Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al
Filing
298
DECLARATION of Suzanna P. Mettham in Support re: 297 MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Christopher Broschart(Tax Id. 915354 in his official capacity), Christopher Broschart(Tax Id. 915354 Individually), Timothy Caughey(Tax Id. 885374 Individually), Timothy Caughey(Tax Id. 885374 in his official capacity), Kurt Duncan(Shield No. 2483, Individually), Kurt Duncan(Shield No. 2483 in his official capacity), William Gough(Tax Id. 919124, Individually), William Gough(Tax Id. 919124, in his Official Capacity), Thomas Hanley(Tax Id. 879761, in his Official Capacity), Thomas Hanley(Tax Id. 879761, Individually), Elise Hanlon(in her official capacity as a lieutenant with the New York City Fire Department), Elise Hanlon(individually), Shantel James(Shield No. 3004 in his official capacity), Shantel James(Shield No. 3004 Individually), Theodore Lauterborn(Tax Id. 897840 in his official capacity), Theodore Lauterborn(Tax Id. 897840, Individually), Michael Marino, Michael Marino, Gerald Nelson(Assistant Chief Patrol Borough Brooklyn North, Tax Id. 912370 in his official capacity), Gerald Nelson(Assistant Chief Patrol Borough Brooklyn North, Tax Id. 912370, Individually), Robert W. O'Hare(Tax Id. 916960, Individually), Robert W. O'Hare(Tax Id. 916960, in his Official Capacity), Frederick Sawyer(Shield No. 2576 in his official capacity), Frederick Sawyer(Shield No. 2576, Individually), The City Of New York, Timothy Trainer(Tax Id. 899922, in his Official Capacity), Timothy Trainer(Tax Id. 899922, Individually), Richard Wall, Sondra Wilson(Shield No. 5172, in her Official Capacity), Sondra Wilson(Shield No. 5172, Individually). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y, # 26 Exhibit Z, # 27 Exhibit AA, # 28 Exhibit BB, # 29 Exhibit CC, # 30 Exhibit DD, # 31 Exhibit EE, # 32 Exhibit FF, # 33 Exhibit GG, # 34 Exhibit HH, # 35 Exhibit II, # 36 Exhibit JJ, # 37 Exhibit KK, # 38 Exhibit LL, # 39 Exhibit MM, # 40 Exhibit NN, # 41 Exhibit OO, # 42 Exhibit PP, # 43 Exhibit QQ, # 44 Exhibit RR)(Shaffer, Ryan)
1
l-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEI/ü YORK
-------*--x
2
ADRTAN SCHOOLCRAFT,
3
PLAÏNTIFF/
Case No:
-against-
4
10 Civ. 6005
(RWS
5
6
1
)
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, DEPUTY CHIEE M]CHAEL MARTNO'
Tax Id. 813220, Individually and in his Official
Capacity,
ASSISTANT CHIEF PATROL BOROUGH BROOKLYN
Tax Id. 9!2310, Individually
And in his Official- Capacity/ DEPUTY INSPECTOR
STEVEN MÀURIELLO/ Tax Id. 895117, Individually and
Tn his Official Capacity, CAPTAIN THEODORE
LAUTERBORN/ Tax Td. 89"1840, Tndividually and in his
Offícial Capacity, LIEUTENANT WILLIAM GOUGH/ Tax Id.
9I9I24, Individuatly and in his Official Capacity,
NORTH GERALD NELSON,
B
9
l_0
11_
TZ
13
L4
15
I6
I1
1B
I9
20
SGT. FREDERICK SAWYER, Shield No. 2576, Individually
and in his Official Capacity' SERGEANT KURT DUNCAN¡
Shield No. 2483, Individually and in his Official
Capacity/ LIEUTENANT CHRTSTOPHER BROSCHART/ Tax Id.
91-5354, rndividualty and in his Official Capacity,
LIEUTENANT TIMOTHY CAUGHEY' Tax Id. 885374'
SERGEANT
Individually and in his Official Capacity'*JOHN
DOE"
Shield No. 3004 and P.O.'s
SHANTEL JAMES,
in their Official Capacity
#1*50, Individually and
(the name John Doe being fictitious,
as the Lrue
(collectively referred
names are presently unknown)
Lo as *NYPD defendanLs"), JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL
CENTER/ DR. ISAK ISAKOV/ Individually and in his
Official Capacity, DR. LILIAN ALDANA*BERNIER'
Individually and in her Official Capacity and
JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDTCAL CENTER EMPLOYEE I S "JOHN
DOE' # 1-50, Individually and in their Official
as
Capacity (the name John Doe being fictitious'
The true names are presently unknown) '
2T
22
23
DATE: October
24
TIMtr: 10:20
25
I'I,
2012
A.M
(Continued ...)
DIAMOND REPORTING
(718) 624-1200 infoGdíamondreporting.com
1
¿
l_
I\,
z
DATE: October
3
TTME: 10:20 A.M.
2012
4
5
VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION
6
of the
taken by the
1
Plaintiff,
o
Respective Parties/ pursuant to a Notice and
9
to the Federal Rul-es of Civil Procedure, helcl at
ADRIAN SCHOOLCRAFT,
10
t.he offices of the New York City Law Department,
t-L
1-00
L2
Nathan MacCormack, a Notary Public of the State of
13
New York.
Church Street, New York, New York 10007' before
14
15
L6
L1
1B
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DIAMOND REPORTTNG
(71-B)
624-1200 j-nfoGdiamondreporting.com
^
¿
3
1.
APPEARANCES
¿
JON L
NORINSBERG, ESQ.
Attorney for Plaintiff
3
ADRIAN SCHOOLCRAFT
4
New
225 Broadway, Suite 2100
York,
BY: JON L.
York 10007
NORTNSBERG, ESQ.
New
5
coHEN & FITCH/ LLP
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ADRIAN SCHOOLCRAFT
1
233 Broadway, Suite 1800
New
B
9
10
11
IZ
13
14
AJ
t6
L1
1B
19
20
2T
22
23
24
25
BY:
York,
New
York
L02'79
GERALD COHENT ESQ.
-and-
JOHN MEEHAN, ESQ.
MICHAEL A. CARDOZO/ ESQ.
CORPORATION COUNSEL
NEW YORK CITY LAW DEPARTMENT
Att.orneys for the Defendants
THE CTTY OF NEI/ü YORK' DEPUTY CHIEF MICHABL MARTNO,
Tax Id. 813220, Indivj-dually and in his Of ficial
Capacit.y/ ASSTSTANT CHIEF PATROL BOROUGH BROOKLYN
NORTH GERALD NELSON, Tax Id. 912310, Individually
and in his Official Capacity, CAPTAIN THEODORE
LAUTERBORN, Tax Id. B91B40t Individually and in his
Officiat Capacity/ LIEUTENANT WILLIAM GOUGH/ Tax Id.
9L9L24, Individually and in his Official Capacity'
SGT. FREDERICK SAWYER, Shield No. 2576, Individually
and in his Official Capacity/ SERGEANT KURT DUNCAN'
Shield No. 2483, Individually and in his Official
Capacity/ LIEUTENANT CHRISTOPHER BROSCHART, Tax Id.
915354, Individually and in hís Official Capacity'
LIEUTENANT TIMOTHY CAUGHEYf Tax Id. 885374'
Indivídually and in his Official Capacity, SERGEANT
SHANTEL JAMES, Shield No. 3004 and P.O.rs 'JOHN DOE"
#1-50, Individually and in their Offj-cial Capacit.y
(t.he name John Doe being fictitious,
as the true
presently unknown) (collectively referred
names are
to as "NYPD defendants")
100 Church Street
New York, New York 10007
BY: SUZANNA PUBLICKER' ESQ',
ASSISTANT CORPORATION COUNSEL and
QIANA SM]TH, ESQ., SENIOR CORPORATION COUNSEL
File #: 2010-033074
Control #:
(Continued . . .)
DIAMOND REPORTING
HHHO571B
(718) 624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
3
4
].
A P P E A R A N C E S (CONT'D.):
¿
3
4
MART]N, CLEARVüATER & BELL. LLP
Attorneys for the Defendant
JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
220 E"ast 42nd Street, 13t,h Floor
New
q
BY:
York,
New
York
GREGORY JOHN
File:
l-0017
RADOMISLI/ ESQ.
66'l -82153
6
1
TVONE, DEVINE & JENSEN, LLP
R
I
10
Attorneys for the Defendant
DR. ISAK ISAKOV
2001 Marcus Avenue, Suite N]-00
Lake Success, New York II042
BY: BRIAN E. LEE' ESQ.
1-1
L2
l-3
T4
15
CALLAN/ KOSTER/ BRADY & BRENNAN, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
LILLIAN
ALDANA_BERNIER
1 Whitehall Street
New York, New York 10004
BY: MEREDITH B. BORG, ESQ.
File #: 005r09-0647-33S
1"6
17
SCOPPETTA/
SEIFFI KRETZ E ABERCROMBIEI ESQS'
Attorneys for
Defendant.
1B
DEPUTY ]NSPECTOR STEVEN MAUR]ELLO
L9
New
444 Madison Avenue, 30th Floor
York,
New York 10022
BY: WALTER ALLOYS]US KRETZ'
JR.,
ESQ.
20
2I
ALSO PRESENT:
ROBERT E
HORGAN, VÏDEOGRAPHER
22
*
23
*
24
25
DTAMOND
REPORTING (718) 624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
4
5
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
THE VIDEOGRAPHER: WC ATC NOW ON
1-
thc
TCCOTd,
2
beginninq approximately 10:20 a.m. on October 11'
J
2
2012, My name is Robert Horgan, legal
4
videographer with Diamond Reporting and Legal
5
Video, based in Brooklyn,
New York.
This is the deposition of Adrian
6
'Ì
SchoolcrafL, taken on behalf of Defendant. This
o
deposition is being held at the
9
DeparLmenL, L00 Church
Street,
New
New
York City
York,
Law
New York
10
in the United States District Court, Southern
11
District
of
New York.
The caption of the case is Adrian
L2
13
Schoolcraft, Plaintiff,
I4
New
l-5
against t.he City of
10 Civ. 6005.
L6
York, et al., Defendants; Civil Action
number
Counsel will now please identifY
L1
themselves, t.heir firms and the parties they
1B
represent.
19
20
21,
22
¿J
MR. NORINSBERG: Jon Norinsberq; on behalf
of Plaintiff,
Adrian SchoolcrafL.
MR. COHEN: Gerald Cohen; Cohen and
LLP/ on behalf of Plaintiff'
MR. KRETZ: Walter
Fitch,
Adrian Schoolcraft.
Kretz; Scoppetta, Seiff,
24
Kretz and Abercrombie, on behalf of Defendant,
25
Steven Mauriel-1o.
DIAMOND REPORTING
(718) 624-1200 infoßdiamondreport,ing.com
5
b
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
Radomisli; for
1
MR. RADOMISLI: Gregory
2
Mart.in, Clearwater, and BeIl, for
3
Hospital Medical Center.
Jamaica
MS. BORC: Meredith Borg; from Callan,
4
'Koster, Brady & Brennan, on behalf of
5
Dr. Al-dana-Bernier.
6
MR.
'7
LEE: Brian Lee; from Ivone, Devine
and
Jensen/ LLP, on behalf of Dr. fsakov.
B
MS. SMITH: Qiana Smith-WiIliams; New York
9
on behalf of City
10
City
11
defendants, with the exception of Defendant
12
Mauriello.
La\^/ DepartmenL,
MS. PUBLICKER: Suzanna Publicker; with
l_3
T4
Office of the Corporation Counsel, representing
15
city defendants, with the exception of Defendant
L6
Mauriell-o.
MR. VIDEOGRAPHER: The Court Reporter
T1
1B
Nathan MacCormack, with Diamond Reporting.
19
Mr. MacCormack, please swear in the
is
Wit.ness.
S C H O O L C R A F T, cal-l-ed as a wiLness,
20
ADRI AN
2T
having been first
22
State of
23
EXAMINATION BY
24
MS.
25
New
duly
s'Ì,^/orn
by a Notary Public of the
York, was examined and testified
as foll-ows:
PUBLICKER:
a.
Good
morning, Mr. Schoolcraft.
DIAMOND REPORTING
My name
is
(718) 624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
6
t
31
A.
A.
1
SCHOOLCRAFT
f donrL know the specific number, but I
The
If
¿
bel-ieve my attorneys have all t.he recordings.
3
perhaps they could be added up; I never added them up.
a.
4
5
\^rere
relevant, to this matter?
A.
6
Did you give your attorncys al-l recordings that
I believe they have all the recordings, yes.
MS. PUBLICKER: To the extent noL already
1
B
produced, f would request production of all
9
recordinqs in this maLter.
O.
l-0
L1
Did you record every single one of your tours
on
command?
L2
A.
I don't. believe so¡ no.
13
O.
How
I4
A.
I didn't.
did you choose what Lo record?
it wasn't always my choice. It, was a
l_5
technology new to me. f dontt believe
L6
me
1a
II
technof ogy was there.
1B
batteries, the batteries go
like, you
asked
if my fat.her ever recorded -- f don't believe the
These devices require po\^Ier,
dead.
fhis is stuff that I didnrt know. And there
19
20
times where I had Lhe recorcler, bul there were
21,
recordings.
22
question?
23
A.
were
24
25
on
Vrlhat was
no
the quest.ion -- did I answer the
Did you attempt to record every one of your tours
command?
A.
T don't recalf any attempt to -- to record
DIAMOND REPORTING
(718) 624-1200 info@diamondreporting.com
31
42
A.
1_
SCHOOLCRAFT
performance evaluation?
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
¿
3
A.
What was the question, aqain?
4
A.
At
some
point in tíme' while you
\^/ere assigned to
5
the Blst Precinctf did you receive an acceptable
6
performance evaluation?
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
7
ð
9
To the best of my memory, I accepted aII the
A.
other evaluations that. were just passing.
you say you "acceptedr " what do you
10
O.
When
11
A.
You don't appeal it..
1,2
You sign off on it,
mean?
without
an appeal.
13
A,
So you found those to be acceptable?
1,4
A.
If I didnrt, I wasn't aware of any other
t-5
I6
I1
l_8
resolutíon.
O.
What years did you receive acceptable performance
eval-uations
A.
?
r believe
I didn't appeal any other yearf
2001
19
any other evaluation.
I
20
process. I was just.
a\^/are
2L
Life
22
your supervisors.
23
24
Ôtr
AJ
\^ras
a.
t/üasn t t
aware
of the appeal
that it. was a passing score
a lot easier if you dontt appeal or don't contest
So what was the first
year that you received
what
you believed to be an unacceptable performance evaluation?
A
What was the year, or when f received it?
DIAMOND REPORT]NG
(718) 624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
42
43
A.
1
O.
SCHOOLCRAFT
What was the Year?
ft was 2008.
2
did you receive t.hat evafuation?
3
a.
When
4
¡ì..
It was
q
a.
Are you alleging t.hat it's
some
time, earlY
2009.
improper f or the
to consider the number of
6
poI ice department
"l
and/or arrests t.hat an officer makes in evaluating his
B
performance
summonses
?
MR.
9
.
NORINSBERG
:
Ob
I believe t.hat ' s
j ect.ion
. You can
ansvver
10
A.
Yes
11-
O.
.
Are there any circumstances in which you believe
wrong
.
13
it would be appropriate for the police department to
consider the number of summonses and/or arrests that
t4
officer makes in evaluating his performance?
L2
MR.
15
NORINSBERG
:
16
A.
I don't believe sor
L7
a.
Which of an officer's
Ob
j ect.ion
an
.
no.
duties do you believe the
LB
police department should consider when eval-uating that
L9
offícer?
20
A.
Professionalism, how t.hey respond t,o calls for
2L
service, how those calls for service are handled.
22
Underneat.h how those
23
are filed or kept, an officer's
24
ability
25
that prímary report
call-s are handled' how those reports
handwriting, a detective's
or -- or an investigator's ability
DTAMOND REPORTING
to investigate
(71-B) 624-7200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
43
49
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
2
think that. the
recordings would helP t.he I.A.B in their investigation of
3
your allegations?
1
O.
SorrY to interruPt.
You didnrt
at that. time.
4
A.
I didn't believe
5
O.
Are you alleging that you
so¡
\^Iere Placed on
6
performance monitoring because of your meeting with the
7
T.A.B.?
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
B
9
10
t1
L2
13
A.
Again, I dontt recalf being placed on performance
monitoring.
A.
Ho'h/
many sumlnonses were of f icers
of
t.he
Blst Precinct required to issue under the de facto policy?
A.
I dontt recall any specific number, buL there
T4
were numbers given on the recordings. Off the top of
15
head, I can'L remember. But. it was always around *- they
I6
wanted a book, a book of summonses' 20 summonses. IL
L1
always around -- it could have been a little
t_B
have been a little
my
was
more' could
less.
I understood it to be at least 10' but they
I9
¿u
wanted a book, 20 summonses. And that's all I remember,
2L
off the top of my head in general. The recordíngs, they
22
give
23
O
24
25
numbers.
Do you know why Lhat number fluctuated?
MR
.â\
NORINSBERG:
Ob
j ect.ion.
f believe it had to do with the officer'
DIAMOND REPORTING
what
he
(718) 624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
49
50
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
¿
-- \^/hat he paid the month before, what he did the month
before. If that officer wanted a particular day off, Lhat
3
officer's
4
sonre other enforcement;
5
involved with patrot.
6
everyone.
1
0.
1
B
patrol' or
duties' are t.hey assigned to traffic'
S.N.E.U., crime, units that are not
I don't believe it was the
You said what. the officers
"paid" the
before. You are nol referring to money' are
9
A.
A.
Vlho
for
month
you?
No.
10
same
11
\^/ere
MR.
Who
book of
book
of
NORINSBERG:
summonses?
Obj
ection.
t.old you t.hat you were required to issue
summonses
a
?
MR. NORTNSBERG:
L6
I1
t.hat officers at the Bl-st Precinct
Say that. aqain.
A
1,4
15
you
required to issue a
L2
l-3
told
Ob
j ect.ion
.
Again, I don't recall any specific supervi-sor or
A.
Perhaps iL's on the recordings, I think
1B
any specific tíme.
I9
it is.
ZU
officer that f was al^/are, that I knew, a book. They had
2L
to -- a b,ook would make the boss happy.
22
But it was general knowledge to every police
A.
Do you recall on any specific occasion' being
23
told by a supervisor that you needed to bring a book of
24
sununonses
25
A.
back at t.he end of the month?
I don't recall any specific conversation. But
DIAMOND REPORTING (71-B)
624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
50
5l-
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
z
told not ** again/ not specifically a book/
but terms like, ttmore activity, tt or ttmore summonse,Sf tt ttmore
3
arrests.
1
yes,
\^/e \^/ere
tt
They didn't always give a number, or a minimum or
4
cert.ainly never a maximum. And again, the
tr
J
maximum,
6
recordings, I think there are
some
very clear quotes that
B
state numbers that they wanted at Lhat time from officers.
Did a union delegaLe ever Lel-l you about a number
a.
9
of
1
r_0
1_1
L2
l_3
summonses you
I don't recall a union delegate ever giving
A.
specific number,
L6
19
the union delegates at the
B1st. Precinct?
MR. NORTNSBERG: At WhAI IiMC?
At t.he time of the de facto policy you are
A.
referring to.
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
L'7
1B
a
Ðo.
Who were
O.
1,4
15
were reguired to issue?
I know there
A.
\^/ere
three; f don't
remember the
names. There were three, l-ike the different shifts
Did
20
2I
summons
22
in a
A
you
ever fail Lo make the number of required
mont.h?
Yeah. I don't bel-ieve I
f don't believe I
23
handed in the number of summonses that t.hey v\Iere happy
24
with¡ flo.
25
ô
Have you
DIAMOND REPORTTNG
ever t.urned in the number of
summonses
(718) 624-1200 infoßdiamondreporting.com
5l-
6I
A.
1"
SCHOOLCRAFT
I don't know if I did, specifically.
fl
But. I was
officers that wanted overtime would have to
2
a\^rare other
3
adhere t.o the policY in order to explain how they could
4
have that overtime.
6
But you PersonallY, do you¿ sitting here todaY,
recall ever losing overtime for failing to issue a certain
1
number
5
A.
of
B
A.
9
summonses?
As I sit. here todaY, I don'L recall losing
overtÍme.
r_0
11
I2
O.
What officers did you observe l-ose overtime for
failing to issue a cerLain number of
A.
summonses?
J don't recall any specify officer.
I just
if an officer wanted
l-3
recal_l that. that was the qeneral
1,4
overtime, they woul-d have to explain it.
15
was overtime, I recaff being addressed by supervisors.
T6
was understood.
L9
It
The number was tttwo and twottr' two summonses and
t't
1B
And when there
t-wo
250's. If the of ficer
made
a collar, they wanted the
the supervisor wanted that colfar, Lhat arrest to
be
20
250'ci. And I think they -- you st.ill weren'L required to
2L
do the sunmonses. But it was "two and two, " that was t,he
22
phrase.
you say "two and t\n/or' what do you
23
O.
When
24
A.
Two sunÌmonses/ two
25
mean?
250rs, two stop, question
and
frisks.
DIAMOND REPORTING (71-B)
624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
6I
62
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
1
a,
Per month?
2
A.
Per t.hat overtime, Per when you are -- that
3
4
mandat.ed overLime,
A.
or if you requesLed it.
So if I understand you, an officer who was given
5
overtime, was required to issue two
6
arrests during that overtime shift?
summgnses and make two
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
1
õ
A.
As a minimum, Yes.
9
a.
AL a minimum.
MR. NORINSBERG:
10
I think you misjudged.
He
said two -
l-1
t2
MS. PUBLICKER: He just said Yes.
13
MR. NORINSBERG: No,
sutnmonses ancl
L4
but he said
two
two 250rs.
1_5
MR. COHEN: He saici
it. two times.
I6
MR. NORINSBERG: He
said it two times, then
you rePhrased it the wrong
L1
MS. PUBLICKER: And then he said "yes."
1B
I9
am
I
sorry if I misPhrased it, but
MR. NORINSBERG: Do you want
20
to clarify'
Adrian?
2I
THE WTTNESS:
22
23
\^/aY.
O.
VrThen
What was
the question?
you say "two and t'nrort' you are saying
24
I misstated you, then --
25
two
summonses and t.wo
two summonses and
if
two 250's, or
arrests per overtime shift?
DIAMOND REPORTING (71-B)
624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
a^
Õz
63
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
1
A.
Two summonses and two
2
a.
Okay.
Vrlhat happened
250's, two urld a*o.
if they did not make that
4
two and two during their overLime shift?
f cion't- believe they would *- they would not
A.
5
abl-e to ask f or overtime anymore.
3
6
1
B
9
10
11
O.
Can you name
a single person who was subject
be
t.o
that. polícy?
A.
But I bel-ieve you can
Not specifically.
overtime is documented very well.
the
You coul-d see a pattern
of certain officers that. have become dependent on overtime
O,
But have you ever seen an officer be refused
L2
overt.ime because they did not hit the quota policy for
13
summons¡ you
I4
A.
referred to earlier?
I don't specifically
-- I donrt specifically
15
recall any officer or exact time. But that. was general
1,6
knowledge.
t1
1B
19
20
2I
a.
Did you ever suffer a tour change as a resul-t of
failing to issue a certain number of
A.
No. I don't
maybe t.hree years
A.
22
A
I was on the
same
per
month?
tour for --
straight.
Do you observe another
officer suffer that
penalt.y?
23
summonses
f donrt recall any specific officer.
But I
24
recall- officers getting in troubl-e. In order to get
25
to t.heir desired Lour, they would have to produce
DTAMOND REPORT]NG
back
surnmonses
(718) 624-1200 infoßdiamondreporting.com
63
64
A.
l-
and arrests / more
2
3
4
Q.
you
When
SCHOOLCRAFT
.
you say was "officers
in troubler " what do
mean?
A
A.
conunand
discipline;
in trouble' any numerous
6
reasons, vioLations or misconduct of the patrol guide.
Are these unrelated to the sunmons quota policy
Q.
7
you have referred to?
5
B
A.
What do You mean, "unrelaLed"?
9
Q.
So as I underst,and what you are statinq'
10
officers would get in trouble, in
l-1
command
L2
is that
way, receive
t.hey would have their tour changed
some
a
discipline for a violation of department rufes
and
And then in order for them to make it. back t.o
13
1,'4 their preferred time, the original Lour, they would have to
15
issue a certain number of
1,6
A.
Correct
ú
O.
To
summons;
is that' correct?
.
so it's
not that the officers had a t.our
l-B
change because they failed to meet the quota policy that.
19
you referred to, but that they had t.o make more
20
in order to go back to the original tour?
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
21,
There v\lere insLances like that.
But I believe
22
A.
23
there
24
denied, overtime denied, based on the illegal
25
summonses
A.
\^/ere
officers t.hat had tour changes, vacation
days
quota policy.
Can you name one officer who that happened to?
DIAMOND REPORTING
(718) 624-'7200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
64
65
A.
1
I can'L recafl any specific officer,
I don'L
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
3
but -- or one specific time. But it was general knowledge,
you don't get overLime if you don't pay the rent; you don't
4
get your days off granted if you don't pay the rent.
5
you get in t.rouble¡
2
6
A.
Vüould
YOU
If
have got to pay more rent.
anylhing refresh your recollection as to
1
officer who had his t,our changed because of the quota
B
an
pol icy?
MR. NORINSBERG: Objectíon.
9
10
l-1
T2
There might. be recordings or documenLs that I
A.
haven'L seen that could refresh -- it's
possible.
Are there any that. you have seen in the past.' but
O.
1-3
don'L have in front of you, that woul-d refresh your
1,4
recol lect.ion
?
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
15
To the best of my memoryf f haventt.
\6
A.
I1
possible.
1B
0,
But it's
I9
ZU
failing
A.
Were you
ever denied vacation days as a result, of
t.o issue a certain number of
sumrnonses?
Whether -- there were vacation picks.
I never
2L
had a vacation pick denied, and I
22
knowledge that, if you are not paying the renl, you are not
23
going to be grant.ed a day off when you request it.
24
25
it was such general
So I don't recal-l me, myself specifically'
being
denied a day off.
But. it was general knowledge. That was
D]AMOND REPORTING
(718) 624-7200 infoßdiamondreport,ing.com
65
66
A.
1
2
3
4
5
6
SCHOOLCRAFT
one of the
Can you name
O.
a single officer who was denied
day off because of failing
to meet t.he quota policy?
recalf a
I clon'L specifically
A.
time when an officer told
a
me
name
or a specific
or I overheard.
During t.he point in time when you \^/ere receiving
O.
1
acceptable performance evaluaLions, were you issuing the
Õ
number
9
policy?
summonses necessary Lo meet
of
summons
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
10
1_1
the de facto
Again, I wasntL keeping track of *- I was going
A.
T2
out there and answering cal-1s, whatever my duty was for
l-3
that tour.
T4
and arresLs I was doing.
I never kept track of the number of
If I had an arresL, f processed the arrest.
t_5
assigned to court, f went to court.
16
if I
1"1
detai I I was part of, I just
1B
t.hat
19
20
2I
summonses
was
And
And whatever
I didn't keep track of
.
We need
to take a break now to change the tape
and the recording.
THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The
time is L1-:48 â.tn.,
22
this is the end of Lape one.
23
are going off
t,he record.
24
25
(Whereupon, an
We
off-t.he-record discussion
was
hel-d, and a break was had.)
DIAMOND REPORTING
(7fB) 624-1200 infoßdiamondreporting.com
66
BB
A.
l_
z
3
4
SCHOOLCRAFT
Again, other than knowing -- I wasn't privy to
that investigation. I don't know exact.Iy -- r donrt recall
exact.Iy who was involved wit.h what, at what time.
A.
O.
Ilave you personally ever alleged that any other
5
indivídual defendants were involved in the downqrading of
6
crime complaints, besides Defendant Mauriello?
"l
A.
I would have to review the Complaint. Off the
B
I
But I belíeve sor it's
t.op of my head, f donrL recall.
in
the Complaint.
l_0
O.
lf I read you a
name
of t'he defendants in t.his
11
Iawsuit, can t.ell me if you have ever alleged thaL they
L2
were invol-ved in crime Complaint manípulation?
15
Off the top of my head at t.his moment, I would
have t.o -- if it's in t.he Complaint *- maybe not just by
hearing the name,, but I am sure f addressed those issues in
I6
the Complaint. Or in general, maybe I --
r-3
L4
1.1
A.
0.
Based on your recol-Iect.ion, sit't.ing here today,
Chief Michael Marino involved in crime Complaint
LB
\^/as Deputy
I9
manipulation?
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
20
of.
2L
A.
Not that I
22
O.
Assistant Chief Gerald
am aware
Nel-son?
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
23
24
A.
Not that. I
25
a.
Sergeant Kurt
D]AMOND REPORTING
am aware of
.
Duncan?
(718) 624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
BB
9'7
A.
t
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
f donrt remember the ones before t.hat.
2
different being -* T believe Caugheyrs behavior
3
reflective of
a.
4
5
me appealing my 2008
When
The
was
evaluation.
did you appeal your 2008 performance
eval-uation?
6
A.
f believe it was earlY
't
0.
You claimed that you used to be the senior pat.rol
B
2009.
officer in the Bl-st Precinct; is that correct?
9
A.
I believe sor yes.
1,0
O.
What is the senior patrol officer?
1L
A.
It would be the
I2
one of the officers with more
time than other officers.
do you become the senior patrol officer?
13
O.
How
T4
A.
You would acquire more
time on patrol than
an
L6
officer would not -- with less time.
So it's just based on the number of hours you
O.
1.1
have been a police officer?
t-5
A.
1B
19
Probably days, years. I don'L know how they
woul-d approximate
it.
20
O.
What h/ere your dut.ies as a senior patrol of f icer?
2t
A.
Same
22
a.
Did you ever take the sergeant's
¿J
A.
I don't recall ever taking the sergeantrs
a)
Why not?
24
25
as any patrolman.
exam?
exam,
no.
DIAMOND REPORTING
(71-B) 624-'7200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
91
99
A.
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
l¿
SCHOOLCRAFT
Again, it's
A.
I bel-ieve it was just a title
just
like Officer Chan, he had the
3
separating officers;
4
amount of time I had. IIe was -* he was considered a senior
5
officer.
It. wasnrt a sPecific
6
1
other officers needed helP,
B
know how
9
j
ob title.
same
It was --
when
usually expecLed to
had, through exPerience.
10
we
r¡rere
to handle whatever theY
whatever question they
Your Complaint states that beginníng in March,
a.
to isolate you from your fellow
l_1
2OOg, the defendants began
I2
of f icers;
t-3
A.
Yes.
L4
O.
Which defendants isolated you from your fellow
1"5
1,6
officers
A.
is t.hat correct?
?
I don't recall any specific supervisor. But
T
L1
was just aware that officers were being written up for --
1B
for just. t.alking to
I9
20
a.
How
me.
did you know that. that was the fault of the
defendants in this case?
2L
A.
They \^Iere the ones writing them up.
22
O.
Who
23
A.
I don't recall the specific supervisor.
24
O.
Who was
25
A.
I believe Officer
wrote them
DIAMOND REPORT]NG
written
uP?
uP?
Chan
wasi the others, I donrt
(718) 624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
gg
1_00
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
2
recall if they were. I recall that incident.
Which defendant disciplined Officer Chan for
a.
3
speaking to you?
1
5
I
A.
4
recal-f
am ¡tot-
sure if it is a defendant, I don't
who
6
O.
Did you witness it?
-t
A.
I may have been there, he may have told me.
Had you started recording your fellow officers
a
9
a.
prior to
March
|
2009?
10
A.
I believe there were recordings.
l-
a.
Did any of your fel-Iow officers know that
1-
1"2
you
were recording them at thaL time?
MR. NORINSBERG:
13
Ob
j ect.ion
.
I4
A.
I dontt believe sor
15
O.
If your fellow officers knew that. you
no.
\^Iere
L6
recording them, how do you think t,hey would have fel-t about
1.1
ir.?
1B
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
l-9
MR. COHEN: Objection.
20
A.
I don'L know what Lhey would have thought..
2t
O.
Is it possible that. your fell-ow officers isolated
22
themselves from you, because they suspected you were
23
recording
MR. NORTNSBERG: Objection.
24
25
t.hem?
A.
I don't believe that's possible.
DIAMOND REPORTING
(718) 624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
100
101
^
1
a.
z
A
3
or
4
SCHOOLCRAFT
Why not?
I don't believe anyone knew that f was recording
was recording. I don't think it \^iaS that
uncolnmon.
anyone
6
I betieve your Complaint stat.es that you learned
O.
from políce officer Zucker that the defendants were
7
attempting to execute a scenario, portraying you as
B
psychologically unfit to work, in which you would
5
be
10
invofuntary committed to a hospital; ís that correcL?
But' I recall
I don'L recall that., specifically.
A.
L1_
Of f
9
t2
t_3
icer Zucker telting me -- a'nd f don't
remember t'he
specific date. It. was -- office,r Zucker informed me that
Sergeant Weiss had -- was t.rying to E.D.P. -- no, I'm
r'7
out, he used the term "psyche. "
"They were going to psyche you that day." I
donrt recall- the exact. day they \^tere ref err j-ng to. But he
said Weiss puJ-led out the patrol guide, and there was an
1_B
argument between him and another supervisor
19
remember who
T4
15
t6
sorry/ psyche
me
it was
as t.o how
20
THE Vü]TNESS:
r would be psyched.
That was E. D. P. ¡ you said?
THE REPORTER:
2T
I can't
f
L was E.D.P., but then I
Zucker used the word "psyched, " to
22
corrected it.
23
the best of my memory.
24
(t
25
Did you record Lhe conversation with Officer
Zucker?
D]AMOND REPORTING
(718) 624-1200 infoßdiamondreporting.com
101
L02
A.
1
2
3
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
I don't believe so. ft's possible, buL I donft
believe so.
Q.
Did Officer Zucker say that he heard Sergeant
4
Weiss sayj-ng that to anYone else?
5
?
I believe he t'old me there was an argument
between another supervisor telling him to be to behave, and
basically asking him what was -- what was he trying to do
B
or accomplish. And Zucker overheard the response,
9
psyche him and remove his guns. "
6
A.
"To
thaL conversation?
10
a.
When was
11
A.
r don't recall the specific date. But I belÍeve
12
13
1.4
the Complaint has the date.
O.
Do you
recall if it was before or after April'
2009?
15
A.
I think it's
16
0.
Did you go to a hospital Ín April of
Ll
A.
I don't recalf any specific date going to the
1B
hospital, but it's
before.
2009?
Possible.
19
O.
Did you seek medical treatment in April of
20
A.
21,
O.
Itts Possible.
Vlhat \^/ere your
22
hospital in APriI of
23
24
25
symptoms when you went
that.
to the
2009?
MR. NORINSBERG:
A.
2009?
Ob
j ect.ion.
I would have t.o look at the medícal records on
I donrL recall that specific month or year, if I
DIAMOND REPORTING
(718) 624-1200 infoßdiamondreportíng.com
L02
105
A.
1
SCHOOLCRAFT
Did you give Dr. Sure a copy of your
O.
rr49rr about
2
corruption involving Lhe Int.egrity control Program of the
?
Bl-st Precinct,?
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
4
5
6
I don't recal-l ever giving him any
A.
department:
documents, no.
Do you know who
Dr. Lambstein is?
1
a.
B
^
I
O.
Who
L0
A,
I believe she was the
Yêe
is
she?
she is assiqned *-
a
11
psychiatrist assigned to the police department's medical
L2
division.
speak with Dr. Lambst.ein?
did you first
IJ
O.
When
1,4
A.
I don't recall the specific date. It was some
15
1"6
L7
1B
tíme, early 2009.
O.
Vüere
examination in
you ordered to undergo a psychological
2009?
I don't believe sor no. Well, if that was why I
A.
I don'L know if
19
was therei it was a consult of some kind.
20
it was
2I
would -- if t.hat meeting was the exam' or evaluat.ion, then
22
YES,
I guess speaking to her was the exam/ so yes. Ï
it would" have
23
9.
VrThat
24
fi rst
A.
did you discuss with Dr. Lambstein at that
meeting?
25
been.
f don't recal-I.
DIAMOND REPORTING
(71- B
)
I recall addressing the
624-'f
r_05
200 inf oGdiamondreporting.
com
106
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
1
misconduct. !n the Blst Precinct, and answering her
2
questions. I don't recafl if she asked questions
3
when
4
question she asked.
r
rn/as
a.
A.
t_3
I4
t_5
remember every
What. happened
as a result of your examination by
As a resull,
right after that. examination, I
was
modified slash restricted.
O.
1L
I2
I can't
Dr. Lambstein?
9
10
.
Bl_st precinct and the stress it was causing on officers.
1
B
st.uf f
But. I recall get.ting int.o t.he misconducL and the
5
6
a child and
abouL
to
What do you understand "modified and restricted"
mean?
It was never explained to me. What I did know
is, your gun and shield is removed. And you are *- but I
never received any inst.ruction on what I was, other than
A.
L'7
other t.han a restricted or modified police officer.
How many guns did you o\^in or possess in April of
O.
1-B
2009?
I6
MR. NORINSBERG:
I9
As a police officer/
21,
22
the
N. Y.
aÊ
LJ
.
owned two.
were you required to inform
P.D. of alt guns that You
owned?
Yes, I believe so.
23
24
j ect.ion
To the best of my recol-Iection, I
A
20
Ob
a.
t.hat
Did you inform the N.Y.P.D. of all of the
you owned
in April. of
DIAMOND REPORTING
guns
2009?
(718) 624-1200 infoßdiamondreporting.com
r-06
1_08
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
1
to turn in all guns in your possession, or just all
2
you
guns
owned?
3
A.
4
a.
It was my understandinq, all Lhe guns I owned'
So in your understar',Oing, you \^/ere allowed to
5
possess other peoplers guns, but not your
6
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
''t
B
9
A.
own?
It was my understanding that they -- they
\^/ere
only asking for the guns that I own, correct'
sorry/ strike
Do you believe that defendant
A.
11
Is it your belief that any of the defendants
consulted with Dr. Lambstein before her decision to
L2
youï gun and shield?
10
that.
MR. COHEN: Objection.
13
not aware of t.hat" happening,
1-4
A.
I
15
O.
Did Dr. Lambstein ever tell you that
I6
remove
am
no.
she
discussed your allegatíons with any of the defendants?
1.1
A.
If she did, I donrL recall.
1-B
O.
Did Dr. Lambstein ever tell you why your
19
20
2I
\^/ere
taken
A.
weapons
away?
To the best of my memory, she said it was because
of the chest pains.
z¿
a.
What chest pains are you speaking of?
23
A.
Around that. tj-me, Lhatrs
ft's the
24
went and saw my internist.
25
I t.hink that.'s why I
time period, I
was experiencing minor chest pains.
DIAMOND REPORTING
same
(71-B) 624-1200 info@diamondreporting.com
108
119
A.
a.
1
z
3
On October
SCHOOLCRAFT
31, 2009t did you state in reference
to Defendant Mauriello, "I would like to at feast have
fucking chance to go in a gun battle with him"?
a
that again?
4
A.
What was
5
a.
Did you state on Oct,ober 31-, 2009, in reference
6
7
to Defendant Mauriello, "T would like to have at .least
fucking chance t.o go in a qun battl-e wiLh hj-m"?
A.
B
9
O.
A.
L6
a.
I don't recall- ever making t'hat statement about
On October
31, 2009, do you recalf stating in
reference to a recording device, "How long do you think
that'1I fucking stay on me, after they fucking kill me?"
A.
I1
1B
recall making that statement about. anyone'
anyoner flo.
1_4
r_5
Do you
not including DefendanL Mauriello?
L2
13
staLemenL
like that.
l_0
11
f don't recall making -- ever making a
a
it's
Again, I don't recall making t.hat statement' but
possible.
did you make that sLatement to?
19
0.
Who
20
A.
I would have t,o hear the recording.
2L
O.
But sitting here right now, you don't recal-f
22
who
you made that statement to?
23
A.
No.
24
O.
Had anyone aL t.he N.Y.P.D. threatened
25
to kill
you
prior to you making this statement?
DIAMOND REPORTING
(718) 624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
l-1-9
1,20
A.
2
3
4
5
6
'7
10
l_ l_
L2
13
T4
l_5
T6
T1
a.
A.
20
Did
you
I felt
no
receive any imPlicit threat?
Caugheyts behavior that day was menaclng
and threat.ening.
O.
And
You
believed that he was threatening to kiII
you?
MR. NORINSBERG: Objection.
A.
I believe his behavior
vúas
menacing, and
intimidat.ing and threateníng.
A,
Besides Lieutenant Caughey, were you in fear from
any other member of the N.Y.P.D.?
I don't recall- any exact -- I was concerned; I
don't know if I would define it at fear. Maybe at. certain
Limes, I was more concerned towards the end of t.he day.
A.
u.
Who were
you concerned about at the end of the
day?
Mostly, Lieutenant
1B
19
receive any exPlicit'threat,
I drdn't
À
B
9
NORINSBERG: Objection.
MR
l-
SCHOOLCRAFT
a.
"Mom
CaugheY.
Did you tell anyone on October 31, 2009, that
is speaking to
me"?
2L
A.
I don't recall ever making that statement'
22
O.
Do you recall making a statement on October 31'
23
24
')
Ê,
"f have heard guys say that. I am six-foot four
that I tift moLorcycles over mY head"?
2009 |
f don't. recall ever making thal
DIAMOND REPORTTNG
no.
and
staLemenL.
(718) 624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
L20
T2L
A.
1
2
SCHOOLCRAFT
On October 31, 2009, do you recall
n
telling
anyone, "MenLallYt I am not that stable"?
4
f donrt recall ever saying -* ever making that.
But if you have the recordings to these, I
statemenL
5
would be happy to l-isten to them and verifY
3
A.
fam just. asking if you recafl ever making these
6
1
t,hem.
statements
?
10
I don't recall ever making these stalements. But'
if you have a recording of these exact sLatements, as you
are t.ell-ing me, I would be happy to verify it through the
L1
recording.
B
9
L2
13
A.
O.
Did there
October 31,
come
a time when you left work
on
2009?
L4
A.
Yes.
1-5
a.
When
L6
A.
I don't remember the approximate time.
71
some
did you firsL decide to leave work that
It
day?
was
time between 2:30 and 3:30 or 2:00 and 3:30, probably.
you supposed to leave work that day?
18
O.
When were
19
A.
I betieve the end of shift is 15:30.
2A
O.
So 3:30?
21,
A.
22
a.
15:00 *- Yeah, 3:00 or 3:30.
Why did you want to leave early that
23
A.
I was feeling under Lhe weather. But. prì-marily'
24
25
day?
I was concerned about Lieutenant. Caughey's behavior.
O.
What l^/ere you concerned about?
D]AMOND REPORTING
(718) 624-1200 infoGdiamondreporting.com
L2T
t22
'
1
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
r was concerned t.hat my safety and well-being
A.
\^Ias
2
-- I was concerned with my safet.y and well-being, Lhe way
3
t.hat he was behaving.
4
5
6
7
B
g
What, specifically,
Q.
about your safety
\^¡ere you
concerned about?
Specificatly, my safety and well-being'
A.
my person
being harmed.
Were you
Q.
afraid that he was going to injure
you?
11
I don't recall any specific -- any specific thing
that I thought he would do to me. I was just concerned,
and I felt it was appropriate to remove myself from that
L2
situation.
13
A.
fs there a piocedure for leaving work early?
1,4
A.
Other than notifying your supervisor, I
15
aware of
16
leaving
10
11
1B
19
20
21,
22
A.
0.
am not
I guess iL depends on what -- why you are
Have you ever been disciplined for not following
sick leave Procedures before?
I donrt believe so. It's possible, probably;
A.
iL's a complicated Procedure.
How is it comPlicated?
O.
A.
There's
iL's like six pages. But as far
as
24
being at work and notifying anyone else, other than your
immedíate supervisor, regarding that situaLion, r am not.
25
a\^/are
23
of any other steps.
DIAMOND REPORTING (71-B
) 624-'1200 infoGdiamondreporting.
L22
com
L32
A.
SCHOOLCRAFT
tape, as well.
1
MR. VIDEOGRAPHER: The
2
3
This will end tape two.
4
time is
1:
31- p . m.
are going off the
record
We
5
(Whereupon, an hour lunch break was taken.
6
(Whereupon,
three groups of photographs
'Ì
identification.
were
marked as DefendanLs' Exhibits A, B and C for
B
)
)
MR. VIDEOGRAPHER: We are back on record.
9
10
The time is 2:40 p.m. on October LL,20L2, and
l-1
this begins tape three of today's deposition of
T2
Adrian Schoolcraft,.
l_3
Mr. Schoolcraft, did Lhere
a
come
a time
on
t4
October 31, 2009 when police officers arrived at your
15
apartment-
16
A.
Yes.
Ll
O.
What time did you first
l-B
?
notice t.hat police
officers had arrived at your apartment?
19
A.
20
I don't recafl- a specific tíme, but it was in the
afLernoon.
2L
22
a.
How
long had you been in your apartment when the
police officers first
23
A.
Maybe an
24
0.
When
25
they
]