Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
637
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Wheeler Declaration ISO Motion to Seal, #2 Proposed Order ISO Motion to Seal, #3 Bartlett Declaration ISO Opposition to Motion to Enforce, #4 Ex A to Bartlett Decl, #5 Ex B to Bartlett Decl, #6 Ex C to Bartlett Decl, #7 Ex D to Bartlett Decl, #8 Ex E to Bartlett Decl, #9 Ex F to Bartlett Decl, #10 Ex G to Bartlett Decl, #11 Ex H to Bartlett Decl, #12 Ex I to Bartlett Decl, #13 Ex J to Bartlett Decl, #14 Ex K to Bartlett Decl, #15 Opposition to Motion to Enforce, #16 Maselli Decl ISO Opposition to Motion to Compel, #17 Ex A Maselli Decl, #18 Ex B Maselli Decl, #19 Ex C Maselli Decl, #20 Ex D Maselli Decl, #21 Ex E Maselli Decl, #22 Opposition to Motion to Compel, #23 Mazza Declaration ISO Opposition to Motion for Clarification, #24 Ex A Mazza Decl, #25 Ex B Mazza Decl, #26 Ex C Mazza Decl)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 1/17/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice)
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
7
8
9
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
San Jose Division
12
13
14
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
15
vs.
16
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
22
23
26
27
Date: January 19, 2012
Time: 10:00am
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
24
25
DECLARATION OF SAMUEL J.
MASELLI IN SUPPORT OF APPLE
INC.’S OPPOSITION TO SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
Defendants.
20
21
Civil Action No. 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Counterclaim Defendant.
28
1
DECLARATION OF SAMUEL J. MASELLI IN
SUPPORT OF APPLE’S OPPOSITION TO
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)
I, Samuel J. Maselli, hereby declare as follows:
1
2
1.
I am an attorney at the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP,
3
4
counsel for Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in the above-referenced litigation. I am licensed to practice law
5
in the State of California, and am admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court for the
6
Northern District of California. I am familiar with the facts set forth herein, and, if called as a
7
witness, I could and would testify competently to those facts under oath.
8
2.
9
10
The parties have exchanged various correspondence regarding the production of
source code for the accused Apple products. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of
11 a letter from me to Melissa Chan (counsel for Samsung) dated December 6, 2011. Attached as
12 Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of a letter from Diane Hutnyan (counsel for Samsung) to Mia
13
14
Mazza (counsel for Apple) dated January 2, 2012. Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct
copy of an email from Peter Kolovos (counsel for Apple) to Diane Hutnyan dated January 3,
15
16
17
2012. Attached as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of a letter from Mia Mazza to Charles
Verhoeven (counsel for Samsung) dated January 7, 2012.
18
19
3.
We understand that counsel for Samsung and Intel have been in communication
since at least December 22, 2011 about the production of Intel’s baseband source code for
20
21
Apple’s accused products. Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of a letter from
22 Christopher Kelly (counsel for Intel) to Todd Briggs (counsel for Samsung) sent on January 13,
23 2012.
24
4.
With its patent local rule disclosures, Apple produced detailed schematics,
25
26
schematic board diagrams, and programming guides for the accused Apple products. These
27 documents show circuit schematics, pin layouts, and subcomponents of the accused products,
28 and include a comprehensive guide on programming in iOS. Apple’s production of technical
2
DECLARATION OF SAMUEL J. MASELLI IN
SUPPORT OF APPLE’S OPPOSITION TO
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)
1
documents related to the accused Apple products has continued both in this action and a related
2
action between the parties -- to date, Apple’s total production across both United States cases
3
includes over four million pages of documents relevant to this action from the files of Apple
4
engineers whose work relates to the accused Apple products. These materials include additional
5
6
schematics, bills of material, specifications, testing data, certification documentation, project
7
build status information and data, and email correspondence concerning accused product
8
technical issues.
9
5.
With respect to technical documents relating to the Intel baseband processor chips
10
11
used in the accused Apple products, on January 11, 2012, Intel provided Apple consent to
12
produce to Samsung those Intel documents that Apple has located thus far (as reflected in
13
Exhibit E). Apple will be producing over 21,000 pages of these documents to Samsung this
14
week. These documents reflect
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
DECLARATION OF SAMUEL J. MASELLI IN
SUPPORT OF APPLE’S OPPOSITION TO
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)
1
2
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge. Executed on this 17th day of January, 2012, in Palo Alto, California.
3
4
5
Dated: January 17, 2012
/s/ Samuel J. Maselli
Samuel J. Maselli
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
DECLARATION OF SAMUEL J. MASELLI IN
SUPPORT OF APPLE’S OPPOSITION TO
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?