WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 482

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law [RENEWED] OF NO INVALIDITY OR, ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL ON INVALIDITY by WI-LAN Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Tiedemann, # 2 Exhibit B - Gitlin, # 3 Exhibit C - Gilhousen, # 4 Exhibit D - IS-95-A, # 5 Exhibit E - Trial Transcript (July 12, 2013 Morning Session), # 6 Exhibit F - Trial Transcript (July 8, 2013 Afternoon Session), # 7 Exhibit G - Trial Transcript (July 9, 2013 Afternoon Session), # 8 Exhibit H - Trial Transcript (July 8, 2013 Morning Session), # 9 Exhibit I - Trial Transcript (July 12, 2013 Afternoon Session), # 10 Text of Proposed Order)(Weaver, David)

WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Doc. 482 Att. 7

Exhibit G

Dockets.Justia.com

1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION

2
3

WI-LAN, INC.

)

4

DOCKET NO. 6:10cv521
-vs-

)

5

Tyler, Texas
12:45 p.m.
July 9, 2013

6

ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC.,
ET AL

7

******************************************************

8

WI-LAN, INC.

)

)
DOCKET NO. 6:13cv252

9
10

-vsHTC CORPORATION,
ET AL

)
)

11
12
13
14
15

TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL
AFTERNOON SESSION
BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONARD DAVIS,
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, AND A JURY

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

COURT REPORTERS:

MS. SHEA SLOAN
MS. JUDY WERLINGER
211 W. Ferguson
Tyler, Texas 75702
[e-mail]

23
24
25

Proceedings taken by Machine Stenotype; transcript was
produced by a Computer.

84
1

Q.

All right.

2

A.

Let me try to underline.

3

Q.

Okay.

4

A.

Samsung.

5

Q.

You think that's all you see there?

6

A.

Yeah.

7

There are some other companies where we

have -- you know, these are all --

8
9

I think -- I think that's --

Q.

Hold on a second.

We don't want to spoil the

mystery.

10

Tell us, what do these companies have in

11

common?

12

A.

13

They are all companies that would -- that have

taken licenses from Wi-LAN for various technologies.

14

Q.

Okay.

Are there any of the companies that are

15

listed on this slide that were members of the 3GPP

16

standard-setting process that have taken license to the

17

patents-in-suit in this case?

18

A.

Yes, there are.

19

Q.

All right.

20

A.

We have Motorola, Samsung, Panasonic was --

Which ones?

21

and we're negotiating with them again -- Fujitsu, and

22

LG.

23

Q.

Okay.

So despite having participated in the

24

3GPP standard-setting process, these companies came to

25

Wi-LAN and took a patent -- took a license to the

85
1

patents that are involved in this lawsuit?

2

A.

They did.

3

Q.

In fact, more than that.

4

Yes.
They took a license

to your wireless portfolio, in fact?

5

A.

Yes, they did.

6

Q.

Let's talk a little bit more about that.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

How many licensees do you think Wi-LAN has had
to the patents in this case?
A.

I would put the number at about 70 companies

have taken licenses that included the patents-in-suit.
Q.

Okay.

And you mention here on this slide

Samsung, LG, Motorola.
A.

Yes, they have a license.

Did I miss their

They're not on the slide.

I'm asking you

name?
Q.

about some others.

17

A.

Sure.

18

Q.

RIM has.

19

What about RIM?

product.

No problem.
What does RIM make?

They make a

Most people know it by a different name.

20

A.

Yeah, they make the BlackBerry smartphone.

21

Q.

How about Sharp?

22

A.

Yes.

23

Q.

Okay.

And so all total, you think it's close

Yeah.

Roughly, yes.

24
25

Sharp took a license as well.

to 70?
A.