Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1129

MOTION for Reconsideration re 1115 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,,,,, #1105 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal,,,,,,,,, filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit to Samsung's Motion, #2 Declaration of Hankil Kang in Support of Samsung's Motion, #3 Exhibit 1 to the Kang Declaration, #4 Exhibit 2 to the Kang Declaration, #5 Exhibit 3 to the Kang Declaration, #6 Exhibit 4 to the Kang Declaration, #7 Exhibit 5 to the Kang Declaration, #8 Exhibit 6 to the Kang Declaration, #9 Exhibit 7 to the Kang Declaration, #10 Exhibit 8 to the Kang Declaration, #11 Exhibit 9 to the Kang Declaration, #12 Exhibit 10 to the Kang Declaration, #13 Exhibit 11 to the Kang Declaration, #14 Exhibit 12 to the Kang Declaration, #15 Exhibit 13 to the Kang Declaration, #16 Exhibit 14 to the Kang Declaration, #17 Exhibit 15 to the Kang Declaration, #18 Exhibit 16 to the Kang Declaration, #19 Exhibit 17 to the Kang Declaration, #20 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion for Reconsideration)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/25/2012)

KANG DECLARATION
EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT C
FILED UNDER SEAL

The final curve that was used is as follows.

1

Actually since until last weekend, we reviewed the bounce issues and until the day before yesterday, we have been reviewing the deceleration speed
issues while on scroll mode.
With regards to bounce, we used the
model which was modeled after the actual physical effect and obtained the bounce effect
that is similar to the iPad. A new Scroller (instead of Interpolator) was created but overall impression is that there was no substantial difference from
the conventional method of changing the parameter of Interpolator. Accordingly, we did not release it.

Hello, this is Sang Wook Han of Nemustech.

From: Sangwook Han <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 10:57 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Wookyun Kho, Chi Hoon Ryu; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [List Bouncing] Questions regarding bouncing
Attachments: Screenshot 2010-10-29 PM 2.49.52.png

Sangwook Han
[e-mail]
2

I will send you next Monday those framework ListView files where the new Scroller is applied.
Thank you.

If there is a better way that is under development that is separate from what was proposed from our internal review, please let us know.
If there isn’t any decision made with regards to the bouncing algorithm, it would be a good idea to consider
.

Upon our internal review with regards to bouncing,
that we used for the previous bouncing is a simple
which has low flexibility and made a little awkward impression.
However, compared to our competitor’s product (you know well which one T ^T), it is still not satisfactory. There was an internal opinion to

I have some questions to ask with regards to list bouncing tuning.
At the time of last tuning, I remember that we agreed to proceed with two tunings.
The items that were forwarded previously have been applied at the first tuning.
I would like to know the current status of the production of the “interpolater” for the smoother bouncing which is to be applied at the 2nd tuning.

Hello, This is Wookyun Kho of Samsung Electronics.

--------------- Original Message---------------------Sender: Wookyun Kho [e-mail] E4/GA Group(Mobile)/SEC
Date: 10/29/2010 11:59 (GMT +09:00)
Title: [List Bouncing] Questions regarding bouncing

Principal Engineer Sang Wook Han, Executive Seung Min Lee is added.

Oct. 29, 2:20 PM, 2010, by Seung Yeon Lee:

Wookyun Kho

Thank you.

4