WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 482

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law [RENEWED] OF NO INVALIDITY OR, ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL ON INVALIDITY by WI-LAN Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Tiedemann, # 2 Exhibit B - Gitlin, # 3 Exhibit C - Gilhousen, # 4 Exhibit D - IS-95-A, # 5 Exhibit E - Trial Transcript (July 12, 2013 Morning Session), # 6 Exhibit F - Trial Transcript (July 8, 2013 Afternoon Session), # 7 Exhibit G - Trial Transcript (July 9, 2013 Afternoon Session), # 8 Exhibit H - Trial Transcript (July 8, 2013 Morning Session), # 9 Exhibit I - Trial Transcript (July 12, 2013 Afternoon Session), # 10 Text of Proposed Order)(Weaver, David)

WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Doc. 482 Att. 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
WI-LAN INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.; et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-521-LED
Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-252-LED
CONSOLIDATED CASES
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER
The Court, having considered Plaintiff Wi-LAN Inc.’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a
Matter of Law of No Invalidity or, Alternatively, Motion for New Trial on Invalidity, the response
thereto, and the papers filed in this action, is of the opinion that W i-LAN’s Renewed Motion for
Judgment as a Matter of Law should be GRANTED.
It is therefore, ORDER ED, ADJ UDGED a nd DECREED that the jury verdict finding
claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326 a nd claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent N o. 6,381,211
invalid as a nticipated, and the jur y verdic t finding claims 2, 5, and 9
6,088,326; claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,222,819; a

of U.S. Patent No.

nd claim s 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No.

6,381,211 invalid as obvious are set as ide. It is further O RDERED t hat claim s 2, 5, and 9 of
U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326; claim 11 of U.S. Pate nt No. 6,222,819; and claim s 2 and 5 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,381,211 are not invalid.

Dockets.Justia.com