Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 634

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS FOR ANDROID 3.0 by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A.1, # 2 Exhibit A.2, # 3 Exhibit A.3, # 4 Exhibit A.4, # 5 Exhibit A.5, # 6 Exhibit A.6, # 7 Exhibit A.7, # 8 Exhibit A.8, # 9 Exhibit A.9, # 10 Exhibit A.10, # 11 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, vs. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED § § § § JURY TRIAL § § § § § § § § § § § § § ORDER GRANTING EOLAS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS FOR ANDROID 3.0 The Court, having considered Eolas’ Motion for Leave to Supplement Its Infringement Contentions for Android 3.0, finds that, good cause having been shown, the motion is meritorious and should be GRANTED. Eolas shall supplement its infringement contentions to include Android 3.0 within three days of this order.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?