Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 634

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS FOR ANDROID 3.0 by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A.1, # 2 Exhibit A.2, # 3 Exhibit A.3, # 4 Exhibit A.4, # 5 Exhibit A.5, # 6 Exhibit A.6, # 7 Exhibit A.7, # 8 Exhibit A.8, # 9 Exhibit A.9, # 10 Exhibit A.10, # 11 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

EXHIBIT A.I

McKOoL SMITH
.!os~ W. Budw~n
Direct [)hi:l: [phone]
j bt~dvd n?~) mcko0i Smi:~h i corn

A PROFESSIONAL CORP()RATK3N - A’VIORNEYS
300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700
Austin, Texas 7870I

March 5, 2010
VIA E-MAIL (w!o enclosures} and U.S. Mlaii (wt enclosures}

Christopher C. Camaval
K.ir~g & Spalding, LLP
1185 Avenue of" the Americas
New ~ < rk, N’Y 10036
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v Adobe Systems. htc:, et~ ai; Civit Action No:
6:09-CV,00446-I,EI); United District Court of’Texas; Eastern District.

[)ear Mr. Carnaval:
In compliance with P,R. 3-1. and 3-2 and the Comb’s DocketContro-" 1 Order.. Eolas
Tectmologies Incorporated I"Eolas’,)hereby subnliis its "Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
Prelimim~ry hffringement C.ontentions ’ and accompanying documem production~

Pursuant to P.R: 2~2, some of the document production accompanying Eolas’ "Disclosure
of Asserted Claims a.nd Preliminau Infringement Contentions’’ is marked "Highly ConfidentlaI."
All documems labeled or designated as ~;Highty Conlidential" shall be deemed "Confidm~tial"
within the meaning of P.R. 2-2 and thereby limited to omside attorneys of recmd and the
employees of suc~ omside altorneys;
]1.

Asserted Clahns and 1[ riorRv Dates

Eolas asse~s the following c!aiins agai~st Google Inc~:
IZS. Patent No. 5,838,906: claims 1-14.
U:S. Patm~t No, 7,59%985: claims 147.
Eolas has endeavored to ~-t~nn*y the asserted claims on a pc>accused instrumentality
basis in the chart, m. ecuon II. in/i,a.
Each of the claims asserted with respect to U.S. Patent Nos .... 5.83 K906. . I"the. ’9~.)6 pate.at’~ "’)
and 7,599,985 (~;the .85 patent 1 are emitled to a priority date at ieast as early as Oclober 17,
1994,

Ma~ch ~ 20t 0
Page 2

] Io

Accused Instrumentalities
The accused m,_trumcn.taht~es are specifically identified in the claim ch~u-ts included on
the DVD enclosed herewith as exhibits 1-18.
Chart
ExMbit

DeR~ndant

Chm-t

lnfi~ingemen~

instrumentalities identified ~herein) (accused of con~ributou
inl>inging claims 1 -I4 of tI~e ’906 patent and
in~?ingement and/or
claims 1-47 of the ’985 ,~}35~!~ ................ inducement)fDOE
.
"4~, ...............................................................................................................................
906 -- Google - Chal~ 1 (see also
[_
instrumentalities idenfilied therein.} (accused of
int~nging claims 1-14 of the ’906 .patent and
claims 1-47 of the ’985 .patent )
906 - Googte - Other Domains {see also
3,
l)irect/IndirectiDOE
~ insmmmntalities identified therein} (accused o1-"
~ int>inging claims 1-14 of the ’906 patent and
~ claims 1-47 of the ’985 ~ent)
4.
~ 906 ~ Android for moNI~ dev mc.s (see also
Directiind~rect,"DOE
{ instrumentalities identified therein) {accused
! int3inging claims 1-I4 of the ’906 patent and

......................................................................
5.

6.

7.

8.
9.
10.

906 - Google - Phone Chart l (see also
D~rcctfl~d~rect, DOE
instrumentalities identified therein} (accused of
im~ringing claims 1-14 of the ’906 patent and
.......................................... clmm~ 1-47 oi the 8. ~atcm)
985 - Google - Chart I (see also
Direct¢"h~direct/DOE
instrumenmlilies identified therein) (accused ol"
infiinging claims I- 14 of the ’906 patent and
claims 1-47 _)t the 985 patent}
985 - Google - Other l)omains {see also
Direct/Indirect/DOE
instrumental i ties id entilied therei n) (accused of
int)inging claims 1~14 of the "906 patent and
claims 1-47 of the ’9852.~..~n.{) ..........................................................................................................
985 - Google ~ AdSense "(.see also
’D~rect, ,lnd~rect/DC )E
insmm~entalities identified fl~ereinl taccused
985 - Google - Documents (see also
Directih~directiI)()I~
I instrumentalities identified therein) (accused of
..J...{~$Tg.{:p.~.:~_& claims 36-47 of the 985 patent only)
1 985 - Google - GmaiI (see also instrumentalities I)uec~.,Induect~I_ OE
} ~dentified therein)(accused of infrit~aiag claims
36-47 of the "985 pate ~t only)

Ma;ch ;~ 2010
Pa~ e 3 of 5

985 - Google - Search Suggest (see also
Dn oct, ln&rect, DOE
instmmentali.ties identified therein) (accused of
infringing claims" 36~47 ofth.e:....-Z.~..-.~....2 ...................
’985 atent only)
"
.............................................
.~..-...-.:.2 ...................
;
12.
985 ~ Google - Search t see also il~Strumentalities [)imct~’Indirect/DOE
identified therein) (accused of infi’inging clahns
.36-47 of the ’985 patent only)
985 ~ Google ~ Chrome (see also
I) irect!h-~direcV’DO E
i~strumentalities identified therein) (accused
infringing claims 3647 of ~he ’985 .p..a_:t~!!t only)
985 ~ Google - Maps ! see also instrumentalities D,rect, In{hrec t, DOE
14.
~dcnuf~e~’ ~ " -’:t thereto " ’" ) (accused of infringing claims
patent .....: ........ only)
985 - Google - Maps Web Service tsee also
[ Direct/Indirect/DOE
15.
instrumentalities identified therei~) ~acc.used of
.... {!.7~.~.r...{.!.!.~.!.~.!.g.....c..!..a..!:!.~.~...}.6-47 of ~he ’985 patent only) i
985 - Google - iGoogle (see also
Direct/Indirect!i)OE
16.
instrumemalities identiI].ed therein) (accused of
...................................................................... }.~?.[0.~?g~.~K~aims 36-47 of the ’985 Pmen~}2.~.[~)
17.
985 Android for mobile devices (see also
D~rec~,’ind~rect, i) )E
"
"st ~ i’~ t~es " .......
m..remittal, i ~ ..denhhed thin era) (accused of
infringing claims 1-14 of ~he ’906 patent and
claims 1-47 of the ’985 patem)
985 - Google - Phone - Cha~ 1 tsee also
Direct!Indirect/DOE
instrumentalities id~.ntifie.d- ~ therein) (accused of
infiinging clai~ns 36~47 of the ’985 patent onlv)
Infringement Theon,
The infiingement theories for each of the accused instrumentalities are specifieal!y
identified in the claim charts attached hereto~ The inffingemem theory ~r each of the accused
instrumentalities is also summarized m the chart m Sv:ctmn II above.
In the alternative, Eola, s contends that any element tbund not to be literally infringed is
.
infringed ., ~ ....
because the differences between the claimed
..... ~ ~ ;~ ~ under the ck=ct~m~, ofequ alents
inventioas and ~he accused insmm~enmlitles, if any, are insubstantial, Eolas also eoiltends that
Google Inc. directly infringes the asserted claims by making, using, off~ring l-br sale, selling, and
importing in to tlie Lmtc.d Stat~s the accused i~strumentaIities as well as indirectly inDinges by
contri.b-uting to and/or inducing others (e.g:, Google Inc,~ s c~s[omers or i~s cus!omers~ customers)
to directly infringe those claims. Eolas t)hrther contends that Google Inc.’s inl>ingement is
’
deliberate m~d willNI entitling E.olas to an injunction~ enhanced damages, and ~ l~es,
art{. mevs . "
,

March,, z010
Page 4 of 5

The claim charts attached hereto as EXhibits 1-18 identi~}’ where each element of each
g~sseJXed claim iS found within each of the accused instrumentalities, as required under Pment
Rule ~> l (c).
Lolas Embodlmentsot the (Aam~ed lnventtons
The inventions claimed: in some orall of the clairns o~ thean&or.... patent are
’906 985
embodied in some or aI1 versions of the tbtlowing prodncts: Visible Embryo Project and/or
AnatLab S3,stem:
VL

Document Production Pursuant to P.R. 3-2
In addition to the DVD comaining the claim cha~s, submitted herewith are 2 DVI)s
containing Eolas’ document production, which include, among other things, documents produced
pursuan~ toP.R.,>.a" ’~. The following lists the specific documents that correspond to each category
ofP.R, 3~2:
P.R. 3-2~ Documents: no.ue.
P.R. 3-2(b~. Documen’~.s: EOLASTX-I!’;-000000000
..... ’ ! X.00000)0_* See aLso Appendices A a]~dB to the specification of the ’906
EOLAS ....~; "
{ "12
patent (included within the P~R, a,2(c)d~ cume~ts ~denul,ed
’
’c
P.R. 3-2(c)Documents:a~ .... 71" . ....
EOLAS [X-0000000.~13, EOLASTX-000000.0875.
Additio.nally, because no Protective Order has been entered in this case, source code
rela~ed to products ~ha:t may embody some or all of the claims of Eolas’ patents will be.made
available in accordance with the agreement of the parties for source code productio~a and the date
fbr such production,
Eolas has used its best efforts to identif3, all responsive }LR. 3-2 documents and only
those documents: However, given the volume of documems, some documents may have been
inadvertently listed or i.nadvertently omittedi To fl~e extent such deficiencies are identified, Eolas
will supplement its productio~ accordingly.
Ifyouhave any questions, ~’ ~dc ~ ’~" ¯
plt:ase ~ not hesm~te to contact me.

March 5, 2010
Page 5 of 5
cc: Without Pmdt~ction m~d Enclosures:
Google*Eolas@kslawlcom
Michael E. Jones ([e-mail])
Atle~a F; Gardner (allengardner@pot’tem~inton~com)