Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 793

Declaration of Chad Russell in Support of 790 Memorandum in Opposition, to Defendants' Motions in Limine filed byOracle EMEA Limited, Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc., Siebel Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y, # 26 Exhibit Z, # 27 Exhibit AA, # 28 Exhibit BB, # 29 Exhibit CC, # 30 Exhibit DD, # 31 Exhibit EE, # 32 Exhibit FF, # 33 Exhibit GG, # 34 Exhibit HH, # 35 Exhibit II, # 36 Exhibit JJ, # 37 Exhibit KK, # 38 Exhibit LL, # 39 Exhibit MM, # 40 Exhibit NN, # 41 Exhibit OO, # 42 Exhibit PP, # 43 Exhibit QQ, # 44 Exhibit RR, # 45 Exhibit SS, # 46 Exhibit TT)(Related document(s) 790 ) (Howard, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/19/2010)

Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Doc. 793 Att. 30

EXHIBIT DD
Dockets.Justia.com

CHRISTOPHER FAYE October 22, 2008 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

Page 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, ORACLE USA, INC., a Colorado corporation, and ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a California corporation, Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

9 vs. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Defendants. ______________________________ SAP AG, a German corporation, SAP AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, TOMORROWNOW, INC., a Texas corporation, and DOES 1-50, inclusive,

No. 07-CV-1658 (PJH)

VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF CHRISTOPHER FAYE _________________________________ WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2008 HIGHLY REPORTED BY: CONFIDENTIAL

HOLLY THUMAN, CSR No. 6834, RMR, CRR (1-413165)

Merrill Legal Solutions [phone]

CHRISTOPHER FAYE October 22, 2008 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
Page 74 Page 76

24 25
Page 75

MR. PICKETT: Q. And once Project Blue started in mid to late 2005, what did you do to
Page 77

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

see -- or to check and see whether the board directive had been complied with? MR. LANIER: Same instruction to you, sir. Again, process steps, not substance of communications or analysis. THE WITNESS: I continued to have conversations with Greg and Andrew and Shelley Nelson. Greg Nelson, Andrew Nelson and Shelley Nelson. And others within TomorrowNow.

20 (Pages 74 to 77) Merrill Legal Solutions [phone]