Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1129

MOTION for Reconsideration re 1115 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,,,,, #1105 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal,,,,,,,,, filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit to Samsung's Motion, #2 Declaration of Hankil Kang in Support of Samsung's Motion, #3 Exhibit 1 to the Kang Declaration, #4 Exhibit 2 to the Kang Declaration, #5 Exhibit 3 to the Kang Declaration, #6 Exhibit 4 to the Kang Declaration, #7 Exhibit 5 to the Kang Declaration, #8 Exhibit 6 to the Kang Declaration, #9 Exhibit 7 to the Kang Declaration, #10 Exhibit 8 to the Kang Declaration, #11 Exhibit 9 to the Kang Declaration, #12 Exhibit 10 to the Kang Declaration, #13 Exhibit 11 to the Kang Declaration, #14 Exhibit 12 to the Kang Declaration, #15 Exhibit 13 to the Kang Declaration, #16 Exhibit 14 to the Kang Declaration, #17 Exhibit 15 to the Kang Declaration, #18 Exhibit 16 to the Kang Declaration, #19 Exhibit 17 to the Kang Declaration, #20 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion for Reconsideration)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/25/2012)

KANG DECLARATION
EXHIBIT 6

Exhibit 35
Filed Under Seal

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

·1· · · · · · · · · ·UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
· · · · · · · · · ·NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
·2· · · · · · · · · · · · SAN JOSE DIVISION
·3· ·___________________________________
·4·
· ·
·5·
· ·
·6·
· ·
·7·
· ·
·8·
· ·
·9·
· ·
10·

·APPLE, INC., a California
·Corporation,
· · · · Plaintiff,
·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Civil Action. No.
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 11-CV-01846-LHK
·SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
·Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
·ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
·York corporation, and SAMSUNG
·TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC,
·a Delaware limited liability
·company, a California corporation.
· · · · Defendants.

11
12·
· ·
13·
· ·
14·
· ·
15·
· ·
16·

·SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
·Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
·ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
·York corporation, and SAMSUNG
·TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC,
·a Delaware limited liability
·company, a California corporation.
· · · · Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
·vs.

17·
· ·
18·
· ·
19

·APPLE, INC., a California
·corporation,
· · · · Counterclaim-Defendant.
·___________________________________

20·
· ·
21
· ·
22·

· · · · · · · · ·*** HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ***
· · · · · · · · ·*** ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY ***

23
· ·
24·
· ·
25·

· · · · · · ·VIDEOTAPED 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION OF:
· · · · · · · · · · · ·SEONG HEE HWANG
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·

· · March 7, 2012
· · ·Kim & Chang
· Seoul, South Korea
2:43 p.m. - 5:11 p.m.
American Realtime Court Reporters / Asia
www.americanrealtime.com· [phone]

1

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 2

·1· ·APPEARANCES:
·2·
· ·
·3
· ·
·4·
· ·
·5·
· ·
·6

·For the Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, Apple,
·Inc.

·7·
· ·
·8
· ·
·9·
· ·
10·
· ·
11·

·For the Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs, the
·Samsung entities:

12
· ·
13
· ·
14·
· ·
15·
· ·
16·

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

MORRISON FOERSTER, LLP
By:· Deok Keun Matthew Ahn, Esq.
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California· 94105-2482
[phone]

·1·
· ·
·2·
· ·
·3·

· · · · · · · · · · · · · I N D E X
·WITNESS:· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · PAGE
·SEONG HEE HWANG
·By Mr. Ahn· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·5
· · · · · · · · · · · ·E X H I B I T S

2..5
Page 3

·4· ·NUMBER· · · DESCRIPTION· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
·5· ·Exhibit 2244· February 23, 2012 letter to Mia· · · ·11
· · · · · · · · · ·Mazza from Rachel Kassabian, one
·6· · · · · · · · ·page
·7·
· ·
·8
· ·
·9·
· ·
10

QUINN, EMANUEL, URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
By:· Mark Tung, Ph.D., Esq.
555 Twin Dolphin Drive
Suite 560
Redwood Shores, California· 94065
[phone]

·Exhibit 2245· Apple, Inc.'s Sixth Rule 30(b)(6)· · ·11
· · · · · · · ·Deposition Notice
·Exhibit 2246· E-mail, Saturday, May 7, 2011 2:16· · 47
· · · · · · · ·a.m.
· · · · · · · ·S-ITC-008814170 - 14171

11
12

·Also present:
13
·
·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·
·

Sujin Woo, Lead Interpreter
Hie Chun Koh, Check Interpreter
David Son, Morrison Foerster
Rosa Kim, Samsung
Inga Kornev, Videographer
Melanie Giamarco, Court Reporter

14
15
16

17

17

18

18

19

19

20

20

21

21

22

22

23

23

24

24

25

25

Page 4

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

··········PROCEEDINGS
· · · · · · VIDEOGRAPHER:· My name is Inga Kornev, a
·videographer with American Realtime Court Reporters in
·Asia.· Today's date is March 7th, 2012, and the time on
·the video monitor is 2:43.· This video deposition is
·being held at the offices of Kim & Chang located at the
·Jeongdong Building, Seoul, Korea.
· · · · · · The caption of this case is Apple, Inc.
·versus Samsung Electronics, Co., et al., held in the
·United States District Court, Northern District of
·California, San Jose Division.· Civil Number is
·11-CV-01846 LHK.
· · · · · · The name of the witness today is Seong Hee
·Hwang testifying in her capacity as a 30(b)(6) witness.
·The court reporter today is Melanie Giamarco, also with
·American Realtime Court Reporters in Asia.
· · · · · · At this time, I would like to ask all counsel
·and interpreters to please state their appearances and
·whom they represent for the record.
· · · · · · MR. AHN:· Matthew Ahn of Morrison & Foerster
·on behalf of Apple, Inc.· With me today is David Son.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Mark Tung from Quinn, Emanuel
·representing Samsung.
· · · · · · MS. KIM:· Rosa Kim from Samsung.
· · · · · · LEAD INTERPRETER:· Sujin Woo, lead

Page 5

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

·interpreter.
· · · · · · CHECK INTERPRETER:· Hie Chun Koh, the check
·interpreter.
· · · · · · VIDEOGRAPHER:· Thank you.
· · · · · · MR. AHN:· We understand the court reporter
·is not authorized to administer oaths in this venue.
·Nevertheless, we request that she administer the oath
·and we stipulate that we waive any objection to the
·validity of the deposition based on the oaths.
· · · · · · VIDEOGRAPHER:· At this time, our court
·reporter will swear in the witness and interpreters,
·and we can proceed.
· · · · · · (Interpreters sworn.)
· · · · · · · · · · · SEONG HEE HWANG,
·after having been duly sworn by the reporter, pursuant
·to stipulation of counsel, was examined and testified
·through the interpreter as follows:
· · · · · · · · · · · · ·EXAMINATION
·BY MR. AHN:
· · · ·Q.· ·Good afternoon.
· · · ·A.· ·Good afternoon.
· · · ·Q.· ·Please state your name and spell it in the
·English alphabet, please.
· · · ·A.· ·My name is Seong Hee Hwang.· In English,
·it's spelled as H-w-a-n-g, S-e-o-n-g, H-e-e.

American Realtime Court Reporters / Asia
www.americanrealtime.com· [phone]

Page 26

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

· · · ·Q.· ·Have you ever seen a window that appears if
·you press a volume-up key on a phone?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, beyond the
·scope.
· · · ·A.· ·Yes, I've seen it on an Android phone.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· What do you call that?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, beyond the scope.
· · · ·A.· ·I'm not sure.· I just call it pop-up.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· You don't call it a toast,
·correct?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, beyond the scope.
· · · ·A.· ·Yes, I do not call it toast.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· For Samsung Android 3.0
·products that exhibit that pop-up, what is the name of
·the source code file that controls its appearance?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, beyond the
·scope, assumes facts.
· · · ·A.· ·What does Samsung Android 3.0 mean?
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· You don't know what that
·means?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, beyond the scope.
· · · ·A.· ·Yes.· Yes, I do not know.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· For Samsung products that use
·Android version 3.0 that exhibit the volume pop-up that
·we just discussed, what is the name of the source code

Page 27

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·

·file that controls the appearance of that pop-up?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, beyond the
·scope, assumes facts.
· · · ·A.· ·I do not know at all what 3. -- version 3.0
·is because I only look at source code.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· If you were to look for source
·code relating to a pop-up related to the volume keys,
·where would you look?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague.
· · · ·A.· ·The question was long, so I didn't
·understand the question.· I would like to have it
·reinterpreted.
· · · · · · MR. AHN:· Please reinterpret.
· · · · · · LEAD INTERPRETER:· (Speaking Korean.)
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objection.

19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Counsel, we've been going about
·an hour, if you can break.
· · · · · · MR. AHN:· Give me five minutes.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Have you, in fact, seen source
·code relating to the volume pop-up that we just
·discussed?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague.

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

·time on the record to flip through the entire set of
·two Redwelds of source code?
· · · · · · MR. AHN:· I think my question to her was
·clear.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Can you answer my question?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· I'm going to object to that
·question as asking the witness to go through thousands
·and thousands of pages of source code.· And it's also
·vague.· It's also an incomplete hypothetical.
· · · ·A.· ·If you're asking me to find the file, then
·it may be possible.· I don't know if you want me it do
·it at home and by what the deadline is.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Can you do it sitting here
·today?· It's okay if you can't.· I just need to know
·your answer.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, leading.· Objection,
·vague.· Objection; again, calling for the witness to go
·through 5,000 pages of code.· It's also an incomplete
·hypothetical.
· · · · · · MR. AHN:· Counsel, you've stated your
·objections.· Stop coaching the witness.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· And I'm allowed to state
·objections.· I'm not coaching the witness.· The record
·is clear.
· · · ·A.· ·I think it will be difficult to do it here

Page 28

·1· · · · ·A.· ·If that is a volume pop-up, yes, I've seen
·2· ·it.
·

24· · · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Counsel, I'm going to object to
25· ·this line of questioning.· Are you asking her to spend

Page 29

Page 30

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

·within today.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Would it have been easier for
·you if you had a computer with the source code on it?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, incomplete
·hypothetical, beyond the scope.
· · · ·A.· ·Yes.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· I asked for a break about five
·minutes ago.
· · · · · · MR. AHN:· Let's go off the record.
· · · · · · VIDEOGRAPHER:· One second, please.· This
·marks the end of Disk Number 1 in the deposition of
·Seong Hee Hwang.· The time is 3:48.· Going off the
·record.
· · · · · · (Recess taken.)
· · · · · · VIDEOGRAPHER:· We are back on the record.
·Here marks the beginning of Disk Number 2 in the
·deposition of Seong Hee Hwang.· The time is 4:13.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· I just wanted to designate this
·transcript highly confidential, outside attorneys' eyes
·only source code and reserve the right for the witness
·to submit errata.
· · · · · · REPORTER:· "Reserve the right for the
·witness to" . . .
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· To submit errata.
· · · · · · LEAD INTERPRETER:· "Errata," can you

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·

·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·

·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· How much time do you need?
·A.· ·I need about two minutes.
· · · (Pausing) Yes, I will respond.
·Q.· ·Please do.

17·
18·
19·
20·
21·

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·

· · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague.
·A.· ·What version are you referring to?
·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Any version.
· · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague.
·A.· ·No.

Page 31

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·

·please . . .
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Errata, errors.
· · · · · · MR. AHN:· Mark, I just want to confirm, I
·read the stipulation at the beginning, but I don't
·think you stated on the record that you agreed with it.
·Do you agree with the stipulation that was stated at
·the start?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· That was stipulated at the
·beginning?· Yes, I do agree with that.

22·
23·
24·
25·

· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Please do.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague.
· · · ·A.· ·I need to organize my thoughts in regards to
·volume.· I need time to do so.

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·

· · · ·A.· ·Yes.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· What does that method do?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, lacks foundation,
·vague.
· · · ·A.· ·What version are you referring to?
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Any version.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.
· · · ·A.· ·I think it's different depending on version.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Can you give me the name of
·any version that you are thinking of right now?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague.
· · · ·A.· ·Are you referring to all versions of
·Android?

Page 32

25· · · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, assumes facts.

Page 33

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 42

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Have you ever seen a pop-up
·disappear without any action by a user?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, beyond the
·scope, and to the extent it calls for a legal
·conclusion.
· · · ·A.· ·In what model do you mean?
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Any model.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.
· · · ·A.· ·I am responsible for pop-ups common to
·Android, in general.· Because I develop for the Google
·market, I would like to ask you to pick one and
·specify.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Identify the product that you
·saw a pop-up disappear on without any action by a user.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.
· · · ·A.· ·Is it okay if it's not our company's
·products?
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· No.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.
· · · ·A.· ·I'd like to pick out GS II among the Korean
·models.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Please describe to me how that
·pop-up disappears without any action by a user on the
·Galaxy S II?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, beyond the

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

· · · ·A.· ·I can explain while looking at the source
·code.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Can you do it without looking
·at the source code?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.
· · · ·A.· ·No.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Tell me anything you remember
·about this process that you can tell me without looking
·at the source code.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, to the extent
·it calls for a legal conclusion, calls for a narrative,
·calls for speculation, lacks foundation, and beyond the
·scope.
· · · ·A.· ·I can most accurately explain by explaining
·it while looking at the source code.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Is there anything you can tell
·me about this process without looking at the source
·code?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.
· · · ·A.· ·I'm not sure about the legal aspects, but I
·would appreciate if you can ask in more detail.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· I just want to know if there's
·anything you can tell me about the process that we just
·discussed without having to look at source code.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, beyond the

42..45
Page 43

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

·scope, and to the extent it calls for a legal
·conclusion.
· · · ·A.· ·I would like you to elaborate what part.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Can you walk me through how
·the source code performs that operation?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, and to the
·extent it calls for a legal conclusion, and calls for a
·narrative.
· · · ·A.· ·What source code do you mean?
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· The source code on the Galaxy
·S II product that you just selected.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, beyond the
·scope, to the extent it calls for a legal conclusion,
·and it calls for a narrative.
· · · ·A.· ·I'm not sure about the legal aspects, but in
·a developer's point of view, because it's associated
·with so many things, it is impossible to explain it
·all.
· · · · · · CHECK INTERPRETER:· Rephrasing the answer.
·"I don't know about the legal aspect, but from the
·developer's perspective, because there are numerous
·files associated with it, therefore, I cannot explain
·in detail."
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Can you try?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

·scope, calls for speculation, lacks foundation, calls
·for a narrative, and to the extent it calls for a legal
·conclusion.
· · · ·A.· ·I would like to ask for the final question
·that I need to answer in detail.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· I'll repeat it.
· · · · · · I just want to know if there's anything you
·can tell me about the process that we just discussed
·without having to look at source code.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.
· · · ·A.· ·What process?
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· The one we've been discussing
·for the past 15 minutes.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.
· · · ·A.· ·I would like to hear it once more in detail,
·in an organized manner.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Please listen very closely.
· · · · · · There's a Galaxy S II product that you
·identified as the product where you had seen a pop-up
·window disappear without user intervention.· Please
·describe to me how the source code makes that process
·happen.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, lacks
·foundation, calls for speculation, beyond the scope, to
·the extent it calls for a legal conclusion, calls for a

Page 44

Page 45

American Realtime Court Reporters / Asia
www.americanrealtime.com· [phone]

Page 46

Page 47

·1· ·narrative.

·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Go ahead.
·5·
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.
·6·
· · · ·A.· ·Because it is such a broad scope, I need
·7·
·time to think.
·8·
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· How much time do you need?
·9·
· · · ·A.· ·I think I would need about an hour.
10·
· · · ·Q.· ·Would you be able to answer it sitting here 11·
·right now?
12·
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, beyond the
13·
·scope, incomplete hypothetical.
14·
· · · ·A.· ·I think I can describe the simple principle 15·
·if I start organizing my thoughts from now and continue 16·
·to do so.
17·
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· But can you actually begin
18·
·answering my question at this moment?
19·
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, beyond the
20·
·scope, incomplete hypothetical, asked and answered.
21·
· · · ·A.· ·No, because it's related to source code as
22·
23·
·much as this folder here, and I am not a genius, I
24·
·cannot explain without the source code.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· I'm going to hand what you has 25·

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

·approximately five rows from the bottom, do you see the
·word "iPad 2"?
· · · ·A.· ·Yes.
· · · ·Q.· ·Can you read that sentence aloud.
· · · ·A.· ·Okay.· iPod -- iPad 2, in comparison to iPad
·2, delay -- delay in horizontal and vertical screen
·change.
· · · ·Q.· ·And do you know what -· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Just to clarify the record, the
·witness read it in Korean, and the interpreter then
·translated it to English.· The original document is in
·Korean.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Do you have an understanding
·of what that refers to?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, lacks foundation,
·calls for speculation.
· · · ·A.· ·No.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Are you aware of any
·comparisons at Samsung between Apple products and
·Samsung products?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, beyond the
·scope, and lacks foundation, calls for speculation.
· · · ·A.· ·No.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Are you aware of any study of
·Apple or Apple products at Samsung?

Page 48

·been marked as Exhibit Number 2246.· Exhibit Number
·2246 is an e-mail from Dooyoel Kam to a number of
·recipients, including Seong Hee Hwang, dated May 7th,
·2011, bearing the Bates numbers S-ITC-008814170 through
·008814171.
· · · · · · (Exhibit 2246 was marked for
·identification.)
· · · ·Q.· ·Do you recognize Exhibit 2246?
· · · ·A.· ·When you say "recognize," do you mean can I
·read it?
· · · ·Q.· ·Take a look at the top of the document.· In
·the "To" field, do you see your name?
· · · ·A.· ·Yes, I seen it -- I see it.
· · · ·Q.· ·Is this an e-mail that you received?
· · · ·A.· ·I'm not sure.
· · · ·Q.· ·Do you have any reason to doubt that you
·received it?
· · · ·A.· ·What do you mean by "doubt"?
· · · ·Q.· ·Do you have any reason to believe that you
·did not receive this e-mail?
· · · ·A.· ·You mean, to doubt whether receiving this
·e-mail?· I'm not sure whether I received it or not.
· · · ·Q.· ·Your name is in the "To" field, correct?
· · · ·A.· ·Yes.
· · · ·Q.· ·Towards the bottom of the first page,
Page 49

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.
· · · ·A.· ·No.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Are you aware of any study of
·iOS at Samsung?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, beyond the
·scope, lacks foundation, calls for speculation.
· · · ·A.· ·No, I don't know well.· I don't know at all.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Have you personally done any
·study of Apple's iOS platform?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, beyond the
·scope.
· · · ·A.· ·No, I haven't.
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· Did you collect any documents
·for production in this case?
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Objection, vague, and beyond the
·scope.
· · · ·A.· ·What case do you mean?
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· The lawsuit between Apple and
·Samsung.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.
· · · ·A.· ·What lawsuit do you mean?
· · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. AHN)· The lawsuit that you're
·currently testifying for.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· Same objections.
· · · ·A.· ·No.

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 50

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14·
15·
16·
17·
18·
19·
20·
21·
22·
23·
24·
25·

· · · · · · MR. AHN:· That's all the questions I have
·for today.· I will note for the record that the witness
·has just testified she did not collect any documents
·for production which confirms the fact that we have
·received a handful of documents with Miss Hwang as a
·custodian.· Until we receive that production and
·Samsung has satisfied its collection and production
·obligations, this deposition will remain open.
· · · · · · In addition, I note that Miss Hwang was
·unable to answer any of my questions and is
·inadequately prepared to testify as a corporate
·representative on the topic of source code relating to
·pop-up windows.
· · · · · · Accordingly, Samsung must produce another
·witness on this subject before the close of discovery.
· · · · · · MR. TUNG:· So I will note that the witness
·asked for source code to be shown to her multiple
·times, and no source code exhibit was ever introduced
·during this deposition, despite the fact that Samsung
·brought thousands of pages of source code that Apple
·had previously printed.
· · · · · · I'll also note that Miss Hwang did answer all
·the questions and asked for clarification which counsel
·failed to provide and, therefore, the questions were
·not well-founded.· Objections were noted on the record.

·1·
· ·
·2·
· ·
·3
· ·
·4·

·(Counsel representing this witness should arrange for
·reading and signing and thereafter distribute copies of
·the signed Errata sheet to opposing counsel without
·involvement of the court reporter.)

Page 52

·STYLE OF CASE:· ·Apple v. Samsung (NDCAL)
·DEPOSITION OF:· ·SEONG HEE HWANG

Page 51

·1·
·2·
·3·
·4·
·5·
·6·
·7·
·8·
·9·
10·
11·
12·
13·
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

· · · · · · I'll also note that, in terms of collection,
·that Samsung has collected their documents and produced
·them already.· There is no basis to keep this
·deposition open.· It is now 5:13.· We agreed with Apple
·previously that witnesses would be available until 7
·p.m.· It is Apple's choice to end the deposition at
·this time.· There is no reason Apple cannot continue
·this deposition and, therefore, this deposition is
·closed.
· · · · · · VIDEOGRAPHER:· This marks the end of Disk
·Number 2 in the deposition of Seong Hee Hwang.· The
·time is 5:11.· Going off the record.
· · · · · · (Time noted:· 5:11 p.m.)

·1· · · · · · · · · · · C E R T I F I C A T E
·2· ·SEOUL· · · · · · )
· · · · · · · · · · · )
·3· ·SOUTH KOREA· · · )

·8
·9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

·4·
· ·
·5·
· ·
·6·
· ·
·7·
· ·
·8
· ·
·9·
· ·
10·

· · · · · · I, Melanie L. Giamarco, Registered
·Professional Reporter and Certified Realtime Reporter,
·do hereby certify that the aforementioned witness was
·first duly sworn by me pursuant to stipulation of
·counsel to testify to the truth; that I was authorized
·to and did report said deposition in stenotype; and
·that the foregoing pages are a true and correct
·transcription of my shorthand notes of said deposition.

· · · · · · I further certify that I am not attorney or
·counsel of any of the parties, nor am I a relative or
·employee of any attorney or counsel of any party
·connected with the action, nor am I financially
·interested in the action.

14·
· ·
15·
· ·
16

·6· · · · · · · · · · · E R R A T A· S H E E T
·7· ·Page· ·Line Change· · · · · · · Reason

· · · · · · The foregoing certification of this
·transcript does not apply to any reproduction of the
·same by any means unless under the direct control
·and/or direction of the certifying reporter.

· · · · · · I further certify that said deposition was
·taken at the time and place hereinabove set forth and
·that the taking of said deposition was commenced and
·completed as hereinabove set out.

18

17
· · · · · · · · IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
18· ·hand this 9th day of March, 2012.

19

19

20

20·
· ·
21·
· ·
22·

17

21

25

Page 53

11·
· ·
12·
· ·
13·

·5· ·DATE TAKEN:· · · March 7, 2012

22·
· ·
23·
· ·
24·

50..53

·I hereby certify that I have read my deposition and
·that it is true and correct subject to any changes in
·form or substance entered here.
·________________· · · · · ·_________________________
·Date· · · · · · · · · · · ·SEONG HEE HWANG

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·

·
·
·
·
·

· ____________________________
·Melanie L. Giamarco
·Certified Realtime Reporter
·Registered Professional Reporter
·Certified Shorthand Reporter

23
24
25

American Realtime Court Reporters / Asia
www.americanrealtime.com· [phone]