Huon v. Breaking Media et al

Filing 194

RESPONSE by Meanith Huonin Opposition to MOTION by Defendants John Lerner, Breaking Media, Breaking Media, LLC, David Lat, Breaking Media, Inc., David Minkin, Elie Mystal to dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint 178 WITH EXHIBITS A TO J (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A1, # 2 Exhibit A2, # 3 Exhibit A3, # 4 Exhibit A4, # 5 Exhibit A5, # 6 Exhibit A6, # 7 Exhibit B, # 8 Exhibit C, # 9 Exhibit D, # 10 Exhibit E1, # 11 Exhibit E2, # 12 Exhibit E3, # 13 Exhibit F, # 14 Exhibit G, # 15 Exhibit H, # 16 Exhibit I, # 17 Exhibit J)(Huon, Meanith) (Attachment 15 Exhibit H replaced on 3/19/2013 pursuant to Judge's order of 3/18/2013) (tg, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MEANITH HUON, Plaintiff, v. FORMER MADISON COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY WILLIAM MUDGE, et al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 12 cv 166 MJR PMF DEFENDANT CHRIS HOELL'S ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S INTERROGATORIES NOW COME Defendant, Chris Hoell, by and through his counsel, John Gilbert, and for his Answer to Plaintiffs Interrogatories, states as follows: 1. Please state your full name, address, date and place of birth, employer, job title, and job duties. ANSWER: Christopher R. Hoell; Missouri Attorney General's Office. Mr. Hoell can be contacted through his undersigned counsel. 2. Please state the name and address for each of your employers for the past ten (10) years and for each also state: (a) (b) (c) the inclusive dates of employment at such place of employment; the reason for leaving each such place of employment; and the nature of your work and duties. ANSWER: Defendant is presently employed at the Missouri Attorney General's Office. Defendant's previous employment includes the Madison County State's Attorney's Office beginning in December of 2007. The Kagen Law Firm, Clayton, MO, March 2007-November 2007, criminal defense firm. Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Hillsboro, Missouri, October 2003-0ctober 2007, prosecuted misdemeanors and felonies. Prior to that, Brasher Law Firm, a civil defense firm. 130346339vl 0925867 3. Have you received any special training for the position of assistant state's attorney for the Madison County State's Attorney's office? If so, state: (a) the nature and substance of the training you received; (b) the inclusive dates of the period during which you received training; (c) the name and address of each and any specialized school you attended to receive such training; (d) the dates of attendance at each such specialized school; (e) the nature and substance ofthe training offered at each such specialized school; (f) the degree or certificate, if any, that you received from each such specialized school. ANSWER: Defendant objects to this interrogatory as overly broad and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Without waiving said objection and subject thereto, yes. CLE and work related trainings, including: Trial Advocacy-National Advocacy Center, Advanced Trial Advocacy-Illinois Appellate Prosecutor, Trial School-Missouri Office of Prosecution Services, Protecting Children Online-National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, Crimes Against Children-Dallas Police Department, Prosecuting Child Abuse Cases-National Advocacy Center, Reconstruction of Injuries in Child Abuse Investigations-John Reid & Associates, Computer-Facilitated Crimes Against Children-John Reid & Associates, Anatomy of Criminal Sexual Assault-Illinois State Bar Association, What Criminal Court Judges Want You to Know-NBI, Inc. 4. State what investigation you made into the facts of 2008 CF 1496, including whether you interviewed witnesses on the scene and reviewed the detectives' street files and files. ANSWER: Defendant did not investigate the case identified in this interrogatory as he is not a detective or law enforcement officer. Defendant did review the reports provided to the State Attorney's Office by detectives for the Madison County Sheriff's Office and speak to detectives for the Madison County Sheriff's Office. 5. State what investigation you made into the facts of2009 CF 1688, including al [sic} facts to support the claim that plaintiff had committed a forcible felony while out on bond. 2 !30346339vl 0925867

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?