Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 637

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Wheeler Declaration ISO Motion to Seal, #2 Proposed Order ISO Motion to Seal, #3 Bartlett Declaration ISO Opposition to Motion to Enforce, #4 Ex A to Bartlett Decl, #5 Ex B to Bartlett Decl, #6 Ex C to Bartlett Decl, #7 Ex D to Bartlett Decl, #8 Ex E to Bartlett Decl, #9 Ex F to Bartlett Decl, #10 Ex G to Bartlett Decl, #11 Ex H to Bartlett Decl, #12 Ex I to Bartlett Decl, #13 Ex J to Bartlett Decl, #14 Ex K to Bartlett Decl, #15 Opposition to Motion to Enforce, #16 Maselli Decl ISO Opposition to Motion to Compel, #17 Ex A Maselli Decl, #18 Ex B Maselli Decl, #19 Ex C Maselli Decl, #20 Ex D Maselli Decl, #21 Ex E Maselli Decl, #22 Opposition to Motion to Compel, #23 Mazza Declaration ISO Opposition to Motion for Clarification, #24 Ex A Mazza Decl, #25 Ex B Mazza Decl, #26 Ex C Mazza Decl)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

Download PDF
Exhibit C From: To: cc: Subject: Date: Kolovos, Peter Diane Hutnyan; Scott Hall; Rachel Herrick Kassabian; Melissa Chan; Maselli, Samuel; Walden, S. Calvin; "Mazza, Mia"; "AppleMoFo"; Kolovos, Peter; RE: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Source Code, "Samsung", Survey, and Financial Documents Tuesday, January 03, 2012 2:53:58 PM Diane, I write regarding your request, as set forth in your January 2, 2012 letter, that we make source code for the Apple accused products available for inspection. On December 6, 2011, we informed you that Apple was "currently prepared" to produce source code for the Apple accused products. See Sam Maselli Dec. 6, 2011 E-mail to Melissa Chan ("Apple is currently prepared to produce the following responsive source code in accordance with the terms of the Interim Protective Order."). You are wrong to assert that Apple "failed to produce these materials for inspection or provide a firm date for their production" or that Apple has "intentionally withheld" source code. Apple did not inform Samsung that it was "preparing" to produce code on some date in the future, but instead stated that it was "currently prepared" to do so, which should have signified that Apple was prepared, at that time (and at all times since), to produce the code for inspection. For whatever reasons, Samsung chose not to accept Apple's prior invitation to inspect that source code. We are still prepared to produce the source code outlined in Sam Maselli's December 6, 2011 e-mail. In your letter, you ask to start the inspection by January 10, 2012. Samsung may begin its inspection at any time (during regular business hours, or at times agreed-upon by the parties) on or before that date at WilmerHale's Palo Alto offices. Apple's code has been available for inspection for weeks, it is thus obviously available now, and will be available on January 10, if that is the date Samsung chooses to begin its inspection. Please let us know when Samsung would like to begin conducting its inspection, and who will be attending the inspection. -- Peter From: Scott Hall [mailto:ScottHall@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 1:09 PM To: 'Mazza, Mia'; 'AppleMoFo' Cc: Rachel Herrick Kassabian; Diane Hutnyan; Maselli, Samuel; Kolovos, Peter; Walden, S. Calvin Subject: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Source Code, "Samsung", Survey, and Financial Documents Mia, Please see the attached correspondence. Thanks, Scott Hall Associate, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-801-5027 Direct 650.801.5000 Main Office Number 650.801.5100 FAX ScottHall@quinnemanuel.com www.quinnemanuel.com NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?