Rockstar Consortium US LP et al v. Google Inc
Filing
92
MOTION for Leave to File A Supplemental Brief In Response To Googles Motion To Transfer In Light Of Newly-Acquired Evidence by NetStar Technologies LLC, Rockstar Consortium US LP. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief In Response to Google's Motion to Transfer in Light of Newly-Acquired Evidence, # 2 Supplement Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief In Response to Google's Motion to Transfer, # 3 Affidavit of Amanda Bonn In Support of Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief In Response to Google's Motion to Transfer, # 4 Exhibit 1, # 5 Exhibit 2, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6, # 10 Exhibit 7, # 11 Exhibit 8, # 12 Exhibit 9, # 13 Exhibit 10, # 14 Exhibit 11, # 15 Exhibit 12, # 16 Exhibit 13, # 17 Exhibit 14, # 18 Exhibit 15, # 19 Exhibit 16, # 20 Exhibit 17, # 21 Exhibit 18, # 22 Exhibit 19, # 23 Exhibit 20, # 24 Exhibit 21, # 25 Exhibit 22, # 26 Exhibit 23, # 27 Exhibit 24, # 28 Exhibit 25, # 29 Exhibit 26, # 30 Exhibit 27, # 31 Exhibit 28, # 32 Exhibit 29, # 33 Exhibit 30)(Bonn, Amanda)
Exhibit 11
US005948061A
Ulllted States Patent [19]
[11] Patent Number:
5,948,061
Merriman et al.
[45]
Sep. 7, 1999
[54]
METHOD OF DELIVERY, TARGETING, AND
Date 0f Patent:
WO 9721183
MEASURING ADVERTISING OVER
NETWORKS
[75]
N.Y.
_
.
Metcalfe, Bob “From the Ether”, InfoWorld, v.18 iss 3.
Available at http://www.infoworldcom, Aug. 1996.
APPL NO; 08/738 634
'
Booker, Ellis “Seeing a Gap, APalo Alto Startup Will Debut
Advertising Server for the Net”, Web Week, v.2 iss2. Avail
abe online at http://WWW.interntWorld.com, Feb. 1996.
[73] Asslgnee' Double Chck’ Inc" New York’ NY'
[21]
WIPO .
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Inventors: Dwight Allen Merriman; Kevin
Joseph O’Connor, both of NeW York,
.
6/1997
NetGravity AdSerer 2.0 Annoucement. Available at http://
’
WWW.netgravity.com, Oct. 1996.
[22]
[51]
Flled:
Oct' 29’ 1996
Int. Cl.6 ......................... .. G06F 17/30; G06F 151/00
“Internet access: Internet marketing revolution begins in the
US thiSSep.” (Hyper Net offering), EDGE: Work—Group
[52]
[58]
us. Cl. ........................... .. 709/219; 705/14; 707/501
Field Of Search ....................... .. 395/20036, 200.33,
Computmg Report, v7 9316,1110 1996
Kohda Y et a1; Ubiquitous advertising on the WWW: Merg
395/200-47, 20048, 20049; 705/26, 10,
14, 27, 1; 707/10, 501, 513
[
56
R f
C't d
e erences l e
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
1
5,692,132
5,710,887
ing Advertising on the BroWser, Computer NetWorks and
ISDN Systems, vol. 28, No. 11, May 1996, pp. 1493—1499.
Primary Examiner—Dung C. Dinh
Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Allan Jacobson
11/1997 Hogan ..................................... .. 705/27
1/1998 Chelliah et al. .
705/26
[57]
ABSTRACT
5,712,979
1/1998 Graber et al.
.. 395/200.47
Methods and apparatuses for targeting the delivery of adver
5,717,860
2/1998 Graber et al- -
-- 395/20057
tisements over a netWork such as the Internet are disclosed.
577217827
5,724,424
2/1998 L9gan ct a1~ ~~
~~ 395/20047
3/1998 Gifford ............................. .. 380/24
Statistics are compiled on individual users and netWorks and
the use of the advertisements is tracked to permit targeting
- of the advertisements of individual users. In response to
5,727,156
3/1998
Herr-Hoyman et al.
5,737,619
4/1998
Judson
5 740 549
577517956
4/1998 Reilly et al
5/1998 Kirsch ____
5:757:917
5/1998 Rose et a1. .............................. .. 380/25
................... ..
395/200.49
707/500
705/14
555720033
.
.
.
.
the advertisement based upon Pro?ling of users and net
Works.
FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
0 749 081 12/1996
European Pat. Off. .
50 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
ADVERTISING /19
SERVER
PROCESS
f 10
I
23\ f24
12\
.
requests from af?hated s1tes, an advertising server transmits
to people accessing the page of a site an appropriate one of
AFFILIATE WEB SITE
ADVERTISER‘S WEB SITE /1B
25
HTTP PROTOCOL
22
20
USER'S BROWSER
2B
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?