your

study

What

you entering

Design

MethodologyWhat
your

of Research

and/or

structures

process

Site

informs your work

methodology

site

and

What
are

ParticipantsWho
these

selecting

your

for selecting

Ethical

How

will

What

study

How

in this

address these

your rationale
criteria

this

site
for

What

is

not others

methods

will

you use

to

in

your

and

you

work

political

build

issues

strategies

may emerge

into

your

as

design

issues

RepresentationHow
consider your

ethical
will

this

question/s

quality

What

is

selection

your

specific

your

insure

Considerations

you engage
to

you

are

for selecting

people and

these

data to answer

collect/generate

Quality

What

Why

be working

will

What

participants

data

collecting

where you

site

our rationale

is

your

participants

rationale

Methods for

the

Describe

not another

you

might

audiences

What

write

up your study

genres

will

Who

do you

be most appropriate

Course Outline

Introduction

Considering

Bogdan
theories

and

May 14
Qualitative
and

methods

Crotty
research process

Research

Biklen

May 15

2007

Boston Pearson

1998

The foundations

Thousand

Oaks

CA

Qualitative

pp

An

introduction

to

3-47

of social

Sage

research for education

research

Chapter

Meaning

Introduction

and perspective in the
The research process

GaState0003772

and

Deazin
research

qualitative

Research

1998

Press

and

research process

Bogdan

methods

and

theories

reflexive

tale

In

post structural

CITI

theory

Course

IRB Website

and perspective

Meaning

to

in the

The march of science

Positivism

An

research for education

Qualitative

introduction

to

48-52

Wanda

researching

Eds

Pillow

education
Subjects

the

of

Fragments

myself

Working

New York

96-113

Feminist

ruins

Routledge

https//www.citiprogram.org/default.asp

Enjoining positionality
forces

modulating

Mahwah NJ

Epistemologies

Being vulnerable

research process

and

Eds Foundations

Mahwah NJ

The foundations

Oaks

CA

of

Sage

research

being ethical withlin

and

research

Methods

Frameworks

and Theoretical

Thousand

Lapan

work

in narrative

and

sciences

the social

Eribaum Associates

Lawrence

1998

Crotty

power

Lawrence

123-138

Publishers

Eds Foundationsfor

Lapan

and

de Marrais

In

of inquiry in education

2004

Tisdale

sciences

research

my people

Human

2004
and

Methods

Eribaum Associates

and

introduction

http//www.gsu.edu/research/human_subjects.html

contentious

Balancing

An

research for education

Chapter

pp

and

in

Oxford

May 17

Researching

and methods

Johnson-Bailey

for research

Sage

2007

the Protection of

in

CA

Elizabeth St Pierre

New York

21-3

of social

Boston Pearson

2000

Chaudhry

of

of qualitative

Chapter

Subjectivities

Biklen

practice

evidence

methods

Theorie.s

Qualitative

The Jbundations

and

and

1-32

and

16

2007

Thousand Oaks

Ethics

Positioning

pp

research project

Biklen

1998

Eds

Sage Handbook

of inquiry

Boston Pearson

methods

and

Crotty

discipline

The

Publications

Sage

May

craft

Designing

Bogdan
theories

The

The

Introduction
Lincoln

Oaks

and Design

Topics

Alford
University

Denzin and

Thousand

edition

3rd

research

2005

Lincoln

In

in

of inquiry

Publishers

deMarrais

In

education and the social

pp

13-30

May 21

social

research Meaning

Chapter

and perspective
The making

Constructionism

in the

of

meaning

2000

Schwantdt
Interpretivism

Handbook

epistemological stances for qualitative

Three

and

hermenutics

In Denzin

constructionism

social

inquiry

Eds.

Lincoln

ed pp1 89-214
SUBJTECTS CERTIFICATE DUE
of Human Subjects
CITI Course in the Protection

research

of qualitative

Thousand Oaks Sage

2td

HUMAN

https//www

Ethnography

Bogdan
theories

and

and

methods

research process
Preissle
In

2007

Biklen

The foundations

Thousand Oaks
and

and Interpretivism
Qualitative

asp

May 22
An

research for education

introduction

to

Boston Pearson Chapter

1998

Crotty

observation

Fieldwork Studies

citiprogram.orgldefault

Grant

de Marrais

CA

2004
and

of social

Sage

Chapter

Fieldwork

Lapan

research

tEds

Meaning

and perspective

Interpretivism

traditions

Foundations

For and

Etimography
.for

and

research

in the

culture

against

participant

Methods

of

GaState0003773

and

inquiry in education

pp

Publishers

2000
and

Latina

Xicanism

Publishers

and

Martin

Ritzer and

Eds

STATEMENT

DUE

2001

Fine

Interactionism

Symbolic

Handbook

Eds.

Smart

of Social

the end

at

of the

London SAGE

Theory

217-228

2005

Stake

Sage Handbook

The

gaze

Pillow

May 23

and Interpretivism

pp

Wanda

and

Routledge

Sandstrom
century

of the exotic

Writings

Elizabeth St Pierre

In

SLJBJECTIVITIES
Case Studies

my back

called

This ethnography

recuperating

74-96 New York

In

Eribaum Associates

Lawrence

161-180

Villenas

othering

NJ

Mahwah

social sciences

the

case studies

Qualitative

Research

of Qualitative

In

Norman Denzin

Yvonna Lincoln

and

SAGE

Thousand Oaks

pp

Publications

Eds

443-

465
2005

Vanderstaay

44

Contemporary Ethnography
and

Wallace

London SAGE

Critical

1998

Crotty

education

like

murder and

CA

Oaks

dead

man

The Journal

of

and

and writing for post graduates

Race

Critical

social

research

May 24
and perspective

inquiry The Marxist
and

whats

it

in the
heritage

nice

doing in

111

7-24

performance Reflection of

home

Studies in Education

of Qualitative
as street

Eds.

Lincoln

Meaning

race theory

is critical

ethnography

Theory

Critical

Chapter

what

Journal

Critical

reading

12

Sage

In Denzin

justice

and

of

Just

International

2005

Madison
race

11

Ethnograpby

1998

Ladson-Bilhings
field

Critical

The foundations

Thousand

research process

2006
Chapters

Critical

and

dollars

371-409

Wray

Publications

Inquiry

One hundred

3rd ed pp 537-546 Thousand Oaks Sage
In
Van Maanen
2004 An end to innocence.

handbook

Sage

of qualitative

research

Patricia

Leavy

York Oxford

Eds.

Approaches

University

Press

Nagy

Day

No

research
or

process

moment

16

St Pierre
Qualitative

and Feminist Research

The foundations

Thousand

Oaks

CA

qf social

Sage

research

May 29

Meaning

and perspective

Postmodernism

Chapter

crisis

in the

of confidence

of truth

Johnson
Education

1998

DUE

May 28

Poststructuralism

Postmodernism
Crotty

class

New

427-446

RESEARCH PROBLEM STATEMENT

Memorial

and

Hesse-Biber

reader on theory and practice

research

to qualitative

pp

Sharlene

2005
pp

13

The problem of bodies and

desires

in

teaching

Teaching

1-149

2000

Poststructural

Studies in Education

135

feminism

in

education

International

Journal

of

447-515

GaState0003774

REVIEW DUE

LITERATURE
10

Narrative

2005
Eds.

Lincoln

May 30

and Queer Theory

Inquiry

Beverley

Testimonio

handbook

Sage

and

subalternity

narrative

research

of qualitative

3rd

Denzin

In

authority

ed pp

Thousand

547-55

Oaks Sage

2005

Chase
and

Narrative inquiry Multiple

Lincoln

Eds

65

Yvonna

lenses

voices

approaches

Research

Norman Denzin

In

Thousand

SAGE

1-679

Publications

Kaufmann

The

Sage Handbook

of Qualitative

Transfiguration of male-to-female

in press

transsexual

Ocr/cs

Journal

International

of

Qualitative Studies in Education

Plummer
Norman Denzin

2005
SAGE

Handbook

to

Publications

Research

of Qualitative
and

Ellis
Researcher

as

understand

Puerto Ricans

May 31

Denzin

Yvonna

and

Eds.

Lincoln

racialization

of color

Handbook

Using

Sociology

Qualitative

June
Bogdan

Kaupapa

Eds

Lincoln

Publications

42

Sage

Reflexivity
research

to

Autoetimography

27

The

119-138

of qualitative

179-201

STATEMENT

EPISTEMOLOGY AND TREORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
12

research

in

domination

Oaks SAGE

ed pp 733-768 Thousand Oaks Sage
Vitdal-Ortiz
2004 On being white person

In

Research

of Qualitative

Autoethnography Personal Narrative

In Denzin

Subject

Norman

with the tensions

Living

Handbook

neocolonial

Thousand

2000

Bochner

from
In

knowledge

creating

theory

queer

Epistemologies

ourselves

Freeing

and

Eds The Sage
pp 357-375

and Indigenous

11 Autoethnography
BishopR 2005
Maori approach

Lincoln

Yvonna

and

Thousand Oaks

humanism

Critical

DUE

Quality

methods

and

theories

CA

Sage

pp

Ed

Smith
Denzin and

Oaks SAGE

Boston Pearson
Qualitative

544-5

Research
and

Yvonna

research for education

An

introduction

to

Chapter

and Evaluation

Methods

edition

Thousand

45
method

in the

of validity
postrnodern

2005

Hodkinson
Lincoln

Qualitative

Research

1997/2001.Masks

Scheurich
Scheurich

2007

Bikien

2002

Patton

Oaks

and

Eds

Relativism

The Sage Handbook

deconstructive

criteria

and

In

investigation

New York Routledge
politics

of Qualitative

pp
In

Research

80-93
Norman
Thousand

915-932

Publications

GROUP BOOK PRSENTATIONS
FINAL RESEARCH

NOTE

The

the instructor

course syllabus

may be

is

PROPOSAL DUE

general plan for the course

deviations

announced

to

the

class

by

necessary

10

GaState0003775