Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1129

MOTION for Reconsideration re 1115 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,,,,, #1105 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal,,,,,,,,, filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit to Samsung's Motion, #2 Declaration of Hankil Kang in Support of Samsung's Motion, #3 Exhibit 1 to the Kang Declaration, #4 Exhibit 2 to the Kang Declaration, #5 Exhibit 3 to the Kang Declaration, #6 Exhibit 4 to the Kang Declaration, #7 Exhibit 5 to the Kang Declaration, #8 Exhibit 6 to the Kang Declaration, #9 Exhibit 7 to the Kang Declaration, #10 Exhibit 8 to the Kang Declaration, #11 Exhibit 9 to the Kang Declaration, #12 Exhibit 10 to the Kang Declaration, #13 Exhibit 11 to the Kang Declaration, #14 Exhibit 12 to the Kang Declaration, #15 Exhibit 13 to the Kang Declaration, #16 Exhibit 14 to the Kang Declaration, #17 Exhibit 15 to the Kang Declaration, #18 Exhibit 16 to the Kang Declaration, #19 Exhibit 17 to the Kang Declaration, #20 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion for Reconsideration)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/25/2012)

KANG DECLARATION
EXHIBIT 3

EXHIBIT E
FILED UNDER SEAL

TRANSLATION
October 16, 2010, 11:48PM Chihoon Ryu wrote:
Hello this is Chihoon Ryu from Nemustech.
I am sending the results of the list bounce effect tuning.
It is a
source file.
The newly applied parameter and logic seem like they should not cause any problem when
applied both to S1 and P1.
I am including a
that has the same parameter and logic
applied, so you may simply test it on any sample without applying the above file.
Thank you.

/**
*Nemustech (Corp)
*Chihoon Ryu Lead Researcher
*Office 02.521.8290 | Fax [phone]
*[e-mail]
*/

October 15, 2010 5:31 pm, WookyunKho wrote:
Hello this is Wookyun Kho from Samsung Electronics.
At this point, I usually only oversee the “Settings” side so I think I mainly saw the
flicking effect in that area.
I cannot see a particular pattern like I did before, and the current condition is such that it
happens only once in a while so I do not know the particular route to reproduce this effect.
T^T
It just seems that the flicking effect happens where there is a list.
It seems to happen more frequently when scrolling multiple times in a short list rather
than a long list.
In addition, there is also the fact that the return effect is too fast with the bouncing effect.
You keep comparing it with the iPad…when I look at the iPad, its bouncing return speed
is very slow. Ours is very fast.
I think it will be good to set our goal to adjusting the bouncing speed and fixing the
occasional flicking effect.
Then I will see you tomorrow at 2pm with my sample ^^;
Thank you.
Wookyun Kho

TRANSLATION
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
From: Sangwook Han [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 12:21 PM
To: Wookyun Kho
Cc: Seung Yun Lee; Eunjung Kim; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [P1] ListView Bouncing Effect Tuning Request
Hello, this is Sangwook Han from Nemustech.
I agree with the need for tuning.
The problem is how much we should investigate and in what areas. Did you record the areas
where the flicking effect was often discovered or the locations where the flicking effect got
disconnected? If you remember anything, please contact us. If you have VOC it will be very
helpful.
I will first start with assessing the current condition.
Thank you.
Sangwook Han
[e-mail]

October 10, 2010 12:05PM, WookyunKho wrote:
Hello, this is Wookyun Kho from Samsung Electronics.
I am contacting you because I have a request regarding the P1 bouncing effect.
Currently when I use the P1, I observe an occasional flicking effect during the list bouncing.
Also, there are minor problems that I can see such as scrolling that seems to get disconnected and
occasionally disappear.
It is possible that such phenomena are more noticeable due to the uniqueness of P1’s hardware
compared to the other devices.
Hence I would like to request tuning of the P1’s list bouncing effect one more time. I would like
to request the due date to be Wednesday (October 20) to reflect next week’s MR.
I know it is not enough time, but please look into this one last time.
We are planning to investigate the relevant areas and see if there can be any improvements.
Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Thank you.
Wookyun Kho