Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 637

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Wheeler Declaration ISO Motion to Seal, # 2 Proposed Order ISO Motion to Seal, # 3 Bartlett Declaration ISO Opposition to Motion to Enforce, # 4 Ex A to Bartlett Decl, # 5 Ex B to Bartlett Decl, # 6 Ex C to Bartlett Decl, # 7 Ex D to Bartlett Decl, # 8 Ex E to Bartlett Decl, # 9 Ex F to Bartlett Decl, # 10 Ex G to Bartlett Decl, # 11 Ex H to Bartlett Decl, # 12 Ex I to Bartlett Decl, # 13 Ex J to Bartlett Decl, # 14 Ex K to Bartlett Decl, # 15 Opposition to Motion to Enforce, # 16 Maselli Decl ISO Opposition to Motion to Compel, # 17 Ex A Maselli Decl, # 18 Ex B Maselli Decl, # 19 Ex C Maselli Decl, # 20 Ex D Maselli Decl, # 21 Ex E Maselli Decl, # 22 Opposition to Motion to Compel, # 23 Mazza Declaration ISO Opposition to Motion for Clarification, # 24 Ex A Mazza Decl, # 25 Ex B Mazza Decl, # 26 Ex C Mazza Decl)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

Download PDF
Exhibit G From: Bartlett, Jason R. Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 9:32 AM To: 'brettarnold@quinnemanuel.com'; 'ScottHall@quinnemanuel.com'; 'annaneill@quinnemanuel.com'; 'dianehutnyan@quinnemanuel.com' Cc: AppleMoFo; 'Samsungv.Apple@quinnemanuel.com'; 'Samuel.Maselli@wilmerhale.com'; 'Calvin.Walden@wilmerhale.com'; 'Peter.Kolovos@wilmerhale.com' Subject: Re: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Production of models for inspection Brett, Yes, we are arranging for additional inspection time. We will present the models for your inspection at the CAD escrow site this coming week. The models will be moved there Tuesday and ready for your inspection starting Wednesday morning. Jason From: Brett Arnold <brettarnold@quinnemanuel.com> To: Scott Hall <ScottHall@quinnemanuel.com>; Bartlett, Jason R.; Anna Neill <annaneill@quinnemanuel.com>; Diane Hutnyan <dianehutnyan@quinnemanuel.com> Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple <Samsungv.Apple@quinnemanuel.com>; Maselli, Samuel <Samuel.Maselli@wilmerhale.com>; Walden, S. Calvin <Calvin.Walden@wilmerhale.com>; Kolovos, Peter <Peter.Kolovos@wilmerhale.com> Sent: Sat Jan 14 22:10:06 2012 Subject: RE: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Production of models for inspection Jason,   Thank you for arranging the inspection last Friday.  We wanted to confirm that we will definitely need  additional time to inspect all the models.  Have you heard back from Apple regarding our request  below?  Thanks for looking into this.   Best regards, Brett      Brett Arnold | quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, llp 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 | Office: 650.801.5000 | Direct: 650.801.5059 | Fax: 650.801.5100 | brettarnold@quinnemanuel.com   NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.     From: Scott Hall Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 12:35 PM To: Bartlett, Jason R.; Anna Neill; Diane Hutnyan Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; Maselli, Samuel; Walden, S. Calvin; Kolovos, Peter Subject: RE: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Production of models for inspection Jason,   I believe Anna mentioned that Brett Arnold and I will be coming tomorrow to inspect the physical models, which  we understand will be available at the Cypress Hotel in Cupertino starting at 9 a.m.  Consistent with past  inspections by both parties, we will bring cameras for photographing and/or videotaping the models, which we will  retain as work product without disclosure to Apple.  Also, as Anna has noted, although we plan to inspect the  models tomorrow, we believe that one day is insufficient for inspection of REDACTED    Please confirm that Apple will continue to make these models available for inspection next week, January 17‐20.     Thank you, Scott C. Hall quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, llp   555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor   Redwood Shores, CA 94065   650‐801‐5027 Direct  650.801.5000 Main Office Number  650.801.5100 FAX  ScottHall@quinnemanuel.com  www.quinnemanuel.com NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.        From: Bartlett, Jason R. [mailto:JasonBartlett@mofo.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:36 PM To: Anna Neill; Diane Hutnyan Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; Maselli, Samuel; Walden, S. Calvin; Kolovos, Peter Subject: RE: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Production of models for inspection Anna, Can you please provide the names of the individuals who are coming for the inspection Friday? I will confer with Apple regarding your request for additional inspection time and respond separately. Thank you, Jason From: Anna Neill [mailto:annaneill@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:21 PM To: Bartlett, Jason R.; Diane Hutnyan Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; Maselli, Samuel; Walden, S. Calvin; Kolovos, Peter Subject: RE: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Production of models for inspection Dear Jason, It is not feasible for Samsung to inspect approximately REDACTED  in a single day.  We will inspect the  models this Friday, January 13, and also ask that Apple make the models available next Tuesday through Friday,  January 17‐20. Thank you, Anna     From: Bartlett, Jason R. [mailto:JasonBartlett@mofo.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:04 PM To: Diane Hutnyan Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; Maselli, Samuel; Walden, S. Calvin; Kolovos, Peter Subject: RE: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Production of models for inspection Diane, We have not received a response to my letter below regarding production of models. We have booked a hotel conference room, movers and security for the inspection. Please confirm that Samsung intends to come. The models will be available to you between 9:00 am to 5:30 pm Friday. Sincerely, Jason R. Bartlett Morrison & Foerster 425 Market St. San Francisco, CA 94105 Direct: 415.268.6615 _____________________________________________ From: Bartlett, Jason R. Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:44 PM To: 'Diane Hutnyan' Cc: AppleMoFo; 'Samsung v. Apple'; 'Maselli, Samuel'; 'Walden, S. Calvin'; 'Kolovos, Peter' Subject: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Production of models for inspection Diane, Please see the attached correspondence regarding Apple's production of models for inspection Sincerely, Jason R. Bartlett Morrison & Foerster 425 Market St. San Francisco, CA 94105 Direct: 415.268.6615 << File: 2012 1 9 Bartlett to Hutnyan re Models.pdf >> --------------------------------------------------------------------To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Morrison & Foerster LLP informs you that, if any advice concerning one or more U.S. Federal tax issues is contained in this communication (including any attachments), such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. For information about this legend, go to http://www.mofo.com/Circular230/ ============================================================================ This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Morrison & Foerster LLP informs you that, if any advice concerning one or more U.S. Federal tax issues is contained in this communication (including any attachments), such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. For information about this legend, go to http://www.mofo.com/Circular230/ ============================================================================ This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?