Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1140

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Wheeler Declaration in Support of Administrative Motion, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Declaration of Jason R. Bartlett, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Exhibit 5, #9 Exhibit 6, #10 Exhibit 7, #11 Exhibit 8, #12 Exhibit 9, #13 Exhibit 10, #14 Exhibit 11, #15 Exhibit 12, #16 Exhibit 13, #17 Exhibit 14, #18 Exhibit 15, #19 Exhibit 16, #20 Exhibit 17, #21 Exhibit 18, #22 Exhibit 19, #23 Exhibit 20, #24 Exhibit 21, #25 Exhibit 22, #26 Exhibit 23, #27 Exhibit 24, #28 Exhibit 25, #29 Exhibit 26, #30 Exhibit 27, #31 Public Declaration of Peter W. Bressler, #32 Exhibit 1, #33 Exhibit 2, #34 Exhibit 3, #35 Exhibit 4, #36 Exhibit 5, #37 Exhibit 6, #38 Exhibit 7, #39 Exhibit 8, #40 Exhibit 9, #41 Exhibit 10, #42 Exhibit 11, #43 Exhibit 12, #44 Exhibit 13, #45 Exhibit 14, #46 Exhibit 15, #47 Exhibit 16, #48 Exhibit 17, #49 Exhibit 18, #50 Exhibit 19, #51 Exhibit 20, #52 Exhibit 21, #53 Exhibit 22, #54 Exhibit 23, #55 Exhibit 24, #56 Exhibit 25, #57 Exhibit 26, #58 Exhibit 27, #59 Exhibit 28, #60 Exhibit 29, #61 Exhibit 30, #62 Exhibit 31, #63 Exhibit 32, #64 Exhibit 33, #65 Exhibit 34, #66 Exhibit 35, #67 Exhibit 36, #68 Exhibit 37, #69 Exhibit 38, #70 Exhibit 39, #71 Exhibit 40, #72 Exhibit 41, #73 Exhibit 42, #74 Exhibit 43, #75 Exhibit 44, #76 Exhibit 45, #77 Exhibit 46, #78 Exhibit 47, #79 Exhibit 48, #80 Exhibit 49, #81 Exhibit 50, #82 Exhibit 51, #83 Exhibit 52, #84 Exhibit 53, #85 Exhibit 54, #86 Exhibit 55, #87 Exhibit 56, #88 Exhibit 57, #89 Exhibit 58, #90 Exhibit 59, #91 Exhibit 60, #92 Exhibit 61, #93 Exhibit 62, #94 Exhibit 63, #95 Exhibit 64, #96 Exhibit 65, #97 Exhibit 66, #98 Exhibit 67, #99 Exhibit 68, #100 Exhibit 69, #101 Exhibit 70, #102 Exhibit 71, #103 Exhibit 72, #104 Exhibit 73, #105 Exhibit 74, #106 Exhibit 75, #107 Exhibit 76, #108 Exhibit 77)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/26/2012) Modified on 6/27/2012 pursuant to General Order No. 62, attachment #1 sealed (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Exhibit 6 Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only Page 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 2 3 4 5 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs. CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK 8 9 10 11 12 13 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. ____________________________/ 14 15 16 17 H I G H L Y C O N F I D E N T I A L O U T S I D E C O U N S E L O N L Y 18 19 20 21 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF CHRISTOPHER STRINGER REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2011 22 23 24 25 BY: ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, CSR, RPR, CCRR, CLR CSR LICENSE NO. 9830 TSG JOB NO. 43706 TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877) 702-9580 Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 3 FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2011 9:56 a m. 1 2 3 4 5 6 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF CHRISTOPHER STRINGER, taken at QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 7 8 SULLIVAN, LLP, 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 9 Suite 560, Redwood Shores, California, 10 Pursuant to Notice, before me, 11 ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, CLR, CCRR, RPR, 12 CSR License No. 9830. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 A P P E A R A N C E S: FOR APPLE INC.: MORRISON & FOERSTER By: MICHAEL A. JACOBS, Esq. 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105 FOR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD: QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN By: MICHAEL T. ZELLER, Esq. 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 ALSO PRESENT: Benjamin Gerald, Videographer Cyndi Wheeler, Apple, Inc. ---oOo--- 23 24 25 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2011 9:56 a.m. 1 2 3 4 5 6 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. This marks 7 the beginning of the disc labeled No. 1 of the 8 videotaped deposition of Chris Stinger -9 MR. JACOBS: Stringer. 10 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: -- Stringer. In the 11 matter Apple, Incorporated versus Samsung Electronics 12 Company Limited, et al. 13 Held in the United States District Court for 14 the Northern District of California, San Jose 15 Division. Case number is 11-cv-01846-LHK. 16 This deposition is being held at 555 Twin 17 Dolphin Drive, in the city of Redwood Shores, 18 California. Taken on November 4th, 2011, at 19 approximately 9:56 a.m. 20 My name is Benjamin Gerald from TSG 21 Reporting, Incorporated, and I am the legal video 22 specialist. The court reporter is Andrea Ignacio, in 23 association with TSG Reporting. 24 At this time, will counsel please identify 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide Page 5 themselves for the record. MR. ZELLER: Mike Zeller for Samsung. MR. JACOBS: Michael Jacobs from Morrison & Foerster for Apple. With me is Cyndi Wheeler from Apple Legal. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Thank you. Will the reporter please swear the witness. CHRISTOPHER STRINGER, having been sworn as a witness, by the Certified Shorthand Reporter, testified as follows: THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Thank you. Please proceed. EXAMINATION BY MR. ZELLER MR. ZELLER: Let's please mark as Exhibit 1161 the Reply Declaration of Christopher Stringer in Support of Apple's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Document marked Exhibit 1161 for identification.) MR. ZELLER: Q. Please let me know when you've reviewed 1161. (877) 702-9580 2 Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only Page 18 1 2 4 Q Focusing your attention at the first page -- 4 TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877) 702-9580 6 Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only Page 78 4 TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877) 702-9580 21 Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only Page 102 Page 104 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 103 Page 105 So let's, for the record, please mark as the version of 841 that now has Mr. Stringer's marking on it on page '18791 as Exhibit 841A. (Document marked Exhibit 841A for identification.) MR. ZELLER: If we can go back to Exhibit 1170. And by the way, did you want to send those mockups back? MR. JACOBS: That would be great. MR. ZELLER: Okay. So let's go off the record. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 2:42 p m., and we are off the record. (Recess taken.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 2:55 p m., and we are back on the record. MR. ZELLER: Direct your attention to the '889 design patent, which was previously marked as Exhibit 8. MR. JACOBS: I'll just hand you my copy. THE WITNESS: All right. Thank you. MR. ZELLER: Q. Please take a look at Figure 1. A Yes. Q You'll see on Figure 1 that at least as part 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide of the -- at least along part of the -- generally what we'll call the perimeter area of the front, there's a darker, thicker line? A Which figure are you looking at? Q This is Figure 1. A Figure 1. Q Do you see where at least on part of the perimeter, there is a line that is darker and thicker? A Which would be the second line from the left on the left side of the figure. Q Right, on the left side. And then on the bottom portion of Figure 1, it appears to run -- to be the line that is -- that the -- is the edge, at least from that perspective? A It looks like the edge, yes. Q Do you know what that thicker line depicts? A It's -- on the lower edge, it's the -- it looks like the edge of the housing. Q Well, what about on the left side? A It's the edge of the housing. Q So on both the left side and the bottom side, you construe that darker, thicker line to be where the edge of the housing is? A I do construe that. And it's -- my assumption is confirmed by looking at Figure 3 that (877) 702-9580 27 Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only Page 122 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 No. 3 of 3 and concludes today's deposition of Chris Stringer. The time is 3:23 p m., and we are off record. (WHEREUPON, the deposition ended at 3:23 p.m.) ---oOo--- Page 123 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 JURAT I, CHRISTOPHER STRINGER, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing transcript of my deposition taken on November 4, 2011; that I have made such corrections as appear noted herein in ink, initialed by me; that my testimony as contained herein, as corrected, is true and correct. DATED this ____ day of _____________, 2011, at _____________________________, California. __________________________________ SIGNATURE OF WITNESS Page 124 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 1 2 3 I, ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, hereby certify 4 that the witness in the foregoing deposition was by me 5 duly sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth, and 6 nothing but the truth in the within-entitled cause; 7 8 That said deposition was taken in shorthand 9 by me, a Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of 10 California, and was thereafter transcribed into 11 typewriting, and that the foregoing transcript 12 constitutes a full, true and correct report of said 13 deposition and of the proceedings which took place; 14 15 That I am a disinterested person to the said 16 action. 17 18 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my 19 hand this 4th day of November 2011. 20 21 _______________________________________ 22 ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, RPR, CCRR, CLR, CSR No. 983023 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide Page 125 INDEX DEPOSITION OF CHRISTOPHER STRINGER EXAMINATION PAGE BY MR. ZELLER BY MR. JACOBS 5 119 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT PAGE Exhibit 1161 Reply Declaration of Christopher 5 Stringer in support of Apple's Motion for a Preliminary injunction; 50 pgs. Exhibit 1162 Colored Photograph Ad of iPad 26 Thinner and Lighter; 1 pg. Exhibit 1163 U.S. Patent No. D627,777 S; 41 7 pgs. Exhibit 1164 U.S. Patent No. D637,596 S; 41 7 pgs. Exhibit 1165 U.S. Patent No. D621,825 S; 41 14 pgs. Exhibit 1166 Sketchbooks, Bates Nos. 41 APLNDC0000037650 - '95; 46 pgs. (877) 702-9580 32

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?