Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
637
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Wheeler Declaration ISO Motion to Seal, #2 Proposed Order ISO Motion to Seal, #3 Bartlett Declaration ISO Opposition to Motion to Enforce, #4 Ex A to Bartlett Decl, #5 Ex B to Bartlett Decl, #6 Ex C to Bartlett Decl, #7 Ex D to Bartlett Decl, #8 Ex E to Bartlett Decl, #9 Ex F to Bartlett Decl, #10 Ex G to Bartlett Decl, #11 Ex H to Bartlett Decl, #12 Ex I to Bartlett Decl, #13 Ex J to Bartlett Decl, #14 Ex K to Bartlett Decl, #15 Opposition to Motion to Enforce, #16 Maselli Decl ISO Opposition to Motion to Compel, #17 Ex A Maselli Decl, #18 Ex B Maselli Decl, #19 Ex C Maselli Decl, #20 Ex D Maselli Decl, #21 Ex E Maselli Decl, #22 Opposition to Motion to Compel, #23 Mazza Declaration ISO Opposition to Motion for Clarification, #24 Ex A Mazza Decl, #25 Ex B Mazza Decl, #26 Ex C Mazza Decl)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 1/17/2012)
Exhibit A
425 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO
CALIFORNIA 94105-2482
TELEPHONE: 415.268.7000
FACSIMILE: 415 268 7522
MO RRI SO N & F O E RST E R LLP
N E W YO R K , SA N F R A N C I SC O ,
LO S AN G E LE S , PALO ALT O ,
SA C RA M E N T O , SA N D I E G O ,
D E N VE R , N O RTH E RN VI RG I N IA
WA SH I N G T O N , D C
,
T O K YO , LO N D O N , BRU SSE LS ,
BE I JI N G , SH A N G H A I , H O N G K O N G
WWW.MOFO.COM
Writer’s Direct Contact
415.268.6024
MMazza@mofo.com
November 15, 2011
Via E-Mail (rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com)
Rachel Herrick Kassabian
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-2139
Re:
Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.)
Dear Rachel:
Enclosed is a corrected version of Apple’s November 7, 2011 search terms disclosure. This
disclosure corrects certain date cutoffs as discussed in recent correspondence.
As with the original November 7, 2011 search terms disclosure, this information covers
documents produced by Apple via Morrison & Foerster in connection with the claims being
pursued by Apple. It does not cover documents recently produced by Apple via Wilmer Hale
in connection with the claims being pursued by Samsung. Those search terms will be
covered in Apple’s next monthly disclosure.
Sincerely,
/s/ Mia Mazza
Mia Mazza
Encl.
cc:
Samuel Maselli
Peter J. Kolovos
S. Calvin Walden
sf-3071621
Apple v. Samsung
Case No. C 11-1846 LHK (PSG)
Search Terms Applied by Apple
November 7, 2011
CORRECTED
Custodian Produced
Andre, Bart
ANPP Server
Anzures, Freddy
Apple Engineering Files
Apple Hardware Engineering
Apple Legal Files
Apple Marketing Files
Blumenberg, Chris
Boule, Andre
Chaudhri, Imran
Christensen, Steven
Christie, Greg
Cook, Tim
Coster, Daniel
de Iuliis, Daniele
Elias, John
Forstall, Scott
Frost & Sullivan
Herz, Scott
Hotelling, Steve
Howarth, Richard
Huppi, Brian
Ive, Jony
Jobs, Steve
Kerr, Duncan
Lamiraux, Henri
Land, Brian
Lemay, Steve
Lutton, Chip
Nishibori, Shin
Ording, Bas
Platzer, Andrew
Rangel, Art
Keyword List Applied
9
None
10
None
None
None
None
1
1
2, 10
None
1
8
9
9
4
1
None
6
5
9
7
9
8
9
None
5
1
8
None
3
6
None
Custodian Produced
Rohrbach, Matthew
Russell-Clarke, Peter
Server, casket.ecs.apple.com
Sewell, Bruce
Strickon, Josh
Stringer, Chris
Twiggs, Sissie
USPTO
Van Os, Marcel
Westerman, Wayne
Whang, Eugene
Williamson, Richard
Woodring, Cooper
Zorkendorfer, Rico
Apple NDCal Custodians Produced
Keyword List Applied
9
9
None
8
7
9
None
None
1
4
9
1
None
9
Apple v. Samsung
Case No. C 11-1846 LHK (PSG)
Search Terms Applied by Apple
November 7, 2011
CORRECTED
Search Term List
1
Date Limitation
On or before September 30, 2007
2
On or before September 30, 2007 or
February 28, 2008 (see list)
On or before September 30, 2007,
December 31, 2007, or February 28,
2008 (see list)
On or before June 29, 2007
On or before June 29, 2007
On or before June 29, 2007
On or before June 29, 2007
January 1, 2010 to April 26, 2011
June 1, 2003 to April 30, 2011
October 1, 2004 to April 30, 2011
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Apple Search Terms
Date Limitations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?